Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 38
Filter
1.
J Gynecol Oncol ; 2024 Apr 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38670561

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To compare the health impact and economic benefits among individuals who did not receive the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine to those who received a single dose, or 2 doses. The comparison was stratified by 4 types of vaccine in conjunction with primary HPV screening in a low/middle-income country setting. METHODS: A Markov model was employed to simulate HPV infection and cervical cancer in a cohort of 100,000 12-year-old girls free of HPV. The study scrutinized 9 strategies: 1 dose and 2 doses of 2vHPV (Cervarix®), 2vHPV (Cecolin®), 4vHPV (Gardasil®), 9vHPV vaccine (Gardasil9®), and no vaccination. The primary outcome measure was the quality-adjusted life year (QALY) of each strategy. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were estimated over a lifetime horizon, accompanied by sensitivity analyses conducted. RESULTS: All vaccination programs yielded 41,298-71,057 QALYs gained accompanied by cost savings of 14,914,186-19,821,655 USD compared to no vaccination. Administering 2 doses of 9vHPV vaccine emerged as the most cost-effective strategy, boasting 406 USD/QALY, within a lower willingness to pay threshold. Sensitivity analysis demonstrated an 80% probability of the cost-effectiveness of the 2 doses of 9vHPV vaccine regimen. Furthermore, uncertainty around the costs of vaccination and vaccine efficacy exerted the most substantial influence on the cost-effectiveness findings. CONCLUSION: Oping for 2 doses of 9vHPV vaccine in conjunction with a primary HPV screening represents the most cost-effective option for implementing a school-based HPV vaccination program targeting 12-year-old girls in Thailand. Such findings provide valuable insights for policymakers in the realm of cervical cancer prevention.

2.
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev ; 25(1): 211-217, 2024 Jan 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38285786

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Self- collected specimens to detect high-risk (hr) HPV and high-grade cervical lesions (CIN2+) has been introduced aiming to increase cervical cancer screening coverage. The performance of self- collected specimen  compared to clinician collected specimen is one major concern. This study aimed to compare self-sampling HPV-DNA and clinician-sampling HPV-mRNA to detect hr-HPV and high-grade cervical lesions. METHODS: Women with abnormal cervical cytology and/ or positive hr-HPV who attended the colposcopy clinics in 10 tertiary hospitals in Bangkok were enrolled. Self-collected specimens were evaluated for  HPV DNA using Cobas® 4800 HPV test prior to the clinician-collected specimens which were tested for HPV mRNA with APTIMA® HPV Assay. Subsequent colposcopy with biopsy was performed. The detection rates of hr-HPV from both HPV tests and their performance to detect high-grade lesions pathology were compared. RESULTS: Data from 497 women's specimens were analyzed. Both samplings had 86.8% concordance rate in detecting hr-HPV (Kappa 0.670; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.599-0.746, P value < 0.001). The sensitivity (95% CI) of self-collected specimen HPV DNA and clinician- collected specimen HPV-mRNA to detect high-grade lesions were 91.8% (85.4%-96.0%) and 90.2% (83.6%-94.9%) respectively. The corresponding negative predictive values (95% CI) were 91.9% (85.6%-96.0%) and 91.7% (86.0%-95.7%) respectively. CONCLUSION: HPV DNA testing from self-collected specimen to detect HR-HPV demonstrates high concordance with HPV mRNA testing from clinician-collected specimen. The sensitivity and negative predictive value of both tests to detect high-grade lesions are comparable.


Subject(s)
Papillomavirus Infections , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms , Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/pathology , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/pathology , Papillomavirus Infections/diagnosis , Early Detection of Cancer , Papillomaviridae/genetics , Thailand , Specimen Handling , Colposcopy , DNA , RNA, Messenger/genetics , Sensitivity and Specificity
3.
Int J Gynecol Cancer ; 33(9): 1354-1358, 2023 09 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37612037

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: We compared the performance of high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) messenger RNA testing of physician- and self-collected specimens for detecting histological grade 2 or higher cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) among women who visited a colposcopy clinic in Thailand. METHODS: From January 2022 to April 2022, 500 women participated in this cross-sectional multicenter study; 494 had complete data and valid specimen results. The participants were women who attended any one of the 10 participating institutes' colposcopy clinics due to abnormal cytology, positive high-risk HPV testing, or for follow-up. Participants used a self-sampling Aptima Multitest Swab specimen collection kit to self-collect vaginal samples before physicians biopsied the cervix during the colposcopic examination. The self- and physician-collected specimens were tested for high-risk HPV messenger RNA using Aptima nucleic acid amplification assays. Cervical tissues were collected during colposcopic-directed biopsy from the most severe lesion or a random biopsy and endocervical curettage specimen if no lesion was detected. RESULTS: We detected high-risk HPV messenger RNA in 75.4% of self-collected specimens and 70.6% of physician-collected specimens. The prevalence of histological grade 2 or higher CIN from cervical histology was 25.1% (n=124). For self-collected specimens, the sensitivity and specificity of high-risk HPV messenger RNA for grade 2 or higher CIN were 87.0% (95% CI 79.7% to 92.4%; n=108) and 28.5% (95% CI 24.0% to 33.4%). For physician-collected specimens, the sensitivity and specificity of high-risk HPV messenger RNA for grade 2 or higher CIN were 90.2% (95% CI 83.6% to 94.9%; n=112) and 36.1% (95% CI 31.2% to 41.3%). CONCLUSIONS: Self-collected specimens for high-risk HPV messenger RNA testing demonstrated good sensitivity and negative predictive value for detecting grade 2 or higher CIN in Thai women attending the participating institutes' colposcopy clinics. Self-collected samples performed similarly to physician-collected ones.


