Enhancement of systemic virus-specific T lymphocyte responses in pigs supplemented with algae-derived ß-glucan.

Algae-derived ß-glucan has been widely used as a feed additive in the swine industry. The supplementation of ß-glucan aims to improve growth performance and modulate the immunity of pigs. However, the potential effects of supplementing ß-glucan from algae on immune responses in pigs-specifically antigen-specific immunity-must be determined. In this study, the effects of algae-derived ß-glucan supplementation on growth performance, virus neutralising antibody and virus-specific T lymphocytes responses were investigated in pigs. Piglets (n=112 per treatment) were assigned to three treatments including non-supplemented group (control), ß-glucan 100 g/ton supplemented group (BG100), and ß-glucan 200 g/ton supplemented group (BG200). In this study, production performance of pigs was not found to be different between the experimental groups. Pigs supplemented with ß-glucan exhibited high levels of classical swine fever virus (CSFV)-specific producing T lymphocytes and neutralising antibody titer, compared to the control group. Interestingly, supplementation of ß-glucan significantly enhanced porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV)-specific interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) producing T lymphocytes, including CD4+, CD8+, and CD4+CD8+ T lymphocyte subpopulations. Moreover, PRRS modified live vaccine (MLV) viremia was reduced in earlier for ß-glucan-supplemented pigs compared to the control group. The findings indicate that the algae-derived ß-glucan possesses biological potential as an immunomodulatory substance to enhance antiviral immunity, which may contribute to disease resistance in pigs.

Immunoglobulin G1 subclass responses can be used to detect specific allergy to the house dust mites Dermatophagoides farinae and Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus in atopic dogs.

BACKGROUND: In dogs with atopic dermatitis, intradermal testing (IDT) or allergen specific IgE serological testing are routinely employed to identify causative allergens. These allergens can then be used for allergen-specific immunotherapy and allergy management. The clinical relevance of this testing is affected by the source of allergen, and other biomarkers that are more related to specific allergens still need to be identified. The aim of this study was to investigate levels of specific IgE, total IgG, and IgG1 and IgG2 subclasses against the local house dust mites (HDM) Dermatophagoides farinae (DF) and D. pteronyssinus (DP) as biomarkers by using in-house ELISAs in healthy (n = 33) and atopic dogs (AD) (n = 44) that were either positive or negative by IDT to HDM. RESULTS: Being over 3 years of age was a risk factor for AD (Odds Ratio (OD) = 4.10, 95% Confidence interval (CI) 1.57-10.75, p = 0.0049), but there was no relation to IDT outcomes (OR = 0.9091, 95% CI 0.22-3.74, p = 1.00). High levels of all antibody isotypes (IgE, IgG, IgG1 and IgG2) against HDM were found in aged healthy dogs (> 3 years old). In AD, HDM-IgE and IgG1 levels were higher in dogs that were IDT positive to HDM than in IDT negative animals. Levels of IgE and IgG1 could be used to distinguish the specific allergens, whereas total IgG and IgG2 levels were not different between IDT-positive and IDT-negative AD. By the receiver operating characteristic curve at a false-positive rate = 0.10, both IgE and IgG1 showed better sensitivity than IgG and IgG2. Similar to IgE, serum IgG1 concentration was also relevant to IDT outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Our in-house ELISAs coated with local HDM were useful for evaluating antibody levels, and we propose use of the HDM-specific IgG1 subclass as a biomarker to detect HDM specific allergens in AD, potentially together with an IgE based platform.