Phase II trial of weekly patupilone in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: Drug resistance mechanisms can reduce response rate and duration in men with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) receiving docetaxel-based therapy. Patupilone (epothilone B), a microtubule-targeting agent, may be unaffected by some resistance mechanisms. Therefore, a phase II study assessed the patupilone safety and activity in CRPC patients with and without previous chemotherapy. METHODS: CRPC patients received patupilone 2.5 mg/m(2) weekly for 3 weeks of a 4-week cycle. Patients were required to have measurable disease or prostate-specific antigen (PSA) progression (levels>20 ng/ml). RESULTS: All 45 enrolled patients (median age, 69 years) were safety and response assessable. Sixty-four percent had previous chemotherapy (55% had previous taxane therapy). Patients received a median of three patupilone cycles. Patupilone was generally well tolerated. Ten (22%) patients experienced grade 3 diarrhea, six (13%) grade 3 fatigue, and one (2%) grade 3 neuropathy with no neutropenia or thrombocytopenia incidence. Six (13%) patients had >or= 50% decline in PSA (three had previous taxane therapy). No patient with measurable disease had a response. Median overall survival was 13.4 months. CONCLUSIONS: The safety profile of weekly patupilone in CRPC patients compares favorably with that of other microtubule inhibitors. At the dose and schedule tested, patupilone demonstrated minimal activity in CRPC.

A dose- and schedule-finding study of darbepoetin alpha for the treatment of chronic anaemia of cancer.

A multicentre study evaluated the efficacy and safety of darbepoetin alpha administered weekly (QW), every 3 weeks (Q3W), and every 4 weeks (Q4W) to anaemic patients with cancer not concurrently receiving chemotherapy or radiotherapy. The QW portion (n=102) was an open-label, sequential, dose-escalation design; cohorts received darbepoetin alpha QW by subcutaneous (s.c.) injection at 0.5, 1.0, 2.25, or 4.5 micro g kg(-1) week(-1) for 12 weeks. The 12-week placebo-controlled, double-blind Q3W (6.75 micro g kg(-1)) and Q4W (6.75 or 10.0 micro g kg(-1)) schedules (n=86), which enrolled different patients, took place after the QW schedule and were followed by a 12-week, open-label phase. Patients were evaluated for change in haemoglobin end points and red blood cell transfusions, serum darbepoetin alpha concentration, and safety. Selected domains of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) were measured. With QW dosing, at least 70% of each cohort had a haemoglobin increase from baseline of > or =2 g dl(-1) or a concentration > or =12 g dl(-1) (haematopoietic response). In the 4.5 micro g kg(-1) QW cohort, all patients achieved a haematopoietic response (100%; 95% confidence interval (CI)=100, 100). In the Q3W and Q4W schedules, all cohorts had at least 60% of patients who achieved a haematopoietic response. Darbepoetin alpha effectively increases haemoglobin concentration when given QW, Q3W, or Q4W. Less-frequent administration may benefit patients with chronic anaemia of cancer and their caregivers alike.

Darbepoetin alfa given every 1 or 2 weeks alleviates anaemia associated with cancer chemotherapy.

In part A of this study, patients were randomised to cohorts receiving darbepoetin alfa at doses of 0.5 to 8.0 m.c.g x kg(-1) x wk(-1) or to a control group receiving epoetin alfa at an initial dose of 150 U x kg(-1) three times weekly. In part B, the cohorts were darbepoetin alfa 3.0 to 9.0 m.c.g x kg(-1) every 2 weeks or epoetin alfa, initial dose 40 000 U x wk(-1). Safety was assessed by adverse events, changes in blood pressure, and formation of antibodies to darbepoetin alfa. Efficacy was assessed by several haematologic endpoints, including change in haemoglobin from baseline. The adverse event profile of darbepoetin alfa was similar to that of epoetin alfa. No relationship between the rapidity of haemoglobin response and any adverse event was observed. No antibodies to darbepoetin alfa were detected. Higher doses of darbepoetin alfa increased the proportion of patients with a haemoglobin response and decreased the median time to response. The overall dose of darbepoetin alfa required to produce a mean increase in haemoglobin does not increase when the dosing interval is increased from 1 to 2 weeks. Therapy with darbepoetin alfa is safe and effective in producing a dose-related increase in haemoglobin levels in patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy.

Novel erythropoiesis stimulating protein (NESP) for the treatment of anaemia of chronic disease associated with cancer.

