ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE), being a displeasing intervention, usually entails sedation. We aimed to compare the effects of hypnosis and midazolam for sedation in TEE. DESIGN AND SETTINGS: A prospective single-blinded study conducted on patients scheduled for TEE between April 2011 and July 2011 at a university in Istanbul, Turkey. METHODS: A total of 41 patients underwent sedation using midazolam and 45 patients underwent hypnosis. Patients were given the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) test for anxiety and continuous performance test (CPT) for alertness before and after the procedure. The difficulty of probing and the overall procedure rated by the cardiologist and satisfaction scores of the patients were also documented. RESULTS: Anxiety was found to be less and attention more in the hypnosis group, as revealed by STAI and CPT test scores (P < .05 and P < .001, respectively). CONCLUSION: Hypnosis proved to be associated with positive therapeutic outcomes for TEE with regard to alleviation of anxiety and maintenance of vigilance, thus providing more satisfaction compared to sedation with midazolam.
Subject(s)
Conscious Sedation/methods , Echocardiography, Transesophageal/psychology , Hypnosis , Hypnotics and Sedatives/therapeutic use , Midazolam/therapeutic use , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Anxiety , Attention , Conscious Sedation/psychology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Satisfaction , Prospective Studies , Single-Blind Method , Treatment Outcome , Turkey , Young AdultABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: EuroSCORE is the most widely used risk prediction system. Standard EuroSCORE, which had been published in 1999, was revised as a Logistic EuroSCORE in 2003. Further, it was reconsidered and published as EuroSCORE II in 2011. In this study we compared Standard, Logistic EuroSCORE and EuroSCORE II in prediction of early mortality following coronary artery bypass grafting. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 406 patients who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting operation between 2011-1012. Standard, Logistic and new version were compared with ROC analysis. RESULTS: In general population, mean standard EuroSCORE was 3.25±1.05, mean logistic EuroSCORE was found 2.48±0.58, mean EuroSCORE II was found 1.30 ± 0.09 and overall mortality was 10 (10/406 2.46%). Area under curve (AUC) was found 0.992 95% CI: 0.978-0.998 for standard EuroSCORE, 0.992 95% CI: 0.977-0.998 for logistic EuroSCORE and 0.990 95% CI: 0.975-0.997 for EuroSCORE II. In high risk patients (patients with standard EuroSCORE ≥ 6) AUC was found 0.870 95% CI 0.707-0.961 for standard EuroSCORE, 0.857 95% CI 0.691-0.954 for logistic EuroSCORE, and 0.961 95% CI: 0.829-0.998 for EuroSCORE II. CONCLUSION: Standard, Logistic EuroSCORE and EuroSCORE II are similarly successful in mortality prediction. EuroSCORE II may be better in high-risk patients which needs confirmation in large prospective studies.
Subject(s)
Coronary Artery Bypass/mortality , Decision Support Techniques , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , ROC Curve , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Survival Analysis , TurkeyABSTRACT
JUSTIFICATIVA E OBJETIVOS: O nosso objetivo foi investigar o efeito da "sedação multifásica" em crianças submetidas à Tomografia Computadorizada (TC) ou Ressonância Magnética (RM), em seus pais e nos anestesiologistas responsáveis. "Sedação multifásica" foi definida como "o nível de sedação pretendido obtido com um ou mais agentes através da mesma via ou vias diferentes com mais de uma administração". MATERIAL E MÉTODOS: Cem crianças e seus respectivos pais foram randomicamente designados para um dos dois grupos de estudo. Na fase 1, os pacientes do Grupo I receberam midazolam (0,5 mg.kg-1) em 5 mL de suco de frutas e os pacientes do Grupo II (grupo controle) receberam apenas suco de frutas. Na fase 2, após a canulação intravenosa (iv), bolus de propofol foi administrado para alcançar a sedação adequada para realização do exame de imagem. Os escores de ansiedade das crianças e de seus pais foram registrados usando a escala de Oucher e o IDATE, respectivamente, e a satisfação dos pais foi avaliada pela escala analógica visual (EAV). O número de tentativas para canulação iv, tempo de preparação e quantidade de hipnóticos foram registrados. RESULTADOS: O estado de ansiedade das crianças foi semelhante entre os grupos antes da pré-medicação, porém mais tarde esse nível foi menor no Grupo I. Antes do procedimento, o escore dos pais no IDATE foi semelhante, mas depois foi menor no Grupo I. A satisfação dos pais no Grupo I foi maior que no Grupo II. O número de tentativas de canulação iv e a dose necessária de propofol foi menor no Grupo I. CONCLUSÃO: O procedimento de "sedação multifásica" diminui a dor e a ansiedade das crianças e a ansiedade dos pais, aumentando a sua satisfação. Ele fornece uma sedação confortável e segura, pois possui um processo de preparação curto e sem problemas também para o anestesiologista responsável.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: We aimed to investigate the effect on children undergoing Computed Tomography (CT) or Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), their parents and attending anesthesiologist of "multiphase sedation" which we define as "the intended sedation level achieved with one or more agents through the same or different routes with more than one administration". MATERIAL AND METHODS: One hundred children and their parents were randomly allocated to one of two study groups. In phase 1; in Group I the patients were given midazolam (0.5 mg.kg-1) in 5 mL fruit juice, and the ones in control group (Group II) were given only fruit juice. After intravenous (iv) cannulation; in phase II, boluses of propofol were given to achieve the adequate sedation for imaging. Anxiety scores of children and their parents were recorded using Oucher scale and STAI, respectively, and parental satisfaction was evaluated by visual analogue scale (VAS). The number of attempts for iv cannulation, length of time for preparation, and amount of hypnotics were recorded. RESULTS: Anxiety state of children was similar between groups before premedication, but later it was lower in Group I. Before procedure, STAI score of parents was similar and later it was lower in Group I. Parental satisfaction in Group I was higher. The number of attempts for iv cannulation and required propofol dose was less in Group I. CONCLUSION: "Multiphase sedation" procedure provides children to feel less pain and anxiety, and decreases parental anxiety while increasing their satisfaction. It supplies a comfortable and safe sedation, as it provides a short and problem-free preparation process for the attending anesthetist as well.
