Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Psychopathol Behav Assess ; 34(3): 351-360, 2012 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22942556

ABSTRACT

The purpose was to test the reliability of short samples of parent/child interaction for use in single-subject research. Four variable pairs of mother/child behaviour were coded for seven mother/child play sessions. Each session lasted 20 min and 18 min of the session was behaviourally coded using frame-by-frame analysis. The co-occurrence of the mother/child behaviours within a given time window was computed and an odds ratio was calculated for the co-occurrence of the targeted behaviours. The play session was divided into shorter segments (3, 6 and 9 min) and odds ratios of the variable pairs from the shorter segments were compared to the odds ratios from the entire session. Segments of 3 and 6 min did not yield the same pattern of results as the entire session. In single-subject research, evidence of the reliability of the time segment for behavioural coding should be reported in the methods section of original research manuscripts.

2.
Brain Cogn ; 73(3): 203-14, 2010 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20621743

ABSTRACT

When young adults carry out visual search, distractors that are semantically related, rather than unrelated, to targets can disrupt target selection (see Belke, Humphreys, Watson, Meyer, & Telling, 2008; Moores, Laiti, & Chelazzi, 2003). This effect is apparent on the first eye movements in search, suggesting that attention is sometimes captured by related distractors. Here we assessed effects of semantically related distractors on search in patients with frontal-lobe lesions and compared them to the effects in age-matched controls. Compared with the controls, the patients were less likely to make a first saccade to the target and they were more likely to saccade to distractors (whether related or unrelated to the target). This suggests a deficit in a first stage of selecting a potential target for attention. In addition, the patients made more errors by responding to semantically related distractors on target-absent trials. This indicates a problem at a second stage of target verification, after items have been attended. The data suggest that frontal lobe damage disrupts both the ability to use peripheral information to guide attention, and the ability to keep separate the target of search from the related items, on occasions when related items achieve selection.


Subject(s)
Attention/physiology , Discrimination, Psychological/physiology , Eye Movements/physiology , Field Dependence-Independence , Frontal Lobe/physiology , Adult , Aged , Brain Damage, Chronic/pathology , Brain Damage, Chronic/physiopathology , Case-Control Studies , Executive Function , Female , Frontal Lobe/pathology , Frontal Lobe/physiopathology , Humans , Male , Matched-Pair Analysis , Middle Aged , Pattern Recognition, Visual/physiology , Photic Stimulation , Reference Values , Semantics
3.
J Cogn Neurosci ; 22(10): 2212-25, 2010 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19803680

ABSTRACT

Visual evoked responses were monitored while participants searched for a target (e.g., bird) in a four-object display that could include a semantically related distractor (e.g., fish). The occurrence of both the target and the semantically related distractor modulated the N2pc response to the search display: The N2pc amplitude was more pronounced when the target and the distractor appeared in the same visual field, and it was less pronounced when the target and the distractor were in opposite fields, relative to when the distractor was absent. Earlier components (P1, N1) did not show any differences in activity across the different distractor conditions. The data suggest that semantic distractors influence early stages of selecting stimuli in multielement displays.


Subject(s)
Attention/physiology , Brain Mapping , Evoked Potentials, Visual/physiology , Semantics , Visual Perception/physiology , Adolescent , Adult , Electroencephalography/methods , Eye Movements/physiology , Female , Functional Laterality/physiology , Humans , Male , Photic Stimulation/methods , Reaction Time/physiology , Young Adult
4.
Percept Psychophys ; 70(8): 1444-58, 2008 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19064489

ABSTRACT

Moores, Laiti, and Chelazzi (2003) found semantic interference from associate competitors during visual object search, demonstrating the existence of top-down semantic influences on the deployment of attention to objects. We examined whether effects of semantically related competitors (same-category members or associates) interacted with the effects of perceptual or cognitive load. We failed to find any interaction between competitor effects and perceptual load. However, the competitor effects increased significantly when participants were asked to retain one or five digits in memory throughout the search task. Analyses of eye movements and viewing times showed that a cognitive load did not affect the initial allocation of attention but rather the time it took participants to accept or reject an object as the target. We discuss the implications of our findings for theories of conceptual short-term memory and visual attention.


Subject(s)
Cognition , Semantics , Visual Perception , Humans , Memory, Short-Term , Reaction Time , Saccades
5.
Psychon Bull Rev ; 14(4): 710-6, 2007 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17972738

ABSTRACT

In a visual search experiment, participants had to decide whether or not a target object was present in a four-object search array. One of these objects could be a semantically related competitor (e.g., shirt for the target trousers) or a conceptually unrelated object with the same name as the target-for example, bat (baseball) for the target bat (animal). In the control condition, the related competitor was replaced by an unrelated object. The participants' response latencies and eye movements demonstrated that the two types of related competitors had similar effects: Competitors attracted the participants' visual attention and thereby delayed positive and negative decisions. The results imply that semantic and name information associated with the objects becomes rapidly available and affects the allocation of visual attention.


Subject(s)
Cognition , Reaction Time , Semantics , Visual Perception , Humans , Time Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...