Anaemia is a common haematologic disorder in patients with cancer and has a multifactorial aetiology, including the effects of the malignancy itself and residual effects from previous therapy. Novel erythropoiesis stimulating protein (NESP, darbepoetin alfa), a protein with additional sialic acid compared with erythropoietin (EPO), stimulates erythropoiesis by the same mechanism as recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO) but it is biochemically distinct. NESP, with its approximately 3-fold greater serum half-life, can maintain haemoglobin levels as effectively as rHuEPO in anaemic patients with chronic renal failure and do so with less frequent dosing. We investigated the ability of NESP to safely increase haemoglobin levels of anaemic patients with non-myeloid malignancies not receiving chemotherapy. NESP was administered under the supervision of a physician at doses of 0.5, 1.0, 2.25 or 4.5 mcg kg(-1)wk(-1)for a maximum of 12 weeks. This report includes 89 patients completing the study by November 2000. NESP was well tolerated, with no reported dose-limiting toxicities or treatment-related severe adverse events. Increasing doses of NESP corresponded with increased efficacy. The percentage (95% confidence interval) of patients responding ranged from 61% (42%, 77%) in the 1.0 mcg kg(-1)wk(-1)group to 83% (65%, 94%) in the 4.5 mcg kg(-1)wk(-1)group.

Re-validation and shortening of the Functional Assessment of Anorexia/Cachexia Therapy (FAACT) questionnaire.

PURPOSE: The original Functional Assessment of Anorexia/Cachexia Therapy (FAACT) was designed to measure general aspects of quality of life (QOL) as well as specific anorexia/cachexia-related concerns. Our primary purpose was to reduce the number of anorexia/cachexia subscale items in a manner that either retains or improves reliability, validity and precision. METHODS: The FAACT was administered using an interactive computer program that allowed immediate entry of the data. A total of 213 patients were recruited. RESULTS: A combined empirical and conceptual approach led to the reduction of the anorexia/cachexia subscale (A/CS) from 18 to 12 items. A 26-item trial outcome index (TOI) combining physical well-being (PWB), functional well-being (FWB), and the A/CS-12 was highly reliable and sensitive to change in performance status rating (PSR). We found that PWB, FWB, and A/CS-12 subscales performed differently. Specifically, PWB and FWB scores decreased in patients whose (PSR) worsened. However, although A/CS-12 scores were responsive to change in PSR over time, average A/CS-12 scores of all patients, even those whose PSR worsened, improved over the course of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Elimination of six items from the anorexia/cachexia subscale of the FAACT was accomplished without loss of internal consistency or sensitivity to change in performance status. The A/CS-12 subscale provides unique, important information not captured by a generic chronic illness questionnaire.

Pharmacoeconomics of nutritional support in cancer.

Physicians are increasingly asked to consider the cost of interventions, including procedures and drugs, when making medical decisions. This article provides some practical information about the cost and efficacy of a variety of nutrition support measures for patients with cancer or acquired immunodeficiency syndrome-associated anorexia and undernutrition. Nutrition counseling, liquid homemade or commercially available food supplements, and appetite stimulants are relatively low-cost, effective means of nutrition support. Enteral nutrition requires invasive procedures, is more expensive, is associated with more potentially serious complications, and should be reserved for patients whose nutritional status cannot be maintained with less aggressive measures. Total parenteral nutrition is exceedingly expensive and seldom helpful; it should be reserved for those patients whose gastrointestinal tract is nonfunctional. In addition to nutritional parameters and cost, the clinician should consider patient preferences. Specific tools to assess the impact of nutrition support measures on patients' quality of life are under development.

Costs and benefits of nutrition support in cancer.

Patients with advanced cancer or AIDS are frequently bothered by anorexia, decreased food intake, fatigue, weight loss, muscle wasting, and a decline in functional status. Nutritional support may afford these patients a better, although not longer life. Available interventions include nutrition counseling, homemade or commercial food supplements, appetite stimulants, enteral nutrition, and parenteral nutrition. Conservative cost estimates for these interventions range from $52/month for homemade supplements to $8,400/month for home parenteral nutrition. Clinicians need to be familiar with the benefits, risks, and costs of these therapies in order to suggest appropriate options.

Oral ondansetron for the control of cisplatin-induced delayed emesis: a large, multicenter, double-blind, randomized comparative trial of ondansetron versus placebo.

