Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Publication year range
2.
J Clin Monit Comput ; 31(6): 1159-1166, 2017 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27987104

ABSTRACT

Phenylephrine increases mean arterial pressure (MAP) by enhanced total peripheral resistance (TPR) but near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) determined muscle oxygenation (SmO2) increases. We addressed that apparent paradox during supine rest and head-up tilt (HUT). Variables were determined ± phenylephrine in males during supine rest (n = 17) and 40° HUT (n = 7). MAP, stroke volume (SV), heart rate (HR), and TPR were derived by Modelflow® and NIRS determined biceps SmO2 and (tibial) bone oxygenation (StibialO2). For ten subjects, cardiac filling and the diameter of the inferior caval vein (ICV collapsibility index: ((ICVexpiration - ICVinspiration)/ICVexpiration) × 100) were assessed by ultrasound. Pancreatic polypeptide (PP) and atrial natriuretic peptide (proANP) in plasma were determined by immunoassay. Brachial artery blood flow was assessed by ultrasound and skin oxygenation (SskinO2) monitored by white light spectroscopy. Phenylephrine increased MAP by 34% and TPR (62%; P < 0.001) during supine rest. The ICV collapsibility index decreased (24%; P < 0.001) indicating augmented cardiac preload although volume of the left atrium and ventricle did not change. SV increased (18%; P < 0.001) as HR decreased (24%; P < 0.001). ProANP increased by 9% (P = 0.002) with unaffected PP. Brachial artery blood flow tended to decrease while SskinO2 together with StibialO2 decreased by 11% (P = 0.026) and 20% (P < 0.001), respectively. Conversely, phenylephrine increased SmO2 (9%) and restored the HUT elicited decrease in SmO2 (by 19%) along with SV (P = 0.02). Phenylephrine reduces skin and bone oxygenation and tends to reduce arm blood flow, suggesting that the increase in SmO2 reflects veno-constriction with consequent centralization of the blood volume.


Subject(s)
Muscle, Skeletal/metabolism , Oxygen Consumption , Phenylephrine/pharmacology , Skin/metabolism , Spectroscopy, Near-Infrared , Tibia/metabolism , Adult , Atrial Natriuretic Factor/blood , Blood Flow Velocity , Blood Volume , Brachial Artery , Heart Rate , Hemodynamics , Humans , Immunoassay , Male , Oxygen/metabolism , Pancreatic Polypeptide/blood , Patient Positioning , Supine Position , Young Adult
3.
J Neurosurg Sci ; 56(4): 267-77, 2012 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23111287

ABSTRACT

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has evolved from an experimental procedure to a major treatment option for Parkinson's disease (PD). Although its underlying mechanism is still not fully understood, a growing body of evidence supports the role of DBS as an effective treatment option for carefully selected patients. Over time, the ever-expanding DBS patient cohort has also revealed the risks and challenges of the surgery. Major goals of this approach include identifying and reaching the correct target of stimulation, as well as delivering electrical current to the appropriate location in an appropriate manner. The safety concerns and adverse outcomes continue to be addressed with ever-improving operative strategies. Imminent developments in biomedical engineering hold the promise of more sophisticated and intelligent DBS devices, and improved imaging technology is providing unprecedented anatomical and functional resolution. Further advances in our understanding of physiology and pathology of the deep brain structures--guided not in small part by experience and access gained with DBS surgery in PD--will shape the future of this field.


Subject(s)
Brain/surgery , Deep Brain Stimulation/methods , Parkinson Disease/therapy , Deep Brain Stimulation/adverse effects , Humans , Parkinson Disease/surgery , Stereotaxic Techniques , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...