One-stage reconstruction of nasal defects: evaluation of the use of modified auricular composite grafts.

Complex nasal defects in the distal regions of the nose are cosmetically difficult to repair. In 70 patients over a period of 10 years, defects of the nasal ala and the soft triangle, nasal tip, columella, and columellar-lobular junction were reconstructed with modified auricular composite grafts. A randomized group of 40 of these patients was assessed after a mean of 55.5 months to evaluate the method's functional and cosmetic long-term results. The majority of the patients (60%, N = 48) had been treated primarily for basal cell carcinoma. Of all defects, 57% ( N = 46) measured 2 to 3 cm in width and 43% ( N = 34) 1 to 2 cm. Seventy-five percent ( N = 60) of all defects were composite lesions involving skin, cartilage, and vestibular mucosa, in contrast to 25% ( N = 20) involving skin and cartilage with intact vestibular skin. Two crucial technical modifications seemed to have improved survival for larger grafts: first, the use of hinge flaps from the margins of the defect to obtain a well-vascularized recipient bed and optimization of the raw contact surface; second, postoperative gentle scarification of the graft in combination with a constantly applied heparin solution decongests venous stasis normally seen in such grafts. This maneuver establishes a stable and early blood supply enhancing graft take. With this type of treatment, 67 (84%) grafts healed well without further complications, whereas 13 (16%) grafts developed complications, resulting in partial ( N = 9) and total ( N = 4) necrosis of the transplant. Six of these patients underwent a secondary reconstruction using another auricular composite graft. Long-term results of this method have turned out to be very satisfying in terms of functional and cosmetic outcome and patient acceptance.

Nasalance in patients with maxillary defects - Reconstruction versus obturation.

BACKGROUND: An important question remains on how to obtain good quality of speech for patients needing maxillectomy. Oral and nasal spaces must be separated either by surgical means or by using an obturator-prosthesis. An objective measure of oronasal closure is nasalance. Different rehabilitative strategies should be compared. METHODS: Between 1990 and 2000, 88 patients underwent maxillectomy of which 28 (32%) were available for examination. Ten patients had obturators (group l) and in 18 patients the maxilla was biologically reconstructed with different techniques (group 2). Sound pressure of nasal and oral airways were assessed seperately using a computerized sampling system (NasalView) and standardized German texts. Nasalance was calculated and compared with an uncompromised sample of patients. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between group 1 and group 2 concerning nasalance. Furthermore, the achieved values of nasalance were similar to healthy individuals. CONCLUSION: Nasalance after maxillectomy can be normal after sufficient rehabilitation.

Perioperative complications following sagittal split osteotomy of the mandible.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to review complications in a series of 1264 consecutive patients who were operated in a single centre during a 20-year-period. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Complications were documented, their incidences calculated and compared with data from the literature. RESULTS: In 35 patients (2.8%) infection developed requiring extraoral incision and drainage; in 27 patients (2.1%) the inferior alveolar nerve was inadvertently cut; 18 patients (1.4%) had to undergo re-operation due to bending or fracture of osteosynthesis material; 15 patients (1.2%) suffered from bleeding complications; in 12 patients (0.9%) an unfavourable split occurred. In 8 patients (0.6%) foreign bodies were left in situ; in 7 patients a partial weakness of the facial nerve occurred, which was permanent in 1 patient. Six patients (0.5%) with a significantly higher age than average (mean: 33.6 years in comparison with 23.1 years) developed non-union at the site of osteotomy, and the mandible had to be bone grafted. Two patients (0.2%) developed osteomyelitis, and in one patient airway problems led to a need for tracheostomy (0.1%). CONCLUSION: Although some of these complications of bilateral sagittal split with osteotomy carry severe limitations in health related quality of life, it remains an overall safe procedure, demanding, however, comprehensive informed consent. Good knowledge of technical reasons for these complications should help to reduce their incidence.

Intra- and perioperative complications of the LeFort I osteotomy: a prospective evaluation of 1000 patients.

The LeFort I osteotomy has become a routine procedure in elective orthognathic surgery. The authors report the occurrence of intra- or perioperative complications in a series of 1000 consecutive LeFort I osteotomies performed within a 20-year period. In total, 64 (6.4%) patients experienced complications. Anatomical complications affected 26 (2.6%), patients, including 16 (1.6%) with a deviation of the nasal septum and 10 (1.0%) with non-union of the osteotomy gap. Extensive bleeding that required blood transfusion occurred in 11 (1.1%) patients exclusively after bimaxillary corrections; in 1 patient a ligation of the external carotid artery became necessary. Significant infections such as abscesses or maxillary sinusitis occurred in 11 (1.1%) patients. No patient experienced an osteomyelitis. Ischemic complications affected 10 (1.0%) patients, including 2 (0.2%) who experienced an aseptic necrosis of the alveolar process and 8 (0.8%) who, under critical revision, were affected by retractions of the gingiva. Five (0.5%) patients experienced an insufficient fixation of the osteosynthesis material. The risk and the extent of complications was enhanced in patients with anatomical irregularities (eg, in patients with craniofacial dysplasias, orofacial clefts, or vascular anomalies). The risk of ischemic complications was enhanced in extensive dislocations or transversal segmentation of the maxilla. The authors conclude that patients with major anatomical irregularities should be informed about an enhanced risk of Le-Fort I osteotomies. Preoperative planning avoiding transversal segmentation or extensive dislocations of the maxilla should reduce the occurrence of complications. For healthy individuals, the risk of complications with the LeFort I osteotomy is considered low.

Alveolar bone grafting in patients with complete clefts: a comparative study between secondary and tertiary bone grafting.

OBJECTIVE: This investigation evaluated the results of alveolar bone grafting in patients with complete clefts, comparing secondary alveolar bone grafting (during the mixed stage of dentition) versus tertiary bone grafting (after completion of the second stage of dentition). DESIGN: This was a retrospective study. Of 140 osteoplasties, which all were operated according to the same standardized surgical technique, a clinical and roentgenological follow-up investigation was carried out in a collective of 85 osteoplasties. Clinically we searched for oronasal fistulae, assessed the periodontal status, determined the extent of the gingival attachment in the area of the osteoplasty, and searched for vertical growth disturbances in the area of the osteoplasty. Roentgenologically the height of the alveolar bone in the former clefted area was ascertained. SETTING: Records were obtained from a clinical and radiological study of the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery of the Medical University of Hannover (Germany). INTERVENTIONS: All patients were operated with the same standardized surgical method. The osteoplastic bridging of the alveolar cleft was performed via a vestibular gingival marginal incision and exclusively by grafting of cancellous bone from the iliac crest. RESULTS: The best results of alveolar bone grafting in cases of secondary osteoplasty were obtained when the lateral incisor or canine had grown into the transplant and had led to a functional stress of the transplanted bone. Approximately good results were to be found in tertiary osteoplasty when the transplanted bone had been stressed functionally through a dental implant. Comparing the secondary with the tertiary osteoplasty, there was a trend of lower resorption in secondary osteoplasty. CONCLUSIONS: Secondary osteoplasty should represent an integral component of any concept for the comprehensive treatment of patients with cleft lip and palate.