PURPOSE: To investigate the efficacy and safety of oral ondansetron in the control of cisplatin-induced delayed emesis in patients who do not require rescue antiemetic therapy for acute emesis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Five hundred thirty-eight chemotherapy-naive patients who received cisplatin chemotherapy (> or = 70 mg/m2), and who were not rescued for acute emesis, were eligible to be randomized to receive one of the three oral regimens to control delayed emesis. Group I received placebo on days 2 to 6; group II received ondansetron 8 mg twice daily on days 2 and 3 and placebo on days 4 to 6; group III received ondansetron 8 mg twice daily on days 2 to 6. All patients received intravenous ondansetron (0.15 mg/kg every 4 hours for three doses) for the control of acute emesis on day 1. The number of emetic episodes on days 2 and 3 combined (days 2/3, when incidence and severity of delayed emesis were expected to be greatest) was considered the primary measure of efficacy. RESULTS: Patients who received odansetron had significantly fewer emetic episodes on days 2/3, 4, and 5 than those who received placebo (P < or = .002 on each day). Additionally, significantly more patients who received ondansetron had a complete plus major response (C+MR; < or = two two emetic episodes) than those who received placebo on days 2/3 (56% v 37%, P = .001), 4 (94% v 85%, P = .005), and 5 (98% v 88%, P = .006). Patients who received ondansetron had significantly less nausea on day 2/3 when day-1 nausea was used as the baseline score (P = .025). Patients who received ondansetron also had significantly less nausea on day 4 (P = .042) and the results approached significance on day 5 (P = .066). CONCLUSION: Oral ondansetron had a significant effect in the control of cisplatin-induced delayed emesis and nausea in patients who had not required rescue antiemetics during the acute emesis period. The control of delayed nausea and vomiting was most notable in the immediate 2 days following cisplatin administration, with the clinical difference narrowing between the two treatment arms on subsequent days.

Megestrol acetate in patients with AIDS-related cachexia.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the effects of oral suspensions of megestrol acetate, 800 mg/d, and placebo on body weight in patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS)-related weight loss. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. SETTING: Outpatient community and university patient care setting. PATIENTS: Consecutive patients with AIDS who had substantial weight loss and anorexia were enrolled. Of 271 patients, 270 and 195 were evaluable for safety and efficacy, respectively. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly assigned to receive placebo or megestrol acetate (100 mg, 400 mg, or 800 mg) daily for 12 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary efficacy criterion was weight gain. Patients were evaluated at 4-week intervals for changes in weight and body composition, caloric intake, sense of well-being, toxic effects, and appetite. RESULTS: For evaluable patients receiving 800 mg of megestrol acetate per day, 64.2% gained 2.27 kg (5 pounds) or more compared with 21.4% of patients receiving placebo (P < 0.001). An intent-to-treat analysis showed significant differences (P = 0.002) between those receiving placebo and those receiving 800 mg of megestrol acetate for the number of patients who gained 2.27 kg (5 pounds) or more (8 of 32 [25%] compared with 38 of 61 [62.3%], respectively). Compared with patients receiving placebo at the time of maximum weight change, evaluable patients receiving megestrol acetate, 800 mg/d, reported improvement in overall well-being and had an increase in mean weight gain (-0.725 compared with 3.54 kg [-1.6 compared with +7.8 pounds]; P < 0.001), lean body mass (-0.772 compared with +1.14 kg [-1.7 compared with +2.5 pounds]; P < 0.001), appetite grade (P < 0.001), and caloric intake (-107 compared with +645.6 calories/d; P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with AIDS-related weight loss, megestrol acetate can stimulate appetite, food intake, and statistically significant weight gain that is associated with a patient-reported improvement in an overall sense of well-being.

Clinical approaches to nutritional support in cancer.

Anorexia and weight loss are frequent complications of cancer and AIDS. Assessment of dietary records and nutritional requirements in patients with decreased food intake and weight loss will assist the dietitian, nurse, or physician in initially addressing the problem. Patients may respond well to nutritional counseling and food supplements, but persistent severe anorexia is common. Various pharmacologic strategies to reverse anorexia and weight loss have been tested, including corticosteroids, anabolic steroids, cyproheptadine, hydrazine sulfate, dronabinol, and megestrol acetate. Dronabinol was recently found to improve appetite in AIDS patients. Megestrol acetate is so far the only agent associated with improvements in appetite and weight in patients with cancer and AIDS. Enteral and parenteral nutrition may be helpful in selected patients with gastrointestinal obstruction or dysfunction, but it is not generally indicated in patients with end-stage disease.

Treatment of anorexia with megestrol acetate.

Anorexia and involuntary weight loss are prevalent problems in oncology and AIDS patients. Cytokines are suspected but not proven causes of cachexia. Megestrol acetate has been found to increase appetite, food intake, and weight in randomized, placebo-controlled trials in patients with advanced malignancies and in patients with AIDS. This hormone derivative probably has both central nervous system and peripheral metabolic effects. No significant effect on survival has been demonstrated in these trials. The optimal dose for appetite enhancement is unknown; we have chosen 320 mg/d as our initial dose. Megestrol acetate is usually well tolerated, and it may be helpful in the symptomatic and palliative therapy of patients with anorexia and weight loss.

