Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
1.
J Altern Complement Med ; 16(3): 251-5, 2010 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20192909

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Recent research shows a high rate of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) use among persons with mental disorders, although correlates and patterns of CAM use are relatively unknown. This study tested whether CAM use is associated with perceived effectiveness of conventional treatment (i.e., psychotropic medication and psychotherapy) and medication compliance among persons with bipolar disorder. DESIGN: Patients with bipolar disorder (n = 435) were included as part of a naturalistic cohort study. Measures of CAM utilization, medication compliance, and perceptions of the effectiveness of psychotropic medications and psychotherapy were based on previously established questionnaires. Associations were tested using bivariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: Bivariate analyses showed that patients who did not perceive psychotherapy as effective at improving social, family, or job functioning reported greater CAM use. However, medication compliance was not significantly associated with use of CAM. Patients who used oral (e.g., herbal therapies) or cognitive (e.g., meditation) CAM were more likely to report that their medications were not effective at relieving manic or depressive symptoms. Users of cognitive CAM were more likely to report that their medications did not help with social, job, or family functioning, and that they did not prevent recurrences of manic or depressive episodes. None of the bivariate associations remained significant in multivariate analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Prior research has suggested that persons who are dissatisfied with treatment for medical conditions are more likely to use CAM therapies. However, the results of this study do not show CAM therapies to be associated with perceived effectiveness of treatments for mental health problems among this sample of persons with serious mental illnesses. This suggests that motivations for CAM use may vary by population and condition. Because few correlates of CAM use among persons with serious mental illnesses are known, providers should conduct routine assessments of CAM use.


Subject(s)
Bipolar Disorder/therapy , Complementary Therapies/statistics & numerical data , Patient Compliance/statistics & numerical data , Patient Satisfaction/statistics & numerical data , Veterans/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Aged , Analysis of Variance , Antipsychotic Agents/therapeutic use , Attitude to Health , Bipolar Disorder/drug therapy , Cohort Studies , Combined Modality Therapy , Complementary Therapies/psychology , Female , Humans , Male , Mental Health , Middle Aged , Patient Compliance/psychology , Patient Participation/statistics & numerical data , Quality of Life , Veterans/psychology
2.
Psychosom Med ; 72(1): 61-7, 2010 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19875633

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of depression treatment on medical and social outcomes for individuals with chronic pain and depression. People with chronic pain and depression have worse health outcomes than those with chronic pain alone. Little is known about the effectiveness of depression treatment for this population. METHODS: Propensity score-weighted analyses, using both waves (1997-1998 and 2000-2001) of the National Survey of Alcohol, Drug, and Mental Health Problems, were used to examine the effect of a) any depression treatment and b) minimally adequate depression treatment on persistence of depression symptoms, depression severity, pain severity, overall health, mental health status, physical health status, social functioning, employment status, and number of workdays missed. Analyses were limited to those who met Composite International Diagnostic Interview Short-Form criteria for major depressive disorder, reported having at least one chronic pain condition, and completed both interviews (n = 553). RESULTS: Receiving any depression treatment was associated with higher scores on the mental component summary of the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-12, indicating better mental health (difference = 2.65 points, p = .002) and less interference of pain on work (odds ratio = 0.57, p = .02). Among those receiving treatment, minimal adequacy of treatment was not significantly associated with better outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Depression treatment improves mental health and reduces the effects of pain on work among those with chronic pain and depression. Understanding the effect of depression treatment on outcomes for this population is important for employers, healthcare providers treating this population, and policymakers working in this decade of pain control and research to improve care for chronic pain sufferers.


Subject(s)
Depressive Disorder, Major/therapy , Pain/epidemiology , Chronic Disease , Comorbidity , Cost of Illness , Depressive Disorder, Major/diagnosis , Depressive Disorder, Major/epidemiology , Employment , Female , Health Status , Health Surveys , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Mental Health , Middle Aged , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Pain/diagnosis , Pain Management , Propensity Score , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales/statistics & numerical data , Quality of Health Care , Sickness Impact Profile , Surveys and Questionnaires
3.
Health Serv Res ; 45(1): 302-15, 2010 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19878343

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether Medicaid-enrolled depressed adults receive adequate treatment for depression and to identify the characteristics of those receiving inadequate treatment. DATA SOURCE: Claims data from a Medicaid-enrolled population in a large mid-Atlantic state between July 2006 and January 2008. STUDY DESIGN: We examined rates and predictors of minimally adequate psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy among adults with a new depression treatment episode during the study period (N=1,098). PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Many depressed adults received either minimally adequate psychotherapy or pharmacotherapy. Black individuals and individuals who began their depression treatment episode with an inpatient psychiatric stay for depression were markedly less likely to receive minimally adequate psychotherapy and more likely to receive inadequate treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Racial minorities and individuals discharged from inpatient treatment for depression are at risk for receiving inadequate depression treatment.


