Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Br J Anaesth ; 85(2): 305-7, 2000 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10992843

ABSTRACT

We compared the pungency and tolerability of three inhaled anaesthetics in a randomized, double-blind study. Eighty-one unpremedicated patients (n = 27, each group) inhaled 2 MAC of isoflurane (2.3%), desflurane (12%) or sevoflurane (4%) for 60 s from an anaesthetic breathing circuit via a mask. Two blinded observers recorded coughing, complaints of burning and irritation, and how long the inhalation was tolerated. One sevoflurane patient coughed, but completed the study period, whereas 11 isoflurane patients and 20 desflurane patients coughed, objected verbally or removed the mask forcefully. All sevoflurane, 20 isoflurane and seven desflurane patients completed the study period (average 60, 49 and 33 s, respectively, P < 0.05). The irritability grading was: desflurane > isoflurane > sevoflurane (P < 0.05). Sevoflurane is the least irritating agent for inhalation at 2 MAC concentration.


Subject(s)
Anesthesia, Closed-Circuit , Anesthetics, Inhalation/adverse effects , Isoflurane/analogs & derivatives , Isoflurane/adverse effects , Methyl Ethers/adverse effects , Desflurane , Double-Blind Method , Humans , Male , Patient Satisfaction , Sevoflurane , Time Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...