Silent Destruction: Fulminant Hepatitis and the Hidden Danger of Weight Loss Drugs.

INTRODUCTION: The use of natural products for therapeutic purposes is a common practice throughout the world, in part, due to the global obesity epidemic and the search for products with appetite suppression and weight loss properties, which include nutritional supplements, vitamins and minerals to herbal products. It is known that such products may be associated with various adverse health effects. Thus, the objective of this study is to report a series of cases of patients, who presented fulminant liver failure (HFI) requiring liver transplantation (LT), related to the consumption of products used for weight loss. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort based on the evaluation of patients listed for LT due to IHF at the Hospital das Clínicas of the Universidade Estadual de Campinas, between 1991 and 2022, with patients who had confirmed consumption of products with the aim of loss being selected. RESULTS: During the studied period, 92 patients were listed for HT due to IHF according to the Kings College criteria, with 5 cases being selected with proven consumption of herbal products for weight loss, and other causes that could explain the IHF were excluded. Four (80%) of the patients were female, with a mean age of 40.5 years, and 40% of the cases died. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Unlike traditional pharmaceutical medicines, in most countries, the commercialization of these products is not conditioned on clinical and safety evidence or prior approval by regulatory bodies. Hepatoxicity can be related to several factors, such as the presence of toxins naturally found in plants, the presence of heavy metals, contamination during obtaining or processing and the addition of substances omitted from the labels. The use of weight loss products can evolve with IHF, a fact that deserves attention, due to ease of access and growing demand, and it is important to regulate the trade of these products and raise public awareness about the risks of use without professional supervision and guidance.

Liver Transplantation After Previous Vena Cava Resection: Case Report.

In some specific cases, the surgical technique involved in liver transplantation can be challenging, as, for example, in cases of Budd-Chiari syndrome. This case describes a case of liver transplantation in a patient diagnosed with Budd-Chiari syndrome due to a previous surgery that required retrohepatic vena cava resection. During the liver transplantation procedure, a cavo-atrial anastomosis was performed through transdiaphragmatic access, with a good postoperative result, showing that, although challenging, this technique is a feasible option in specific cases.

Validation of New York/California Score in the Preoperative Period of Liver Transplant for Hepatocellular Carcinoma at University of Campinas's Hospital.

Liver transplant is the main treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma and there is currently an important demand from patients waiting in transplant queues. Thus, it is extremely important to improve the criteria for selecting patients who will undergo transplant to mitigate graft loss and reduce cases of recurrence. Thus, it becomes necessary to use models, such as the New York/California (NYCA), that include alpha fetoprotein as a marker of recurrence and prognosis. The aim of this study was to assess whether the NYCA score correlated with the presence of tumor recurrence after transplant in patients undergoing orthotopic liver transplant at the Clinics Hospital of the University of Campinas. We had 214 patients undergoing liver transplant who met the inclusion Milan criteria. The age of the patients ranged from 34 to 77 years, with a median age of 61 years. The mean waiting time on the transplant list was 6.12 months. After calculating the NYCA score, it was possible to stratify 13 patients (6.1%) as high risk, 64 patients (29.9%) as medium risk, and 137 patients (64%) as low risk. Patients with recurrence had higher scores with a mean of 4 points in relapse and 2 points in the absence of relapse (P = .0011). Patients with recurrence had statistically higher high- and medium-risk scores (P = .0010). Therefore, the NYCA score was higher in patients with recurrence. Therefore, in this study, our findings suggest the possibility of using the NYCA score as an aid to detect patients with a higher risk of tumor recurrence.

Refinement of the Milan Criteria: Role of α-Fetoprotein In Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common primary neoplasm of the liver, mainly secondary to cirrhosis caused by hepatitis C virus. Liver transplant (LT) is considered the best treatment because, in addition to removing the tumor, it also removes the underlying cirrhotic liver. The Milan criteria for LT have limitations because they do not consider the biological characteristics of the tumor. Thus, our objective was to evaluate the association of α-fetoprotein (AFP) levels before LT performed for HCC with recurrence of this tumor, and, based on the results, a new predictive model that combines the AFP values at the list entry with the usual criteria of tumor size and number of nodules was validated. In present study, the Score AFP model, we were able to correlate a greater occurrence of relapse with scores of 3 and 4 (P = .0001), indicating the usefulness of using AFP as a predictor of recurrence.

Validation of Metroticket Score in the Preoperative Period of Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the sixth leading cause of cancer in the world, and liver transplant (LT) is a good therapeutic option in selected cases because it treats the neoplasm and the underlying disease. Recurrence after LT is usually aggressive and has low survival; thus, an adequate selection of recipients is ideal. The new models aim to assess the individual risk of HCC recurrence in patients undergoing LT and to improve post-LT survival. In this study, our aim was to assess the applicability of the "Metroticket" score, correlating it with our rates of recurrence and survival after LT. Overall survival at 5 years in our study differed from that in Metroticket 2.0 because that study did not consider only recurrence as the cause of death; our study evaluated only patients with recurrence, so we were able to validate the score as a predictor of greater tumor aggressiveness after LT.