Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 56
Filter
2.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 13: 491, 2013 Nov 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24274829

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In 2007-2008, two UK-based organisations, the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence and the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, published guidelines for the management of care and organisation of outpatient services for women with heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB). In 2010, this study was conducted to provide an update on guideline-related services provided in England and Wales, and whether they are consistent with national clinical guidelines two to three years after publication. METHODS: An organisational survey of outpatient gynaecology clinics was conducted of 221 hospitals in 154 acute National Health Service (NHS) trusts in England and Wales. A questionnaire was distributed to all hospitals to examine provision of diagnostic and therapeutic services in outpatient settings. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize results. RESULTS: The response rate was 100%. For diagnosis, 80% of hospitals had ultrasound, 87% had hysteroscopy, and 98% had endometrial biopsy available. Overall, 76% of hospitals provided an information leaflet, 8% referred patients to a website for information, and 20% did not provide any written information. A dedicated menstrual bleeding clinic was present in 38% of hospitals. Only 30% of hospitals reported that they have a local written protocol regarding the care and management of women with HMB. CONCLUSION: The majority of hospitals offer appropriate diagnostic and surgical services for women with HMB. However, local protocol development may not reflect the local services. It may be that hospitals are finding it difficult to summon resources to provide clinics for women with menstrual disorders.


Subject(s)
Guideline Adherence/statistics & numerical data , Menorrhagia/therapy , Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Hospital/standards , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Ambulatory Care/standards , Ambulatory Care/statistics & numerical data , Clinical Protocols/standards , England , Female , Humans , Menorrhagia/diagnosis , Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Surveys and Questionnaires , Wales
3.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 13: 200, 2013 May 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23721128

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Information on maternity services is increasingly derived from national administrative health data. We evaluated how statistics on maternity care in England were affected by the completeness and consistency of data on "method of delivery" in a national dataset. METHODS: Singleton deliveries occurring between April 2009 and March 2010 in English NHS trusts were extracted from the Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) database. In HES, method of delivery can be entered twice: 1) as a procedure code in core fields, and 2) in supplementary maternity fields. We examined overall consistency of these data sources at a national level and among individual trusts. The impact of different analysis rules for handling inconsistent data was then examined using three maternity statistics: emergency caesarean section (CS) rate; third/fourth degree tear rate amongst instrumental deliveries, and elective CS rate for breech presentation. RESULTS: We identified 629,049 singleton deliveries. Method of delivery was not entered as a procedure or in the supplementary fields in 0.8% and 12.5% of records, respectively. In 545,594 records containing both data items, method of delivery was coded consistently in 96.3% (kappa = 0.93; p < 0.001). Eleven of 136 NHS trusts had comparatively poor consistency (<92%) suggesting systematic data entry errors. The different analysis rules had a small effect on the statistics at a national level but the effect could be substantial for individual NHS trusts. The elective CS rate for breech was most sensitive to the chosen analysis rule. CONCLUSIONS: Organisational maternity statistics are sensitive to inconsistencies in data on method of delivery, and publications of quality indicators should describe how such data were handled. Overall, method of delivery is coded consistently in English administrative health data.


Subject(s)
Databases, Factual/standards , Delivery, Obstetric/statistics & numerical data , Maternal Health Services/statistics & numerical data , National Health Programs/statistics & numerical data , Clinical Coding/standards , Delivery, Obstetric/methods , England/epidemiology , Female , Humans , National Health Programs/standards , Pregnancy
4.
BMJ Open ; 2(4)2012.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22869092