Efficacy of oral ondansetron in the prevention of emesis in outpatients receiving cyclophosphamide-based chemotherapy. The Ondansetron Study Group.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of oral ondansetron (Zofran) as an antiemetic in patients receiving cyclophosphamide-based chemotherapy. DESIGN: A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, stratified, placebo-controlled trial conducted between March 1989 and January 1990. SETTING: Twenty-seven oncology centers including university hospitals, community cancer centers, and private medical oncology practices. PATIENTS: A total of 349 chemotherapy-naive patients having their first cycle of cyclophosphamide (> or = 450 mg/m2)-based chemotherapy. Patients also received methotrexate (> or = 30 mg/m2) or doxorubicin (> or = 35 mg/m2). All patients were evaluated for safety and 318 (91%) were evaluated for efficacy. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly assigned to one of four treatment groups: placebo, 1 mg, 4 mg, or 8 mg of ondansetron. Assigned study medication was taken three times per day for 3 consecutive days. MEASUREMENTS: Time and number of emetic episodes as well as degree of nausea were recorded by patients for each of the 3 study days. RESULTS: Compared with placebo, all three doses of ondansetron were superior (P < 0.001) in preventing vomiting and controlling nausea. A complete response (no emetic episodes) was observed in 19%, 57%, 65%, and 66% of patients in the placebo, 1-mg, 4-mg, and 8-mg ondansetron groups, respectively. For patients who received higher-dose cyclophosphamide and doxorubicin, a dose-related trend in antiemetic efficacy of ondansetron was observed. Mild headache and constipation were the most frequently reported adverse events. No extrapyramidal reactions were observed. CONCLUSION: Oral ondansetron is a safe and effective antiemetic that is more efficacious than placebo for patients receiving cyclophosphamide-based chemotherapy.

Hormonal and metabolic abnormalities in the malnourished cancer patient: effects on host-tumor interaction.

Many common metastatic cancers are associated with marked weight loss at the time of diagnosis. Anorexia clearly plays a major role in weight loss in the cancer patient, but cannot explain all of the weight loss noted. Malnourished patients with localized cancers under metabolic ward conditions fail to gain weight when given apparently adequate calories for anabolism, thus suggesting that these patients are hypermetabolic. Increased whole body protein breakdown, increased lipolysis, and increased gluconeogenesis have been repeatedly demonstrated in malnourished cancer patients. Protein and glucose metabolism are closely linked, and both are regulated by a number of the same hormones and metabolites. For example, when increased glucose production in malnourished cancer patients is inhibited pharmacologically, protein catabolism is proportionally decreased. Studies of glucose, growth hormone, cortisol, and insulin secretion following an oral glucose load in well-nourished cancer patients are consistent with insulin resistance but no other hormonal abnormalities. Malnourished cancer patients have elevated levels of growth hormone that are further stimulated by arginine and insulin infusion. No abnormalities of thyroid function were noted in cancer patients. Current studies are underway to determine the mechanisms and effects of progestational steroids and cytokines on both food intake and intermediary lipid metabolism.

Nutrition in advanced cancer: anorexia as an outcome variable and target of therapy.

The endpoints used as outcome variables in clinical cancer treatment trials, including nutrition intervention studies, should contain items that are meaningful to the patient. Variables to consider are appetite, food intake, physical performance, psychological and social functioning, response to cancer therapies, survival time, nutrition status, associated morbidity, and costs. Ideally, the design and conduct of nutrition trials should be carried out by a multidisciplinary team comprising medical oncologists, physician specialists in nutrition, dietitians, and social scientists. Anorexia has not been a focus of nutrition support trials in the past partly because of the lack of effective strategies to reverse it. Anorexia is one important cause of cancer starvation, and it also causes patient discomfort. This paper describes outcome variables that include patient derived subjective factors such as anorexia, and outlines new strategies to reverse anorexia. Pharmacologic strategies tested to reverse anorexia include corticosteroids, anabolic steroids, cyproheptadine, hydrazine sulfate, cannabinoids, and megestrol acetate. Of these, only the latter has been consistently well tolerated and effective, with significant improvements in appetite and food intake demonstrated in large-scale, randomized, controlled trials involving more than 600 cancer patients. Dose-response studies have demonstrated increasing efficacy with increasing doses of megestrol acetate from 160 to 800 mg/day. Doses in excess of 800 mg/day are not currently recommended. The mechanisms of action of megestrol acetate involve both behavioral and metabolic effects, and its impact on energy expenditure, appetite, body composition, endocrine function, and lipid metabolism is the subject of ongoing research.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Megestrol acetate in cancer anorexia and weight loss.

