Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Access in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Large B-Cell Lymphoma: Association of Access with Social Determinants of Health and Travel Time to Treatment Centers.

Large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) is the most common type of non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR T) therapy represents a novel treatment with curative potential for relapsed or refractory (R/R) LBCL, but there are access barriers to this innovative therapy that are not well-studied. Study objectives were: (1) Assess the impact of geographic factors and social determinants of health (SDOH) on access to treatment with CAR T in a sample of patients with R/R LBCL and ≥2 prior lines of therapy (LOT). (2) Compare and contrast patient characteristics, SDOH, and travel time between patients with R/R LBCL who received CAR T and those who did not. An observational, nested case-control study of patients with R/R LBCL, ≥2 prior LOT, not in a clinical trial, identified using 100% Medicare Fee-For-Service and national multi-payer claims databases. Patients were linked to near-neighborhood SDOH using 9-digit ZIP-code address. Driving distance and time between residence and nearest CAR T treatment center (TC) was calculated. Patients were stratified based on treatments received upon third LOT initiation (Index Date) or later: (1) received CAR T and (2) did not receive CAR T. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate factors associated with CAR T. 5011 patients met inclusion criteria, with 628 (12.5%) in the CAR T group. Regression models found the likelihood of receiving CAR T decreased with patient age (odds ratio [OR] = .96, P < .001), and males were 29% more likely to receive CAR T (OR = 1.29, P = .02). Likelihood of CAR T increased with Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI; OR = 1.07, P < .001) indicating patients with more comorbidities were more likely to receive CAR T. Black patients were less than half as likely to receive CAR T than White patients (OR = .44, P = .01). Asian patients did not significantly differ from White patients (OR = 1.43, P = .24), and there was a trend for Hispanic patients to have a slightly lower likelihood of CAR T (OR = .50, P = .07). Higher household income was associated with receipt of CAR T, with the lowest income group more than 50% less likely to receive CAR T than the highest (OR = .44, P = .002), and the second lowest income group more than 30% less likely (OR = .68, P = .02). Finally, likelihood of CAR T therapy was reduced when the driving time to the nearest TC was 121 to 240 minutes (reference group: ≤30 minutes; OR = .64, P = .04). Travel times between 31 and 121 or greater than 240 minutes were not significantly different from ≤30 minutes. Payer type was collinear with age and could not be included in the regression analysis, but patients with commercial insurance were 1.5 to 3 times more likely to receive CAR T than other payers on an unadjusted basis. We identified significant disparities in access to CAR T related to demographics and SDOH. Patients who were older, female, low income, or Black were less likely to receive CAR T. The positive association of CCI with CAR T requires further research. Given the promising outcomes of CAR T, there is urgent need to address identified disparities and increase efforts to overcome access barriers.

Race/ethnicity and socioeconomic position in emergency department utilization in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

Aim: Evaluate the association of race/ethnicity and socioeconomic position (SEP) on emergency department (ED) visits for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), which may reflect access to and quality of cancer care. Materials & methods: Patients with HCC identified from a commercial multi-payer claims database between 2015 and 2018 were matched to near-neighborhood social determinants of health (SDOH) and stratified by race/ethnicity and SEP (proxied by annual household income). Analyses evaluated the effect of race/ethnicity and SEP on ED utilization, adjusting for SDOH, demographic and clinical characteristics using multivariable regression methods. Results: A total of 22,247 patients were included. Black and Hispanic patients had 43 and 18% higher ED utilization than White patients at higher-income levels (p < 0.01); these differences were nonsignificant at lower-income. Regardless of income level, Asian patients had lower ED utilization. Conclusion: Further research on the intersectionality between race/ethnicity, SEP and other SDOH may guide structural-level interventions to address health inequities.

Health disparities among racial/ethnic minorities have been observed in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We conducted a real-world retrospective insurance claims study of more than 22,200 adult patients with HCC between 2015 and 2018. We evaluated the association of race/ethnicity and socioeconomic position (measured by income level) with emergency department (ED) utilization. Our study consisted of 69% White, 14% Black, 7% Hispanic, 6% Asian and 4% other patient populations. Black and Hispanic patients had the highest number of ED visits, followed by White and Asian patients. Compared with White patients, ED visits were 27% higher for Black, 17% higher for Hispanic and 36% lower for Asian patients. Compared with low income, middle income was associated with 4% more and high income with 6% less ED use, regardless of race/ethnicity. At higher income levels, Black and Hispanic but not Asian patients demonstrated higher ED use than White patients. These findings suggest that improved socioeconomic position of Black and Hispanic patients may not provide as protective an effect on health outcomes, potentially due to structural health inequities.