Subject(s)
Papillomavirus Infections , Specimen Handling , Female , Humans , Male , Cervix Uteri , Cross-Sectional Studies , Human Papillomavirus Viruses , Papillomavirus Infections/diagnosis , Physicians , Southeast Asian People , Thailand/epidemiology , Self-Testing
4.
Viruses ; 14(12)2022 12 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36560717

ABSTRACT

Persistent infection with high-risk human papillomaviruses (HR-HPVs), particularly HPV16 and 18, has long been known to induce cervical cancer progression. However, given that a minority of HPV-infected women develop cancer, analysis of HR-HPV-infected women could help to predict who is at risk of acquiring cervical cancer. Therefore, to improve HR-HPVs detection, we used the FDA-approved cobas® 4800 HPV and REBA HPV-ID® HPV assays to detect HR-HPVs in colposcopy-derived cervical cells from 303 patients, detecting 72.28% (219) and 71.62% (217) of HR-HPVs positive cases, with HPV16 detection rates of 35.64% (108) and 30.69% (93), respectively. Of the HPV16-positive cases, cobas® 4800 and REBA HPV-ID® identified 28.81% (51) and 25.42% (45) of the CIN1 cases, and 55% (33) and 50% (30) of the 60 CIN2/3 cases, respectively. HPV-diagnostic concordance was 82.17% overall (kappa = 0.488), 87.45% for HR-HPVs (kappa = 0.689), and 88.33% for CIN2/3 (kappa = 0.51). The HR-HPVs detection rates of these assays were comparable. Our findings reveal that the FDA-approved HR-HPVs detection assay is appropriate for screening women with HR-HPVs infection, and for predicting increased risk of cervical cancer progression. REBA HPV-ID® can be used to detect low risk-HPV types in high-grade cervical lesions that are HR-HPV negative as well as in the distribution of HPV types.


Subject(s)
Papillomavirus Infections , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms , Female , Humans , Human Papillomavirus Viruses , Cervix Uteri , Human papillomavirus 16/genetics , Early Detection of Cancer , Papillomaviridae/genetics , Genotype
5.
Vaccine ; 40(13): 1968-1976, 2022 03 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35190207

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine the real-world effectiveness of bi- or quadrivalent human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines in Thai adult women ≥5 years post-vaccination in reducing HPV 16/18-associated low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions or worse (LSIL+), atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance or worse (ASC-US+), and HPV 16/18 positivity. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted among Thai women aged 20-45 years in Bangkok. The vaccinated and unvaccinated groups were matched according to baseline years. HPV/Pap test results were collected from the medical records and/or obtained by cervical sample collection at the study sites. Adjusted hazard ratios were measured using multivariable Cox regression analyses. RESULTS: A total of 993 participants (493 vaccinated and 500 unvaccinated) were enrolled from 2018 to 2019. The median ages at baseline of the vaccinated and unvaccinated groups were 33 years (interquartile range [IQR] 27-38) and 34 years (IQR 30-38), respectively. The median follow-up periods were 7.3 years (IQR 6.1-8.6) and 7.2 years (IQR 5.8-8.9) for the vaccinated group and the unvaccinated group, respectively. More women in the vaccinated group were single (29.2% vs. 13.2%, P < 0.001) and university graduates (83.2% vs. 75.4%, P = 0.009). The vaccinated and unvaccinated groups had similar personal monthly incomes (>20,000 THB/month, 63.9% vs. 62.4%, respectively, P = 0.685). There were no cases of HPV 16/18-associated LSIL+ in the vaccinated group, whereas there were four cases in the unvaccinated group. HPV vaccine effectiveness was 88.0% (95% CI 2.0-98.5) in the reduction of HPV 16/18-associated ASC-US+, and 84.6% (95% CI 43.5-95.8) in the reduction of HPV 16/18 positivity. CONCLUSIONS: HPV vaccine effectiveness was high in adult women in a real-world scenario in a developing country. Free HPV vaccination in adult women in this age group should be further explored when vaccine supplies are not limited. (HPV: human papillomavirus. LSIL+: low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion or worse. ASC-US+: atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance or worse).


