ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: In Brazil, sepsis has a high mortality; and early recognition is essential in outcome. The aim of the study was to evaluate physicians' knowledge about systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS), sepsis, severe sepsis, and septic shock concepts. METHODS: This was a prospective, observational study performed in 21 hospitals in Brazil, which enrolled physicians working in the participant institutions. A previously validated questionnaire was applied to physicians including 5 clinical cases. RESULTS: Twenty-one Brazilian institutions enrolled 917 physicians. The percentage of physicians correctly recognizing SIRS, infection, sepsis, severe sepsis, and septic shock was 78.2%, 92.6%, 27.3%, 56.7%, and 81.0%, respectively. Intensivists performed better in all diagnoses. There was a significantly higher rate of correct answers for SIRS (P < .001), sepsis (P = .001), and severe sepsis (P = .032) among physicians from university hospitals as compared with those from public hospitals. A mean global score of 3.36 ± 1.08 was found, with better performance for residents (P = .012) and intensivists (P < .001); but no difference was found for emergency physicians (P = .875). CONCLUSION: The prompt recognition of sepsis and its severity is not satisfactory. This difference is probably due to the difficulty in the recognition of organ dysfunction, which hampers early identification of septic patients.
Subject(s)
Clinical Competence/statistics & numerical data , Medical Staff, Hospital , Sepsis/diagnosis , Adult , Brazil , Critical Care , Female , Hospitals, Private , Hospitals, Public , Hospitals, University , Humans , Infections/diagnosis , Male , Prospective Studies , Shock, Septic/diagnosis , Surveys and Questionnaires , Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome/diagnosisABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to characterize the practices of Brazilian ICU physicians toward sedation and delirium. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among a convenience sample of critical care physicians between April and June 2008. RESULTS: One thousand fifteen critical care physicians responded. Sedation scoring systems were used by 893 (88.3%) of the respondents. The Ramsay and Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale were used by 81.9% and 6.8% of the respondents, respectively. Most respondents did not discuss sedation targets (62.8%) or practice daily sedative interruption (68.3%) in most patients. More than half of the respondents (52.7%) used a sedation protocol, and the most used sedatives were midazolam (97.8%), fentanyl (91.5%), and propofol (55%). A significant rate of the respondents (42.7%) estimated that more than 25% of patients under mechanical ventilation have delirium, but 53.5% occasionally assessed patients for delirium. Thirteen percent used specific delirium scales, with the Confusion Assessment Method for intensive care unit (ICU) being the most applied. Delirium was often treated with haloperidol (88.1%); however, atypical antipsychotics (36.3%) and benzodiazepines (42.3%) were also used. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the recent advances in knowledge of sedation and delirium, most of them are still not translated into clinical practice. Significant variation in practice is observed among ICU physicians and represents a potential target for future research and educational interventions.
Subject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel , Delirium/diagnosis , Delirium/prevention & control , Hypnotics and Sedatives , Intensive Care Units/organization & administration , Brazil , Clinical Protocols , Critical Illness , Cross-Sectional Studies , Delirium/etiology , Humans , Hypnotics and Sedatives/administration & dosage , Hypnotics and Sedatives/adverse effects , Physicians , Practice Patterns, Physicians' , Respiration, Artificial/methodsABSTRACT
JUSTIFICATIVA E OBJETIVOS: Atualmente, há uma tendência crescente de se buscar o "morrer com dignidade", mais do que prolongar inutilmente o sofrimento de pacientes terminais em unidades de terapia intensiva (UTI). O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar a utilização de condutas que sugerem limitação terapêutica (LT) em pacientes que foram a óbito em UTI Adulto. MÉTODO: Trata-se de um estudo exploratório, retrospectivo, que avaliou prontuários médicos de pacientes que foram a óbito na UTI geral de um hospital privado de Salvador-BA, entre janeiro e agosto de 2003, com internação superior a 24 horas na unidade. Os pacientes foram classificados, em relação ao óbito, em "não resposta a medidas de reanimação", "morte encefálica", "decisão de não reanimar" (DNR), "não adoção ou retirada de medidas de suporte de vida", sendo estas duas últimas consideradas medidas sugestivas de limitação terapêutica. RESULTADOS: Foram incluídos dados referentes a 67 pacientes, correspondendo a 90,4 por cento dos pacientes falecidos na unidade durante o período. Destes, 