The clinical utility of rapid exome sequencing in a consanguineous population.

BACKGROUND: The clinical utility of exome sequencing is now well documented. Rapid exome sequencing (RES) is more resource-intensive than regular exome sequencing and is typically employed in specialized clinical settings wherein urgent molecular diagnosis is thought to influence acute management. Studies on the clinical utility of RES have been largely limited to outbred populations. METHODS: Here, we describe our experience with rapid exome sequencing (RES) in a highly consanguineous population. Clinical settings included intensive care units, prenatal cases approaching the legal cutoff for termination, and urgent transplant decisions. RESULTS: A positive molecular finding (a pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant that explains the phenotype) was observed in 80 of 189 cases (42%), while 15 (8%) and 94 (50%) received ambiguous (variant of uncertain significance (VUS)) and negative results, respectively. The consanguineous nature of the study population gave us an opportunity to observe highly unusual and severe phenotypic expressions of previously reported genes. Clinical utility was observed in nearly all (79/80) cases with positive molecular findings and included management decisions, prognostication, and reproductive counseling. Reproductive counseling is a particularly important utility in this population where the overwhelming majority (86%) of identified variants are autosomal recessive, which are more actionable in this regard than the de novo variants typically reported by RES elsewhere. Indeed, our cost-effectiveness analysis shows compelling cost savings in the study population. CONCLUSIONS: This work expands the diversity of environments in which RES has a demonstrable clinical utility.

Effect of new modalities of treatment on physicians management plan for patients with spinal muscular atrophy.

OBJECTIVE: To determine physicians` attitudes and stated practice in the management of patients with spinal muscular atrophy (SMA). We also aimed to explore their knowledge about consensus statement for standard of care in SMA and the role of new treatment modalities in changing the method of practice in the management of these cases. METHODS: This is a quantitative observational cross-sectional study, conducted from February to May 2017 among physicians who manage SMA patients in Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. The study cohort included pediatric neurologists, adult neurologists, and physicians of other sub-specialties who manage SMA patients. We used online and paper-based questionnaires. RESULTS: Half of the 169 participants were aware of the consensus guidelines for the care of SMA patients. With regard to the newly released Nursinersen treatment protocol for SMA-diagnosed patients, half of the participants were uncertain, and the other half were hesitant about its outcomes. Junior physicians tended to be significantly more inclined to reverse the do-not-resuscitate (DNR) status of an SMA-diagnosed child than more senior physicians. CONCLUSION: Our results indicate the existence of wide differences in physician practice with children of SMA disease. Our data demonstrate a need for increased awareness of consensus guidelines and further awareness about the physician`s role in the variability of care for children with SMA.