Subject(s)
Alphapapillomavirus , Atypical Squamous Cells of the Cervix , Papillomavirus Infections , Papillomavirus Vaccines , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms , Adult , Female , Human papillomavirus 16 , Human papillomavirus 18 , Humans , Papillomaviridae , Papillomavirus Infections/prevention & control , Retrospective Studies , Thailand , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/prevention & control
6.
PLoS One ; 16(2): e0245894, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33571186

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine was introduced into Thailand's national immunization program in 2017 for 11-12 year old school girls. The objectives of this study were to examine the epidemiological consequences and cost-effectiveness of a routine quadrivalent HPV (4vHPV) vaccination and the routine 4vHPV vaccination plus 5-year catch-up vaccination by comparing with cervical cancer screening only (no vaccination) in Thailand. METHOD: A transmission dynamic model was used to assess the cost-effectiveness of the routine 4vHPV vaccination and the routine 4vHPV vaccination plus catch-up vaccination, compared with no vaccination (screening only) in Thai population. The vaccination coverage rate assumptions were 95% in 11-12-year-old girls for the routine vaccination and 70% in 13-24 year-old females for the 5-year catch-up vaccination. Vaccination costs, direct medical costs of HPV-related diseases, and the number of quality of life years (QALYs) gained were calculated for over a 100-year time horizon with discount rate of 3%. RESULT: The model indicated that the routine 4vHPV vaccination and the routine plus catch-up 4vHPV vaccination strategies could prevent approximately 434,130 and 472,502 cumulative cases of cervical cancer, 182,234 and 199,068 cumulative deaths from cervical cancer and 12,708,349 and 13,641,398 cumulative cases of HPV 6/11 related genital warts, respectively, when compared with no vaccination over 100 years. The estimated cost per QALY gained (ICER) when compared to no vaccination in Thailand was 8,370 THB/QALY for the routine vaccination and 9,650 THB/QALY for the routine with catch-up vaccination strategy. CONCLUSION: Considering the recommended threshold of 160,000 THB/QALY for Thailand, the implementation of the routine 4vHPV vaccination either alone or plus the catch-up vaccination was cost-effective as compared to the cervical cancer screening only.


Subject(s)
Papillomavirus Vaccines/economics , Papillomavirus Vaccines/pharmacology , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/epidemiology , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/prevention & control , Child , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Female , Humans , Mass Screening/economics , Models, Economic , Thailand/epidemiology
7.
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev ; 21(10): 2913-2917, 2020 Oct 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33112548

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Self sampled HPV testing is a cervical cancer screening method . However, cytology in self-sampled specimen cannot be used as a triage test.  Therefore, other methods for triage should be considered. CyclinA1 (CCNA1) promoter methylation has strong association with cervical precancerous and cancerous lesion. The objective of this study was to compare the diagnostic value of CCNA1 and self-sampled specimen for detecting high-grade cervical intraepithelial lesions or worse (CIN2+). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross sectional study was conducted. Women with abnormal cytology or positive for high risk HPV (hrHPV) indicated for colposcopic examination were enrolled.  Self-collected sampling for hrHPV DNA (SS-HPV) and CCNA1 were performed. hrHPV DNA testing was done by Cobas 4800 method. CCNA1 promoter methylation was detected by CCNA1 duplex methylation specific PCR. Histopathologic result as CIN2+ obtaining from colposcopic directed biopsy or excisional procedure  was considered as positive a gold standard. The results of hrHPV and CCNA1 were reported as positive or negative. Sensitivity specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of SS-HPV and CCNA1 were calculated by comparing the results with the gold standard. RESULTS: Two hundreds and eighty women were recruited. High-grade cervical lesions and cervical cancer (CIN2+) were diagnosed in 21.8% (61 cases) of the patients. The most common type of hrHPV was non 16, 18 subtype, followed by HPV16 and 18. CCNA1 was positive in 13 patients out of whom, twelve were CIN2+. Sensitivity of CCNA1 was 19.7 % and its  specificity and accuracy were 99.5% and 82.14%, respectively.  The sensitivity of SS-HPV was 70.5%, and its  specificity and accuracy were 39.2% and 43.3%, respectively. CONCLUSION:   Due to high specificity and positive predictive value of CCNA1, it can be used as alarming sign of having high-grade cervical intraepithelial lesions, especially in patient who has positive hrHPV DNA test based on self-collected sampling.
.


