Surgical Outcomes at a Single Institution of Infrapubic Insertion of Malleable Penile Prosthesis in Transmen.

OBJECTIVE: To describe our technique for the infrapubic approach for malleable penile prosthesis (MPP) insertion after phalloplasty in transgender men and review surgical outcomes. METHODS: The infrapubic prosthesis insertion technique involves a horizontal incision anterior to the pubic symphysis, allowing dissection of the neophallus tract and anchor site on the pubic symphysis. Surgical outcomes by a single surgeon using a Spectra or Genesis MPP between October 2017 and May 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. Complications were categorized into erosions, infections, device detachment, device malposition, pain or activity limitation, urethral injury, and flap loss. Implant survival kinetics were assessed by evaluating time to surgical revision. RESULTS: Forty patients underwent infrapubic MPP insertion; 35 patients had a prior radial forearm free flap (RFFF) and 5 had a prior anterolateral thigh flap (ALT) phalloplasty. Of 30 patients who maintained follow-up, mean follow-up was 34.9 months. Complications were not mutually exclusive, with 7 implant detachments from the anchor site, 3 malpositions, 2 with pain/activity limitation, and 1 infection. Surgical revision was required in 12/30 patients (40%). There were no neophallus erosions, flap loss, nor urethral injuries. More complications occurred with the Spectra (9/17 or 53%) than the Genesis MPP (3/13 or 23%), but this was not statistically significant (P = .10). CONCLUSION: Infrapubic insertion in transmen after phalloplasty using commercially available MPPs is safe compared with other post-phalloplasty penile prosthesis insertion techniques, with similarly high surgical revision rates. Further study of techniques is needed to improve outcomes after penile prosthesis insertion in transmen.

Microsurgical Denervation of the Spermatic Cord: A Historical Perspective and Recent Developments.

INTRODUCTION: The management of chronic scrotal pain is long and varied, with historical treatment algorithms typically ending with orchiectomy. Microsurgical denervation of the spermatic cord (MDSC) is a testicle-sparing option for patients who have failed conservative treatment options and over its forty-year history has seen many technical refinements. OBJECTIVES: To review the history and development of MDSC and discuss the outcomes of different surgical techniques. METHODS: A literature review using PubMed and Google Scholar was conducted to identify studies pertaining to surgical treatment of CSP, MDSC, and outcomes. Search terms included "chronic," "scrotal pain," "orchialgia," "spermatic cord," "denervation," and "microsurgery." RESULTS: We included 21 case reports and series since the first seminal paper describing MDSC technique in 1978. Additional studies that challenged existing conventions or described novel techniques are also discussed. The current standard procedure utilizes a subinguinal incision and a surgical microscope. Open, robotic, and laparoscopic approaches to MDSC have been described, but access to minimally invasive instruments may be limited outside of developed nations. Pain reduction following preoperative spermatic cord predicts success of MDSC. Methods for identifying and preserving the testicular and deferential arteries vary depending on surgeon preference but appear to have comparable outcomes. Future developments in MDSC involve targeted denervation, minimizing collateral thermal injury, and alternative techniques to visualize arterial supply. CONCLUSION: For patients suffering from CSP, MDSC is a well-studied technique that may offer appropriately selected patients' relief. Future investigation comparing targeted vs full MDSC as well as in vivo study of new techniques are needed to continue to improve outcomes. Sun HH, Tay KS, Jesse E, et al. Microsurgical Denervation of the Spermatic Cord: A Historical Perspective and Recent Developments. Sex Med Rev 2022;10:791-799.

Microsurgical Denervation of the Spermatic Cord: A Historical Perspective and Recent Developments.

INTRODUCTION: The management of chronic scrotal pain is long and varied, with historical treatment algorithms typically ending with orchiectomy. Microsurgical denervation of the spermatic cord (MDSC) is a testicle-sparing option for patients who have failed conservative treatment options and over its forty-year history has seen many technical refinements. OBJECTIVES: To review the history and development of MDSC and discuss the outcomes of different surgical techniques. METHODS: A literature review using PubMed and Google Scholar was conducted to identify studies pertaining to surgical treatment of CSP, MDSC, and outcomes. Search terms included "chronic," "scrotal pain," "orchialgia," "spermatic cord," "denervation," and "microsurgery." RESULTS: We included 21 case reports and series since the first seminal paper describing MDSC technique in 1978. Additional studies that challenged existing conventions or described novel techniques are also discussed. The current standard procedure utilizes a subinguinal incision and a surgical microscope. Open, robotic, and laparoscopic approaches to MDSC have been described, but access to minimally invasive instruments may be limited outside of developed nations. Pain reduction following preoperative spermatic cord predicts success of MDSC. Methods for identifying and preserving the testicular and deferential arteries vary depending on surgeon preference but appear to have comparable outcomes. Future developments in MDSC involve targeted denervation, minimizing collateral thermal injury, and alternative techniques to visualize arterial supply. CONCLUSION: For patients suffering from CSP, MDSC is a well-studied technique that may offer appropriately selected patients' relief. Future investigation comparing targeted vs full MDSC as well as in vivo study of new techniques are needed to continue to improve outcomes.