The Impact of a Standardized Pre-visit Laboratory Testing Panel in the Internal Medicine Outpatient Clinic: a Controlled "On-Off" Trial.

BACKGROUND: In several settings, a shorter time to diagnosis has been shown to lead to improved clinical outcomes. The implementation of a rapid laboratory testing allows for a pre-visit testing in the outpatient clinic, meaning that test results are available during the first outpatient visit. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the pre-visit laboratory testing leads to a shorter time to diagnosis in the general internal medicine outpatient clinic. DESIGN: An "on-off" trial, allocating subjects to one of two treatment arms in consecutive alternating blocks. PARTICIPANTS: All new referrals to the internal medicine outpatient clinic of a university hospital were included, excluding second opinions. A total of 595 patients were eligible; one person declined to participate, leaving data from 594 patients for analysis. INTERVENTION: In the intervention group, patients had a standardized pre-visit laboratory testing before the first visit. MAIN MEASURES: The primary outcome was the time to diagnosis. Secondary outcomes were the correctness of the preliminary diagnosis on the first day, health care utilization, and patient and physician satisfaction. KEY RESULTS: There was no difference in time to diagnosis between the two groups (median 35 days vs 35 days; hazard ratio 1.03 [0.87-1.22]; p = .71). The pre-visit testing group had higher proportions of both correct preliminary diagnoses on day 1 (24% vs 14%; p = .003) and diagnostic workups being completed on day 1 (10% vs 3%; p < .001). The intervention group had more laboratory tests done (50.0 [interquartile range (IQR) 39.0-69.0] vs 43.0 [IQR 31.0-68.5]; p < .001). Otherwise, there were no differences between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Pre-visit testing did not lead to a shorter overall time to diagnosis. However, a greater proportion of patients had a correct diagnosis on the first day. Further studies should focus on customizing pre-visit laboratory panels, to improve their efficacy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NL5009.

Inappropriate laboratory testing in internal medicine inpatients: Prevalence, causes and interventions.

BACKGROUND: To reduce overutilization of laboratory testing many interventions have been tried, but selecting the most effective intervention for a given setting is challenging. To be sustainable, interventions need to align with healthcare providers' needs and daily practices. This study aimed to assess the extent of overutilization and the perspectives of healthcare providers, which may be used to guide the choice of intervention. METHODS: The extent of inappropriate laboratory testing in internal medicine inpatients was evaluated using a database. Surveys and focus groups were used to investigate healthcare providers' perceptions on its causes and solutions. RESULTS: On average, patients had 5.7 laboratory orders done during the first week of admission, whereas guidelines advise performing laboratory testing no more than twice per week. Repeat testing of normal test results occurred in up to 85% of patients. The frequency of laboratory testing was underestimated by survey responders, even though the majority of responders (78%) thought that laboratory tests are ordered too frequently. Residents were considered to be most responsible for laboratory test ordering.The primary causes of overutilization discussed were personal factors, such as a lack of awareness and knowledge, as well as feelings of insecurity. Regarding possible solutions, residents generally recommended educational interventions, whereas specialists tended to favour technical solutions such as lockouts. CONCLUSION: Inappropriate laboratory testing is common in internal medicine. The most important causes are a lack of awareness and knowledge, especially in residents. The intervention most favoured by residents is education, suggesting educational interventions may be most applicable.

Exploring the value of routinely measured hematology parameters for identification of elderly patients at high risk of death at the Emergency Department.

Of the warning scores in use for recognition of high-risk patients at the Emergency Department (ED), few incorporate laboratory results. Although hematological characteristics have shown prognostic value in small studies, large studies in elderly ED populations are lacking. We studied the association between blood cell and platelet counts and characteristics as well as C-reactive protein (CRP) at ED presentation with mortality in non-multitrauma patients ≥ 65 years. Comparison between survivors and non-survivors showed small, significant differences with AUROCs ranging between 56.6% and 65.2% for 30-day mortality. Combining parameters yielded an evident improvement (AUROC of 70.4%). Efforts should be pursued to study the added value of hematological parameters on top of clinical data when assessing patient risk.

