Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Publication year range
1.
EuroIntervention ; 13(9): e1020-e1025, 2017 Oct 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28691908

ABSTRACT

AIMS: Transcatheter valve-in-valve (VIV) implantation is usually discouraged in small surgical tissue valves. We report our first ten cases of fracturing small dysfunctional Mitroflow bioprostheses by high-pressure balloon dilatation to increase the internal diameter of the surgical valve before VIV (BF-VIV). METHODS AND RESULTS: BF-VIV was performed in 10 patients (mean age 84±4 years) with failing Mitroflow valves size 19 mm (n=3, threshold of fracture 15 atm) and 21 mm (n=7, threshold of fracture 13 atm). An Edwards SAPIEN 3 or XT 20 mm or 23 mm transcatheter valve was implanted inside the fractured Mitroflow bioprosthesis. The procedure improved aortic valve area (0.7±0.3 vs. 1.1±0.3 cm2, p=0.001), reduced peak aortic valve gradient (66±27 vs. 29±7 mmHg, p=0.002), resolved aortic regurgitation and improved patients' NYHA functional class (p=0.005). One patient had a minor stroke with complete resolution of symptoms and another patient required a pacemaker due to AV block. All patients were still alive at the end of follow-up (438±255 days). CONCLUSIONS: Initial experience with transcatheter BF-VIV suggests that this method is feasible and safe, and that it improves aortic valve haemodynamics and clinical functional capacity. BF-VIV is a promising alternative to repeat surgery in patients with small failing Mitroflow bioprostheses.


Subject(s)
Aortic Valve , Bioprosthesis , Heart Valve Prosthesis , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/methods , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Humans , Prosthesis Failure , Reoperation , Retrospective Studies
2.
J Thorac Dis ; 8(10): E1213-E1218, 2016 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27867590

ABSTRACT

Prosthetic valve endocarditis (PVE) after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) or surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) is a potential life threatening complication. Better understanding of the incidence, predictors, clinical presentation, diagnostic measures, complications and management of PVE may help improve TAVI long-term outcome. We report a case of TAVI-PVE in an 80-year-old high risk patient in whom SAVR was successfully performed. We have reviewed literature regarding TAVI-PVE.

3.
J Thorac Dis ; 8(8): E711-4, 2016 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27621906

ABSTRACT

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is an established therapeutic alternative to surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) in high-risk or inoperable patients with symptomatic aortic valve stenosis. Hitherto, TAVI is not recommended in young and low-intermediate risk patients. However, TAVI may also serve as an alternative to SAVR in selected young patients, e.g., patients who have previously undergone multiple cardiac surgery procedures. We report a case of trans-femoral TAVI in a 25-year-old heart transplant (HTx) recipient with prior surgery for congenital heart disease.

4.
J Vasc Surg ; 63(6): 1476-82, 2016 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26926935

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of a novel stent graft specifically designed for treatment of the ascending aorta. METHODS: This was a multicenter, retrospective analysis of all consecutive patients treated with the dedicated Zenith Ascend TAA Endovascular Graft (William Cook Europe, Bjaeverskov, Denmark) for pathologic processes requiring stent grafting of the ascending aorta. The graft is short (6.5 cm), with a delivery system designed for transfemoral placement in the ascending aorta. RESULTS: In 10 patients (five men; age, 67 years; range, 26-90 years), the Zenith Ascend graft was implanted for the following indications: dissection (n = 5) and aneurysm (n = 4) of the ascending aorta and fixation of an intraprocedural dislocated aortic valve (n = 1). All patients were judged to be at high risk for open surgery (nine patients were classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists class 3 or class 4). A transfemoral approach was selected in eight cases and a transapical approach in two. All endografts were successfully deployed without intraoperative adverse events at the targeted landing zone. Clinical success in coverage of the lesions was achieved in all cases with the exception of an attempted treatment of an intraprocedural aortic valve implantation dissection that resulted in early mortality. The 30-day survival was 90%. Early neurologic events included one patient with stroke and paraplegia and one patient with a transient ischemic attack. One patient underwent early evacuation of a hemopericardium. There were two late reinterventions for persisting endoleaks. At a mean follow-up of 10 months (range, 1-36 months), three late deaths occurred, with one treatment related, as a result of graft infection. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the fact that in this first published series the graft was frequently used as a "rescue tool" outside its intended indication, treatment with the Zenith Ascend graft in this early experience appears to be safe and feasible for repair of ascending aorta pathologic processes in high-risk patients unsuitable for open repair.


Subject(s)
Aorta/surgery , Aortic Diseases/surgery , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/instrumentation , Blood Vessel Prosthesis , Endovascular Procedures/instrumentation , Stents , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Aorta/diagnostic imaging , Aortic Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Aortic Diseases/mortality , Aortography/methods , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/adverse effects , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/mortality , Computed Tomography Angiography , Endovascular Procedures/adverse effects , Endovascular Procedures/mortality , Feasibility Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Postoperative Complications/therapy , Prosthesis Design , Retreatment , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
5.
Ugeskr Laeger ; 175(4): 209-10, 2013 Jan 21.
Article in Danish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23347741

ABSTRACT

Time from symptom onset to final treatment is crucial for survival. We present a case where prehospital diagnosis by the emergency physician in the ambulance was followed by a telemedicine conference and data transfer to the hospital. This was combined with bypassing of the emergency room and direct transfer to the thoracic surgical theatre, and time to treatment was reduced considerably. Obtaining a prehospital diagnosis in time-dependent life-threatening disease as basement for supportive treatment and transfer directly to treatment is very important.


Subject(s)
Aortic Dissection , Time-to-Treatment , Aortic Dissection/diagnosis , Aortic Dissection/therapy , Aortic Aneurysm/diagnosis , Aortic Aneurysm/therapy , Electrocardiography , Emergency Medical Services , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Telemedicine , Treatment Outcome , Triage
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL