Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Otolaryngol Clin North Am ; 32(1): 53-64, 1999 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10196438

ABSTRACT

Correction of the deviated nose presents a challenge to even the experienced rhinoplastic surgeon. This article describes the etiology, analysis, and surgical treatment for the severely twisted nose. The applied anatomy of the deviated nose is discussed in detail. Finally, a graduated approach to surgical management is described.


Subject(s)
Nose Deformities, Acquired/surgery , Rhinoplasty/methods , Humans , Nose Deformities, Acquired/etiology
2.
Otolaryngol Clin North Am ; 30(4): 519-39, 1997 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9233857

ABSTRACT

Reconstruction of forehead and scalp defects are challenging. A thorough understanding of the anatomy and dissection planes of the scalp is essential. The ability to use a variety of techniques allows the facial plastic surgeon to maximize functional and aesthetic results. Techniques such as tissue expansion, free tissue transfer, and flaps used for covering exposed bone are useful adjuncts for optimal results.


Subject(s)
Alopecia/surgery , Forehead/surgery , Scalp/surgery , Surgical Flaps/methods , Humans , Tissue Expansion
3.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg ; 116(6 Pt 1): 642-6, 1997 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9215376

ABSTRACT

The classic approach to anterior skull base lesions uses bifrontal craniotomies together with lateral rhinotomies. This approach requires frontal lobe retraction and is associated with postoperative anosmia and the development of frontal lobe encephalomalacia. The transglabellar/subcranial approach permits removal of anterior skull base lesions without frontal lobe retraction and avoids facial scars. No studies to date, however, have directly compared the two approaches in terms of patient morbidity. The present retrospective study compares the two approaches when used for the removal of anterior skull base lesions in terms of estimated blood loss, number of transfusions, number of days in the hospital and intensive care unit, and postoperative complications. Twenty patients with anterior skull base lesions were examined. The classic approach was used on 10, and the transglabellar/subcranial route was used on 10. When compared with the classic approach, the transglabellar/subcranial approach resulted in a lower estimated blood loss and subsequent transfusion rate, fewer days in the hospital and intensive care unit, and lower numbers and less severe types of complications. Furthermore, visualization of the tumors before resection with the transglabellar/subcranial approach allowed preservation of olfaction in virtually all of these patients. Although this study represents a small sample population, the results are sufficiently impressive to favor the transglabellar/subcranial approach for the removal of a variety of anterior skull base lesions.


Subject(s)
Craniotomy , Skull Base Neoplasms/surgery , Skull/surgery , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Otolaryngology/methods , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
5.
Can J Anaesth ; 39(7): 649-54, 1992 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1394752

ABSTRACT

Prophylactic administration of analgesics before surgery can decrease the intraoperative anaesthetic requirement and decrease pain during the early postoperative period. In a double-blind, placebo-controlled study involving 90 healthy ASA physical status I or II children undergoing bilateral myringotomy, we compared the postoperative analgesic effects of oral acetaminophen and ketorolac, when administered 30 min before induction of anaesthesia. Patients were randomized to receive saline (0.1 ml.kg-1), acetaminophen (10 mg.kg-1) or ketorolac (1 mg.kg-1) diluted in cherry syrup to a total volume of 5 ml. Anaesthesia was induced and maintained with halothane and nitrous oxide via a face mask. Postoperative pain was assessed by a blinded observer using an objective pain scale. The three study groups were similar with respect to demographic data, duration of anaesthesia and surgery, induction behaviour, oxygen saturation, incidence of postoperative emesis and, recovery times. The ketorolac group had lower postoperative pain scores and required less frequent analgesic therapy in the early postoperative period compared with the acetaminophen and placebo groups. In contrast, there were no differences in pain scores or analgesic requirements between the acetaminophen and the placebo groups. We conclude that the preoperative administration of oral ketorolac, but not acetaminophen, provided better postoperative pain control than placebo in children undergoing bilateral myringotomy.


Subject(s)
Acetaminophen/therapeutic use , Analgesics/therapeutic use , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/therapeutic use , Preoperative Care , Tolmetin/analogs & derivatives , Tromethamine/therapeutic use , Tympanic Membrane/surgery , Acetaminophen/administration & dosage , Administration, Oral , Analgesics/administration & dosage , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/administration & dosage , Child, Preschool , Double-Blind Method , Drug Combinations , Humans , Infant , Ketorolac Tromethamine , Tolmetin/administration & dosage , Tolmetin/therapeutic use , Tromethamine/administration & dosage
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...