Platelet activation in the presence of neutral protamine Hagedorn insulin: a new feature of antibodies against protamine/heparin complexes.

Essentials Protamine (PRT) is used to stabilize insulin in neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH) insulin. The interaction between NPH-insulin, anti-PRT/heparin antibodies and platelets was investigated. Anti-PRT/heparin antibodies activate platelets in presence of NPH-insulin dependent on heparin. Cross-reactivity seems to have no major effect on the clinical outcome of medical patients. SUMMARY: Background Protamine (PRT) is used to stabilize insulin in neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH) insulin, a commonly used therapeutic agent for diabetes mellitus. Immunization against PRT/heparin complexes is common in diabetic patients. Objectives To investigate the impact of NPH-insulin on the interaction between anti-PRT/heparin antibodies and platelets. Methods The interaction between NPH-insulin and anti-PRT/heparin antibodies was tested using in-house enzyme immunoassays. The ability of anti-PRT/heparin antibodies to activate platelets in the presence of NPH-insulin (and heparin) was investigated using flow cytometry. Results Twenty-one out of 80 sera containing anti-PRT/heparin IgG showed binding to NPH-insulin. Anti-PRT/heparin IgG from immunized patients bound to platelets in the presence of NPH-insulin, but not in the presence of native insulin. Anti-PRT/heparin antibodies induced P-selectin expression in the presence of NPH-insulin in a heparin-dependent way (median mean fluorescence intensity in the presence of NPH-insulin: 55, 95% confidence interval [CI] 18.7-100.5 vs. NPH-insulin and heparin: 204, 95% CI 106.5-372.8). The clinical relevance of platelet-activating anti-PRT/heparin antibodies was assessed by investigating a multicenter study cohort of 332 acutely ill medical patients who received heparin. None of the 21 patients with anti-PRT/heparin IgG developed thrombocytopenia or thromboembolic complications. Conclusions Anti-PRT/heparin antibodies activate platelets in the presence of NPH-insulin in a heparin-dependent way. However, results from our preliminary study indicate no major impact of these antibodies on the clinical outcome in medical patients receiving heparin, particularly on thromboembolic complications.

Dental fear in children: clinical consequences. Suggested behaviour management strategies in treating children with dental fear.

AIM: This is to present an overview of behavioural management techniques in the dental situation, and to prepare guidelines for the treatment of dentally fearful children, focusing on the behavioural management approach. REVIEW: The literature related to the behavioural management of children in the dental setting was reviewed. Using this material a provisional set of guidelines for behaviour management strategies in treating children with dental fear was developed. CONCLUSIONS: Effective behavioural strategies that can be used by the dentist are discussed, from a theoretical as well as from a clinical point of view. In addition, available research studies are discussed and suggestions for guidelines in dental practice are presented.

Cycle control and side effects of a new combiphasic oral contraceptive regimen.

In a multicentre study 882 women were treated during a total of 12,850 cycles with a new combiphasic contraceptive: CTR 24. The study period was 18 cycles. The combiphasic preparation CTR 24 contains 25 micrograms desogestrel (CAS 54024-22-5) plus 40 micrograms ethinylestradiol (CAS 57-63-6) daily for the first 7 days followed by the combination of 125 micrograms desogestrel and 30 micrograms ethinyl-estradiol daily for the subsequent 15 days. The bleeding patterns were analysed over pill cycles and a comparison was made between starters and switchers. The cycle control of the combination was very good. The side effect profile was favourable.

