Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg ; 49(3): 397-402, 2020 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31611048

ABSTRACT

One in 16 patients prescribed opioids after a surgical procedure will become a long-term user. The lack of procedure-specific guidelines after common dental procedures contributes to the opioid overprescribing problem. We convened a multidisciplinary panel to develop consensus recommendations for opioid prescribing after common dental procedures. We used a three-step modified Delphi method to develop a consensus recommendation for outpatient opioid prescribing for 14 common dental procedures. The multi-institution, multidisciplinary panel represented seven relevant stakeholder groups (oral surgeons, periodontists, endodontists, general dentists, general surgeons, oral surgery residents, and oral surgery patients). The panel determined the minimum and maximum number of opioid tablets a clinician should consider prescribing. For all 14 surgical procedures, ibuprofen was recommended as initial therapy. The maximum number of opioid tablets recommended varied by procedure (overall median = 5 tablets, range = 0-15 tablets). Zero opioid tablets were recommended as the maximum number for six of 14 (43%) procedures, one to 10 opioid tablets was the maximum for four of 14 (27%) procedures, and 11-15 tablets was the maximum for four of 14 (27%) procedures. Procedure-specific prescribing recommendations may help provide guidance to clinicians and help address the opioid overprescribing problem.


Subject(s)
Analgesics, Opioid , Surgeons , Consensus , Humans , Pain, Postoperative , Practice Patterns, Physicians'
2.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg ; 43(2): 217-26, 2014 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24042068

ABSTRACT

A previous randomized controlled trial (RCT) by Schiffman et al. (2007)(15) compared four treatments strategies for temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disc displacement without reduction with limited mouth opening (closed lock). In this parallel group RCT, 106 patients with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-confirmed TMJ closed lock were randomized between medical management, non-surgical rehabilitation, arthroscopic surgery, and arthroplasty. Surgical groups also received rehabilitation post-surgically. The current paper reassesses the effectiveness of these four treatment strategies using outcome measures recommended by the International Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons (IAOMS). Clinical assessments at baseline and at follow-up (3, 6, 12, 18, 24, and 60 months) included intensity and frequency of TMJ pain, mandibular range of motion, TMJ sounds, and impairment of chewing. TMJ MRIs were performed at baseline and 24 months, and TMJ tomograms at baseline, 24 and 60 months. Most IAOMS recommended outcome measures improved significantly over time (P≤0.0003). There was no difference between treatment strategies relative to any treatment outcome at any follow-up (P≥0.16). Patient self-assessment of treatment success correlated with their ability to eat, with pain-free opening ≥35mm, and with reduced pain intensity. Given no difference between treatment strategies, non-surgical treatment should be employed for TMJ closed lock before considering surgery.


Subject(s)
Temporomandibular Joint Disc/surgery , Temporomandibular Joint Disorders/surgery , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Arthroplasty , Arthroscopy , Female , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Male , Middle Aged , Pain Measurement , Range of Motion, Articular/physiology , Temporomandibular Joint Disc/physiopathology , Temporomandibular Joint Disorders/physiopathology , Treatment Outcome
3.
J Dent Res ; 86(1): 58-63, 2007 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17189464

ABSTRACT

For individuals with temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disc displacement without reduction with limited mouth opening (closed lock), interventions vary from minimal treatment to surgery. In a single-blind trial, 106 individuals with TMJ closed lock were randomized among medical management, rehabilitation, arthroscopic surgery with post-operative rehabilitation, or arthroplasty with post-operative rehabilitation. Evaluations at baseline, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, and 60 months used the Craniomandibular Index (CMI) and Symptom Severity Index (SSI) for jaw function and TMJ pain respectively. Using an intention-to-treat analysis, we observed no between-group difference at any follow-up for CMI (p > or = 0.33) or SSI (p > or = 0.08). Both outcomes showed within-group improvement (p < 0.0001) for all groups. The findings of this study suggest that primary treatment for individuals with TMJ closed lock should consist of medical management or rehabilitation. The use of this approach will avoid unnecessary surgical procedures.


Subject(s)
Joint Dislocations/therapy , Temporomandibular Joint Disc/pathology , Temporomandibular Joint Disorders/therapy , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Anti-Inflammatory Agents/therapeutic use , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/therapeutic use , Arthroplasty , Arthroscopy , Counseling , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Joint Dislocations/drug therapy , Joint Dislocations/surgery , Methylprednisolone/therapeutic use , Middle Aged , Occlusal Splints , Physical Therapy Modalities , Severity of Illness Index , Single-Blind Method , Temporomandibular Joint Disc/surgery , Temporomandibular Joint Disorders/drug therapy , Temporomandibular Joint Disorders/surgery , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...