Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
BMC Cardiovasc Disord ; 17(1): 212, 2017 08 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28764639

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Thrombolysis is still used when primary angioplasty is delayed for a long time, but 25%-30% of patients require rescue angioplasty (RA). There are no established recommendations for antithrombotic management in RA. This registry analyzes regimens for antithrombotic management. METHODS: A retrospective, multicenter, observational registry of consecutive patients treated with RA at 8 hospitals. All variables were collected and follow-up took place at 6 months. RESULTS: The study included 417 patients. Antithrombotic therapy in RA was: no additional drugs 22.3%, unfractionated heparin (UFH) 36.6%, abciximab 15.5%, abciximab plus UFH 10.5%, bivalirudin 5.7%, enoxaparin 4.3%, and others 4.7%. Outcomes at 6 months were: mortality 9.1%, infarction 3.3%, definite or probable stent thrombosis 4.3%, revascularization 1.9%, and stroke 0.5%. Mortality was related to cardiogenic shock, age > 75 years, and anterior location. The stent thrombosis rate was highest with bivalirudin (12.5% at 6 months). The incidence of bleeding at admission was high (14.8%), but most cases were not severe (82% BARC ≤2). Variables independently associated with bleeding were: femoral access (OR 3.30; 95% CI 1.3-8.3: p = 0.004) and post-RA abciximab infusion (OR 2.26; 95% CI 1.02-5: p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Antithrombotic treatment regimens in RA vary greatly, predominant strategies consisting of no additional drugs or UFH 70 U/kg. No regimen proved predictive of mortality, but bivalirudin was related to more stent thrombosis. There was a high incidence of bleeding, associated with post-RA abciximab infusion and femoral access.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal/administration & dosage , Enoxaparin/administration & dosage , Fibrinolytic Agents/administration & dosage , Hirudins/administration & dosage , Immunoglobulin Fab Fragments/administration & dosage , Myocardial Infarction/therapy , Peptide Fragments/administration & dosage , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , Thrombolytic Therapy , Abciximab , Aged , Antibodies, Monoclonal/adverse effects , Chi-Square Distribution , Coronary Thrombosis/etiology , Drug Administration Schedule , Enoxaparin/adverse effects , Female , Fibrinolytic Agents/adverse effects , Hemorrhage/chemically induced , Hirudins/adverse effects , Humans , Immunoglobulin Fab Fragments/adverse effects , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Myocardial Infarction/diagnosis , Myocardial Infarction/mortality , Odds Ratio , Peptide Fragments/adverse effects , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/adverse effects , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/mortality , Recombinant Proteins/administration & dosage , Recombinant Proteins/adverse effects , Registries , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Spain , Thrombolytic Therapy/adverse effects , Thrombolytic Therapy/mortality , Time Factors , Treatment Failure
2.
EuroIntervention ; 12(6): 708-15, 2016 Aug 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27542782

ABSTRACT

AIMS: Adenosine administration is needed for the achievement of maximal hyperaemia fractional flow reserve (FFR) assessment. The objective was to test the accuracy of Pd/Pa ratio registered during submaximal hyperaemia induced by non-ionic contrast medium (contrast FFR [cFFR]) in predicting FFR and comparing it to the performance of resting Pd/Pa in a collaborative registry of 926 patients enrolled in 10 hospitals from four European countries (Italy, Spain, France and Portugal). METHODS AND RESULTS: Resting Pd/Pa, cFFR and FFR were measured in 1,026 coronary stenoses functionally evaluated using commercially available pressure wires. cFFR was obtained after intracoronary injection of contrast medium, while FFR was measured after administration of adenosine. Resting Pd/Pa and cFFR were significantly higher than FFR (0.93±0.05 vs. 0.87±0.08 vs. 0.84±0.08, p<0.001). A strong correlation and a close agreement at Bland-Altman analysis between cFFR and FFR were observed (r=0.90, p<0.001 and 95% CI of disagreement: from -0.042 to 0.11). ROC curve analysis showed an excellent accuracy (89%) of the cFFR cut-off of ≤0.85 in predicting an FFR value ≤0.80 (AUC 0.95 [95% CI: 0.94-0.96]), significantly better than that observed using resting Pd/Pa (AUC: 0.90, 95% CI: 0.88-0.91; p<0.001). A cFFR/FFR hybrid approach showed a significantly lower number of lesions requiring adenosine than a resting Pd/Pa/FFR hybrid approach (22% vs. 44%, p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: cFFR is accurate in predicting the functional significance of coronary stenosis. This could allow limiting the use of adenosine to obtain FFR to a minority of stenoses with considerable savings of time and costs.


Subject(s)
Contrast Media , Coronary Stenosis/physiopathology , Fractional Flow Reserve, Myocardial , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...