Combination immunotherapy in the treatment of chronic bilateral panuveitis and uveitic glaucoma during acute dengue fever infection in the Caribbean.

BACKGROUND: Ocular manifestations of the dengue fever virus include bilateral panuveitis that can occur after the acute systemic infection has resolved. In most reported cases, the inflammation resolves with topical or systemic steroid therapy. We report a case of chronic, refractory bilateral panuveitis and uveitic glaucoma that began during the acute phase of the systemic infection and required treatment with oral steroids, multiple steroid-sparing agents, and surgical therapy for glaucoma. FINDINGS: A 22-year-old male with acute systemic dengue fever presented with bilateral pain and decreased vision. Clinical examination revealed bilateral panuveitis with elevated intraocular pressures. Management required oral steroids, mycophenolate mofetil, cyclosporine, and bilateral glaucoma valve implantation. CONCLUSION: This case highlights the fact that dengue-associated panuveitis can begin in the acute stage of systemic infection and persist long after convalescence with progression to chronic bilateral panuveitis and uveitic glaucoma. Dengue-associated chronic panuveitis with uveitic glaucoma may be effectively managed with a combination of steroid-sparing oral immunosuppression and glaucoma surgery. This is, to our knowledge, the first case of bilateral refractory dengue-associated panuveitis from the Caribbean treated with combination steroid-sparing oral immunosuppression and bilateral glaucoma valve implantation.

Lipectomy as a new approach to secondary procedure superficialization of direct autogenous forearm radial-cephalic arteriovenous accesses for hemodialysis.

BACKGROUND: The depth of veins can discourage surgeons from creating radial-cephalic arteriovenous accesses for hemodialysis in obese patients. Elevation and tunneled transposition are the two techniques that have been described to superficialize these veins and make them accessible for cannulation. Unfortunately, such manipulation of veins has potential drawbacks. We report lipectomy, a new technique that removes subcutaneous fat and does not mobilize the vein. METHODS: This single-center prospective study included 49 consecutive patients (17 men, 32 women) who underwent second-stage lipectomy after creation of a radial-cephalic fistula. Mean patient age was 54 years, 36% had diabetes, and the mean body mass index was 31 +/- 5.6 kg/m(2). Subcutaneous fatty tissues were removed after two transverse skin incisions under regional anesthesia and preventive hemostasis. Cannulation was first allowed 1 month later, after clinical and color duplex ultrasound evaluation. Technical success was defined as the ability to remove the fat and to palpate the patent vein immediately under the skin at the end of the operation. Clinical success was defined as the ability to perform at least three consecutive dialysis sessions with two needles. All patients were checked systematically every 6 months by the surgeon. RESULTS: Technical and clinical success rates were 96% (47 of 49) and 94% (46 of 49), respectively. Mean vein depth decreased from 8 +/- 2 to 3 +/- 1 mm according to duplex ultrasound imaging. The mean vein diameter increased from 6 +/- 1 to 8 +/- 2 mm. In one patient, vein tortuosity that was overlooked required conventional repeat tunneling. One extensive hematoma resulted in loss of the fistula. One patient died before the fistula could be used. Primary patency rates were 71% +/- 7% and 63% +/- 8% at 1 and 3 years, respectively, and secondary patency rates were 98% +/- 2% and 88% +/- 7%. Delayed complications were treated by surgery (n = 7) or by endovascular procedures (n = 10). CONCLUSION: Lipectomy is a safe, effective, and durable approach to make deep arterialized forearm veins accessible for routine cannulation for hemodialysis in obese patients. It might even be hypothesized that incident obese dialysis patients will eventually have the highest proportion of radial-cephalic fistulas because they often have distal veins that have been preserved by their fat from previous attempts at cannulation for blood sampling or infusion.

Venous mapping using venography and the risk of radiocontrast-induced nephropathy.

Venous mapping using venography has been considered to be the gold standard for identifying veins suitable for arteriovenous fistula (AVF) creation. By utilizing a radiocontrast medium, however, venography introduces the risk of radiocontrast-induced nephropathy. The risk of this complication in the chronic kidney disease (CKD) population has not been previously studied. Twenty-five consecutive patients (CKD stage 4 and 5) undergoing venography were enrolled in this study. Patients were advised not to fast for the procedure and were encouraged to take oral fluids. Radiocontrast-induced nephropathy was defined as a 20% decrease in the estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) from the baseline value at 48 hours after contrast administration. Weekly telephone calls were made for a total of 4 weeks to assess the need for dialysis. Venography was performed by interventional nephrology using 10-20 cc of low osmolarity contrast medium. Data were collected prospectively. Median age was 48.9 +/- 7.8 years and 52% of the patients had diabetes. Complete sets of pre- and postprocedure GFRs were available in 21 patients. At 48 hours, there were no differences between the pre- and postprocedure GFRs. At the third week, one patient developed flu-like symptoms with severe gastroenteritis and was hospitalized for volume depletion. This patient initiated dialysis during the hospital stay. We conclude that at 48 hours, our cohort did not develop radiocontrast-induced nephropathy. During the 4-week phone call follow-up, only one patient needed dialysis. Large-scale studies with a longer follow-up using GFR estimation are needed to confirm these preliminary findings.

Nephrology nurses in a new role: diagnostic and interventional nephrology.

Diagnostic and interventional nephrology is a growing subspecialty of nephrology. Increasingly, procedural care of nephrology patients is being managed by nephrologists trained in this area. As a result, new opportunities have been created for nephrology nurses as they assist these interventionists in the administration of care in diagnostic and interventional nephrology. This article describes the components of a diagnostic and interventional nephrology program, the initiation of such a program at a university center, and the role of nephrology nursing personnel in this rapidly developing area.

Modification of the peritoneoscopic technique of peritoneal dialysis catheter insertion: experience of an interventional nephrology program.

Bowel perforation is a well-recognized complication of peritoneal dialysis catheter insertion and is associated with increased morbidity and cost of medical care. In this article we describe our 2-year experience (August 2001-October 2003) with a modified peritoneoscopic technique of peritoneal dialysis catheter insertion to minimize the incidence of bowel perforation. Seventy patients underwent 82 consecutive peritoneal dialysis catheter insertions using the innovative technique. The modified technique is very similar to the traditional peritoneoscopic procedure except for the following differences. To gain access to the peritoneal cavity, a Veress insufflation needle (Ethicon Endo-Surgery Inc., Cincinnati, OH) is utilized instead of the trocar. In contrast to the sharp tip of the trocar, the Veress needle has a blunt, self-retracting end. In addition, the Veress needle is only 14 gauge as opposed to the 2.2 mm diameter of the trocar. Upon introduction of the Veress needle into the abdominal cavity, two "pops" are discerned similar to the trocar. After introduction, 400-500 cc of air are infused and the needle is removed. The infusion of air creates a space between the peritoneal surface of the anterior abdominal wall and the bowel loops. At this point, the cannula with trocar is inserted into the space created. The rest of the steps of the procedure are the same as the traditional peritoneoscopic technique. Utilizing the innovative technique, all 82 catheter insertions were performed successfully without a single bowel perforation. No other complications except for catheter migration (n = 2) were noted. The extra cost of the needle (35 USD) should be viewed in the context of the costs associated with management of a bowel perforation. Large-scale studies are needed to confirm the superiority of this innovative technique over the traditional peritoneoscopic insertion found in our case series. In the interim, however, the increased morbidity and cost associated with bowel perforation calls for logical measures to be taken to avoid this dreaded complication.