Minimally invasive epicardial surgical left atrial appendage exclusion for atrial fibrillation patients at high risk for stroke and for bleeding.

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) patients at high risk for stroke and for bleeding may be unsuitable for either oral anticoagulation or endocardial left atrial appendage (LAA) occlusion. However, minimally invasive, epicardial left atrial appendage exclusion (LAAE) may be an option. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate outcomes of LAAE in high-risk AF patients not receiving oral anticoagulation. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of Medicare claims data was conducted to evaluate thromboembolic events in AF patients who underwent LAAE compared to a 1:4 propensity score-matched group of patients who did not receive LAAE (control). Neither group was receiving any oral anticoagulation at baseline or follow-up. Fine-Gray models estimated hazard ratios and evaluated between-group differences. Bootstrapping was applied to generate 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: The LAAE group (n = 243) was 61% male (mean age 75 years). AF was nonparoxysmal in 70% (mean CHA2DS2-VASc score 5.4; mean HAS-BLED score 4.2). The matched control group (n = 972) had statistically similar characteristics. One-year adjusted estimates of thromboembolic events were 7.3% (95% CI 4.3%-11.1%) in the LAAE group and 12.1% (95% CI 9.5%-14.8%) in the control group. Absolute risk reduction was 4.8% (95% CI 0.6%-8.9%; P = .028). Adjusted hazard ratio for thromboembolic events for LAAE vs non-LAAE was 0.672 (95% CI 0.394-1.146). CONCLUSION: In AF patients not taking oral anticoagulation who are at high risk for stroke and for bleeding, minimally invasive, thoracoscopic, epicardial LAAE was associated with a lower rate of thromboembolic events.

Relationship between social determinants of health and hospitalizations and costs among patients with bipolar disorder 1.

BACKGROUND: Bipolar disorder type 1 (BD-1) is a serious episodic mental illness whose severity can be impacted by social determinants of health (SDOH). To date the relationship of social and economic factors with health care utilization has not been formally analyzed using real-world data. OBJECTIVE: To describe patient characteristics and assess the influence of SDOH on hospitalizations and costs in patients with BD-1 insured with commercial and managed Medicaid health plans. METHODS: This retrospective observational study used data from the Medical Outcomes Research for Effectiveness and Economics (MORE2) Registry to identify patients aged 18 years and older with evidence of BD-1 between July 1, 2016, and December 31, 2018. SDOH were linked to patients at the "near neighborhood" level (based on ZIP9 area). Multivariable models assessed the relationship between patient characteristics and hospitalizations (incidence rate ratios [95% CI]) and costs (cost ratios [95% CI]). RESULTS: Of 243,286 patients with BD-1, 62,148 were covered by commercial insurance and 181,138 by Medicaid. Mean ages [±SD] were similar (commercial 39.8 [±14.8]; Medicaid 40.1 [±13.6]), with more female patients in both cohorts (commercial 59.8%; Medicaid 65.4%). All-cause hospitalization rates were 21.6% for commercial and 35.1% for Medicaid patients; emergency department visits were 39.7% and 64.3%, respectively. All-cause costs were $15,379 [±$27,929] for commercial and $21,474 [±$37,600] for Medicaid. Older age was a significant predictor of fewer hospitalizations compared with those aged younger than 30 years, particularly ages 40-49 for both commercial (0.60 [0.57-0.64]) and Medicaid (0.82 [0.80-0.85]). Increasing age was associated with significantly higher costs, especially age 65 and older (commercial 1.37 [1.31-1.44]); (Medicaid 1.43 [1.38-1.49]). Initial treatment with antipsychotics plus antianxiety medications was a significant predictor of higher hospitalizations (commercial 2.12 [1.98-2.27]; Medicaid 1.62 [1.57-1.68]) and higher costs (commercial 1.86 [1.80-1.92]); Medicaid 1.80 [1.76-1.84]). Household income was inversely associated with hospitalizations for Medicaid (<$30,000 [1.16 (1.12-1.19)]; $30,000-$39,999 [1.11 (1.07-1.15)]; $40,000-$49,999 [1.08 (1.05-1.12)]; $50,000-$74,999 [1.06 (1.02-1.09)]). Not speaking English well or at all was associated with 90% higher hospitalizations for commercial patients (1.93 [1.36-2.76]) but 40% fewer hospitalizations for Medicaid patients (0.59 [0.53-0.67]). Low English language proficiency was associated with significantly higher costs for commercial patients (2.22 [1.86-2.64]) but lower costs for Medicaid patients (0.57 [0.53-0.61]). CONCLUSIONS: Medicaid patients with BD-1 had high SDOH burden, hospitalizations, and costs. The association of lower English proficiency with fewer hospitalizations and lower costs in Medicaid patients suggests a potential disparity in access to care. These findings highlight the importance of addressing social risk factors to advance health equity in treatment of mental illness.

