Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand ; 59(4): 475-85, 2015 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25532557

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: A maladaptation of the autonomic nervous system may been seen in patients with chronic pain that includes persistent changes in the autonomic tone, increased heart rate, and reduced heart rate variability and baroreflex sensitivity. Baroreflex sensitivity and acute pain intensity have been reported to be inversely correlated. However, it is unknown whether the same correlation applies with regard to post-operative pain. In the present study, autonomic function was measured in patients scheduled for minor hand surgery and correlated with early and persistent pain after the procedure. Thus, the cause (autonomic imbalance) was present before the effect (post-operative pain). Our primary hypothesis was that a lower level of pre-operative baroreflex sensitivity is correlated with increased early post-operative pain. METHODS: There were 30 patients included and scheduled for open carpal tunnel surgery. Baroreflex sensitivity and heart rate variability were measured before surgery. Efferent cardiac parasympathetic activity was estimated by power spectral analysis of heart rate variability. Post-operative pain was recorded daily for 6 weeks (early post-operative pain) and for 1 week 1 year after surgery (persistent post-operative pain). RESULTS: Pre-operative baroreflex sensitivity correlated negatively with early (P=0.05) and persistent (P=0.04) post-operative pain. Efferent cardiac parasympathetic activity correlated negatively with early (P=0.03) but not persistent post-operative pain (P=0.12). CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that a low pre-operative level of baroreflex sensitivity is associated with higher post-operative pain intensity. To our knowledge, this is the first study to show the correlation between baroreflex sensitivity and post-operative pain.


Subject(s)
Autonomic Nervous System Diseases/physiopathology , Baroreflex , Heart/innervation , Pain, Postoperative/epidemiology , Adult , Aged , Blood Pressure , Carpal Tunnel Syndrome/surgery , Female , Heart/physiopathology , Heart Rate , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pain Measurement , Pain, Postoperative/physiopathology , Young Adult
2.
J Oral Rehabil ; 42(5): 378-85, 2015 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25495065

ABSTRACT

To characterise self-reported levels of stress and autonomic responses in healthy humans evoked by different rates of the Paced Auditory Serial Addition Task (PASAT). Fifteen participants performed PASATs with different rates (3·6-, 2·4-, 1·6- or 1·2-s intervals) and a control task, in random order. Correct responses, self-reported levels of stress and autonomic responses to the PASATs were estimated. Increased PASAT rates were associated with decreases in correct responses (P < 0·001) and increases in self-reported levels of stress (P < 0·001). For autonomic responses, significant changes were seen in 10 variables during 2·4-s PASAT compared with the respective baseline; however, significant differences in relative changes from baseline were found between the 2·4-s PASAT and control task only for mean RR-intervals (P < 0·001), systolic and diastolic blood pressure (P = 0·002 and P = 0·006) and cardiac output (P < 0·001). Regarding comparison between the four PASATs, significant differences in the relative changes from baseline were seen between the 3·6-s PASAT and faster PASATs, for example mean RR-intervals, high-frequency power and respiration rate; however, there were no differences between the faster PASATs. The autonomic responses during the PASATs with different rates were quite similar for the faster PASATs (intervals < 2·4 s); however, the slowest 3·6-s PASAT evoked significantly less self-reported stress and autonomic arousal compared with the faster PASATs. Standardization of the PASAT rate may be important for studies on autonomic nervous system function and self-reported measures of stress. Future studies may test more complex interactions between stress, autonomic responses and pain responses.


Subject(s)
Acoustic Stimulation , Autonomic Nervous System/physiopathology , Neuropsychological Tests , Stress, Psychological/physiopathology , Task Performance and Analysis , Adult , Electrocardiography , Female , Healthy Volunteers , Heart Rate/physiology , Hemodynamics/physiology , Humans , Male
3.
Acta Neurol Scand ; 121(5): 320-7, 2010 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19930209

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Examination of the relationship between pain, sensory hypersensitivity, referred sensations and involuntary muscle jerks in patients with brachial plexus injury. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fourteen patients with brachial plexus lesions were included. Spontaneous background and paroxysmal pain and mechanically and thermally evoked pain were recorded. Areas with sensory hypersensitivity and referred pain were mapped on a body chart. This was supplemented by electrophysiological analysis in three patients. RESULTS: Sensory hypersensitivity and areas with pinprick-induced referred phantom sensations were present in adjacent dermatomes. There was no clear relationship between chronic neuropathic pain and referred sensations, but there was a correlation between pain paroxysms and sensory hypersensitivity in dermatomes adjacent to deafferented areas. In three patients, simultaneous referred sensations and short latency motor action potentials ipsilateral to the denervated side suggested origin at subcortical sites. CONCLUSION: The study suggests a possible role of a spinal generator for sensory hypersensitivity and referred sensations following denervation.