Subject(s)
Cyclin A1/genetics , DNA Methylation , Papillomavirus Infections/diagnosis , Promoter Regions, Genetic , Self Care , Specimen Handling/methods , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/diagnosis , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , DNA, Viral/analysis , DNA, Viral/genetics , Early Detection of Cancer/methods , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Human Papillomavirus DNA Tests/methods , Humans , Middle Aged , Papillomaviridae/isolation & purification , Papillomavirus Infections/epidemiology , Papillomavirus Infections/genetics , Papillomavirus Infections/virology , Prognosis , Thailand/epidemiology , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/epidemiology , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/genetics , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/virology , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/diagnosis , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/epidemiology , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/genetics , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/virology
8.
Cancer Control ; 27(1): 1073274820922540, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32372659

ABSTRACT

To identify the optimal cost-effective strategy for cervical cancer screening program in Thailand by comparing the different algorithms which based on the use of primary human papilloma virus (HPV) assay. We use a Microsoft Excel-based spreadsheet to calculate the accumulated cases of preinvasive and invasive cervical cancer and the budget impact of each screening program. The model was developed to determine the cost-effectiveness of 3 screening strategies: pooled HPV test with reflex liquid-based cytology triage, HPV genotyping with reflex p16/ki67 dual stain cytology, and pooled HPV test with dual stain. The main outcomes were the total cost, incremental quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). Strategy entailing primary HPV genotyping and reflex dual stain cytology is the least costly strategy (total cost US$37 893 407) and provides the similar QALY gained compared to pooled high-risk HPV testing with reflex dual stain (Average QALY 24.03). Pooled HPV test with reflex dual staining is more costly compared to strategy without reflex dual staining. The ICER was US$353.40 per QALY gained. One-way sensitivity analysis showed that the model is sensitive to the cost of dual stain and the cost of cancer treatment. Decreasing the incidence of cervical cancer case and increasing the QALYs can be successful by using dual stain cytology as the triage test for pooled HPV test or HPV genotyping. The result of our analysis favors the use of HPV genotyping with the reflex dual stain as it offers the most QALY at the lowest cost.


Subject(s)
Mass Screening/economics , Mass Screening/methods , Papillomavirus Infections/diagnosis , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/diagnosis , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/economics , Adult , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Cytological Techniques , Female , Genotyping Techniques , Health Expenditures , Humans , Middle Aged , Models, Econometric , Neoplasm Invasiveness , Quality-Adjusted Life Years , Thailand , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/pathology , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/virology
9.
J Gynecol Oncol ; 31(3): e55, 2020 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32266804

ABSTRACT

Cervical cancer is still one of the most common female cancers in Asia and the leading cause of cancer-related deaths in low- and middle-income countries. Nowadays, national screening programs for cervical cancer are widely provided in Asian countries. We reviewed the National Cancer Screening Program (NCSP) in China, India, Indonesia, Japan, Korea, and Thailand. The NCSP were established at varying times, from 1962 in Japan to 2014 in Indonesia. The primary screening method is based on cytology in all countries except for India and Indonesia. In India and Indonesia, visual inspection of the cervix with acetic acid (VIA) is mainly used as a primary screening method, and a "see and treat" strategy is applied to women with a positive VIA result. The starting age of NCSP ranges from 18 years in China to 30 years in Thailand. The screening interval is 2 years in all countries except for China and Indonesia, in which it is 3 years. Uptake rates of NCSP vary from 5.0%-59.7%. Many women in low- and middle-income countries still do not participate in NCSP. To improve uptake rates and thereby prevent more cases of cervical cancer, Asian countries should continue to promote NCSP to the public using various approaches.


Subject(s)
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , China , Early Detection of Cancer , Female , Humans , India , Japan , Middle Aged , Republic of Korea , Thailand , Young Adult
10.
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev ; 21(2): 473-477, 2020 Feb 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32102526

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:
Using HPV testing to triage ASC-US still has some problems of unnecessary colposcopy in many cases. A previous study reported that methylation of CCNA1, a tumor suppressor gene, can differentiate between low and high grade lesions. This study was designed to evaluate the diagnostic values and application of CCNA1 methylation in the patients with ASC-US group.
Materials and methods:
Cross sectional analytic study was conducted in the patients with
ASC-US cytology. HPV DNA testing and CCNA1 promoter methylation testing were performed. The patients were sent for colposcopic examination and biopsy. Biopsy results were considered as gold standard. Diagnostic test of HPV test and CCNA1 methylation test were calculated for sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), positive predictive value (PPV), likelihood ratio for test positive and negative and 95% confidence interval.
Results:
One hundred and seventy patients were enrolled. Mean age was 39.7 years old. HR-HPV was positive in 70% of the patients. HPV type 16, type 18 and non-16,18 were 12.4%, 4.7% and 42.4%, respectively. CIN2+ were found in 12.4% (21 cases). CCNA1 promoter methylation was positive in 5 cases. CCNA1 had high specificity 99.3%, NPV 89.2% and PPV 80% in detection of CIN2+ but sensitivity was 19%. Likelihood ratio for positive test was 28.4 and likelihood ratio for negative test was 0.8. HPV test had sensitivity of 90.5% and NPV of 95.9% but low specificity and PPV as 31.5% and 15.7%, respectively.
Conclusion:
CCNA1 promoter methylation testing had very high specificity, likelihood ratio for the positive test and PPV (99.3%, 28.4 and 80.0, respectively). Therefore, CCNA1 promoter methylation test may be used in the HPV DNA positive cases to classify the urgency of colposcopy and the colposcopist should pay more attention to CCNA1 positive patients because of their higher chance to identify the significant lesions.