PIP: Physicians recruited 882 women into a multicenter trial of a new biphasic oral contraceptive (OC) (25 mcg + 125 mcg desogestrel and 40 mcg + 30 mcg ethinyl estradiol). Trial sites were in Belgium, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Norway, Sweden, and the former Yugoslavia. After 3 cycles, women who had switched from using another OC in the 2 months before the study (switchers) were less likely to continue the new OC than were women who had not used any OC in the last 2 months (starters) (6 cycles = 87.2% vs. 90.6%, 12 cycles = 74.7% vs. 79.5%; and 18 cycles = 59.8% vs. 64.9%). Withdrawal bleeding did not occur in 3.2% of all cycles. Absence of withdrawal bleeding became less common over time (cycle 1 = 7.6%, cycle 3 = 5%, cycle 6 = 3.2%, and cycle 18 = 1.8%). Duration of withdrawal bleeding was no more than 5 days in 80% of all women. More and more women had no more than 5 days of withdrawal bleeding as time passed (cycle 1 = 81.7%, cycle 6 = 85.6%, and cycle 18 = 90.6%). Irregular bleeding was more common in the first cycles of the study than in subsequent cycles (e.g., spotting during cycles 1-3 = 8.5-4.8% vs. 3.7-3.1% during cycles 6-18). By cycle 18, 96% of all women had no irregular bleeding. The drop-out rate for irregular bleeding was 2.2% at the end of the study. In 5% of cycles, at least 1 tablet was forgotten. In the first cycles, starters were somewhat more likely to complain of nausea, headache, and breast tenderness than switchers (e.g., nausea, cycle 1 = 5.8% vs. 3.4%). The gap between the 2 groups disappeared after 3 cycles. Starters were more likely to have minor complaints before OC use than after OC use (e.g., 6.5% fewer frequencies of headaches at 18 months). These findings show that the new OC has very good cycle control and a agreeable side effect profile.

Desogestrel: using a selective progestogen in a combined oral contraceptive.

Desogestrel is the most selective progestogen used in oral contraceptives (OCs). The clinical characteristics of the monophasic combined OC containing 150 micrograms desogestrel and 30 micrograms EE per tablet (Marvelon) are in accordance with the strong progestogenic and minimal androgenic effects of desogestrel: a very high contraceptive efficacy is combined with minimal and, in the case of lipid metabolism, even potentially positive effects on metabolic parameters. Through increasing the plasma levels of sex hormone binding globulin, and thereby decreasing the plasma levels of free testosterone, the desogestrel-containing OC also has substantial beneficial effects on acne.

Phase III clinical trial with a new oral contraceptive containing 150 micrograms desogestrel and 20 micrograms ethinylestradiol.

Results are presented of a Phase III international multicentre trial to study the effect of a new low-dose oral contraceptive (OC) containing 20 micrograms ethinylestradiol and 150 micrograms desogestrel (Mercilon) regarding efficacy, cycle control, blood pressure, and acceptability. Altogether 1,684 women from 12 European countries were included in the study. Four pregnancies occurred, 3 of them patient failures, one tablet failure. The overall Pearl Index was 0.20. The frequency of irregular bleeding was comparable to that recorded with other commonly used low-dose OCs. No serious side effects occurred. The incidence of the most frequently reported subjective side effects--headache, nausea and breast tension--was already low after the first cycle of treatment and decreased to below pretreatment levels with continued use. There was a small increase in mean body weight, which was confined essentially to young women. The preparation did not affect the mean systolic or diastolic blood pressure. This new preparation has thus proved to be an effective, safe and well-accepted ultra low-dose oral contraceptive.

PIP: Results are presented of a phase 3 international multicenter trial to study the effect of a new, low-dose oral contraceptive (OC) containing 20 mcg ethinyl estradiol and 150 mcg desogestrel (Mercilon) with regard to efficacy, cycle control, blood pressure, and acceptability. In total, 1684 women from 12 European countries were included in the study. 4 pregnancies occurred, 3 of them patient failure and 1 tablet failure. The overall Pearl Index was 0.20. The frequency of irregular bleeding was comparable to that recorded with other commonly used low-dose OCs. No serious side effects occurred. The incidence of the most frequently reported subjective side effects, i.e., headache, nausea, and breast tenderness, was already low after the 1st cycle of treatment and decreased to below pretreatment levels with continued use. There was a small increase in mean body weight, which was confined essentially to young women. The preparation did not affect the mean systolic or diastolic blood pressure. This new preparation has thus far proven to be an effective, safe, and well-accepted ultra low-dose OC.