Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Clin Anat ; 15(1): 51-5, 2002 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11835545

ABSTRACT

We have evaluated the students' response to the practical teaching sessions in Clinical Anatomy in our Medical School using an action-research method. The aim was to identify problems and to introduce changes that might improve both the program and the performance of the teaching staff. At the end of each section of the program, each student completed a "target type" questionnaire with eight different components. As each one quarter of the whole class had its own teacher, we used an analysis of variance to evaluate the target questions in the various sections of the program, and the performance of the four teachers. This research method gave us feedback on the students' responses while the program was in progress. The results emphasize the importance of action-research in assessing and improving a developing program in a basic discipline of the medical curriculum.


Subject(s)
Anatomy/education , Education, Medical/methods , Program Development , Humans , Portugal , Program Evaluation , Students, Medical , Teaching/methods
2.
Clin Anat ; 15(1): 56-61, 2002 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11835546

ABSTRACT

The discipline of Clinical Anatomy, as introduced in the Medical School of Porto in academic year 1995/96, involved major changes in the way we teach anatomy to medical students, by adopting a clinically oriented approach. A questionnaire was designed to evaluate the opinion of second-year medical students enrolled in the program concerning main aspects of the discipline in two consecutive years; 84% of the students returned the questionnaire in 1996/97, and 70% in 1997/98. Students were asked about the level of their approval of the organization of the discipline, the role of the teaching staff, lectures, practical sessions, educational media, and continuous and summative assessments. For items replicated in both academic years, the means of the sum of scores in each year were compared (Student's t-distribution). Whenever a significant difference was found, changes in individual items were tested (chi-square distribution). The evaluation of the discipline in each of the two years was highly favorable for most of the parameters analyzed.


Subject(s)
Anatomy/education , Education, Medical/methods , Program Evaluation/statistics & numerical data , Curriculum , Humans , Portugal , Surveys and Questionnaires , Teaching/methods , Time Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...