Subject(s)
Atypical Squamous Cells of the Cervix/metabolism , Cyclin A1/genetics , DNA Methylation , Papillomavirus Infections/diagnosis , Promoter Regions, Genetic , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/diagnosis , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/diagnosis , Adult , Atypical Squamous Cells of the Cervix/pathology , Biopsy , Colposcopy , Female , Human Papillomavirus DNA Tests , Human papillomavirus 16/genetics , Human papillomavirus 18/genetics , Humans , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Grading , Papanicolaou Test , Papillomavirus Infections/pathology , Predictive Value of Tests , Sensitivity and Specificity , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/genetics , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/pathology , Vaginal Smears , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/genetics , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/pathology
11.
Clin Infect Dis ; 71(8): e270-e280, 2020 11 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31768522

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Female youth with perinatally acquired human immunodeficiency virus (PHIV) may be at higher risk than uninfected youth for persistent anogenital human papillomavirus (HPV) infection, due to prolonged immunodeficiency. METHODS: A 3-year cohort study was conducted between 2013 and 2017 among Thai and Vietnamese PHIV and HIV-uninfected females 12-24 years, matched by age group and number of lifetime sexual partners. For HPV genotyping, cervical and anal samples were obtained at baseline and annually. Vaginal samples were collected at baseline and every 6 months. Factors associated with high-risk HPV (HR-HPV) persistence and incidence were assessed. RESULTS: We enrolled 93 PHIV and 99 HIV-uninfected females. Median age was 19 (interquartile range [IQR] 18-20) years. For the 7 HR-HPV types (16, 18, 31, 33, 45, 52, 58) in the nonavalent HPV vaccine, PHIV had significantly higher incidence (P = .03) and persistence (P = .01) than HIV-uninfected youth over a 3-year period. Having HIV (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 2.1, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1-3.9) and ever using illegal substances (aHR 4.8, 95% CI 1.8-13.0) were associated with incident 7 HR-HPV infections. HIV-positive status (adjusted prevalence ratio [aPR] 2.2, 95% CI 1.5-3.2), recent alcohol use (aPR 1.75, 95% CI 1.2-2.5), and higher number of lifetime partners (aPR 2.0, 95% CI 1.4-3.1, for 3-5 partners; aPR 1.93, 95% CI 1.2-3.2, for ≥6 partners) were significantly associated with persistent 7 HR-HPV infections. CONCLUSIONS: Female PHIV were at higher risk of having anogenital HR-HPV acquisition and persistence. Primary and secondary prevention programs for HPV infection and HPV-related diseases should be prioritized for PHIV children and youth.


Subject(s)
HIV Infections , Papillomavirus Infections , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Cohort Studies , Female , HIV Infections/complications , HIV Infections/epidemiology , Humans , Incidence , Papillomaviridae/genetics , Papillomavirus Infections/complications , Papillomavirus Infections/epidemiology , Prevalence , Risk Factors , Thailand , Young Adult
12.
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol ; 58(4): 477-481, 2019 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31307736

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: to correlate the detection rate of high risk HPV (HR-HPV) DNA between self-collected and clinician-collected testing. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional analytic study was conducted in 400 women undergoing cervical cancer screening program during February and May 2015. The procedure began with self-collected method and then clinician-collected method. Then, the specimens were processed and interpreted with the same technique. If the results from either methods were positive for HPV genotype 16 or 18, colposcopy was performed. We also conducted cytology testing for the participants. If the results were abnormal (ASC-US+), colposcopy was also performed. RESULTS: The detection rate of HR-HPV DNA was 10.0% and 7.5% by self-collected and clinician-collected specimen, respectively (kappa = 0.73). HR-HPV positive rate in cytology ASC-US+ was no significantly different between groups. HR-HPV DNAs were positive in every HSIL (100% detection rate). HPV DNA test positive for detection CIN+ was not significantly different between self-collected and clinician-collected testing. CONCLUSION: self-collected HPV testing can be used as an alternative option for primary cervical screening program. Detection rate of high grade lesion is similar to clinician-collected test.


