Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
J Occup Environ Med ; 60(8): 737-742, 2018 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29538275

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Bullied workers have poor self-reported mental health; monetary costs of bullying exposure are unknown. We tested associations between bullying and health plan claims for mental health diagnoses. METHODS: We used data from 793 hospital workers who answered questions about bullying in a survey and subscribed to the group health plan. We used two-part models to test associations between types of incivility/bullying and mental health expenditures. RESULTS: Workers experiencing incivility or bullying had greater odds of any mental health claims. Among claimants, unexposed workers spent $792, those experiencing one type of incivility or bullying spent $1557 (P for difference from unexposed = 0.016), those experiencing two types spent $928 (P = 0.503), and those experiencing three types spent $1446 (P = 0.040). CONCLUSION: Workplace incivility and bullying may carry monetary costs to employers, which could be controlled through work environment modification.


Subject(s)
Bullying/psychology , Health Expenditures/statistics & numerical data , Hospitals , Incivility , Mental Disorders/economics , Workplace/psychology , Administrative Claims, Healthcare , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Mental Health , Mental Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , Occupational Health , Personnel, Hospital/psychology
2.
J Occup Environ Med ; 58(2): 207-14, 2016 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26565709

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To estimate cost-effectiveness ratios and net costs of a training intervention to reduce morbidity among porters who carry loads without mechanical assistance in a developing country informal sector setting. METHODS: Pre- and post-intervention survey data (n = 100) were collected in a prospective study: differences in physical/mental composite scores and pain scale scores were computed. Costs and economic benefits of the intervention were monetized with a net-cost model. RESULTS: Significant changes in physical composite scores (2.5), mental composite scores (3.2), and pain scale scores (-1.0) led to cost-effectiveness ratios of $6.97, $5.41, and $17.91, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that program adherence enhanced effectiveness. The net cost of the intervention was -$5979.00 due to a reduction in absenteeism. CONCLUSIONS: Workplace ergonomic training is cost-effective and should be implemented wherein other engineering-control interventions are precluded due to infrastructural constraints.


Subject(s)
Cost-Benefit Analysis , Ergonomics , Lifting , Musculoskeletal Diseases/prevention & control , Occupational Diseases/prevention & control , Occupational Health Services/economics , Occupational Injuries/prevention & control , Absenteeism , Adult , Developing Countries , Health Promotion/economics , Health Promotion/methods , Humans , India , Male , Models, Economic , Multivariate Analysis , Musculoskeletal Diseases/economics , Musculoskeletal Diseases/etiology , Occupational Diseases/economics , Occupational Diseases/etiology , Occupational Health Services/methods , Occupational Injuries/economics , Occupational Injuries/etiology , Prospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
3.
Risk Anal ; 35(10): 1858-75, 2015 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25809160

ABSTRACT

This study explores the relationship between individuals' risk tolerance and occupational injuries. We analyze data from a national representative survey of U.S. workers that includes information about injuries, risk tolerance, cognitive and noncognitive attributes, and risky behaviors. We measure risk tolerance through questions regarding individuals' willingness to gamble on their lifetime income. We estimate zero-inflated count models to assess the role played by such measures on workers' recurrent injuries. We discuss some implications of our results for future research and occupational safety policies. Our results highlight the concurrent and changing role played by individual, work, and environmental factors in explaining recurrent incidents. They show that risk tolerance affects recurrent injuries, although not in the direction that proponents of the concept of proneness would expect. Our measure of risk aversion shows that individuals who are somewhat more risk tolerant have fewer recurrent injuries than those who are risk averse. But the estimated relationship is U-shaped, not monotonic and, therefore, not easy to predict. At the same time, we find that individuals' "revealed risk preferences"-specific risky behaviors-are related to higher injury probabilities. Demanding working conditions, measures of socioeconomic status, health, and safety problems experienced by workers during their youth remain among the most important factors explaining the phenomena of recurrent injuries. So our results contribute also to the important debate about the relationship between health and socioeconomic status.


Subject(s)
Occupational Injuries/epidemiology , Risk Assessment , Accidents , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Regression Analysis , United States/epidemiology
4.
Pediatrics ; 130(3): 445-56, 2012 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22869834

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To test the effect of a culturally tailored, family-centered, short-term behavioral intervention on BMI in Latino-American preschool-aged children. METHODS: In a randomized controlled trial, 54 parent-child dyads were allocated to the intervention and 52 dyads were allocated to an alternative school-readiness program as the control condition. Parent-child dyads were eligible if the parent self-defined Latino, was at least 18 years old, had a 2- to 6-year-old child not currently enrolled in another healthy lifestyle program, had a valid telephone number, and planned on remaining in the city for the next 6 months. The Salud Con La Familia (Health with the Family) program consisted of 12 weekly 90-minute skills-building sessions designed to improve family nutritional habits and increase physical activity. Both programs were conducted in a community recreation center serving an urban neighborhood of mostly Spanish-speaking residents. RESULTS: Forty-two percent of participating preschool-aged children were overweight or obese. Controlling for child age, gender, and baseline BMI, the effect of the treatment condition on postintervention absolute BMI was B = -0.59 (P < .001). The intervention effect seemed to be strongest for obese children. CONCLUSIONS: A skills-building, culturally tailored intervention involving parent-child dyads changed short-term early growth patterns in these Latino-American preschool-aged children. Examining long-term effects would be a prudent next step.


Subject(s)
Behavior Therapy , Culture , Family Health , Hispanic or Latino , Obesity/therapy , Acculturation , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Male , Obesity/prevention & control , Weight Loss
5.
Child Obes ; 8(2): 116-23, 2012 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22799511

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Living near community recreation centers (CRC) is associated with increases in adolescent and adult physical activity, but the efficacy of efforts to increase use among Latino parents and young children is unknown. We hypothesized that Latino parent-child dyads with exposure to a CRC through culturally tailored programming would be more likely to use the facility for physical activity a year after programming ended than dyads living in the same geographic area who were not exposed to the programming. METHODS: Self-identified Latino parent-child dyads who had participated in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) of a culturally tailored healthy lifestyle program and completed a 12-month follow-up assessment constituted the "exposed" group (n = 66). The "unexposed" group included 62 parent-child dyads living in the same zip codes as the exposed group, all within a 5-mile radius of the CRC. Participants completed in-person structured interviews. RESULTS: Approximately two-thirds of exposed parents reported more than monthly use of the CRC for themselves a year after programming ended, compared to one-third of unexposed Latino families with the same geographic access (χ(2) = 11.26, p < 0.01). Parents in the exposed group were four times more likely than the unexposed group to use the CRC with their children on a monthly basis (odds ratio = 4.18, p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: CRCs that develop culturally tailored programs that invite Latino families inside can increase sustained CRC use for physical activity in this population at heightened risk for childhood obesity.


Subject(s)
Community Participation/statistics & numerical data , Hispanic or Latino/statistics & numerical data , Motor Activity , Parents , Public Facilities/statistics & numerical data , Recreation , Adult , Case-Control Studies , Child, Preschool , Cultural Characteristics , Educational Status , Female , Humans , Male , Obesity/prevention & control , Parents/education , Parents/psychology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...