Performance evaluation of the Viasure PCR assay for the diagnosis of monkeypox: A multicentre study.

BACKGROUND: Monkeypox virus (MPXV) is the causative agent of the 2022 monkeypox global outbreak. Rapid detection of MPXV infection is essential to inform patient management and public health response. Currently, there is a lack of established real-time PCR assays to support a rapid diagnosis of monkeypox. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the performance characteristics of the Viasure MPXV PCR assay in three London teaching hospitals. STUDY DESIGN: Prospectively collected paired patient swabs from matched or unmatched anatomical sites were evaluated by the reference laboratory and Viasure MPXV PCR assays. A subset of samples were also tested for HSV, VZV, and/or Treponema pallidum DNA. RESULTS: 217 paired samples were evaluated. 91.2% of the paired swabs generated concordant results whilst 8.8% generated discordant results. The accuracy, diagnostic sensitivity, diagnostic specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, likelihood ratio positive, and likelihood ratio negative of the Viasure PCR assay across the hospitals were 93.2 - 96.3%, 90.0 - 100%, 88.2 - 100%, 94.9 - 100%, 87.9 - 100%, 8.50 - 14.41, and 0.00 - 0.10 respectively. MPXV co-infections with HSV were detected in two patients. Five patients were negative for monkeypox but positive for herpes or chickenpox. CONCLUSIONS: The Viasure MPXV PCR assay demonstrated excellent performance characteristics, was easy to use, and is fit for routine diagnostic purpose. Where implemented, the assay would allow rapid and accurate laboratory diagnosis of MPXV infections and support a timely management of monkeypox. To reduce the risk of false negative detections, vesicular lesions from any anatomical site should be preferentially and optimally sampled.

The Alpha variant was not associated with excess nosocomial SARS-CoV-2 infection in a multi-centre UK hospital study.

OBJECTIVES: Recently emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants have been associated with an increased rate of transmission within the community. We sought to determine whether this also resulted in increased transmission within hospitals. METHODS: We collected viral sequences and epidemiological data of patients with community and healthcare associated SARS-CoV-2 infections, sampled from 16th November 2020 to 10th January 2021, from nine hospitals participating in the COG-UK HOCI study. Outbreaks were identified using ward information, lineage and pairwise genetic differences between viral sequences. RESULTS: Mixed effects logistic regression analysis of 4184 sequences showed healthcare-acquired infections were no more likely to be identified as the Alpha variant than community acquired infections. Nosocomial outbreaks were investigated based on overlapping ward stay and SARS-CoV-2 genome sequence similarity. There was no significant difference in the number of patients involved in outbreaks caused by the Alpha variant compared to outbreaks caused by other lineages. CONCLUSIONS: We find no evidence to support it causing more nosocomial transmission than previous lineages. This suggests that the stringent infection prevention measures already in place in UK hospitals contained the spread of the Alpha variant as effectively as other less transmissible lineages, providing reassurance of their efficacy against emerging variants of concern.