Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Am J Surg ; 217(6): 1107-1111, 2019 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30343880

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: We examined and compared APP versus surgical resident perceptions of the role of APPs in surgical subspecialty teams. METHODS: Residents/first year surgical critical care fellows and inpatient service-specific APPs responded to a survey that examined perceptions about the APP-resident/fellow relationship. Statistical analysis compared responses using a Pearson chi-square test. RESULTS: Thirty-two resident/fellows (48%) and 10 APPs (42%) responded. There was consensus that having an APP on service decreases workload, contributes to continuity of care and enhances resident-patient coordination education and agreement that there was clear communication and adequate collaboration. Both groups differed with respect to APPs contribution to resident/fellow clinical education, role definition and chain of command. The majority of trainees felt that APPs function at a PGY2 level (51.7%) compared to APPs, who felt that they functioned at a PGY4/5 (22%) or Fellow (44%) level. CONCLUSION: APPs and resident/fellows agree that APPs impact resident workload, continuity of care and patient-coordination education.


Subject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel , General Surgery/education , Internship and Residency , Nurse Practitioners/organization & administration , Physician Assistants/organization & administration , Surgeons/education , Continuity of Patient Care , Fellowships and Scholarships , Female , Humans , Interprofessional Relations , Male , Nurse Practitioners/psychology , Physician Assistants/psychology , Professional Role/psychology , Surgeons/organization & administration , Surgeons/psychology , Surveys and Questionnaires , United States , Workload
2.
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg ; 42(2): 243-7, 2016 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26038056

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Acute care surgery (ACS) services have evolved in an effort to provide 24-h surgical services for a wide array of general surgical emergencies. The formation of ACS services has been shown to improve outcomes and lead to more expeditious care. Despite the advances of ACS, the etiology and timing of patient mortality has yet to be described. We hypothesized that infectious complications occur more frequently in ACS patients that die during their hospitalization. METHODS: A retrospective review of a local ACS service (non-trauma) registry was conducted. Demographic variables, admission and discharge data, and ICD-9 codes were collected. ICD-9 codes were used to identify patients with sepsis, shock, GI perforation, peritonitis, and other hospital acquired infections (urinary tract, bloodstream, and ventilator-associated pneumonias). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to model the outcome of death. RESULTS: 1,329 patients were analyzed. 53 % were male with the mean age of 52 years and an average length of stay of 13 days. 106 (8 %) died while in the hospital. Of the patients who died, 34 (32 %) died within 7 days of admission. The majority of mortalities (56 %) occurred after hospital day 14. In ACS patients that died, there were significantly higher rates of sepsis, shock, peritonitis, urinary tract infections, and VAP. After adjustment; age, sepsis on admission, and shock on admission were associated with greater odds of death. CONCLUSION: ACS patients with sepsis and shock have higher mortality rate than those patients without. The majority of ACS patient deaths occurred after hospital day 14. Further investigation and continued focus on preventing and rapidly treating infectious complications as they arise is warranted.


Subject(s)
Critical Care , Cross Infection , Emergency Medical Services , Surgical Procedures, Operative , Critical Care/methods , Critical Care/statistics & numerical data , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Cross Infection/etiology , Emergency Medical Services/methods , Emergency Medical Services/statistics & numerical data , Female , Hospital Mortality , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Length of Stay , Male , Middle Aged , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Postoperative Complications , Registries , Surgical Procedures, Operative/adverse effects , Surgical Procedures, Operative/mortality , Surgical Procedures, Operative/statistics & numerical data , United States
3.
J. trauma acute care surg ; 78(1)Jan. 2015. ilus
Article in English | BIGG - GRADE guidelines | ID: biblio-965698

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Blunt traumatic aortic injury (BTAI) is the second most common cause of death in trauma patients. Eighty percent of patients with BTAI will die before reaching a trauma center. The issues of how to diagnose, treat, and manage BTAI were first addressed by the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma (EAST) in the practice management guidelines on this topic published in 2000. Since that time, there have been advances in the management of BTAI. As a result, the EAST guidelines committee decided to develop updated guidelines for this topic using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) framework recently adopted by EAST. METHODS: A systematic review of the MEDLINE database using PubMed was performed. The search retrieved English language articles regarding BTAI from 1998 to 2013. Letters to the editor, case reports, book chapters, and review articles were excluded. Topics of investigation included imaging to diagnose BTAI, type of operative repair, and timing of operative repair. RESULTS: Sixty articles were identified. Of these, 51 articles were selected to construct the guidelines. CONCLUSION: There have been changes in practice since the publication of the previous guidelines in 2000. Computed tomography of the chest with intravenous contrast is strongly recommended to diagnose clinically significant BTAI. Endovascular repair is strongly recommended for patients without contraindications. Delayed repair of BTAI is suggested, with the stipulation that effective blood pressure control must be used in these patients.(AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Vascular System Injuries/diagnostic imaging , Endovascular Procedures
4.
Adv Shock Res ; 1: 71-81, 1978.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-400422

ABSTRACT

Prostaglandin E1 and methylprednisolone sodium succinate were administered simultaneously after shock in an intact canine hemorrhagic shock model and compared to treatment with each agent singly and with a 60 cc saline infusion. A detrimental effect of the prostaglandin E1/steroid combination was evidenced by decreased heart rate, mean arterial and central venous pressures, cardiac output, and arterial pH, and increased venous lactate. Survival was poor after the combined regimen. These changes may be related to vasodilation in the peripheral vascular system, causing pooling of blood. Lysosomal membranes were stabilized in spite of prolonged hypoperfusion.


Subject(s)
Methylprednisolone Hemisuccinate/therapeutic use , Methylprednisolone/analogs & derivatives , Prostaglandins E/therapeutic use , Shock, Hemorrhagic/drug therapy , Animals , Cathepsins/blood , Dogs , Hemodynamics , Shock, Hemorrhagic/physiopathology , Splenectomy
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...