ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Rhipicephalus microplus, an important cattle ectoparasite, is responsible for a substantial negative impact on the economy due to productivity loss. The emergence of resistance to widely used commercial acaricides has sparked efforts to explore alternative products for tick control. METHOD: To address this challenge, innovative solutions targeting essential tick enzymes, like glutathione S-transferase (GST), have gained attention. Dimeric flavonoids, particularly brachydins (BRAs), have demonstrated various biological activities, including antiparasitic effects. The objectives of this study were to isolate four dimeric flavonoids from Fridericia platyphylla roots and to evaluate their potential as inhibitors of R. microplus GST. RESULTS: In vitro assays confirmed the inhibition of R. microplus GST by BRA-G, BRA-I, BRA-J, and BRA-K with IC50 values of 0.075, 0.079, 0.075, and 0.058 mg/mL, respectively, with minimal hemolytic effects. Molecular docking of BRA-G, BRA-I, BRA-J, and BRA-K in a threedimensional model of R. microplus GST revealed predicted interactions with MolDock Scores of - 142.537, -126.831, -108.571, and -123.041, respectively. Both in silico and in vitro analyses show that brachydins are potential inhibitors of R. microplus GST. CONCLUSION: The findings of this study deepen our understanding of GST inhibition in ticks, affirming its viability as a drug target. This knowledge contributes to the advancement of treatment modalities and strategies for improved tick control.
ABSTRACT
Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus (Canestrini, 1887) is one of the most important ectoparasites of cattle, causing severe economic losses in tropical and subtropical regions of the world. The selection of resistance to the most commonly used commercial acaricides has stimulated the search for new products for tick control. The identification and development of drugs that inhibit key tick enzymes, such as glutathione S-transferase (GST), is a rational approach that has already been applied to other parasites than ticks. In this context, alkaloids such as anonaine display several biological activities, including an acaricidal effect. This study aimed to assess the specific inhibition of the R. microplus GST by anonaine, and analyze the effect on ticks when anonaine is combined with cypermethrin. For this purpose, a molecular docking analysis was performed using an R. microplus GST three-dimensional structure model with anonaine and compared with a human GST-anonaine complex. The absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion, and toxicity properties of anonaine were also predicted. Then, for in vitro analyses, anonaine was isolated from Annona crassiflora (Martius, 1841) leaves. The inhibition of purified recombinant R. microplus GST (rRmGST) by anonaine and the effect of this alkaloid on cypermethrin efficacy towards R. microplus were assessed. Anonaine has a higher affinity to the tick enzyme than to the human enzyme in silico and has moderate toxicity, being able to inhibit, in vitro, rRmGST up to 37.5% in a dose-dependent manner. Although anonaine alone has no activity against R. microplus, it increased the cypermethrin effect on larvae, reducing the LC50 from 44 to 22 µg/mL. In conclusion, anonaine is a natural compound that can increase the effect of cypermethrin against R. microplus.
Subject(s)
Acaricides , Annona , Rhipicephalus , Humans , Cattle , Animals , Glutathione Transferase , Molecular Docking Simulation , Acaricides/pharmacology , LarvaABSTRACT
The present study attempted to evaluate the practical experience and methods employed by Brazilian veterinary practitioners for control of parasites. Twenty-one questions were asked of 403 veterinary practitioners based in different climatic zones with reference to parasite epidemiology from the country. Administration of a combination of drugs at three-month intervals was the most common regime recommended for prophylaxis against gastrointestinal helminths, with a single treatment repeated after 15 days. Routine prophylaxis against dog ectoparasites was recommended by 82.4% veterinary practitioners, and 46.6% changed the drug compound used. Monthly prophylaxic treatments for ectoparasites, using systemic, topical and/or collar-impregnated drugs, was recommended by 21.5% veterinary practitioners. Side-effects of ectoparasiticide-impregnated collars were suspected by 58% of the veterinary practitioners. Isoxazolines were the most frequently used chemical group to treat ectoparasites in dogs. Poor efficacy of fipronil in controlling ticks was suspected by 79.5% of the veterinary practitioners. The isoxazolines and combination of anthelmintic compounds are the most common drugs to prevent or treat ectoparasites and gastrointestinal nematodes, respectively. The suspect of the inefficacy of antiparasitic drugs is shared among the veterinary practitioners from part of Brazil. Guidelines are needed, specifically for the control of gastrointestinal helminths and ectoparasites in Brazilian dogs.
Subject(s)
Dog Diseases , Insecticides , Nematoda , Parasites , Ticks , Animals , Dog Diseases/drug therapy , Dog Diseases/prevention & control , DogsABSTRACT
Abstract The present study attempted to evaluate the practical experience and methods employed by Brazilian veterinary practitioners for control of parasites. Twenty-one questions were asked of 403 veterinary practitioners based in different climatic zones with reference to parasite epidemiology from the country. Administration of a combination of drugs at three-month intervals was the most common regime recommended for prophylaxis against gastrointestinal helminths, with a single treatment repeated after 15 days. Routine prophylaxis against dog ectoparasites was recommended by 82.4% veterinary practitioners, and 46.6% changed the drug compound used. Monthly prophylaxic treatments for ectoparasites, using systemic, topical and/or collar-impregnated drugs, was recommended by 21.5% veterinary practitioners. Side-effects of ectoparasiticide-impregnated collars were suspected by 58% of the veterinary practitioners. Isoxazolines were the most frequently used chemical group to treat ectoparasites in dogs. Poor efficacy of fipronil in controlling ticks was suspected by 79.5% of the veterinary practitioners. The isoxazolines and combination of anthelmintic compounds are the most common drugs to prevent or treat ectoparasites and gastrointestinal nematodes, respectively. The suspect of the inefficacy of antiparasitic drugs is shared among the veterinary practitioners from part of Brazil. Guidelines are needed, specifically for the control of gastrointestinal helminths and ectoparasites in Brazilian dogs.
Resumo O presente estudo avaliou os métodos de controle empregados por médicos veterinários clínicos para o controle de parasitos de cães no Brasil. Vinte e uma perguntas foram feitas a 403 veterinários de diferentes regiões do país. O uso de associações de compostos ativos em intervalos de três meses foi o mais recomendado para profilaxia de helmintos gastrointestinais, repetido após 15 dias. A profilaxia de rotina contra ectoparasitos foi recomendada por 82,4% dos veterinários, e 46,6% mudam rotineiramente o composto indicado. Tratamentos profiláticos mensais para ectoparasitos, com produtos sistêmicos, tópicos e / ou impregnados com colar, foram recomendados por 21,5% dos veterinários. Os efeitos colaterais das coleiras impregnadas com ectoparasiticidas foram relatados por 58% dos médicos veterinários. As isoxazolinas foram o grupo químico mais utilizado para tratar ectoparasitos em cães. A baixa eficácia do fipronil no controle de carrapatos foi suspeitada por 79,5% dos médicos veterinários. As isoxazolinas e a associação de compostos anti-helmínticos são os medicamentos mais comuns para prevenir ou tratar ectoparasitos e nematoides gastrointestinais, respectivamente. A suspeita da ineficácia dos antiparasitários é compartilhada entre os médicos veterinários de algumas regiões do Brasil. Orientações são necessárias, especificamente para o controle de helmintos e ectoparasitos gastrointestinais em cães no Brasil.