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To investigate reproductive outcomes in women following induced abortion (IA). DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Hospital admissions between 1981 and 2007 in Scotland. PARTICIPANTS: Data were extracted on all women who had an IA, a miscarriage or a live birth from the Scottish Morbidity Records. A total of 120 033, 457 477 and 47 355 women with a documented second pregnancy following an IA, live birth and miscarriage, respectively, were identified. OUTCOMES: Obstetric and perinatal outcomes, especially preterm delivery in a second ongoing pregnancy following an IA, were compared with those in primigravidae, as well as those who had a miscarriage or live birth in their first pregnancy. Outcomes after surgical and medical termination as well as after one or more consecutive IAs were compared. RESULTS: IA in a first pregnancy increased the risk of spontaneous preterm birth compared with that in primigravidae (adjusted RR (adj. RR) 1.37, 95% CI 1.32 to 1.42) or women with an initial live birth (adj. RR 1.66, 95% CI 1.58 to 1.74) but not in comparison with women with a previous miscarriage (adj. RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.79 to 0.91). Surgical abortion increased the risk of spontaneous preterm birth compared with medical abortion (adj. RR 1.25, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.45). The adjusted RRs (95% CI) for spontaneous preterm delivery following two, three and four consecutive IAs were 0.94 (0.81 to 1.10), 1.06 (0.76 to 1.47) and 0.92 (0.53 to 1.61), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The risk of preterm birth after IA is lower than that after miscarriage but higher than that in a first pregnancy or after a previous live birth. This risk is not increased further in women who undergo two or more consecutive IAs. Surgical abortion appears to be associated with an increased risk of spontaneous preterm birth in comparison with medical termination of pregnancy. Medical termination was not associated with an increased risk of preterm delivery compared to primigravidae.

7.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ; 11: 95, 2011 Nov 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22103697

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To compare the risk of placenta previa at second birth among women who had a cesarean section (CS) at first birth with women who delivered vaginally. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of 399,674 women who gave birth to a singleton first and second baby between April 2000 and February 2009 in England. Multiple logistic regression was used to adjust the estimates for maternal age, ethnicity, deprivation, placenta previa at first birth, inter-birth interval and pregnancy complications. In addition, we conducted a meta-analysis of the reported results in peer-reviewed articles since 1980. RESULTS: The rate of placenta previa at second birth for women with vaginal first births was 4.4 per 1000 births, compared to 8.7 per 1000 births for women with CS at first birth. After adjustment, CS at first birth remained associated with an increased risk of placenta previa (odds ratio = 1.60; 95% CI 1.44 to 1.76). In the meta-analysis of 37 previously published studies from 21 countries, the overall pooled random effects odds ratio was 2.20 (95% CI 1.96-2.46). Our results from the current study is consistent with those of the meta-analysis as the pooled odds ratio for the six population-based cohort studies that analyzed second births only was 1.51 (95% CI 1.39-1.65). CONCLUSIONS: There is an increased risk of placenta previa in the subsequent pregnancy after CS delivery at first birth, but the risk is lower than previously estimated. Given the placenta previa rate in England and the adjusted effect of previous CS, 359 deliveries by CS at first birth would result in one additional case of placenta previa in the next pregnancy.


Subject(s)
Cesarean Section , Placenta Previa/epidemiology , Case-Control Studies , Cohort Studies , Demography , England/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Parity , Placenta Previa/etiology , Pregnancy , Regression Analysis , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , State Medicine/statistics & numerical data
8.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol ; 159(1): 62-6, 2011 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21835537

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Estimates of the increased risk of maternal complications after caesarean section posed by placenta praevia differ between studies and may not reflect current practice. We assess the impact of placenta praevia on maternal complications after elective caesarean section (CS). STUDY DESIGN: We undertook a retrospective cohort study of women who had an elective CS for a singleton at term in the English National Health Service between 1 April 2000 and 28 February 2009 using routine data from the Hospital Episode Statistics database. Multiple logistic regression was used to estimate the effect of placenta praevia on maternal complications after controlling for maternal age, parity, whether a woman had a previous CS, and gestational age. Maternal complications included postpartum haemorrhage, obstetric trauma, blood transfusion and hysterectomy. RESULTS: Among 131,731 women having an elective CS for a singleton, 4,332 (3.3%) women had placenta praevia. Placenta praevia increased the risk of postpartum haemorrhage from 9.7% to 17.5% (adjusted odds ratio (OR) 1.91; 95% CI: 1.74 to 2.09), the risk of blood transfusion from 1.4% to 6.4% (OR 4.39; 3.76 to 5.12), and the risk of hysterectomy from 0.03% to 1% (OR 39.70; 22.42 to 70.30). Previous studies have estimated the rate of hysterectomy among women with placenta praevia to be 5%. CONCLUSION: Placenta praevia remains a risk factor for various maternal complications, although the increased risk of hysterectomy is lower than previously reported.


