Does preoperative multidisciplinary team assessment of high-risk patients improve the safety and outcomes of patients undergoing surgery?

BACKGROUND: International guidelines recommend preoperative multidisciplinary team (MDT) assessment for high-risk surgical patients. Preoperative MDT meetings can help to improve surgical care, but there is little evidence on whether they improve patient outcomes. METHODS: This paper aims to share our experience of MDT meetings for high-risk surgical patients to underline their added value to the current standard of care. An observational study of a retrospective cohort of preoperative high-risk MDT meetings of a tertiary referral hospital between January 2015 and December 2020. For 249 patients the outcomes preoperative data, MDT decisions, and patient outcomes were collected from electronic health records. MAIN RESULTS: A total of 249 patients were discussed at high-risk MDT meetings. Most of the patients (97%) were assessed as having an American Society of Anesthesiology score ≥ 3, and 219 (88%) had a European Society of Cardiology and European Society of Anaesthesiology risk score of intermediate or high. After MDT assessment, 154 (62%) were directly approved for surgery, and 39 (16%) were considered ineligible for surgery. The remaining 56 (23%) patients underwent additional assessments before reconsideration at a high-risk MDT meeting. The main reason for patients being discussed at the high-risk MDT meeting was to assess the risk-benefit ratio of surgery. Ultimately, 184 (74%) patients underwent surgery. Of the operated patients, 122 (66%) did not have a major complication in the postoperative period, and 149 patients (81%) were alive after one year. CONCLUSIONS: This cohort study shows the vulnerability and complexity of high-risk patients but also shows that the use of an MDT assessment contributes too improved peri- and postoperative treatment strategies in high-risk patients. Most patients underwent surgery after careful risk assessment and, if deemed necessary, preoperative and perioperative treatment optimization to reduce their risk.

Minimal effects on ex vivo coagulation during mild therapeutic hypothermia in post cardiac arrest patients.

OBJECTIVES: Mild therapeutic hypothermia (MTH) is being used to improve neurological outcome and survival in patients successfully resuscitated after cardiac arrest. The impact on coagulation may be difficult to assess since most coagulation parameters are measured at 37°C and not at actual body core temperature. Therefore we investigated the effects of MTH both at body core (target) temperature of 32°C and at 37°C. METHODS: Patients admitted at the ICU after cardiac arrest treated with MTH. Baseline blood samples, measured at 37°C were taken directly at arrival. The second and third samples were drawn within 1h and 24h after reaching target temperature and were measured at 32°C and 37°C. A final sample was drawn when the patient returned to normotemperature (measured at 37°C). Clotting time (CT) and maximum clotting formation (MCF) were measured with thromboelastometry. RESULTS: Upon reaching target temperature (32°C) Extem and Intem CT were increased compared to baseline with 57s (49-75) to 65s (59-72) and 165s (144-183) to 193s (167-212) respectively (median with IQR; P<0.05), with a further significant increase after 24h of hypothermia with 68s (57-80) and 221s (196-266). Samples analyzed at 32°C showed a significant longer CT of 12s in Extem and 33s in Intem compared to 37°C. MCF was not affected by MTH or adjustment of temperature. CONCLUSION: The mild effect of MTH on coagulation parameters remains unidentified when measured at 37°C. Although measurements at 32°C differ from those at 37°C, this does not appear to be of clinical relevance as all values were still within the reference range.