Economic and Humanistic Burden Among Medicare-Aged Women With Fragility Fracture in the United States.

OBJECTIVE: Describe patient characteristics, health care resource utilization, costs, and humanistic burden of women with Medicare insurance with incident fragility fracture who were admitted to post-acute-care (PAC). DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study using 100% Medicare Fee-for-Service (FFS) data. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Community-dwelling female Medicare beneficiaries with incident fragility fracture January 1, 2017, to October 17, 2019, resulting in PAC admission to a skilled nursing facility (SNF), home-health care, inpatient-rehabilitation facility, or long-term acute-care hospital. METHODS: Patient demographic/clinical characteristics were measured during 1-year baseline. Resource utilization and costs were measured during baseline, PAC event, and PAC follow-up. Humanistic burden was measured among SNF patients with linked Minimum Data Set assessments. Multivariable regression examined predictors of PAC costs after discharge and changes in functional status during SNF stay. RESULTS: A total of 388,732 patients were included. Compared with baseline, hospitalization rates were 3.5, 2.4, 2.6, and 3.1 times higher and total costs 2.7, 2.0, 2.5, and 3.6 times higher for SNF, home-health, inpatient-rehabilitation, and long-term acute-care, respectively, following PAC discharge. Utilization of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and osteoporosis medications remained low: 8.5% to 13.7% received DXA during baseline vs 5.2% to 15.6% following PAC; 10.2% to 12.0% received osteoporosis medication during baseline vs 11.4% to 22.3% following PAC. Dual eligibility for Medicaid (ie, low income) was associated with 12% higher costs; Black patients had 14% higher costs. Activities of daily living scores improved 3.5 points during SNF stay, but Black patients had 1.22-point lower improvement than White patients. Pain intensity scores showed small improvement (-0.8 points). CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Women admitted to PAC with incident fracture had high humanistic burden with little improvement in pain and functional status and significantly higher economic burden after discharge compared with baseline. Disparities in outcomes related to social risk factors were observed, with consistently low utilization of DXA and osteoporosis medications even after fracture. Results indicate a need for improved early diagnosis and aggressive disease management to prevent and treat fragility fractures.

Comparative Effectiveness of Carbidopa/Levodopa Enteral Suspension and Deep Brain Stimulation on Pill Burden Reduction in Medicare Fee-for-Service Patients with Advanced Parkinson's Disease.

INTRODUCTION: Complex polypharmacy regimens to manage persistent motor fluctuations result in significant pill burden for patients with advanced Parkinson's disease (APD). This study evaluated the effectiveness of carbidopa/levodopa enteral suspension (CLES) and deep brain stimulation (DBS) on reducing pill burden in APD patients. METHODS: We utilized 100% Medicare fee-for-service claims from 2014 to 2018 linked to CLES Patient Support Program (PSP) data. CLES initiators (CLES-I) were propensity matched 1:1 with patients enrolled in PSP who did not initiate treatment (CLES-NI) (N = 188) or undergo DBS, and 1:3 with patients who received DBS (N = 204, N = 612). Average daily pill burden and levodopa equivalent daily dosage (LEDD) were measured at baseline, 0-6 months and 7-12 months follow-up. RESULTS: CLES-I and CLES-NI had higher pill burden than DBS patients at baseline. However, at 6 months post-treatment, CLES-I had significantly fewer pills/day than CLES-NI (4.7 versus 11.4, p < 0.05) and DBS (4.8 versus 7.4, p < 0.05). A significant reduction in pill burden was observed at 0-6 months (46.3%) and 7-12 months (68.3%) follow-up for CLES-I (p < 0.001) versus increased burden for CLES-NI (+10.5%, p < 0.05 and +8.2%, p > 0.05) and insignificant reductions for DBS (-3.9% and -6.1%, p > 0.05). Mean adjusted pill burden showed 57.3% fewer pills at 0-6 months and 74.1% at 7-12 months among CLES-I compared with CLES-NI, and 49.6% and 70.1% reduction compared with DBS. CLES-I showed a decrease in LEDD at 7-12 months compared with baseline (935 to 237 mg) and to CLES-NI (237 mg versus 1112 mg) and DBS patients (236 mg versus 594 mg). CONCLUSION: CLES led to a significant reduction in pill burden and oral LEDD compared with CLES-NI and DBS patients. Pill burden reduction could be considered a treatment goal for patients with APD challenged by complex polypharmacy regimens that interfere with activities of daily living and quality of life.