Subject(s)
Early Detection of Cancer/methods , Human papillomavirus 16/isolation & purification , Papillomavirus Infections/diagnosis , Specimen Handling/methods , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/pathology , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/pathology , Adult , Colposcopy/methods , Cross-Sectional Studies , Cytodiagnosis/methods , DNA, Viral/isolation & purification , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Risk Assessment , Self-Examination/methods , Sensitivity and Specificity , Thailand , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/surgery , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/virology , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/surgery , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/virology
13.
J Gynecol Oncol ; 30(2): e17, 2019 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30740950

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To assess the clinical and cost-effectiveness of human papillomavirus (HPV) primary screening triage with p16/Ki-67 dual stain cytology compared to cytology. METHODS: We conducted an Excel®-based budget impact model to estimate the preinvasive and invasive cervical cancer cases identified, mortality rate, direct medical costs, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and the incremental cost-effectiveness analysis of two strategies from the healthcare payer perspective. The study population is a cohort of women 30-65 years of age presenting for cervical screening. RESULTS: HPV primary screening triage with p16/Ki-67 dual stain showed higher sensitivity without losing specificity compared to conventional Pap smear. The improving the screening performance leads to decrease the prevalence of precancerous lesion, annual incidence and mortality of cervical cancer. The incidence of cervical cancer case detected by new algorithm compared with conventional method were 31,607 and 38,927, respectively. In addition, the new algorithm was more effective and more costly (average QALY 24.03, annual cost $13,262,693) than conventional cytology (average QALY 23.98, annual cost $7,713,251). The incremental cost-effective ratio (ICER) per QALY gained was $1,395. The sensitivity analysis showed if the cost of cytology and HPV test increased three times, the ICER would fall to $303/QALY gained and increased to $4,970/QALY gained, respectively. CONCLUSION: Our model results suggest that screening by use of HPV genotyping test as a primary screening test combined with dual stain cytology as the triage of HPV positive women in Thai population 30-65 years old is expected to be more cost-effective than conventional Pap cytology.


Subject(s)
DNA, Viral/genetics , Early Detection of Cancer/economics , Human papillomavirus 16/isolation & purification , Human papillomavirus 18/isolation & purification , Models, Economic , Vaginal Smears , Adult , Aged , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Early Detection of Cancer/methods , Female , Genotype , Human papillomavirus 16/genetics , Human papillomavirus 18/genetics , Humans , Middle Aged , Quality-Adjusted Life Years , Sensitivity and Specificity , Thailand/epidemiology , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/diagnosis , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/mortality , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/virology , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/diagnosis , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/mortality , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/virology
14.
Obstet Gynecol Int ; 2018: 7821574, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30402106

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the diagnostic performance among CA-125, RMI, HE4, and ROMA for cancer detection in women with nonfunctional ovarian cysts at King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital (KCMH). Secondary objective is to reconsider the proper cutoff value of HE4. METHODS: This is a prospective analytic study in women with nonfunctional ovarian cysts larger than 3 cm who scheduled for surgery at KCMH during 3rd June 2015 to 31st May 2016. Ultrasonogram and blood sample collection were completed before the operation. Patients' demographic information and pathologic results were obtained. SPSS software version 17 was used for statistical evaluation. RESULTS: A total of 281 participants were evaluated. 19.9% of them were malignant. Compared with CA-125, HE4 had lower sensitivity (53.4% vs. 87.9%) and NPV (89% vs. 93.6%) but higher specificity (97.8% vs. 46.2%) and PPV (86.1% vs. 29.8%). ROMA had slightly lower sensitivity (79.3% vs. 87.9%) and similar NPV (93.7% vs. 93.6%), but higher specificity (79.8% vs. 46.2%) and PPV (50.5% vs. 29.8%) compared with CA-125. The model that achieves the highest area under the ROC curve in differentiating benign versus malignant ovarian tumor was ROMA. Cutoff value of HE4 at 70 pMol/L (from 150 pMol/L) would give sensitivity 74.1% and specificity 86.5% that are comparable with ROMA. CONCLUSIONS: HE4 and ROMA had better performance (higher specificity, PPV) compared to CA-125 and RMI. HE4 at 70 pMol/L could be the new cutoff value for Thai women with ovarian cysts, giving higher sensitivity and specificity.

15.
Clin Infect Dis ; 67(4): 606-613, 2018 08 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29617952

ABSTRACT

Background: Infection with high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) may be higher in perinatally human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected (PHIV) than HIV-uninfected (HU) adolescents because of long-standing immune deficiency. Methods: PHIV and HU females aged 12-24 years in Thailand and Vietnam were matched by age group and lifetime sexual partners. At enrollment, blood, cervical, vaginal, anal, and oral samples were obtained for HPV-related testing. The Wilcoxon and Fisher exact tests were used for univariate and logistic regression for multivariate analyses. Results: Ninety-three PHIV and 99 HU adolescents (median age 19 [18-20] years) were enrolled (June 2013-July 2015). Among PHIV, 94% were currently receiving antiretroviral therapy, median CD4 count was 593 (392-808) cells/mm3, and 62% had a viral load <40 copies/mL. Across anogenital compartments, PHIV had higher rates of any HPV detected (80% vs 60%; P = .003) and any HR-HPV (60% vs 43%, P = .02). Higher proportions of PHIV had abnormal Pap smears (eg, atypical squamous cells of unknown significance [ASC-US], 12% vs 14%; low-grade squamous intraepithelial neoplastic lesions, 19% vs 1%). After adjusting for ever being pregnant and asymptomatic sexually transmitted infections (STI) at enrollment, PHIV were more likely to have HR-HPV than HU (odds ratio, 2.02; 95% confidence interval, 1.09-3.77; P = .03). Conclusions: Perinatal HIV infection was associated with a higher risk of HR-HPV and abnormal cervical cytology. Our results underscore the need for HPV vaccination for PHIV adolescents and for prevention and screening programs for HPV and other STIs.


