Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Language
Publication year range
1.
Skin Appendage Disord ; 5(4): 211-215, 2019 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31367598

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Fibrosing alopecia in a pattern distribution (FAPD) has only been described in Caucasian patients, and it is not clear whether it can develop in dark-skin ethnicities. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixteen Brazilian female patients, 12 of African descent and 4 Hispanic, with progressive scarring alopecia in a pattern distribution were analyzed. RESULTS: Dermatoscopic features showed perifollicular erythema and scaling (14/16), hair fiber diameter diversity (16/16), loss of follicular ostia (16/16), and follicular keratosis (3/16). Late stages showed a honeycomb pigmented network (12/16), a hyperpigmented perifollicular halo (12/16), and small white patches (12/16). Histopathological features showed lichenoid perifollicular infiltrate (14/16), follicular miniaturization (16/16), concentric fibrosis (16/16), perifollicular lymphocytic infiltrate (16/16), and vellus hair involvement (10/16). Premature desquamation of the inner root sheath was found in 11 patients. CONCLUSIONS: The concomitant findings of cicatricial pattern hair loss (with or without the recess of the front hair line), hair fiber diversity, perifollicular erythema and scaling, a whitish perifollicular halo, and histological findings of androgenetic alopecia, with vacuolar interface alteration of the upper portion of the follicular epithelium, are the main key features to suggest the diagnosis of FAPD. FAPD is a possible diagnosis in patients of color with cicatricial pattern hair loss. Clinical, dermatoscopic, and histopathological examination allow a proper final differential diagnosis.

2.
Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo ; 56(4): 307-11, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25076431

ABSTRACT

The aim of this cross-sectional study was to determine the hepatitis B vaccination coverage among medical students at a public university in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, and their compliance with the postvaccination serologic testing recommendations. Of the total of 858 students, 675 (78.7%) participated in the study. Among the participants, 48.9% (95% CI: 45.1% to 52.7%) were vaccinated against hepatitis B (received ≥ 3 doses of the vaccine), 31.6% were not (received 0, 1 or 2 doses), and 19.6% did not know their vaccination status. Hepatitis B vaccination coverage increased from 26.0% among first-year students to 70.6% among sixth-year students while the prevalence of unknown vaccination status decreased from 39.7% among first-year students to 2.4% among sixth-year students. The frequency of unvaccinated students ranged from 23.7% among fifth-year students to 34.4% among first-year students. Only 34.8% of the vaccinated students performed the anti-HBs testing after vaccination. Among these medical students, we found a low adherence to the hepatitis B vaccination and to the postvaccination serologic testing. A comprehensive hepatitis B immunization program should be offered to students at this medical school.


Subject(s)
Hepatitis B Antibodies/immunology , Hepatitis B Vaccines/administration & dosage , Hepatitis B/prevention & control , Students, Medical/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Brazil , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Hepatitis B/immunology , Hepatitis B Vaccines/immunology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Vaccination/statistics & numerical data , Young Adult
3.
Rev. Inst. Med. Trop. Säo Paulo ; 56(4): 307-311, Jul-Aug/2014. tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-716419

ABSTRACT

The aim of this cross-sectional study was to determine the hepatitis B vaccination coverage among medical students at a public university in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, and their compliance with the postvaccination serologic testing recommendations. Of the total of 858 students, 675 (78.7%) participated in the study. Among the participants, 48.9% (95% CI: 45.1% to 52.7%) were vaccinated against hepatitis B (received ≥ 3 doses of the vaccine), 31.6% were not (received 0, 1 or 2 doses), and 19.6% did not know their vaccination status. Hepatitis B vaccination coverage increased from 26.0% among first-year students to 70.6% among sixth-year students while the prevalence of unknown vaccination status decreased from 39.7% among first-year students to 2.4% among sixth-year students. The frequency of unvaccinated students ranged from 23.7% among fifth-year students to 34.4% among first-year students. Only 34.8% of the vaccinated students performed the anti-HBs testing after vaccination. Among these medical students, we found a low adherence to the hepatitis B vaccination and to the postvaccination serologic testing. A comprehensive hepatitis B immunization program should be offered to students at this medical school.


O objetivo deste estudo transversal foi determinar a cobertura vacinal para a hepatite B entre estudantes de medicina de uma universidade pública no Rio de Janeiro, Brasil e a sua adesão às recomendações sobre o teste sorológico pós-vacinal. De um total de 858 estudantes, 675 (78,7%) participaram do estudo. Entre os participantes, 48,9% (IC de 95%: 45,1% a 52,7%) eram vacinados contra a hepatite B (receberam ≥ 3 doses da vacina), 31,6% não eram (receberam zero, uma ou duas doses) e 19,6% não sabiam o seu status vacinal. A cobertura vacinal para a hepatite B aumentou de 26,0% entre os estudantes do primeiro ano para 70,6% entre os estudantes do sexto ano, enquanto a prevalência de status vacinal ignorado diminuiu de 39,7% entre os estudantes do primeiro ano para 2,4% entre os estudantes do sexto ano. A frequência de estudantes não vacinados variou de 23,7% entre os estudantes do quinto ano a 34,4% entre os estudantes do primeiro ano. Apenas 34,8% dos estudantes vacinados realizaram o teste anti-HBs após a vacinação. Entre esses estudantes de medicina encontramos uma baixa adesão à vacinação contra a hepatite B e ao teste sorológico pós-vacinal. Um amplo programa de imunização contra a hepatite B deveria ser oferecido aos estudantes, nessa escola médica.