Management of uncontrollable motor movements in patients with advanced Parkinson's disease rely on oral levodopa-based treatments. Non-motor symptoms such as depression and anxiety are managed with additional oral medications. Over time, higher and more frequent dosing of oral medications is required, resulting in complex medication regimens that impact quality of life and adherence.A real-world study of 10,752 Parkinson's disease patients between 2014 and 2018 evaluated the effectiveness of two device-aided therapies to reduce pill burden, carbidopa/levodopa enteral suspension and deep brain stimulation. Carbidopa/levodopa suspension treatment involves continuous delivery of levodopa to the intestines through a surgical port attached to a portable pump. Brain stimulation involves surgery to attach metal wires to the brain to send electrical pulses via an implanted stimulator.As Parkinson's disease predominately affects the elderly, we compared Medicare patients on carbidopa/levodopa suspension to a matched control group receiving no suspension and to those receiving brain stimulation. Average pill burden/day was measured prior to receiving a device-aided treatment (baseline) and at 0­6 months and 7­12 months post-treatment (follow-up).The top graph shows that by 6-months post-treatment, patients on carbidopa/levodopa suspension required fewer pills than those without suspension (4.7 versus 11.4), with further pill reduction at 12 months (3.5 versus 11.1). The bottom graph shows that by 6 months, patients on carbidopa/levodopa suspension required fewer pills than patients treated with brain stimulation (4.8 versus 7.4), with further reduction at 12 months (3.6 versus 7.0). The reduction in oral pill burden suggests that the carbidopa/levodopa suspension may present an opportunity to simplify treatment regimens.

The Increased Clinical and Economic Burden of Hyperkalemia in Medicare Patients Admitted to Long-Term Care Settings.

INTRODUCTION: Older patients are at increased risk for hyperkalemia (HK). This study describes the prevalence, recurrence, and clinical and economic burden of HK in Medicare patients admitted to a long-term care (LTC) setting. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study using 100% Medicare Fee-for-Service (FFS) claims identified patients aged ≥ 65 years with index admission between 2017 and 2019 to a LTC setting (skilled nursing, home health, inpatient rehabilitation, or long-term acute care). Beneficiaries were required to have 12 months continuous medical and pharmacy coverage prior to index LTC admission and ≥ 30 days after LTC discharge (follow-up). Patient characteristics, healthcare resource utilization, and costs were assessed. HK was defined as ICD-10 diagnosis code E87.5 in any claim position or Medicare Part D fill for oral potassium binder. RESULTS: Of 4,562,231 patients with a LTC stay, the prevalence of HK was 14.7% over the full study period (pre-index, index stay, and follow-up). Excluding those with HK only during the follow-up period resulted in 4,081,103 patients. Of these, 290,567 (7.1%) had HK and 3,790,536 (92.9%) did not have HK during or within 14 days prior to index LTC stay. The HK recurrence rate during index stay and follow-up was 48.3%. Unmatched HK versus non-HK patients were more often male (43.0% vs. 35.4%), Black (13.5% vs. 8.0%), dual eligible for Medicaid (34.2% vs. 25.0%), with higher mean Charlson Comorbidity Index scores (6.2 vs. 3.9) (all p < 0.0001). After propensity matching, HK patients were 2.2 times more likely to be hospitalized, with higher mortality (30.8% vs. 21.5%) and higher total healthcare costs during both index stay (US$26,520 vs. $18,021; p < 0.0011) and follow-up ($57,948 vs. $41,744 (p < 0.0011) versus matched non-HK patients. CONCLUSION: Prevalence and recurrence of HK was high among LTC patients, and HK was associated with significantly greater clinical and economic burden during and post-LTC.

Hyperkalemia is a serious medical condition commonly occurring in nursing home residents. It is characterized by abnormally high blood levels of potassium that if untreated can be life-threatening. High levels of potassium can be the result of kidney disease and inability to remove potassium from the bloodstream; eating foods high in potassium; and/or taking medications that interfere with the kidney's ability to remove potassium from the bloodstream. Older patients who have chronic kidney disease, heart failure, diabetes, and high blood pressure are at particularly high risk for hyperkalemia. Management is difficult as it requires reducing intake of foods high in potassium, adjusting medications that cause hyperkalemia, and potentially treating with oral potassium binders to reduce potassium blood levels. This study focused on the clinical outcomes, healthcare services use, and costs incurred by Medicare beneficiaries 65 years and older admitted to long-term care, where the occurrence of hyperkalemia is often high yet unrecognized. Patients with a diagnosis of hyperkalemia immediately before and during admission to long-term care or after discharge had an increased rate of death compared with patients without a hyperkalemia diagnosis. Hyperkalemia patients also had more hospitalizations and visits to the Emergency Department and outpatient facilities, resulting in higher total medical costs. Total costs for hyperkalemia patients were highest for those with chronic kidney disease, heart failure, and diabetes.