Subject(s)
Cesarean Section/adverse effects , Elective Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Placenta Previa/epidemiology , Placenta Previa/surgery , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Blood Transfusion/statistics & numerical data , Cohort Studies , Cross-Sectional Studies , Databases, Factual , Female , Humans , Hysterectomy/statistics & numerical data , Incidence , Morbidity , Placenta Previa/physiopathology , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Postoperative Complications/surgery , Postpartum Hemorrhage/epidemiology , Postpartum Hemorrhage/etiology , Postpartum Hemorrhage/therapy , Pregnancy , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , State Medicine , United Kingdom/epidemiology , Young Adult
9.
BMJ ; 341: c7083, 2010 Dec 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21177531
10.
BMJ ; 341: c5065, 2010 Oct 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20926490

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the variation in unadjusted rates of caesarean section derived from routine data in NHS trusts in England can be explained by maternal characteristics and clinical risk factors. DESIGN: A cross sectional analysis using routinely collected hospital episode statistics was performed. A multiple logistic regression model was used to estimate the likelihood of women having a caesarean section given their maternal characteristics (age, ethnicity, parity, and socioeconomic deprivation) and clinical risk factors (previous caesarean section, breech presentation, and fetal distress). Adjusted rates of caesarean section for each NHS trust were produced from this model. SETTING: 146 English NHS trusts. Population Women aged between 15 and 44 years with a singleton birth between 1 January and 31 December 2008. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Rate of caesarean sections per 100 births (live or stillborn). RESULTS: Among 620 604 singleton births, 147 726 (23.8%) were delivered by caesarean section. Women were more likely to have a caesarean section if they had had one previously (70.8%) or had a baby with breech presentation (89.8%). Unadjusted rates of caesarean section among the NHS trusts ranged from 13.6% to 31.9%. Trusts differed in their patient populations, but adjusted rates still ranged from 14.9% to 32.1%. Rates of emergency caesarean section varied between trusts more than rates of elective caesarean section. CONCLUSION: Characteristics of women delivering at NHS trusts differ, and comparing unadjusted rates of caesarean section should be avoided. Adjusted rates of caesarean section still vary considerably and attempts to reduce this variation should examine issues linked to emergency caesarean section.


Subject(s)
Cesarean Section/statistics & numerical data , Pregnancy Complications/surgery , Adolescent , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , England/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications/epidemiology , Regression Analysis , Risk Factors , State Medicine , Young Adult
11.
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol ; 24(4): 503-16, 2010 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20418168

ABSTRACT

Medical abortion has been shown to be an effective alternative to surgery for termination of pregnancy in the late as well as the early first trimester of pregnancy. This review discusses the development, application and the current issues with medical and surgical abortion in the first trimester. Studies comparing the two approaches are also assessed as well as potential research directions in this area.


Subject(s)
Abortifacient Agents/administration & dosage , Abortion, Induced/methods , Pregnancy Trimester, First , Administration, Intravaginal , Administration, Oral , Anesthesia, Obstetrical , Female , Humans , Mifepristone/administration & dosage , Misoprostol/administration & dosage , Misoprostol/pharmacokinetics , Patient Preference , Pregnancy , Vacuum Curettage/methods
13.
Fertil Steril ; 93(3): 833-6, 2010 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19111293

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To identify Chlamydia trachomatis DNA by polymerase chain reaction in the upper genital tract of men with obstructive azoospermia compared with men seeking vasectomy reversal. DESIGN: Case-control study. SETTING: Tertiary referral center, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, United Kingdom. PATIENT(S): Cases were men with idiopathic obstructive azoospermia, and controls were men with azoospermia secondary to vasectomy. INTERVENTION(S): Chlamydia trachomatis-specific DNA test by polymerase chain reaction on testicular and epididymal biopsy samples, as well as epididymal aspirate. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Presence of Chlamydia trachomatis DNA. RESULT(S): We did not detect the presence of Chlamydia trachomatis-specific DNA by polymerase chain reaction in the epididymis or testis of 36 asymptomatic men with obstructive azoospermia (14 cases, 22 controls). CONCLUSION(S): Our hypothesis that unrecognized, asymptomatic chlamydial infection will lead to complete bilateral obstruction of the male genital tract remains unproven.


