Week 4 viral load predicts long-term suppression of hepatitis B virus DNA during antiviral therapy: improving hepatitis B treatment in the real world.

BACKGROUND: Entecavir and tenofovir potently suppress hepatitis B virus (HBV) replication so that serum HBV DNA levels <20 IU/mL can be achieved after 2 years. Despite this, inadequate suppression is reported in >20% of cases for unclear reasons. AIM: We tested whether 4-week viral load (VL) assessment could improve 96-week treatment outcome. METHODS: Data on all chronic hepatitis B patients treated with entecavir or tenofovir between 2005 and 2014 were entered prospectively. Full data capture included pre-treatment, weeks 4, 24, 48 and 96 HBV DNA titre, HBeAg, age, gender, antiviral agent and dose escalation. Compliance data were compiled from pharmacy records, doctors' letters and clinic bookings/attendance. Time to achieve complete viral suppression (HBV DNA < 20 IU/mL) was graphed using Kaplan-Meier curves. Factors affecting this were examined using a multivariate Cox Proportional Hazard model. RESULTS: Among 156 patients treated, 72 received entecavir and 84 tenofovir. Pre-treatment HBV DNA titre, 4-week assessment and compliance impacted significantly on time to complete viral suppression. At 96 weeks, 90% of those assessed as compliant by 4-week HBV DNA had complete viral suppression versus 50% followed by 6-month VL estimation. Continuing care by the same physician was related to 4-week VL testing and optimal compliance. CONCLUSIONS: Medium-term outcomes of HBV antiviral therapy are improved by early on-treatment VL testing, facilitating patient engagement and improved compliance. The observation that 90% complete viral suppression after 2 years monotherapy is achievable in a routine clinic setting questions the need for combination therapy in HBV cases with suboptimal response.

Hepatic microcirculation in fatty liver disease.

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), the most common cause of steatosis, is associated with visceral obesity and insulin resistance. With more severe risk factors (obesity, type 2 diabetes [T2D], metabolic syndrome), steatosis may be complicated by hepatocellular injury and liver inflammation (steatohepatitis or NASH). NASH can lead to perisinusoidal fibrosis and cirrhosis. Fat-laden hepatocytes are swollen, and in steatohepatitis, further swelling occurs due to hydropic change (ballooning) of hepatocytes to cause sinusoidal distortion, as visualized by in vivo microscopy, reducing intrasinusoidal volume and microvascular blood flow. Involvement of other cell types (sinusoidal endothelial cells, Kupffer cells, stellate cells) and recruitment of inflammatory cells and platelets lead to dysregulation of microvascular blood flow. In animal models, the net effect of such changes is a marked reduction of sinusoidal space (approximately 50% of control), and a decrease in the number of normally perfused sinusoids. Such microvascular damage could accentuate further liver injury and disease progression in NASH. The fatty liver is also exquisitely sensitive to ischemia-reperfusion injury, at least partly due to the propensity of unsaturated fatty acids to undergo lipid peroxidation in the face of reactive oxygen species (ROS). This has important clinical consequences, particularly limiting the use of fatty donor livers for transplantation. In this review, we discuss available data about the effects of steatosis and steatohepatitis on the hepatic microvascular structure and sinusoidal blood flow, highlighting areas for future investigation.

Management of chronic hepatitis B virus infection: a new era of disease control.

When assessing patients with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, consider the state of viral replication, the immune response and whether viral mutations could be present, as well as evidence for liver disease or extrahepatic manifestations. In wild-type infections, loss of hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg), gain of anti-HBe and disappearance of HBV DNA from serum indicate immunosuppression of viral replication, or 'nonreplicative chronic HBV infection'. This 'healthy carrier' state must be distinguished from HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B (CHB) resulting from precore and core promoter mutations. HBeAg-negative CHB is common with genotypes D (Mediterranean region, south Asia) and C (north Asia) infections. Age, disease activity (alanine aminotransferase level) and severity (fibrosis stage, cirrhosis) influence treatment decisions. Following the marginal effectiveness of interferon and often temporary effectiveness of lamivudine due to drug resistance, treatment of CHB is entering a new era. Adefovir, entecavir, tenofovir, telbivudine and clevudine have equal or superior antiviral efficacy to lamivudine, whereas several agents are effective against lamivudine-resistant HBV. Pegylated-interferon (peginterferon) is superior to conventional interferon for obtaining sustained immunosuppression of HBV without drug resistance. Antiviral suppression of HBV replication for 2-5 years reverses hepatic fibrosis, prevents cirrhosis and, when cirrhosis is established, improves liver function, prevents hepatic decompensation and lowers the risk of liver cancer. Before embarking on immunosuppressive chemotherapy or organ transplantation in patients with chronic HBV infection, it is important to start antiviral therapy to prevent hepatitis flares. Antiviral therapy can be effective against membranous glomerulonephritis and polyarteritis nodosa caused by HBV. Further improvements in treatment of CHB are needed to prevent drug resistance and permanently suppress viral replication by eradicating viral templates or stimulating host immune responsiveness to HBV.

Management of chronic hepatitis C virus infection: a new era of disease control.

The management of chronic viral hepatitis has changed significantly with the availability of effective antiviral agents. There is now a high probability that timely intervention can arrest development of cirrhosis, thereby preventing mortality from portal hypertension, liver failure and liver cancer. This two-part review discusses the implications of this new era of antiviral therapy for physicians. The present review is about chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV); a similar review that considers the treatment of hepatitis B virus will be published in a later issue of the Internal Medicine Journal. Chronic HCV infection is common, but fibrotic progression of liver disease is slow and variable; many infected persons never develop cirrhosis. Case selection for antiviral therapy is crucial. The most effective therapy is a pegylated (long-acting) interferon with ribavirin. Sustained viral response (SVR) (absent viraemia 6 months after completing treatment) can be obtained in 40-60% of individuals infected with genotype 1 and in approximately 67% with genotype 4 after 12 months of treatment. Response rates are higher (75-85%) with genotypes 2 and 3 after only 6 months of treatment. Late relapse is negligible after SVR. This viral cure reverses hepatic fibrosis, reduces the risk of liver failure and of hepato-cellular carcinoma. Combination therapy requires a supportive setting to minimize the impact of side-effects and maximize therapeutic effectiveness. Overall management of HCV-infected persons must also embrace measures to improve quality of life by preventing or dealing with psychosocial issues and advocating lifestyle changes to counter comorbidity from alcohol, central obesity and insulin resistance. These latter factors favour fibrotic disease progression, complications of cirrhosis (such as hepatocellular carcinoma) and development of type 2 diabetes mellitus, as well as eroding the chances of SVR with antiviral therapy.