Subject(s)
Cervix Uteri/pathology , HIV Infections/complications , Papillomavirus Infections/epidemiology , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/virology , Sexually Transmitted Diseases/complications , Adolescent , CD4 Lymphocyte Count , Female , HIV/isolation & purification , HIV Infections/epidemiology , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/epidemiology , Risk Factors , Sexually Transmitted Diseases/epidemiology , Thailand/epidemiology , Vaginal Smears , Vietnam/epidemiology , Viral Load , Young Adult
16.
Gynecol Oncol Rep ; 22: 58-63, 2017 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29034308

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to compare the cost and benefit of four different cervical cancer screening strategies involving primary HPV 16/18 genotyping, hrHPV testing alone and cytology for detecting CIN2 +. METHODS: Economical analysis using Markov modeling approach to combine the epidemiological data from current population-based study of The National Cancer Institute of Thailand. A cohort of 100,000 hypothetical female population age 30-65 years was simulated in each strategy. The compared strategies are HPV 16/18 genotyping with reflexed cytology, hrHPV testing alone followed by colposcopy, Papanicolaou standard cytology and liquid based cytology followed by colposcopy. The interval of screening was 5 years' interval. The main outcomes were defined as a number of CIN2 + cases and cost per 100,000 women screening over 35 years. RESULTS: Model predictions indicated that, the most cost-effectiveness strategy is hrHPV testing alone by reducing cost and also increase CIN2 + detection rate. It identify an additional 130 cases and decrease cost by 46,950,840 THB (1,394,441 USD) per 100,000 women screened when compared to HPV 16/18 genotyping. Compared with cytology, hrHPV testing decrease cost by 51,279,781 THB (1,523,011 USD) and detected more 506 cases of CIN2 +. From sensitivity analysis, the cost of HPV testing, cost of colposcopy, incidence of HPV infection and sensitivity of cytology may affect the results. (1 USD = 33.67 Baht). CONCLUSION: The results of this cost-effectiveness analysis support the full scale implementation of HPV testing as a primary cervical cancer screening in Thailand.

17.
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev ; 18(5): 1271-1275, 2017 05 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28610413

ABSTRACT

Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of HPV 16/18 genotyping test, high risk HPV DNA testing, alone and in conjunction with the liquid-based cytology method in screening for cervical cancer precursors. Methods: A Markov model was used to describe the course of the cases of CIN2+ that had been detected over a 35 year period. Screening programs started at age 30 and were performed at an interval of once every five years. The model compared three strategies of HPV 16/18 genotyping with reflex cytology triage, high-risk HPV testing alone with referral to colposcopy and cytology-based screening with referral to colposcopy. We assumed the rate of patients lost to follow-up for those referred to colposcopy would be 0%. The clinical parameters were estimated using the data from a study conducted by the Thailand National Cancer Institute. Result: Of the three screening strategies evaluated, the high risk HPV DNA testing alone was the most effective for detecting CIN2+ over the 35 year study period. It detected 143 and 510 cases per 100,000 women more than the HPV 16/18 genotyping test and cytology-based strategy, respectively. The HPV genotyping test detected 368 cases per 100,000 women more than the cytology-based approach. In addition, when viewed with five year intervals, there were missed cases totaling approximately half of the detected cases screened by the cytology strategy and 10% of cases detected with screening by the HPV genotyping test. Conclusion: This study strongly indicates that HPV/DNA testing is preferable to cytology-based screening for cervical cancer precursors. However, the balance between the benefits, burdens and cost of each screening program should be considered.

18.
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev ; 16(16): 6857-62, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26514457

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: To identify the optimal cost effective strategy for the management of women having ASC-US who attended at King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital (KMCH). DESIGN: An Economical Analysis based on a retrospective study. SUBJECT: The women who were referred to the gynecological department due to screening result of ASC-US at King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, a general and tertiary referral center in Bangkok Thailand, from Jan 2008 - Dec 2012. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A decision tree-based was constructed to evaluate the cost effectiveness of three follow up strategies in the management of ASC-US results: repeat cytology, triage with HPV testing and immediate colposcopy. Each ASC-US woman made the decision of each strategy after receiving all details about this algorithm, advantages and disadvantages of each strategy from a doctor. The model compared the incremental costs per case of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN2+) detected as measured by incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). RESULTS: From the provider's perspective, immediate colposcopy is the least costly strategy and also the most effective option among the three follow up strategies. Compared with HPV triage, repeat cytology triage is less costly than HPV triage, whereas the latter provides a more effective option at an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of 56,048 Baht per additional case of CIN 2+ detected. From the patient's perspective, the least costly and least effective is repeat cytology triage. Repeat colposcopy has an incremental cost-effectiveness (ICER) of 2,500 Baht per additional case of CIN2+ detected when compared to colposcopy. From the sensitivity analysis, immediate colposcopy triage is no longer cost effective when the cost exceeds 2,250 Baht or the cost of cytology is less than 50 Baht (1USD = 31.58 THB). CONCLUSIONS: In women with ASC-US cytology, colposcopy is more cost-effective than repeat cytology or triage with HPV testing for both provider and patient perspectives.