Subject(s)
Brachial Plexus/injuries , Brachial Plexus/physiopathology , Dyskinesias/physiopathology , Neuralgia/physiopathology , Pain, Referred/physiopathology , Adult , Chronic Disease , Electromyography , Evoked Potentials, Motor , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pain Measurement , Pectoralis Muscles/physiopathology , Physical Stimulation , Temperature , Time Factors , Young Adult
4.
Acta Physiol Scand ; 180(4): 405-14, 2004 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15030382

ABSTRACT

AIM: Do distraction from- or attention to sural nerve stimulation affect pain, heart rate variability, and a spinal withdrawal reflex? MATERIAL AND METHODS: In 26 male volunteers, electrical stimulation at the distal cutaneous receptive field of the sural nerve elicited pain and a nociceptive withdrawal reflex. Intensity of pain was rated on a numeric rating scale. Electromyographic reflex responses were measured from biceps femoris muscle. Cardiac autonomic function was estimated by heart rate variability measures and was expressed in the time domain as mean of RR-intervals for normal heart beats (mean-RR) and standard deviation of all normal RR-intervals (SD-NN) and, in the frequency domain, where pure vagal activity was assessed by high frequency power (0.15-0.4 Hz). Low frequency power (0.04-0.15 Hz) reflects both parasympathetic and sympathetic control. Effect parameters were recorded before and during random distraction and attention. Distraction from sural nerve stimulation was induced by a mental arithmetic test, paced auditory serial addition task (PASAT), while attention was induced by concentrating on painful foot stimulation. RESULTS: Paced auditory serial addition task decreased mean-RR and SD-NN, frequency domain parameters, as well as pain (P<0.001). In contrast, PASAT did not change the spinal withdrawal reflex. Attention did not affect any effect parameter. CONCLUSION: Distraction by PASAT altered autonomic activity and inhibited pain but failed to affect withdrawal reflex responses, while attention had no effect on either parameter. Psychological distraction and attention may have different effects on noxious evoked pain perception and autonomic activity. Pain relief during PASAT probably involves supraspinal mechanisms.


Subject(s)
Heart Rate/physiology , Pain/psychology , Reflex/physiology , Stress, Psychological/psychology , Adult , Attention/physiology , Electric Stimulation , Electromyography/methods , Humans , Male , Muscle, Skeletal/physiology , Pain/physiopathology , Pain Measurement/methods , Perception/physiology , Stress, Psychological/physiopathology , Sural Nerve/physiology
5.
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand ; 45(9): 1128-35, 2001 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11683664

ABSTRACT

Our understanding of nociceptive processing and of plastic changes after persistent noxious input has increased immensely within the last two decades. It is now clear that long-lasting noxious stimulation or damage to the nervous system give rise to a neuronal hyperexcitability and that this sensitisation of the nervous system plays an important role for development and maintenance of chronic pain. The manifestations of such hyperexcitability are numerous and include among others: increased neuronal response to a suprathreshold stimulus, expansion of the peripheral areas from where a central neurone can be activated and the recruitment of previous non-responding nociceptive neurones. Furthermore, it has been possible to modulate this neuronal hyperexcitability by the discovery of molecular targets for pain, by sequencing DNA of ion channels and receptors and by development of new molecules that exert their effects on these molecular targets. The changes in responsiveness appear to be partly time and intensity dependent and partly dependent on the cause of injury. Whereas relatively short-lasting and moderate noxious input leads to reversible plastic changes, more intense and long-lasting noxious stimulation implies a risk for persistent and more profound alterations in transmitters, receptors, ion channels and in neuronal connectivity. Despite the explosion of new knowledge in pain processing and in molecular background for neuroplasticity, this progress has unfortunately not resulted in a corresponding improvement of our ability to treat chronic pain. The number of patients with chronic unrelieved pain is still high and newer types of treatment have so far not resulted in a substantially better treatment. Nevertheless, there is now an ongoing systematic research in which chronic pain conditions are assessed in a fashion so that mechanisms underlying pain can be dissected. Moreover, controlled clinical trials together with systematic reviews are carried out which in the future should permit formulation of treatment algorithms for chronic pain. Finally, it is likely that the development of new specific types of treatment will show efficacy if they are evaluated and analysed not on the global pain experience, but more specifically on those targets and elements of the pain experience they are aimed to deal with.


Subject(s)
Pain Management , Animals , Chronic Disease , Humans , Pain/metabolism , Pain/physiopathology , Pain/prevention & control
6.
Acta Physiol Scand ; 172(3): 211-7, 2001 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11472308

ABSTRACT

A nociceptive withdrawal reflex in 12 human volunteers was elicited by painful electrical stimulation applied to the cutaneous innervation area of the sural nerve. The evoked electromyographic reflex activities were recorded with surface electrodes placed on the short head of the biceps femoris muscle ipsi-lateral to sural nerve stimulation, before, during and after conditioning stimuli. The nociceptive withdrawal reflex was conditioned by nociceptive and non-nociceptive, heterotopic and segmental counter-stimulation. Heterotopic nociceptive counter-stimulation and segmental nociceptive counter-stimulation were induced by ice water applied to the contra-lateral hand and foot, respectively. Heterotopic nociceptive counter-stimulation produced a significant inhibition of the nociceptive withdrawal reflex and the associated pains rating to sural nerve stimulation. Segmental nociceptive counter-stimulation inhibited the pain rating and tended to inhibit the nociceptive withdrawal reflex. There was no obvious correlation between visual analogue scale (VAS) and the nociceptive withdrawal reflex elicited by sural nerve stimulation neither in the group nor in the individual subject. This suggests that the nociceptive withdrawal reflex cannot always be used as a quantitative measure of pain.


Subject(s)
Functional Laterality/physiology , Pain/physiopathology , Reflex/physiology , Adult , Cold Temperature , Electric Stimulation , Electromyography , Humans , Male , Pain Measurement , Pressure , Sural Nerve/physiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...