ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The deep inferior epigastric perforator flap procedure has become a popular alternative for women who require breast reconstruction. One of the difficulties with this procedure is identifying perforator arteries large enough to ensure that the harvested tissue is well vascularized. Current techniques involve imaging the perforator arteries with computed tomography (CT) to produce a grid mapping the locations of the perforator arteries relative to the umbilicus. OBJECTIVES: To compare the time it takes to produce a map of the perforators using either two-dimensional (2D) or three-dimensional (3D) CT, and to see whether there is a benefit in using a 3D model. METHODS: Patient CT abdomen and pelvis scans were acquired from a GE 64-slice scanner. CT image processing was performed with the GE 3D Advantage Workstation v4.2 software. Maps of the perforators were generated both as 2D and 3D representations. Perforators within a region 5 cm rostral and 7 cm caudal to the umbilicus were measured and the times to perform these measurements using both 2D and 3D images were recorded by a stopwatch. RESULTS: Although the 3D method took longer than the 2D method (mean [+/- SD] time 1:51+/-0:35 min versus 1:08+/-0:16 min per perforator artery, respectively), producing a 3D image provides much more information than the 2D images alone. Additionally, an actual-sized 3D image can be printed out, removing the need to make measurements and producing a grid. CONCLUSIONS: Although it took less time to create a grid of the perforators using 2D axial CT scans, the 3D reconstruction of the abdomen allows the plastic surgeons to better visualize the patient's anatomy and has definite clinical utility.