Subject(s)
Azoospermia/microbiology , Chlamydia Infections/diagnosis , Chlamydia trachomatis/genetics , Chlamydia trachomatis/isolation & purification , Epididymis/microbiology , Testis/microbiology , Adult , Azoospermia/pathology , Biopsy , Case-Control Studies , Chlamydia Infections/microbiology , DNA, Bacterial/genetics , Epididymis/pathology , Humans , Infertility, Male/microbiology , Infertility, Male/pathology , Male , Middle Aged , Polymerase Chain Reaction , Testis/pathology , Vasectomy
14.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev ; (2): CD003416, 2009 Apr 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19370588

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Multiple embryo transfer during IVF has increased multiple pregnancy rates (MPR) causing maternal and perinatal morbidity. Elective single embryo transfer (SET) is now being considered as an effective means of reducing this iatrogenic complication. OBJECTIVES: To determine in couples undergoing IVF/ICSI (intra-cytoplasmic sperm injection) whether:(1) elective transfer of two embryos improves the probability of livebirth compared with:(a) elective single embryo transfer,(b) three embryo transfer (TET) or(c) four embryo transfer (FET).(2) elective transfer of three embryos improves the probability of livebirth compared with:(a) elective single embryo transfer, or(b) elective four embryo transfer. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group's trials register (searched March 2008), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Cochrane Library, Issue 1, 2008), MEDLINE (1970 to 2008), EMBASE (1985 to 2008) and reference lists of articles. Relevant conference proceedings were hand-searched and researchers in the field contacted. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials were included. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently assessed eligibility and quality of trials. MAIN RESULTS: For the update in 2008 five trials compared DET with SET. DET versus TET and DET versus FET were evaluated in a single small trial each. The difference in cumulative livebirth rates (CLBR) after DET and those after SET followed by transfer of a single frozen thawed embryo (1FZET) was not statistically significant (OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.59 to 1.11; p=0.18). There was no statistically significant difference in CLBR after a single fresh cycle of DET versus two fresh cycles of SET (OR 1.23, 95% CI 0.56 to 2.69, p= 0.60 ). The live birth rate (LBR) per woman in a single fresh treatment was higher following DET than SET (OR 2.10, 95% CI 1.65 to 2.66, p<0.00001). The MPR was lower following SET (OR 0.04, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.11; p< 0.00001). The CLBR following two fresh cycles of DET versus two fresh cycles of TET (OR 0.77, 95%CI 0.22 to 2.65, p=0.67) and CLBR after three fresh cycles of DET versus three fresh cycles of TET showed no statistically significant differences (OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.24 to 2.52; p=0.67). There were no statistically significant differences between DET and TET in terms of LBR (OR 0.40, 95%CI 0.09 to 1.85; p=0.24) and MPR (OR 0.17, 95%CI 0.01 to 3.85; p= 0.27). DET led to lower LBR than FET but the difference was not statistically significant (OR 0.35, 95% CI 0.11 to 1.05; p = 0.06). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: In a single fresh IVF cycle, SET is associated with a lower LBR than DET. However there is no significant difference in CLBR following SET+ 1FZET and the LBR following a single cycle of DET. MPR are lowered following SET compared with other transfer policies. There are insufficient data on the outcome of two versus three and four embryo transfer policies.


Subject(s)
Embryo Transfer , Fertilization in Vitro , Pregnancy Rate , Embryo Transfer/adverse effects , Embryo Transfer/methods , Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Pregnancy, Multiple , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Sperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic
15.
Lancet ; 369(9567): 1077, 2007 Mar 31.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17398296
16.
Hum Reprod ; 20(10): 2681-7, 2005 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16183994

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The most common complication of IVF is multiple pregnancy, which occurs in 25% of pregnancies following the transfer of two embryos. Single embryo transfer can minimize twin pregnancies but could also lower live birth rates. Our aim was to perform a systematic review of randomized trials to determine the effectiveness of single versus double embryo transfer. METHODS: Cochrane Collaboration review methods were followed. Randomized controlled trials comparing single and double embryo transfers were identified by searching Medline, EMBASE and the Cochrane register of controlled trials. Contents of specialist journals and proceedings from meetings of relevant societies were hand searched. Data were pooled with Rev Man software using the Peto-modified Mantel-Hanzel method. RESULTS: Pooled results from four trials indicate that although double embryo transfer leads to a higher live birth rate per woman [odds ratio (OR) 1.94, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.47-2.55] in a fresh IVF cycle, comparable results are obtained by subsequent transfer of a frozen embryo (OR 1.19, 95% CI 0.87-1.62). The multiple pregnancy rate is significantly higher (OR 62.83, 95% CI 8.52-463.57) after double embryo transfer. CONCLUSIONS: Single embryo transfer significantly reduces the risk of multiple pregnancy, but also decreases the chance of live birth in a fresh IVF cycle. Subsequent replacement of a single frozen embryo achieves a live birth rate comparable with double embryo transfer.