Subject(s)
Atypical Squamous Cells of the Cervix/pathology , Colposcopy/economics , Health Care Costs , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/pathology , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/pathology , Vaginal Smears/economics , Virology/economics , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Decision Trees , Female , Humans , Papanicolaou Test/economics , Papillomavirus Infections/diagnosis , Retrospective Studies , Thailand , Virology/methods
19.
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev ; 16(13): 5483-8, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26225698

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To compare perioperative outcomes and oncologic outcomes in endometrial cancer patients treated with laparotomy, and laparoscopic or robotic surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Endometrial cancer patients who underwent primary surgery from January 2011 to December 2014 were retrospectively reviewed. Perioperative outcomes, including estimated blood loss (EBL), operation time, number of lymph nodes retrieved, and intra and postoperative complications, were reviewed. Recovery time, disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared. RESULTS: Of the total of 218 patients, 143 underwent laparotomy, 47 laparoscopy, and 28 robotic surgery. The laparotomy group had the highest EBL (300, 200, 200 ml, p<0.05) while the robotic group had the longest operative time (302 min) as compared with laparoscopy (180 min) and laparotomy (125 min) (p<0.05). Intra and postoperative complications were not different with any of the surgical approaches. No significant difference in number of lymph nodes retrieved was identified. The longest hospital stay was reported in the laparotomy group (four days) but there was no difference between the laparoscopy (three days) and robotic (three days) groups. Recovery was significantly faster in robotic group than laparotomy group (14 and 28 days, p=0.003). No significant difference in DFS and OS at 21 months of median follow up time was observed among the three groups. CONCLUSIONS: Minimally invasive surgery has more favorable outcomes, including lower blood loss, shorter hospital stay, and faster recovery time than laparotomy. It also has equivalent perioperative complications and short term oncologic outcomes. MIS is feasible as an alternative option to surgery of endometrial cancer.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma, Clear Cell/surgery , Cystadenocarcinoma, Serous/surgery , Endometrial Neoplasms/surgery , Laparoscopy/mortality , Laparotomy/mortality , Perioperative Care , Postoperative Complications , Robotic Surgical Procedures/mortality , Adenocarcinoma, Clear Cell/mortality , Adenocarcinoma, Clear Cell/pathology , Aged , Cystadenocarcinoma, Serous/mortality , Cystadenocarcinoma, Serous/pathology , Endometrial Neoplasms/mortality , Endometrial Neoplasms/pathology , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Hysterectomy/mortality , Length of Stay , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Grading , Neoplasm Invasiveness , Neoplasm Staging , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Survival Rate
20.
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev ; 15(17): 7437-41, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25227855

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Acceptability of self-sampling HPV testing is confirmed worldwide. However, some cultural differences may affect this question. Therefore, this study was conducted to evaluate the acceptability of self- sampling HPV testing in Thai women. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred women aged 30-65 years with an intact cervix were included in this study. The participants were asked to do the Pap test by physicians and then brush type self-sampling instruments were assigned for self-collection and finally completed a questionnaire for acceptability evaluation. The questionnaire contains 2 parts. Part one covered general information of the participants and part two is the acceptability questions. RESULTS: Mean age was 40.6 years. The incidence of high risk HPV detection in this study was 16%. The most common reason for doing Pap smear was for annual checkup. On the topic of ease of use, 85 % of the subjects agreed. Most of the participants (82%) reported that they felt less pain. However, reliability of the result was not satisfactory because 37% of the participants hesitated to rely on the results of the test. According to the price, if the price is less than 1,000 Baht (32.59 Baht = 1USD), 82% of the subjects would use it for their next screening. CONCLUSIONS: The acceptability of self-sampling device in this study is quite good but the reliability of the test was questioned by some of the participants. Moreover, the price of the test in Thailand may also influence the acceptability of the test.


Subject(s)
Early Detection of Cancer/methods , Papillomavirus Infections/diagnosis , Patient Acceptance of Health Care , Self Care/methods , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/diagnosis , Vaginal Smears/methods , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Papanicolaou Test , Reproducibility of Results , Specimen Handling/methods , Thailand
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...