Assessment of chromosomal gains as compared to DNA content changes is more useful to detect dysplasia in Barrett's esophagus brush cytology specimens.

Abnormal DNA ploidy status has been suggested as a prognostic factor for Barrett's esophagus progression into esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). The aim of the study was to compare image cytometry DNA analysis (ICDA) and fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) in the assessment of DNA ploidy status in Barrett's esophagus (BE), and to determine the value of these abnormalities as an adjunct to conventional cytology in detection of dysplasia and EAC. Brush cytology specimens of 90 BE patients were examined using ICDA and FISH with peri-centromeric probes for chromosomes 7 and 17. The results of ICDA and FISH were compared with each other, and with dysplasia grade or EAC as determined by histology and cytology. FISH and ICDA detected abnormalities in 41% (37/90) and 22% (19/90) of the BE cases, respectively. Gains of chromosome 7 and/or 17 were present in 13% of nondysplasia cases, which further increased with dysplasia stage, while overall DNA content aneuploidy was detected predominantly in high grade dysplasia (HGD) and EAC. Using FISH results combined with cytology, we were able to identify IND/LGD (indefinite/ low grade dysplasia) with a sensitivity and specificity of 75 and 76%, respectively. FISH alone detected HGD/EAC with a high sensitivity and specificity of 85 and 84%, which was superior to that of cytology alone. Thus, FISH is more sensitive than ICDA to detect chromosomal abnormalities in BE brush cytology specimens. FISH detects chromosomal gains in early stages of BE and represents a valuable adjunct to conventional cytology to detect dysplasia or EAC.

Efficient automated assessment of genetic abnormalities detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization on brush cytology in a Barrett esophagus surveillance population.

BACKGROUND: Automated assessment of genetic abnormalities detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in brush cytology specimens from patients with Barrett esophagus (BE) may enhance the clinical applicability of this methodology. The objectives of this study were to validate a novel, automated, proprietary system (CytoVison SPOT AX) for the assessment of FISH abnormalities in BE brush cytology and, subsequently, to use this automated method for screening of a BE surveillance cohort. METHODS: FISH with DNA probes for chromosomes 9, 17, and Y, and for the 9p21 (p16), 17q11.2 (Her2/neu), and 17p13.1 (p53) loci was applied on brush cytology specimens from a surveillance cohort of 151 patients with BE. Validation of the automated system was performed by comparison of the automated FISH results with manual scores for the first 60 patients. RESULTS: There was 98% concordance between manual and automated FISH analysis with kappa values from 0.49 to 1 for the different probes. The loss of 17p13.1 (p53) was observed in only 5% of patients with no dysplasia (ND) and in 9% of patients with low-grade dysplasia (LGD) but increased to 46% in patients with high-grade dysplasia (HGD) (P < .005; Fisher exact test). Chromosomes 9 and 17 were observed in 6% of patients with ND, in 21% of patients with LGD, and in 62% of patients with HGD (P < .05). Ten percent of patients with ND had loss of the Y chromosome, which increased to 27% in patients with HGD (P< .05). The amplification of 17q11.2 (Her2/neu) was detected in 62% of patients with HGD (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: The current investigation indicated that the CytoVison SPOT AX is an objective, efficient system for the analysis of DNA-FISH on BE brush cytology and is applicable for analyzing large populations of BE patients. In the current study cohort, the loss of 17p13.1 (p53), Y chromosome loss, and polysomy of chromosomes 17 and 9 were correlated with increasing grade of dysplasia in patients with BE.