Development and Initial Validation of a New Practice Context Assessment Tool for Ambulatory Practices Engaged in Quality Improvement.

Variable success with quality improvement (QI) efforts in ambulatory care is often attributed to differences in local contexts. Identifying and addressing patient-, practice-, or community-level contextual factors might improve implementation of QI projects. The authors developed and validated a framework for a Practice Context Assessment (PCA), and then created the PCA instrument to glean insights from staff on contextual factors and distributed it at 10 ambulatory practice sites. The PCA framework showed acceptable expert-assessed content validity, with content validity index scores ranging from 0.74 (community engagement) to 0.97 (leadership). The PCA instrument comprised several scales grouped into 7 domains with Cronbach α scores from 0.83 (leadership) to 0.95 (patient and family engagement). The PCA framework provides a valid construct to help ambulatory practices understand contextual issues that might influence QI projects. A revised version of the PCA instrument is now ready for further testing.

A preliminary investigation of risks for adverse outcomes of relationship seeking on social network sites (SNS): a descriptive study of women over 50 seeking relationships on MySpace in Hillsborough County, Florida.

In contrast to younger populations, little attention has been paid to the increase in seniors using Internet-based venues to find relationships and the potential risk for adverse outcomes this poses. This study examined data collected via an online survey from 45 ethnically diverse women aged 50+ "seeking relationships" on MySpace. The majority of women reported a relationship with someone they met online (85%). They also reported experiencing adverse events including financial exploitation (40%), threats (55%), and physical harm (38%) by someone they met online at levels greater than traditional relationship seeking in the general population. Directions for future research are explored.

Characteristics of START assessments completed in mental health jail diversion programs.

Many different instruments have been developed to assist in the assessment of risk for violence and other criminal behavior. However, there is limited evidence regarding how these instruments work in the 'real world'. Even less is known about how these instruments might work for assessing risk in jail diversion populations, whether in research or practice. To address these knowledge gaps, the present study examined the characteristics of risk assessments completed by program staff (n=10) on 96 mental health jail diversion clients (72 men and 24 women) using the Short-Term Assessment of Risk and Treatability (START). The findings provide preliminary support for the reliability and validity of START assessments completed in jail diversion programs, the first evidence of the transportability of START outside psychiatric settings, and further evidence regarding the reliability and validity of START assessments completed in the field. They additionally support the consideration of an eighth, general offending risk domain in START assessments.