Clinical burden of recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection in the medicare population: A real-world claims analysis.

Objective: To describe 12-month outcomes for beneficiaries in the 100% Medicare Fee-for-Service (FFS) population with primary and recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI). Design: A retrospective, descriptive, cohort study of CDI claims from the 100% Medicare FFS population, with a first CDI diagnosis between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2016. Setting: Any US-based provider that submitted inpatient or outpatient CDI diagnosis claims to Medicare FFS. Patients: The study included patients aged ≥65 years with continuous enrollment in Medicare Parts A, B, and D during 12 months before and 12 months after the index period. Methods: The number of CDI and recurrent (rCDI) episodes, healthcare resource utilization, treatments, complications, and procedures were calculated for pre-index and follow-up periods. The data were stratified by number of rCDI episodes (ie, no rCDI, 1 rCDI, 2 rCDI, and ≥3 rCDI). Results: Of 268,762 patients with an index CDI, 34.7% had at least 1 recurrence. Of those who had 1 recurrence, 59.1% had a second recurrence and of those who had 2 recurrences, 58.4% had ≥3 recurrences. Incident psychiatric conditions occurred in 11.3%-18.2% of each rCDI cohort; 6.0% of patients with rCDI underwent subtotal colectomy, and 1.1% of patients underwent diverting loop ileostomy. After each CDI episode, ∼1 in 5 patients had a documented sepsis event. Over the 12-month follow-up, 30% of patients experienced sepsis, and sepsis occurred in 27.0% of the cohort with no rCDI, compared to 35.5% of patients in the rCDI cohorts. Conclusions: Elderly patients with CDI and rCDI experienced a significant clinical burden and complications.

Mortality, healthcare resource utilization, and cost among Medicare beneficiaries with Clostridioides difficile infection with and without sepsis.

Objective: To describe mortality, healthcare resource utilization (HRU), and costs among Medicare beneficiaries with primary Clostridioides difficile infection (pCDI) or recurrent CDI (rCDI), with and without sepsis. Methods: We conducted a retrospective observational study of 100% Medicare Fee-for-Service claims from adults aged ⩾ 65 years with ⩾1 CDI episode between 1 January 2009 and 31 December 2017. Patients were continuously enrolled in Medicare Parts A/B/D 12 months before and up to 12 months after pCDI. ICD-9/10 codes defined CDI using ⩾1 inpatient claim, or ⩾1 outpatient claim plus ⩾1 claim for CDI treatment. The pCDI episode ended after 14 days without a CDI claim. rCDI episodes started within 8 weeks from the end of a previous CDI episode. ICD-9/10 codes identified all-cause sepsis over 12 month follow-up. Results: Of 497,489 CDI patients, 41.0% (N = 203,888) had sepsis; 57.7% with sepsis died versus 32.4% without sepsis. Among patients with pCDI only (N = 345,893) or ⩾1 rCDI (N = 151,596), 39.2% and 45.1% suffered sepsis, respectively. All-cause hospitalizations were frequent for all cohorts (range: 81-99%). Among patients who died, those with sepsis versus without had more-frequent intensive care unit (ICU) use (pCDI: 29% versus 15%; rCDI: 65% versus 34%), longer hospital stays (pCDI: 12 versus 10 days; rCDI: 12 versus 9 days), and higher per-patient-per-month costs (pCDI: $34,841 versus $22,753; rCDI: $42,269 versus $25,047). In both cohorts, sepsis patients who survived had higher total costs and all-cause HRU than those without sepsis. All p < 0.001 above. Conclusions: Sepsis was common among Medicare beneficiaries with CDI. CDI patients with sepsis, especially after an rCDI, experienced higher mortality, HRU, and costs compared with those without sepsis.

Mortality, Health Care Use, and Costs of Clostridioides difficile Infections in Older Adults.