Subject(s)
Adolescent , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Young Adult , Hepatitis B Antibodies/immunology , Hepatitis B Vaccines/administration & dosage , Hepatitis B/prevention & control , Students, Medical/statistics & numerical data , Brazil , Cross-Sectional Studies , Hepatitis B Vaccines/immunology , Hepatitis B/immunology , Vaccination/statistics & numerical data
4.
Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo ; 54(2): 77-82, 2012.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22499420

ABSTRACT

The aim of this cross-sectional study was to determine, among medical students at a public university in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, the acceptance of the pandemic influenza A/H1N1 vaccine during the 2010 mass immunization campaign and the vaccine safety in this group and, among unvaccinated students, the reasons for refusing vaccination. Of a total of 858 students, 678 (79%) participated in the study. Vaccination coverage was 60.4% among students aged 20 to 39 years (an age group targeted for vaccination) and 43.8% among those who did not belong to this age group. The most frequent adverse reactions to the vaccine were pain at the injection site (8.7%) and fever (7.9%). There were no serious adverse reactions. Among students aged 20 to 39 years, the most common reasons for refusing the vaccine were "lack of time" (42.4%), "fear of adverse reactions" (41.9%), and "difficult access to the vaccine" (11.5%). Other reasons for vaccine refusal were "uncertainties about vaccine safety and efficacy" and "vaccination was not needed". To increase the acceptance of the influenza vaccine, a comprehensive immunization program should be offered to these students.


Subject(s)
Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype/immunology , Influenza Vaccines/adverse effects , Influenza, Human/prevention & control , Students, Medical/statistics & numerical data , Vaccination/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Brazil/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Influenza Vaccines/administration & dosage , Influenza, Human/epidemiology , Male , Pandemics , Treatment Refusal
5.
Rev. Inst. Med. Trop. Säo Paulo ; 54(2): 77-82, Mar.-Apr. 2012. tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-625260

ABSTRACT

The aim of this cross-sectional study was to determine, among medical students at a public university in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, the acceptance of the pandemic influenza A/H1N1 vaccine during the 2010 mass immunization campaign and the vaccine safety in this group and, among unvaccinated students, the reasons for refusing vaccination. Of a total of 858 students, 678 (79%) participated in the study. Vaccination coverage was 60.4% among students aged 20 to 39 years (an age group targeted for vaccination) and 43.8% among those who did not belong to this age group. The most frequent adverse reactions to the vaccine were pain at the injection site (8.7%) and fever (7.9%). There were no serious adverse reactions. Among students aged 20 to 39 years, the most common reasons for refusing the vaccine were "lack of time" (42.4%), "fear of adverse reactions" (41.9%), and "difficult access to the vaccine" (11.5%). Other reasons for vaccine refusal were "uncertainties about vaccine safety and efficacy" and "vaccination was not needed". To increase the acceptance of the influenza vaccine, a comprehensive immunization program should be offered to these students.


O objetivo deste estudo transversal foi determinar, entre estudantes de medicina de uma universidade pública no Rio de Janeiro - Brasil, a aceitação da vacina contra a influenza A/H1N1 pandêmica durante a campanha de imunização em massa de 2010, a segurança da vacina neste grupo e, entre os estudantes não vacinados, os motivos para recusarem a vacinação. De um total de 858 estudantes, 678 (79%) participaram do estudo. Entre os estudantes de 20 a 39 anos de idade (um grupo etário alvo para vacinação) a cobertura vacinal foi de 60,4% e entre aqueles que não pertenciam a esta faixa etária a cobertura vacinal foi de 43,8%. As reações adversas à vacina mais freqüentes foram dor no local da injeção (8,7%) e febre (7,9%). Não ocorreram reações adversas graves. Entre os estudantes de 20 a 39 anos, os motivos mais freqüentes para recusarem a vacina foram "falta de tempo" (42,4%), "receio de reações adversas" (41,9%) e "difícil acesso a vacina" (11,5%). Outros motivos para a não vacinação foram "incertezas sobre eficácia e segurança da vacina" e "vacinação não era necessária". A fim de aumentar a aceitação da vacina contra a influenza, um programa de imunização abrangente deveria ser oferecido aos estudantes.


Subject(s)
Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype/immunology , Influenza Vaccines/adverse effects , Influenza, Human/prevention & control , Students, Medical/statistics & numerical data , Vaccination/statistics & numerical data , Brazil/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Influenza Vaccines/administration & dosage , Influenza, Human/epidemiology , Pandemics , Treatment Refusal
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...