Subject(s)
Embryo Transfer , Fertilization in Vitro/methods , Pregnancy, Multiple , Sperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic/methods , Adult , Clinical Trials as Topic , Cryopreservation , Databases as Topic , Databases, Bibliographic , Embryo, Mammalian , Female , Humans , MEDLINE , Multiple Birth Offspring , Odds Ratio , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Outcome , Pregnancy Rate , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted , Software , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Twins
17.
J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care ; 31(3): 185-8, 2005 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16105275

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Studies from the USA have reported the efficacy and high acceptability of surgical abortion using manual vacuum aspiration (MVA) under local anaesthesia. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility, acceptability and efficacy of surgical abortion using MVA under local anaesthesia for termination of pregnancy up to 63 days' gestation, within a UK National Health Service setting. METHODS: Surgical abortion was carried out using MVA under local anaesthesia. Women's satisfaction with the procedure, and pain and anxiety levels, were assessed. The main outcome measures were: (1) feasibility assessed through successful completion of the procedure without the need for general anaesthetic or conversion to suction vacuum aspiration, (2) efficacy assessed through complete uterine evacuation without the need for further medical or surgical intervention and (3) women's acceptability of the procedure. RESULTS: The mean (SD) gestation was 50 (9.4) days. A total of 55/56 (98%) women had a successful procedure and did not require any further surgical or medical treatment. Fifty-five (98%) women were satisfied with the procedure, 48 (86%) said they would recommend it to a friend and 45 (80%) said they would have the same method again in the future. Anxiety levels, as reflected by the visual analogue scales, showed a significant fall in anxiety scores following the procedure (p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Surgical abortion using MVA under local anaesthesia is effective and acceptable to women. These findings now need to be assessed in the context of a randomised trial.


Subject(s)
Abortion, Induced/methods , Anesthesia, Local , Patient Satisfaction , Vacuum Curettage , Adult , Feasibility Studies , Female , Humans , Pilot Projects , Pregnancy , United Kingdom
18.
J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care ; 31(3): 189-92, 2005 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16105279

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Studies from the USA have suggested the feasibility and acceptability of home medical abortion, however the issue has not been addressed in the UK. This study aimed to assess the feasibility, efficacy and acceptability of home self-administration of misoprostol for medical abortion up to 56 days' gestation. METHODS: Mifepristone 200 mg was given orally in hospital under nursing supervision. Women were provided with misoprostol tablets 600 microg and advised to take them sublingually 36-48 hours later. The main outcome measures were (1) feasibility, assessed through successful completion of abortion at home without the need for hospital admission, (2) efficacy, assessed through complete uterine evacuation without the need for further medical or surgical intervention and (3) women's acceptability of the procedure as assessed by questionnaire. RESULTS: A total of 49 women participated in this study. Of these, 48 women aborted at home while one opted to be admitted to hospital after receiving misoprostol at home. One woman underwent surgical evacuation 5 weeks following abortion for excessive bleeding and retained products of conception. A total of 43/44 (98%) women were satisfied with having the abortion at home. Side effects experienced by women included nausea [32/40 (80%], vomiting [17/41 (42%)], diarrhoea [17/41 (42%)], shivering [26/40 (65%)], tiredness [32/40 (80%)], headache [12/39 (31%)], hot flushes [14/40 (35%)], dizziness [24/39 (62%)] and unpleasant mouth taste [19/38 (50%)]. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests the feasibility and acceptability of home self-administration of misoprostol for medical abortion up to 56 days' gestation. These findings need to be assessed in the context of a randomised trial.