High-dose megestrol acetate has been associated with increased appetite and weight. To examine the effects of high-dose megestrol acetate in the treatment of anorexia and weight loss in patients with advanced hormone-insensitive malignant lesions, a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial was conducted. Patients receiving megestrol acetate for 1 month reported a significant improvement in appetite and adequacy of food intake compared with those receiving placebo. A three-item scale measuring appetite, adequacy of food intake, and concern about weight revealed a higher improvement with megestrol acetate than with placebo. Patients who worsened while receiving placebo had similar favorable changes after the cross over to megestrol acetate. These data indicate that megestrol acetate may improve appetite and food intake in patients with advanced cancer.

Assessment and maintenance of nutrition in older cancer patients.

Variables that the clinician can assess to determine the nutritional status of cancer patients include percent and rate of weight loss from usual body weight, current weight compared to calculated ideal body weight, and levels of appetite and food intake. Our studies show that two-thirds of patients with advanced cancer over the age of 65 have had some degree of weight loss, and that more than half are underweight, have loss of appetite, or complain of a decrease in food intake. Ongoing support and education, food supplementation, and attention to activity level may all contribute to preserve the patient's nutritional status and quality of life. Severe, persistent anorexia that does not respond to dietary counseling can be reversed with megestrol acetate. Enteral and parenteral nutrition have specific indications but should not be routinely used in anorectic patients.

Pathophysiology of cancer: hormonal and metabolic abnormalities.

Despite the development of advanced nutritional support technology, malnutrition remains a significant morbid and mortal complication of cancer. A number of metabolic abnormalities have been demonstrated in malnourished cancer patients, including increased protein breakdown, increased glucose production, increased lipolysis, hypogonadism in male patients, and insulin resistance. Previous studies conducted under metabolic ward conditions have demonstrated that metabolic abnormalities interfere with efforts at renutrition of patients with localized head and neck cancer. Efforts to correct these abnormalities by treatment with hydrazine sulfate, anabolic androgens, and insulinotropic drugs have been ineffective. An improved understanding of the pathophysiology of cancer malnutrition may lead to improved therapies of this vexing clinical problem.

Clinical aspects of nutrition in advanced cancer.

Nutritional assessments of our patients with disseminated malignancies have revealed that the incidences of reported anorexia, decreased food intake, and weight loss range between 49 and 64%. It is therefore essential that a planned approach to the nutritional needs of patients with advanced cancer be part of routine oncology care. Our first step is a clinical assessment of the patient's nutritional state and diet, and a determination of caloric and nutrient needs. The potential tools available to the oncologist in the management of the undernourished cancer patient are many and include dietary counseling, food supplements (which contain vitamins and other micronutrients), stimulation of appetite, enteral nutrition, total parenteral nutrition, or a combination of these. The dietitian can be an invaluable component of the cancer care team, both in the inpatient and outpatient settings. An understanding of the role of each intervention will enable the physician to use available resources rationally and efficiently.

A phase I/II study of high-dose megestrol acetate in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer.

A dose-response relationship has been suggested for medroxyprogesterone acetate in the treatment of advanced breast cancer. To determine the tolerability and efficacy of increasing doses of megestrol acetate in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer, we conducted a phase I/II study among 57 patients. Three patients each received 480, 800, and 1280 mg/d; 48 patients received 1600 mg/d. Of the 57 patients, 56 patients had had disease progression on prior hormone therapy, chemotherapy, or both. Twenty-seven patients had previously received standard-dose MA (160 mg/d). Among the 37 patients with measurable disease, high-dose megestrol acetate (HDMA) produced 6 (16%) complete responses (CRs) and 6 (16%) partial responses (PRs); 11 patients achieved stable disease (SD). HDMA resulted in improvement or stabilization in 12 of the 20 patients with evaluable, non-measurable disease. There were no responses among the 6 patients with liver metastases. Among the 27 patients who were previously treated with standard-dose MA, including 9 patients with primary treatment failure, HDMA resulted in 1 CR, 3 PRs, and 10 SD. Toxicities, which were mild and reversible, included fluid retention, hypertension, hyperglycemia, and mild congestive heart failure. Two patients had superficial phlebitis. The most profound side effect was weight gain which occurred in 43 patients (75%). This study suggests a dose-response relationship for MA in the treatment of advanced breast cancer. A randomized trial to determine the optimal dose is ongoing.