OBJECTIVES: Estimate mortality, cost, and health care resource utilization for Medicare beneficiaries aged ≥65 years who suffered a primary Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) episode only or any recurrent CDI, and understand how outcomes covary with death. DESIGN: Retrospective observational claims analysis. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Patients aged ≥65 years who had an inpatient or outpatient CDI diagnosis claim to Medicare and continuous enrollment in Medicare parts A, B, and D during the 12-month pre- and post-index periods. METHODS: Using 100% Medicare Fee-for-Service claims data for 2009-2017, primary (pCDI, n = 345,893) and recurrent (rCDI: n = 151,596) CDI episodes were identified. Demographic and clinical characteristics, mortality, health care resource utilization, and costs (per patient per month) were summarized for 12 months before and up to 12 months after episode start. Regression models were estimated for hospitalization risk, hospital length of stay (LOS), and cost to adjust for comorbidities. RESULTS: CDI-associated deaths were almost 10 times higher after recurrent CDI (25.4%) than primary CDI (2.7%). Compared with survivors, decedents were older, had higher Charlson Comorbidity Index scores, and were more likely Black. Adjusting for comorbidities, during follow-up, decedents had higher hospitalization rates [pCDI: odds ratio (OR) = 1.83, P < .001; rCDI: OR = 2.58, P < .001], and recurrent CDI decedents had more intensive care unit use (OR = 2.34, P < .001) compared with survivors. Decedents also had a longer length of stay (pCDI: +3.2 days, P < .001; rCDI: +2.6 days, P < .001), and higher total cost (pCDI: +303%, P < .001; rCDI: +297%, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: CDI is an important contributing diagnosis to all-cause mortality, particularly for recurrences. Prior to death, older Medicare beneficiaries who experienced CDI received longer, more intensive, and more costly care compared with survivors. Clinicians should be particularly attentive to prevention, identification, and appropriate treatment of CDI in older adults. Better treatments to reduce primary C difficile infection and recurrences in this vulnerable population can lower both mortality and economic burden.

Out-of-pocket payments for part d covered medications by medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.

BACKGROUND: Out-of-pocket (OOP) drug costs for Medicare Fee-for-Service (FFS) beneficiaries with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) are not well characterized. This study evaluated Part D OOP spending by Medicare beneficiaries with chronic HFrEF, stratified by those with and without a worsening HF event (WHFE). METHODS: Medicare FFS 100% Part D claims were used to identify HFrEF patients with 12 months of continuous Part D enrollment in 2018. HFrEF was defined as 1 inpatient or 2 outpatient claims of systolic HF or 1 systolic HF plus 1 HF outpatient claim. WHFE was defined as having a HF hospitalization or intravenous diuretic use within 12 months of HFrEF index date. OOP costs by Medicare Part D coverage phase for all covered drugs were calculated for HFrEF patients, and those with and without WHFE. RESULTS: Of 305,373 Medicare patients with HFrEF, 26% had a WHFE. Total mean (SD) OOP drug costs among all HFrEF patients was $1,166 (1,205)/year. Patients with WHFE and patients without WHFE had respectively a mean (SD) annual OOP costs of $1,302 (1,273) and $1,117 (1,176). Over 39% of HFrEF patients entered the "donut hole" (44% and 37% of patients with WHFE and without WHFE, respectively), while 11% of HFrEF patients entered the catastrophic phase (13% and 10% of patients with and without WHFE, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: More than 1 in 10 patients with heart failure entered the catastrophic phase within Medicare-Fee-For-Service, whereas in 2018 only 10% of costs were attributable to heart failure medication and 90% to comorbidities.

Medication Trajectory and Treatment Patterns in Medicare Patients With Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction.

BACKGROUND: Although a worsening heart failure event (WHFE) is associated with poor outcomes in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), it is unclear how guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) is used in this population compared to those without WHFEs. This study evaluated treatment patterns in patients with HFrEF, both with and without WHFEs. METHODS: A retrospective study using 100% Medicare Fee-For-Service claims identified beneficiaries with HFrEF, stratified by those with and without WHFEs (defined as hospitalization due to HF or outpatient intravenous diuretic use). The use of GDMT for HFrEF before and after WHFEs and adherence were assessed in patients who were prescribed and initiated GDMT. Logistic regression identified patients' characteristics associated with medication nonadherence. RESULTS: Of 353,642 patients with HFrEF, 31.4% had a WHFE. Although there was no overall change in the treatment trajectory of patients without WHFEs, GDMT use in patients with WHFEs intensified within the first 3 months of a WHFE, but the intensification was not sustained in subsequent months. From 0-3 months pre-WHFE to 0-3 months post-WHFE, the proportion of patients receiving dual (41%-48%) and triple-therapy (4%-12%) increased, followed by a decline to pre-WHFE rates. The 1-year adherence rates for those with and without WHFEs were 67.9% vs 73.3% for beta-blockers; 59.1% vs 70.9% for angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors, beta-blockers, and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists; 53.9% vs 61.3% for angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors; and 49.2% vs 59.3% for mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists. WHFE, age < 65 years, Black race, asthma, chronic kidney disease, and depression were associated with nonadherence to medications. Asians and Hispanics were less adherent to some medication classes. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated underuse of GDMT for patients with HFrEF with or without WHFEs. Although there was a treatment escalation within 3 months following WHFE, it was not sustained thereafter.

