Postal survey of cuffed or uncuffed tracheal tubes used for paediatric tracheal intubation.

A postal survey of the use of cuffed or uncuffed tracheal tubes for tracheal intubation in children and infants was performed to investigate the criteria used for deciding the choice of tube and the manner of inflating the cuff in the case of use of a cuffed tracheal tube (CTT). From 200 questionnaires despatched, replies were received from 130 paediatric anaesthesiologists (response rate 65%). In paediatric practice, the CTT was routinely used by 25% of respondents for more than 80% of their patients, while more than 37% of respondents use them in less than 20% of the cases. The three main criteria used for inflating a cuff were: (i) the presence of a leak, (ii) the type of surgery associated with the presence of a leak and (iii) the patient's age associated with the type of surgery and the presence of a leak. These criteria were specified, respectively, by 32%, 24% and 18% of the respondents. The cuff was inflated in response to a leak in 18% of the cases and as a response to a pressure manometer in 15% of the cases. Few paediatric anaesthesiologists use a cuffed tracheal tube routinely for tracheal intubation in children, and fewer actually use a pressure monitoring device, while it is suggested that the cuff pressure should be monitored in case of CTT.

[Is the direct admission to the recovery service or to the intensive care unit of patients cared for by the Smur system justified?]. / L'admission directe en service de réanimation ou de soins intensifs des patients pris en charge par le Smur est-elle justifiée?

STUDY DESIGN: The French system of Samu-Smur allows the admission of patients directly in intensive care unit (ICU). The aim of this study is to examine the utility of the Samu-Smur with regard to such direct admission (DA). PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective study was performed by the Samu of Paris. Patient details were gathered from three reports: namely hospitalization, transport and regulation reports. These were analysed to decide whether the admission diagnostic was exact, whether the patient's condition was serious, whether the prehospital treatment justified direct admission into an ICU and whether the management was coherent. RESULTS: In 1997, 409 (31%) cases were studied among the 1,350 admitted patients in ICU. Three groups of patients were classified according to admission to surgical (n = 54), medical (n = 180), cardiological ICU (n = 175). The prehospital diagnosis was confirmed by the hospitalization report in 91% of patients in the all three groups. The patient's condition was found to the serious in all cases. Justification of the treatment was respectively found in 96, 88 and 84% of patients. The coherence of management was confirmed in 94, 96 and 89%. DISCUSSION: This study has shown that Samu-Smur management lead to justified DA in ICU for all patients in the study. Prospective studies are needed to show the advantages of this strategy in term of speed of management and outcome.

[Cervicofacial cellulitis of dental origin and tracheal intubation]. / Cellulites cervico-faciales d'origine dentaire et intubation trachéale.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the difficulty of intubation in relation with the localisation and spread of cervico-facial cellulitis of odontogenic origin and to recognize the optimal technique of intubation in such circumstances. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective clinical open study. PATIENTS: Hundred patients, including 16 children, undergoing surgical drainage of a cervico-facial cellulitis of odontogenic origin under general anesthesia were studied. METHODS: Difficulty of intubation was evaluated with the following four criteria: active mouth opening in the awake patient, Mallampati's classifying system, presence of trismus, clinical and radiological control of localisation and extension of the cellulitis (mandibular, maxillar or mouth floor). In case of a foreseen difficult intubation, a fibrescope was used in the awake patient. Otherwise the endotracheal tube was inserted after administration of propofol (3 mg.k-1) and alfentanil (10 to 20 micrograms.kg-1). A Cormack's grading was performed during intubation. RESULTS: Mouth opening depended on the localisation of the cellulitis. Trismus occurred more often with mandibular than maxillary localisations. Trismus and a Mallampati's class > 2 were associated with difficulty in intubation (Cormack's grade > 2), except in maxillary localisations. CONCLUSIONS: The localisation of cellulitis of odontogenic origin is responsible for the difficulty grade of intubation. Awake fibreoptic intubation should be systematically performed in patients with a floor of the mouth cellulitis to reduce the risk of rupture of the abscess by a laryngoscope blade. As trismus associated with mandibular localisations is not relieved by general anaesthesia, awake fibreoptic endotracheal intubation should be preferred.