Intradural cystic schwannomas of the spine: A case-based systematic review of an unusual tumor.

Introduction: Cystic schwannomas have only been reported in a few case reports/series. As a result, they may be misdiagnosed and a standardized management approach remains challenging to establish. Research question: The aim of this study was to compile all reported cases of cystic schwannomas and analyze the perioperative course based on a systematic review of the literature with an additional two cases from the authors' experience. Material and methods: We conducted a search of MEDLINE and CENTRAL databases for spinal intradural extramedullary cystic schwannomas, in accordance to the PRISMA statement. All title/abstracts were screened, and a full-text review of the remaining articles was conducted. The results were compiled in tables and summarized using means and standard deviation (SD), median and interquartile range, and percentage and 95% confidence intervals. Results: We identified 263 articles, of which 35, which reported 54 cases, were included. Including our case-reports (n = 56), patients had a mean age of 47.7 years (SD ± 13.0 years) at presentation, 57% were males, and most lesions were lumbar (43%). The most common symptoms were pain (82%) and muscle weakness (68%) with 84% of patients showing neurological findings. 70% of patients showed a complete relief of symptoms after surgery and 96% reported improvement. Only four complications were reported. Discussion and conclusion: Schwannomas should be considered in the differential diagnosis of intradural extramedullary cystic lesions. Patients typically present with subacute to chronic pain and/or neurologic changes. Surgical resection is the primary therapeutic modality and usually has a good to excellent outcome.

Laser Interstitial Thermal Therapy for Radionecrosis.

Radiotherapy is widely used for brain tumors but can cause radiation necrosis (RN). Laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) is a relatively new therapeutic modality for RN and its impact on patient outcome is still not well understood. Based on a systematic literature search (n=33), the authors discuss the available evidence. Most studies found a positive safety/efficacy profile, as LITT may help to lengthen survival, prevent progression, taper steroids, and improve neurological symptoms while remaining safe. Prospective studies on this subject are needed and may result in LITT becoming an essential therapeutic option for the treatment of RN.

Adverse Events in Neurosurgery: The Novel Therapy-Disability-Neurology Grade.

BACKGROUND: The most widely used classifications of adverse events (AEs) in neurosurgery define their severity according to the therapy used to treat them. This concept has substantial shortcomings because it does not reflect the severity of AEs that are not treated, such as new neurological deficits. OBJECTIVE: To present a novel multidimensional and patient-centered classification of the severity of AE in neurosurgery and evaluate its applicability. METHODS: The Therapy-Disability-Neurology (TDN) grading system classifies AEs depending on the associated therapy, disability, and neurological deficits. We conducted a 2-center retrospective observational study on 6071 interventions covering the whole neurosurgical spectrum with data prospectively recorded between 2013 and 2019 at 2 institutions from 2 countries. RESULTS: Using the first patient cohort (4680 interventions), a positive correlation was found between severity of AE and LOS as well as treatment cost. Each grade was associated with a greater deterioration of the Karnofsky Performance Status Scale (KPS) at discharge and at follow-up. When using the same methods on the external validation cohort (1391 interventions), correlations between the grades of AE, LOS, and KPS at discharge were even more pronounced. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that the TDN grade is consistent with clinical and economic repercussions of AE and thus reflects AE severity. It is easily interpreted and enables comparison between different medical centers. The standardized report of the severity of AE in the scientific literature could constitute an important step forward toward a more critical, patient-centered, and evidence-based decision-making in neurosurgery.