Quality outcomes, healthcare resource utilization and costs in Medicare patients with chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction with and without a worsening event.

AIMS: The study compared quality outcomes, resource utilization, and costs in Medicare beneficiaries with chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) with and without a worsening heart failure event (WHFE). METHODS: This retrospective observational study evaluated claims data for two cohorts of Medicare beneficiaries with chronic HFrEF who were enrolled in Medicare fee-for-service (FFS) or Medicare advantage (MA) plans. The index date was the first claim of HFrEF between October 2015 and September 2017. Patients with WHFE were identified if they had IV diuretic use or hospitalization for HF during 12 months after index date; with remaining patients classified as non-WHFE. During follow-up, starting from the 13th month after HFrEF index date to end of follow-up, generalized linear models were used to adjust for patient characteristics to compare mean per patient per year (PPPY) quality outcomes, resource utilization, and costs between HFrEF patients with and without WHFE. RESULTS: Of the 1,182,509 FFS and 28,645 MA patients with HFrEF, 34.2% and 32.5% developed WHFE, respectively. Compared to patients without WHFE, patients with WHFE had higher rates of all-cause 30-day readmissions (FFS: 42% vs. 31%; MA: 41% vs. 31%), hospitalizations (FFS: 2.27 vs. 1.36; MA: 1.47 vs. 0.78 PPPY) and ED visits (FFS: 1.82 vs. 1.25; MA: 1.43 vs. 0.96 PPPY); all comparisons p < .05. Mortality rates in FFS patients were higher among patients with WHFE (34.3%) compared to those without (23.4%). All-cause total PPPY costs were higher for patients with WHFE compared to those without by $20,825 in FFS and $15,974 in MA. Similar trends were observed for HF-related outcomes. CONCLUSION: Medicare patients with chronic HFrEF experiencing a WHFE had worse quality outcomes as well as higher resource utilization and costs compared to those without WHFE, thus, suggesting the need for better treatments and interventions to manage these patients.

Adjusting Quality Measures For Social Risk Factors Can Promote Equity In Health Care.

Risk adjustment of quality measures using clinical risk factors is widely accepted; risk adjustment using social risk factors remains controversial. We argue here that social risk adjustment is appropriate and necessary in defined circumstances and that social risk adjustment should be the default option when there are valid empirical arguments for and against adjustment for a given measure. Social risk adjustment is an important way to avoid exacerbating inequity in the health care system.

Health care resource utilization and costs of recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection in the elderly: a real-world claims analysis.

BACKGROUND: Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) affected an estimated 365,000 persons in the United States in 2017. Despite a nationally decreasing trend of CDI cases, the population incidence of recurrent CDI (rCDI) has not improved. Elderly individuals (aged ≥ 65 years) are at higher risk of CDI, rCDI, and complicated CDI compared with younger individuals. OBJECTIVE: To analyze Medicare fee-for-service data for 12 months after an initial CDI episode, in order to obtain real-world data on health care resource utilization (HRU) and costs for elderly patients with CDI and rCDI. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of patients who were aged ≥ 65 years and had a first (index) CDI diagnosis from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2016, and continuous enrollment in Medicare Parts A, B, and D during the 12-month pre-index and 12-month post-index periods was conducted. A CDI episode was identified by either an inpatient stay with CDI diagnosis code or an outpatient medical claim with a CDI diagnosis code plus a CDI treatment. Each CDI episode was followed by a 14-day CDI claim-free period after the last CDI claim or end of CDI treatment. rCDI was a second or subsequent episode of CDI that occurred within an 8-week window after the 14-day CDI claim-free period. The number of CDI and rCDI episodes, HRU, time to recurrence, and total all-cause direct medical costs were calculated over the 12-month pre-index (baseline) and 12-month follow-up periods and stratified by number of rCDI episodes (No rCDI, 1 rCDI, 2 rCDI, 3+ rCDI). RESULTS: A total of 268,762 patients with an index CDI were included. Mean age was 78.3 years, and 69.0% were female. HRU was higher during the 6 months immediately pre-index versus 7-12 months pre-index, including a higher proportion of patients with a hospital admission (55.1% vs. 27.5%) or emergency department visit (41.3% vs. 27.4%), respectively. Moreover, 34.7% of the study population experienced rCDI. Of those who experienced 1 recurrence, 59.1% had a second recurrence, and of those who had 2 recurrences, 58.4% had a third. During the 12-month follow-up, postacute care was used by at least 70% of each rCDI cohort. The proportion of patients with ≥ 4 hospital admissions during follow-up was highest for the 3+ rCDI cohort (24.9% of patients). During the 12-month follow-up, mean total all-cause direct costs were $76,024, $99,348, $96,148, and $96,517 for the No rCDI, 1 rCDI, 2 rCDI, and 3+ rCDI cohorts, respectively, largely driven by inpatient costs. Adjusted all-cause total costs were significantly higher for all 3 rCDI cohorts compared with the No rCDI cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Elderly individuals experienced high rates of recurrence after their first CDI episode, and especially after a prior recurrence. The intensity of HRU during follow-up was higher for patients who suffered recurrences. Patients with rCDI had the burden of higher costs of care, including the patient out-of-pocket responsibility, versus patients with a single CDI episode. DISCLOSURES: Funding for this study was provided by Ferring Pharmaceuticals. Nelson is an employee of Ferring Pharmaceuticals, and Scott, Boules, and Unni were employees of Ferring Pharmaceuticals at the time of this study. Teigland and Parente are employees of Avalere Health and provided consulting services to Ferring Pharmaceuticals. Feuerstadt has served as a consultant to and on the speakers bureau for Merck and Co. and has served as a consultant for Ferring Pharmaceuticals and Roche Pharmaceuticals. Portions of the data contained in this study appeared as an abstract/ePoster for the AMCP Annual Meeting 2020, April 2020.

