ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: This study describes the baseline clinical characteristics, predictors of successful extubation at referring hospitals and short-term outcomes of children intubated for status epilepticus and referred to United Kingdom (UK) paediatric critical care transport teams (PCCTs). DESIGN: Multicentre audit with case-control analysis, conducted between 1 September 2018 and 1 September 2020. SETTING: This study involved 10 UK PCCTs. PATIENTS: Children over 1 month of age intubated during emergency management for status epilepticus (SE), referred to UK PCCTs. Patients with trauma, requiring time-critical neurosurgical intervention or those with a tracheostomy were excluded. INTERVENTIONS: No interventions were implemented. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Out of the 1622 referrals for SE, 1136 (70%) were intubated at referral. The median age was 3 years (IQR 1.25-6.54 years). Among the intubated children, 396 (34.8%) were extubated locally by the referring team, with 19 (4.8%) requiring reintubation. Therefore, the overall rate of successful extubation was 33% (377/1136). There was significant variation between PCCTs, with local extubation rates ranging from 2% to 74%. Multivariable analyses showed region/PCCT, contributing diagnosis, acute changes on CT, preceding encephalopathy and type of continuous sedation (midazolam) used postintubation were significantly associated with transfer to a critical care unit. CONCLUSION: This study highlights wide regional variation in early extubation practices. Regions with high successful extubation rates have established extubation guidelines from PCCTs. Successful extubation represents critical care transports that have been avoided.
Subject(s)
Critical Care , Intubation, Intratracheal , Status Epilepticus , Humans , Status Epilepticus/therapy , United Kingdom , Child, Preschool , Case-Control Studies , Male , Infant , Female , Intubation, Intratracheal/statistics & numerical data , Intubation, Intratracheal/methods , Child , Critical Care/methods , Transportation of Patients/statistics & numerical data , Transportation of Patients/methods , Airway Extubation/statistics & numerical data , Airway Extubation/methods , Medical AuditSubject(s)
Parents , Teaching Rounds , Humans , Child , Intensive Care Units, Pediatric , CommunicationABSTRACT
AIM: To determine if the revised APLS UK formulae for estimating weight are appropriate for use in the paediatric intensive care population in the United Kingdom. METHODS: A retrospective observational study involving 10,081 children (5622 male, 4459 female) between the age of term corrected and 15 years, who were admitted to Paediatric Intensive Care Units in the United Kingdom over a five year period between 2006 and 2010. Mean weight was calculated using retrospective data supplied by the 'Paediatric Intensive Care Audit Network' and this was compared to the estimated weight generated using age appropriate APLS UK formulae. RESULTS: The formula 'Weight=(0.5×age in months)+4' significantly overestimates the mean weight of children under 1 year admitted to PICU by between 10% and 25.4%. While the formula 'Weight=(2×age in years)+8' provides an accurate estimate for 1-year-olds, it significantly underestimates the mean weight of 2-5 year olds by between 2.8% and 4.9%. The formula 'Weight=(3×age in years)+7' significantly overestimates the mean weight of 6-11 year olds by between 8.6% and 20.7%. Simple linear regression was used to produce novel formulae for the prediction of the mean weight specifically for the PICU population. CONCLUSIONS: The APLS UK formulae are not appropriate for estimating the weight of children admitted to PICU in the United Kingdom. Relying on mean weight alone will result in significant error as the standard deviation for all age groups are wide.
Subject(s)
Algorithms , Body Weight , Intensive Care Units, Pediatric , Adolescent , Anthropometry , Body Weights and Measures , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Hospitalization , Humans , Infant , Male , Retrospective Studies , United KingdomABSTRACT
Spinal clearance in unconscious children following traumatic brain injury is an area of controversy. The risk of significant injury in this high-risk group needs to be balanced against that of prolonged spinal immobilization and all its implications. No national or international guideline exists to aid clinicians faced with such a scenario. This article reviews traumatic spinal injury in children looking at prevalence, risk factors, anatomical considerations, and radiological investigation. Spinal immobilization is discussed along with the use of appropriate and targeted radiological investigations to aid clearance.
Subject(s)
Brain Injuries/complications , Spinal Cord Injuries/complications , Spinal Cord Injuries/diagnosis , Unconsciousness/etiology , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Guidelines as Topic , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Spinal Cord Injuries/pathologyABSTRACT
A 5-week-old male infant was admitted to the paediatric intensive care unit with small bowel obstruction secondary to an inguinal hernia. His postoperative course was complicated by suspected migration of his left internal jugular central venous catheter into branches of the inferior thyroid artery and mediastinum. This resulted in bilateral pleural effusions which were biochemically and visually similar to the total parenteral nutrition he was receiving. After drainage of the pleural effusions he made an uneventful recovery.
Subject(s)
Central Venous Catheters/adverse effects , Parenteral Nutrition, Total/adverse effects , Pleural Effusion/etiology , Drainage , Hernia, Inguinal/complications , Hernia, Inguinal/surgery , Humans , Ileal Diseases/etiology , Ileal Diseases/surgery , Infant , Intestinal Obstruction/etiology , Intestinal Obstruction/surgery , Male , Pleural Effusion/surgeryABSTRACT
Preview A crabby infant or a toddler pulling at his or her ears is a fairly common sight in a primary care office, and a 10-day course of antibiotics often does the trick. But what should you do when this doesn't work? And what if symptoms seem to resolve but effusion continues? The authors describe acute and chronic otitis media, explain how to diagnose and treat patients to avoid lifelong problems, and suggest when to call in an otolaryngologist.