Subject(s)
Abortifacient Agents, Nonsteroidal/therapeutic use , Abortion, Induced/methods , Misoprostol/therapeutic use , Adult , Feasibility Studies , Female , Gestational Age , Humans , Patient Satisfaction , Pregnancy , Self Administration
19.
BJOG ; 112(8): 1102-8, 2005 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16045525

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To assess women's acceptability, the efficacy and side effects of sublingual versus vaginal administration of misoprostol in combination with mifepristone for medical abortion up to 13 weeks of gestation. DESIGN: Randomised controlled trial. SETTING: Aberdeen Royal Infirmary. POPULATION: Women undergoing medical abortion under the terms of the 1967 Abortion Act. METHODS: Mifepristone (200 mg) was given orally followed 36-48 hours later by misoprostol administration (sublingual: 600 microg; vaginal: 800 microg). A second dose of misoprostol 400 microg was given 3 hours later (sublingually or vaginally). Women between 9 and 13 weeks of gestation received a further (third) dose of misoprostol 400 microg (sublingually or vaginally), 3 hours later if abortion had not occurred. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Women's acceptability, efficacy of the regimen and side effects experienced. RESULTS: A total of 340 women were recruited (171 sublingual and 169 vaginal). A total of 70% of women in the sublingual group expressed satisfaction with the route of misoprostol administration; 18% answered 'Don't know' while 12% were dissatisfied, compared with 68%, 28% and 4%, respectively, in the vaginal group (P= 0.02). There was no significant difference in the need for surgical evacuation for women in the sublingual (3/158, 1.9%) and vaginal groups (4/156, 2.6%) (P= 0.70). Women receiving misoprostol sublingually were more likely to experience diarrhoea (P < 0.01), shivering (P < 0.01) and unpleasant mouth taste (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Sublingual administration of misoprostol is an effective alternative to vaginal administration for medical abortion up to 13 weeks of gestation. The prevalence of prostaglandin-related side effects, however, was higher with this route of administration.


Subject(s)
Abortifacient Agents, Nonsteroidal/administration & dosage , Abortifacient Agents, Steroidal/administration & dosage , Abortion, Induced/methods , Mifepristone/administration & dosage , Misoprostol/administration & dosage , Abortifacient Agents, Nonsteroidal/adverse effects , Abortifacient Agents, Steroidal/adverse effects , Administration, Intravaginal , Administration, Oral , Administration, Sublingual , Adolescent , Adult , Drug Therapy, Combination , Female , Humans , Mifepristone/adverse effects , Misoprostol/adverse effects , Patient Satisfaction , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Trimester, First , Treatment Outcome
20.
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand ; 84(8): 761-6, 2005 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16026402

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Although not much research comparing the emotional distress following medical and surgical abortion is available, few studies have compared psychological sequelae following both methods of abortion early in the first trimester of pregnancy. The aim of this review was to assess the psychological sequelae and emotional distress following medical and surgical abortion at 10-13 weeks gestation. METHODS: Partially randomized patient preference trial in a Scottish Teaching Hospital was conducted. The hospital anxiety and depression scales were used to assess emotional distress. Anxiety levels were also assessed using visual analog scales while semantic differential rating scales were used to measure self-esteem. A total of 368 women were randomized, while 77 entered the preference cohort. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in hospital anxiety and depression scales scores for anxiety or depression between the groups. Visual analog scales showed higher anxiety levels in women randomized to surgery prior to abortion (P < 0.0001), while women randomized to surgical treatment were less anxious after abortion (P < 0.0001). Semantic differential rating scores showed a fall in self-esteem in the randomized medical group compared to those undergoing surgery (P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Medical abortion at 10-13 weeks is effective and does not increase psychological morbidity compared to surgical vacuum aspiration and hence should be made available to all women undergoing abortion at these gestations.


Subject(s)
Abortifacient Agents/therapeutic use , Anxiety/diagnosis , Depressive Disorder/diagnosis , Vacuum Curettage/methods , Abortion, Induced/methods , Abortion, Induced/psychology , Adult , Anxiety/epidemiology , Anxiety/etiology , Confidence Intervals , Depressive Disorder/epidemiology , Depressive Disorder/etiology , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Gestational Age , Humans , Incidence , Pregnancy , Probability , Risk Assessment , Stress, Psychological , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Vacuum Curettage/psychology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...