Effects of trimethoprim-sulfadiazine and detomidine on the function of equine Kv 11.1 channels in a two-electrode voltage-clamp (TEVC) oocyte model.

The long QT syndrome (LQTS) is a channelopathy that can lead to severe arrhythmia and sudden cardiac death. Pharmacologically induced LQTS is caused by interaction between drugs and potassium channels, especially the Kv 11.1 channel. Due to such interactions, numerous drugs have been withdrawn from the market or are administered with precautions in human medicine. However, some compounds, such as trimethoprim-sulfonamide combinations are still widely used in veterinarian medicine. Therefore, we investigate the effect of trimethoprim-sulfadiazine (TMS), trimethoprim, sulfadiazine, and detomidine on equine-specific Kv 11.1 channels. Kv 11.1 channels cloned from equine hearts were heterologously expressed in Xenopus laevis oocytes, and whole cell currents were measured by two-electrode voltage-clamp before and after drug application. TMS blocked equine Kv 11.1 current with an IC50 of 3.74 mm (95% CI: 2.95-4.73 mm) and affected the kinetics of activation and inactivation. Similar was found for trimethoprim but not for sulfadiazine, suggesting the effect is due to trimethoprim. Detomidine did not affect equine Kv 11.1 current. Thus, equine Kv 11.1 channels are also susceptible to pharmacological block, indicating that some drugs may have the potential to affect repolarization in horse. However, in vivo studies are needed to assess the potential risk of these drugs to induce equine LQTS.

Sigma-1 receptor inhibition reverses acute inflammatory hyperalgesia in mice: role of peripheral sigma-1 receptors.

RATIONALE: Sigma-1 (σ1) receptor inhibition ameliorates neuropathic pain by inhibiting central sensitization. However, it is unknown whether σ1 receptor inhibition also decreases inflammatory hyperalgesia, or whether peripheral σ1 receptors are involved in this process. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the role of σ1 receptors in carrageenan-induced inflammatory hyperalgesia, particularly at the inflammation site. RESULTS: The subcutaneous (s.c.) administration of the selective σ1 antagonists BD-1063 and S1RA to wild-type mice dose-dependently and fully reversed inflammatory mechanical (paw pressure) and thermal (radiant heat) hyperalgesia. These antihyperalgesic effects were abolished by the s.c. administration of the σ1 agonist PRE-084 and also by the intraplantar (i.pl.) administration of this compound in the inflamed paw, suggesting that blockade of peripheral σ1 receptors in the inflamed site is involved in the antihyperalgesic effects induced by σ1 antagonists. In fact, the i.pl. administration of σ1 antagonists in the inflamed paw (but not in the contralateral paw) was sufficient to completely reverse inflammatory hyperalgesia. σ1 knockout (σ1-KO) mice did not develop mechanical hyperalgesia but developed thermal hypersensitivity; however, the s.c. administration of BD-1063 or S1RA had no effect on thermal hyperalgesia in σ1-KO mice, supporting on-target mechanisms for the effects of both drugs. The antiedematous effects of σ1 inhibition do not account for the decreased hyperalgesia, since carrageenan-induced edema was unaffected by σ1 knockout or systemic σ1 pharmacological antagonism. CONCLUSIONS: σ1 receptors play a major role in inflammatory hyperalgesia. Targeting σ1 receptors in the inflamed tissue may be useful for the treatment of inflammatory pain.