Subject(s)
Depression/drug therapy , Medicaid , Quality of Health Care , Adolescent , Adult , Databases as Topic , Drug Therapy , Female , Forecasting , Healthcare Disparities , Humans , Insurance Claim Review , Male , Middle Aged , United States , Young Adult
4.
Depress Anxiety ; 26(3): 222-8, 2009.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19133701

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Anxiety disorders and pain are commonly comorbid, though little is known about the effect of pain on the course and treatment of anxiety. METHODS: This is a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial for anxiety treatment in primary care. Participants with panic disorder (PD) and/or generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) (N=191; 81% female, mean age 44) were randomized to either their primary-care physician's usual care or a 12-month course of telephone-based collaborative care. Anxiety severity, pain interference, health-related quality of life, health services use, and employment status were assessed at baseline, and at 2-, 4-, 8-, and 12-month follow-up. We defined response to anxiety treatment as a 40% or greater improvement from baseline on anxiety severity scales at 12-month follow-up. RESULTS: The 39% who reported high pain interference at baseline had more severe anxiety (mean SIGH-A score: 21.8 versus 18.0, P<.001), greater limitations in activities of daily living, and more work days missed in the previous month (5.8 versus 4.0 days, P=.01) than those with low pain interference. At 12-month follow-up, high pain interference was associated with a lower likelihood of responding to anxiety treatment (OR=.28; 95% CI=.12-.63) and higher health services use (26.1% with >/=1 hospitalization versus 12.0%, P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: Pain that interferes with daily activities is prevalent among primary care patients with PD/GAD and associated with more severe anxiety, worse daily functioning, higher health services use, and a lower likelihood of responding to treatment for PD/GAD.


Subject(s)
Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use , Anti-Inflammatory Agents/therapeutic use , Antidepressive Agents/therapeutic use , Anxiety Disorders/drug therapy , Anxiety Disorders/epidemiology , Pain/epidemiology , Activities of Daily Living , Adolescent , Adult , Anxiety Disorders/diagnosis , Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Health Status , Humans , Male , Mental Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , Pain/diagnosis , Pain/drug therapy , Pain Measurement , Primary Health Care/methods , Quality of Life/psychology , Severity of Illness Index , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
5.
Gen Hosp Psychiatry ; 30(6): 528-35, 2008.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19061679

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Depression is common and associated with poor outcomes for people with chronic medical conditions (CMCs). The goals of this study were (1) to determine the effect of CMCs on the use and quality of depression care and (2) to understand whether the patient-provider relationship mediates the relationship between CMCs and depression care quality. METHOD: With the use of data from the 1997-1998 National Survey of Alcohol, Drug, and Mental Health Problems (Healthcare for Communities), the relationships between CMCs, depression recognition, receipt of minimally adequate depression care and the patient-provider relationship were assessed with multivariate linear and logistic regression models for 1309 adults who met criteria for major depressive disorder. RESULTS: Depressed patients with a CMC were more likely to have their depression recognized by a provider (OR=2.10; 95% CI=1.32-3.35) and to take antidepressant medications (32% vs. 19%, P=.02) than those without a CMC. However, having a CMC was not associated with receiving minimally adequate depression care or patient satisfaction. Depression recognition was associated with number of medical visits (OR=1.12; 95% CI=1.09-1.15), having a usual source of care (OR=3.57; 95% CI=2.26-5.63), and provider trust (OR=1.07; 95% CI=1.04-1.11). CONCLUSION: Depressed people with a comorbid CMC are more likely to have their depression recognized than those without a CMC, though were no more likely to receive minimally adequate depression care. Aspects of the patient-provider relationship, including trust and continuity of care, may help to explain the increased rate of depression recognition among patients with severe CMCs.


Subject(s)
Antidepressive Agents/therapeutic use , Chronic Disease/psychology , Depressive Disorder, Major/drug therapy , Dysthymic Disorder/drug therapy , Quality Assurance, Health Care , Adult , Comorbidity , Depressive Disorder, Major/diagnosis , Depressive Disorder, Major/psychology , Dysthymic Disorder/diagnosis , Dysthymic Disorder/psychology , Female , Health Surveys , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Satisfaction , Physician-Patient Relations , Primary Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Referral and Consultation/statistics & numerical data , United States , Utilization Review
6.
Psychiatr Serv ; 59(6): 663-9, 2008 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18511587

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This study assessed gender differences in health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in a national sample of veterans with serious mental illness. METHODS: Data were analyzed from the Large Health Survey of Veterans, which was mailed to a national random sample of veterans in 1999. The linear and logistic multiple regression analyses included 18,017 veterans with schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, or bipolar disorder who completed the survey. HRQOL was measured by using the various subscales of the 36-Item Short Form of the Medical Outcomes Study (MOS SF-36) (mental component summary, physical component summary, and activities of daily living) and by questions assessing self-perceptions of health status. RESULTS: The sample was 7.3% female, 75.7% white, and 83.8% unemployed. Mean+/-SD age was 54.3+/-12.2 years. After the analysis adjusted for sociodemographic characteristics, health status, and other variables, compared with male veterans, female veterans with serious mental illness had lower scores on the SF-36 physical component summary (indicating worse symptoms), were more likely to report that they were limited "a lot" in activities of daily living, and had more pain. However, female respondents were more likely to have a positive outlook on their health. CONCLUSIONS: Among veterans who received a diagnosis of serious mental illness from providers of the Department of Veterans Affairs, women reported substantially poorer HRQOL than men across several domains but women reported better self-perceived health. Attention to the particular needs of female veterans with serious mental illness is imperative as the numbers of female veterans continue to increase.


Subject(s)
Health Status , Mental Disorders , Quality of Life , Veterans/psychology , Aged , Female , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Severity of Illness Index , Sex Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires , United States
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...