JUSTIFICATIVA Y OBJETIVOS: Nuestro objetivo fue investigar el efecto de la "sedación multifásica" en niños sometidos a la tomografía computadorizada (TC) o resonancia magnética (RM), en sus padres y en los anestesiólogos responsables. La "sedación multifásica" fue definida como "el nivel de sedación pretendido que se obtiene con uno o más agentes por medio de la misma vía o vías diferentes con más de una administración". MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Cien niños y sus respectivos padres fueron randómicamente designados para uno de los dos grupos de estudio. En la fase 1, los pacientes del Grupo I recibieron midazolam (0,5 mg.kg-1) en 5 mL de jugo de frutas, y los pacientes del Grupo II (grupo control) recibieron solamente jugo de frutas. En la fase 2 después de la canulación intravenosa (i.v.), un bolo de propofol se administró para alcanzar la sedación adecuada para la realización del examen de imagen. Las puntuaciones de ansiedad de los niños y de sus padres se registraron usando la escala de Oucher y el IDATE respectivamente, y la satisfacción de los padres fue evaluada por la escala visual analógica (EVA). También se registraron el número de intentos para canulación i.v., tiempo de preparación y cantidad de hipnóticos. RESULTADOS: El estado de ansiedad de los niños fue parecido entre los grupos antes de la premedicación sin embargo, más tarde ese nivel disminuyó en el Grupo I. Antes del procedimiento, la puntuación de los padres en el IDATE fue similar pero después cayó en el Grupo I. La satisfacción de los padres en el Grupo I fue mayor que en el Grupo II. El número de intentos de canulación i.v. y la dosis necesaria de propofol fue menor en el Grupo I. CONCLUSIONES: El procedimiento de "sedación multifásica" reduce el dolor y la ansiedad de los niños y de los padres, aumentando su satisfacción. El procedimiento suministra una sedación cómoda y segura porque posee un proceso de preparación corto y sin problemas también para el anestesiólogo responsable.
Subject(s)
Adult , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Male , Deep Sedation/methods , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Anesthesiology , Anxiety , Attitude , Double-Blind Method , Hypnotics and Sedatives/administration & dosage , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/psychology , Midazolam/administration & dosage , Parents/psychology , Propofol/administration & dosage , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/psychologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: We aimed to investigate the effect on children undergoing Computed Tomography (CT) or Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), their parents and attending anesthesiologist of "multiphase sedation" which we define as "the intended sedation level achieved with one or more agents through the same or different routes with more than one administration". MATERIAL AND METHODS: One hundred children and their parents were randomly allocated to one of two study groups. In phase 1; in Group I the patients were given midazolam (0.5mg.kg(-1)) in 5 mL fruit juice, and the ones in control group (Group II) were given only fruit juice. After intravenous (iv) cannulation; in phase II, boluses of propofol were given to achieve the adequate sedation for imaging. Anxiety scores of children and their parents were recorded using Oucher scale and STAI, respectively, and parental satisfaction was evaluated by visual analogue scale (VAS). The number of attempts for iv cannulation, length of time for preparation, and amount of hypnotics were recorded. RESULTS: Anxiety state of children was similar between groups before premedication, but later it was lower in Group I. Before procedure, STAI score of parents was similar and later it was lower in Group I. Parental satisfaction in Group I was higher. The number of attempts for iv cannulation and required propofol dose was less in Group I. CONCLUSION: "Multiphase sedation" procedure provides children to feel less pain and anxiety, and decreases parental anxiety while increasing their satisfaction. It supplies a comfortable and safe sedation, as it provides a short and problem-free preparation process for the attending anesthetist as well.
