Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Eye (Lond) ; 36(6): 1314-1318, 2022 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34172942

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Oculoplastics is a predominantly visual specialty and many of the pathologies can be diagnosed based on external appearance. An image-based eyelid lesion management service was piloted to reduce the number of patients who would require outpatient clinic review. The aim of this study was to determine its accuracy and feasibility, both as a hospital-based and community optometrist-based service. If successful, the service was envisaged to significantly reduce the number of patients that require face-to-face (F2F) review, in accordance with current post-COVID-19 principles of social distancing. METHODS: Patients with lid lesions attending an oculoplastics clinic were assessed by consultant oculoplastic surgeons in an F2F consultation (Arm A). The lesions were photographed by a professional clinical photographer (Arm B) and by an optometrist with a handheld digital camera (Arm C). These images were reviewed by independent consultants masked to the outcome of the F2F clinical encounter. Data were collected prospectively including patient demographics, diagnosis, suspicion of malignancy and management. The image-based clinic results were compared to the F2F clinic results. RESULTS: Ninety-five patients were included. Clinical diagnoses were compared for intra-observer variability and substantial agreement was demonstrated between gold-standard F2F clinic visit (Arm A) and Arm B (Ƙ = 0.708) and C (Ƙ = 0.776). There was no statistically significant difference in the rate of discharge and all cases of malignancy were either identified or flagged for F2F review in the image-based arms. CONCLUSION: This pilot demonstrated substantial diagnostic agreement of image-based diagnoses with F2F consultation and image review alone did not miss any cases of malignancy.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Ambulatory Care Facilities , Eyelids , Humans , Referral and Consultation
2.
Scott Med J ; 58(2): e1-6, 2013 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23728762

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Endogenous endophthalmitis is a sight-threatening condition caused by microorganisms crossing the blood-ocular barrier and inducing profound intraocular inflammation. CASE REPORT: A 65-year-old female experienced bilateral loss of vision after developing infective endocarditis as a complication of combined Bentall procedure and coronary artery bypass grafting. She was diagnosed with bilateral endogenous endophthalmitis secondary to Serratia marcescens. Despite aggressive treatment with intravitreal injections of antibiotics and steroids, intensive topical and systemic antibiotic therapy, there was permanent loss of sight in both eyes. CONCLUSION: The case highlights the importance of early recognition of the symptoms and signs of endogenous endophthalmitis in any patient with systemic infection by all clinicians and the necessity of prompt ophthalmological referral if a useful level of vision is to be preserved.


Subject(s)
Endocarditis/complications , Endophthalmitis/etiology , Postoperative Complications , Serratia Infections/complications , Serratia marcescens , Aged , Aorta/surgery , Aortic Valve/surgery , Coronary Artery Bypass , Echocardiography, Transesophageal , Endophthalmitis/diagnosis , Endophthalmitis/therapy , Female , Humans
3.
Br J Ophthalmol ; 90(2): 139-41, 2006 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16424520

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The majority of eye drops used in the United Kingdom contain preservatives and are bottled in plastic containers. Preservative free drops are used to avoid ocular irritation and allergies in certain individuals. The aim of this study was to investigate the incidence of microbial contamination of preservative free drops dispensed from multiusage containers. METHODS: Eye drop bottles were collected from patients attending the Tennent Institute of Ophthalmology outpatient and inpatient departments. The bottles were collected on day 3 (for inpatients) and day 7 (for outpatients) of use. The drops were inoculated onto different culture plates (chocolate agar, blood agar, fungal culture media, and enriched media) and the resulting microbial growth was identified using standard microbial identification techniques. RESULTS: 95 eye drop bottles were collected, containing a variety of 10 different eye drops. Significant bacterial growth was found in eight bottles. In total, seven different types of organism were identified from the eye drops. The organisms identified were Staphylococcus aureus, coagulase negative staphylococcus, Bacillus spp, Serattia spp, Klebsiella oxytoca, Enterobacter cloacae, and alpha streptococcus. Staph aureus was the commonest microbial organism. CONCLUSION: Preservative free eye drops in multiple application containers are at risk of contamination by potentially pathogenic micro-organisms.


Subject(s)
Bacteria/isolation & purification , Drug Contamination , Drug Packaging/methods , Ophthalmic Solutions , Anti-Bacterial Agents , Humans , Preservatives, Pharmaceutical , Staphylococcus aureus/isolation & purification
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...