56,7 por cento eram mulheres e a idade média dos pacientes foi de 66,58 ± 17,86 anos. Medidas sugestivas de LT foram encontradas em 59,7 por cento dos pacientes, sendo a mais importante "não adoção de medidas de suporte" (35,8 por cento), seguida de DNR (17,9 por cento) e "retirada de medidas de suporte" (6 por cento). A utilização de fármacos vasoativos e métodos dialíticos foram as medidas de suporte mais omitidas, enquanto antibioticoterapia foi a mais retirada. A utilização de medidas de LT foi mais freqüente nos pacientes clínicos. CONCLUSÕES: Os dados do presente estudo sugerem altas freqüências de condutas médicas sugestivas de LT em UTI geral no Nordeste do Brasil. Métodos terapêuticos que possam causar desconforto ou sofrimento aos pacientes terminais, como nutrição, sedação e analgesia, raramente foram omitidos ou retirados.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: There is a growing tendency of looking for "dying with dignity", rather than to prolong death and suffering of terminal patients on intensive care units (ICU). This study aims to evaluate medical practices that suggest therapeutic limitation (TL) in patients who died in an adult ICU. METHODS: A retrospective exploratory study was carried out to evaluate medical records of patients who died in a general adult ICU of a private hospital in Salvador-BA, between January and August of 2003, after at least 24 hours from the admission. The patients were classified, in relation to their deaths, in: "not responding to cardiopulmonary resuscitation", "brain death", "decision not to resuscitate" (DNR) and "withhold or withdrawal life-support measures". RESULTS: Sixty seven patients were included, corresponding to 90.4 percent of the deaths occurred in this ICU during the referred period. The most of them (56.7 percent) were women and the patientsÆ mean age was 66.58 ± 17.86 years. Suggestive measures of TL were found in 59.7 percent of the patients, being "withhold of life-support measures" the most important (35.8 percent), followed by DNR (17.9 percent) and "withdrawal of life-support measures" (6 percent). The procedures most commonly omitted were use of vasoactive drugs and dialysis, while antibiotics were the most discontinued. The use of TL measures was more frequent in clinical patients. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the present study suggest high frequencies of medical conducts suggestive of TL in a general ICU in Northeast of Brazil. Therapeutic methods that could cause discomfort or suffering to the patients, as nutrition, sedation and analgesia, were rarely omitted or discontinued.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Medical Futility/ethics , Withholding TreatmentABSTRACT
JUSTIFICATIVA E OBJETIVOS: O ambiente hospitalar, especialmente o de uma Unidade de Terapia Intensiva (UTI), devido à complexidade do atendimento prestado, bem como a estrutura física, o barulho, os equipamentos e a movimentação das pessoas, é tido como gerador de estresse para os pacientes. O objetivo deste estudo foi identificar e estratificar os estressores para pacientes internados em UTI, na perspectiva do próprio paciente, familiares e profissionais de saúde. MÉTODO: Estudo de corte transversal realizado entre junho e novembro de 2004, na UTI geral de hospital privado. A amostra foi composta por três grupos: pacientes (G1), familiares (G2) e um membro da equipe da UTI responsável pelo atendimento do paciente incluído (G3). Para identificação e estratificação dos fatores estressantes, utilizou-se a Escala de Estressores em UTI (Intensive Care Unit Environmental Stressor Scale - ICUESS). Para cada paciente e participante, foi calculado um escore total de estresse (ETE) pela soma de todas as respostas da escala. RESULTADOS: Foram incluídos 30 pacientes e participantes em cada grupo. A média de idade foi de: 57,30 ± 17,61 anos para o G1; 41,43 ± 12,19 anos para o G2; e 40,82 ± 20,20 anos para o G3. A média do ETS foi: 62,63 ± 14,01 para os pacientes; 91,10 ± 30,91 para os familiares; e 99,30 ± 21,60 para os profissionais. A média do ETS dos pacientes foi estatisticamente inferior à encontrada nos familiares e nos profissionais de saúde (p < 0,01). Os principais estressores para os pacientes foram: ver a família e amigos por apenas alguns minutos do dia; tubos no nariz e/ou boca; e não ter controle de si mesmo. CONCLUSÕES: A percepção sobre os principais estressores foi diferente entre os três grupos. A identificação destes fatores é importante para a implementação de medidas que possam facilitar a humanização do ambiente da UTI.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The hospital environment, especially in Intensive Care Units (ICU), due to the complexity of the assistance, as well as the physical structure, the noise, the equipments and people's movement, is considered as stress generator for the patients. The aim of this study was to identify and stratify the stressful factors for patients at an ICU, in the perspective of the own patient, relatives and health care professionals. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was carried out between June and November 2004 in a general ICU of a private hospital. The sample was composed of three groups: patients (G1), relatives (G2) and a member of the ICU health care team responsible for the included patient (G3). In order to identify and stratify the stressful factors, we used the Intensive Care Unit Environmental Stressor Scale (ICUESS). For each individual, a total stress score (TSS) was calculated from the sum of all the answers of the scale. RESULTS: Thirty individuals were included in each group. The mean age of the three groups was: 57.30 ± 17.61 years for G1; 41.43 ± 12.19 for G2; and 40.82 ± 20.20 for G3. The mean TSS was 62.63 ± 14.01 for the patients; 91.10 ± 30.91 for the relatives; and 99.30 ± 21.60 for the health care professionals. The patients' mean TSS was statistically lower than mean TSS of relatives and professionals (p < 0.01). The most stressful factors for the patients were: seeing family and friends only a few minutes a day; having tubes in their nose and/or mouth; and having no control on oneself. CONCLUSIONS: The perception of the main stressful factors was different among the three groups. The identification of these factors is important to the implementation of changes that can make the humanization of the ICU environment easier.
Subject(s)
Inpatients , Intensive Care Units , Stress, PhysiologicalABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The hospital environment, especially in Intensive Care Units (ICU), due to the complexity of the assistance, as well as the physical structure, the noise, the equipments and people's movement, is considered as stress generator for the patients. The aim of this study was to identify and stratify the stressful factors for patients at an ICU, in the perspective of the own patient, relatives and health care professionals. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was carried out between June and November 2004 in a general ICU of a private hospital. The sample was composed of three groups: patients (G1), relatives (G2) and a member of the ICU health care team responsible for the included patient (G3). In order to identify and stratify the stressful factors, we used the Intensive Care Unit Environmental Stressor Scale (ICUESS). For each individual, a total stress score (TSS) was calculated from the sum of all the answers of the scale. RESULTS: Thirty individuals were included in each group. The mean age of the three groups was: 57.30 ± 17.61 years for G1; 41.43 ± 12.19 for G2; and 40.82 ± 20.20 for G3. The mean TSS was 62.63 ± 14.01 for the patients; 91.10 ± 30.91 for the relatives; and 99.30 ± 21.60 for the health care professionals. The patients' mean TSS was statistically lower than mean TSS of relatives and professionals (p < 0.01). The most stressful factors for the patients were: seeing family and friends only a few minutes a day; having tubes in their nose and/or mouth; and having no control on oneself. CONCLUSIONS: The perception of the main stressful factors was different among the three groups. The identification of these factors is important to the implementation of changes that can make the humanization of the ICU environment easier.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: There is a growing tendency of looking for "dying with dignity", rather than to prolong death and suffering of terminal patients on intensive care units (ICU). This study aims to evaluate medical practices that suggest therapeutic limitation (TL) in patients who died in an adult ICU. METHODS: A retrospective exploratory study was carried out to evaluate medical records of patients who died in a general adult ICU of a private hospital in Salvador-BA, between January and August of 2003, after at least 24 hours from the admission. The patients were classified, in relation to their deaths, in: "not responding to cardiopulmonary resuscitation", "brain death", "decision not to resuscitate" (DNR) and "withhold or withdrawal life-support measures". RESULTS: Sixty seven patients were included, corresponding to 90.4% of the deaths occurred in this ICU during the referred period. The most of them (56.7%) were women and the patients mean age was 66.58 ± 17.86 years. Suggestive measures of TL were found in 59.7% of the patients, being "withhold of life-support measures" the most important (35.8%), followed by DNR (17.9%) and "withdrawal of life-support measures" (6%). The procedures most commonly omitted were use of vasoactive drugs and dialysis, while antibiotics were the most discontinued. The use of TL measures was more frequent in clinical patients. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the present study suggest high frequencies of medical conducts suggestive of TL in a general ICU in Northeast of Brazil. Therapeutic methods that could cause discomfort or suffering to the patients, as nutrition, sedation and analgesia, were rarely omitted or discontinued.