Antipsychotic Medication Adherence and Healthcare Services Utilization in Two Cohorts of Patients with Serious Mental Illness.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate differences in patient characteristics and real-world outcomes in two distinct high-risk cohorts of patients with serious mental illness (SMI). METHODS: Retrospective cross-sectional analysis using a national multi-payer claims database. Two SMI cohorts identified by a technical expert panel-patients recently discharged (RD) from an SMI-related hospitalization and early episode (EE) patients-were evaluated for antipsychotic medication adherence, healthcare utilization, and spending patterns. RESULTS: The analysis included 51,705 patients with bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder, and schizophrenia. More than half were over age 46 and >60% were female. Adherence to psychiatric medications was low (52.5% RD and 16.1% EE). More than half of RD and 100% of EE patients switched medications at least once annually, but 19% of RD patients switched ≥2 times compared to 14% of EE. The RD cohort (generally older and sicker) had higher psychiatric related utilization and higher annual costs (US$21,171 versus US$15,398). In both cohorts, women were more likely to have an emergency department (ED) and primary care provider (PCP) visit, but less likely to be hospitalized. Patients age <46 were less likely to have a PCP visit and more likely to have an ED visit, but younger patients age 18-24 were less likely to be hospitalized. CONCLUSION: Efforts to manage SMI are confounded by heterogeneity and low adherence to treatment. By better understanding which patients are at higher risk for specific adverse outcomes, clinicians can target interventions more appropriately to reduce the significant burden of SMI.

Comparative safety of atypical antipsychotics and the risk of pneumonia in the elderly.

PURPOSE: Previous studies have documented increased risk of pneumonia with antipsychotic use in the elderly; however, differential risk across individual atypical antipsychotics remains unaddressed. This study examines the effect of individual atypical antipsychotics on risk of pneumonia in elderly patients. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study was conducted using a large claims database. The study population included new users of atypical antipsychotics (≥65 years). The multiple propensity-score adjusted survival model was used to examine risk of pneumonia within a 1-year follow-up period. RESULTS: A total of 92 234 patients newly prescribed atypical antipsychotic medication were identified. Of these, 41 780 (45.30%) were quetiapine users, 31 048 (33.66%) risperidone users, 11 375 (12.33%) olanzapine users, 6790 (7.36%) aripiprazole users, and 1241 (1.35%) ziprasidone users. Within the 1-year follow-up period, 12 411 (13.46%) patients taking atypical antipsychotics had a diagnosis of pneumonia. The multiple propensity-score-adjusted survival model revealed increased risk of pneumonia with the use of risperidone (hazard ratios (HR) 1.14, 95%CI 1.10-1.18) and olanzapine (HR 1.10, 95%CI 1.04-1.16) compared with the use of quetiapine. CONCLUSION: This large population-based study suggests that use of risperidone and olanzapine increases risk of pneumonia compared with use of quetiapine in elderly patients. This study provides new information on the comparative risk of pneumonia associated with different atypical antipsychotics in the elderly to support optimal treatment decisions.