ABSTRACT
Pituitary apoplexy is a potentially fatal clinical condition that results from pituitary infarction due to ischemia or hemorrhage. We present a case of a 53-year-old female patient with a history of recurrent pituitary macroadenoma who presented with headache, blurry vision, nausea, vomiting, and photophobia after receiving a gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist, leuprolide, as part of adjuvant endocrine therapy for breast cancer. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) confirmed the presence of pituitary apoplexy, and endocrine workup showed anterior hypopituitarism. The patient was managed conservatively and required glucocorticoid replacement. A repeat MRI after 3 months showed a partially empty sella. A review of the literature revealed that this case adds to the growing number of patients who present with headache, visual symptoms, and symptoms related to meningeal irritation after administration of GnRH agonists, with varying latency from treatment to symptom onset. Although there are other cases involving female patients or patients with known pituitary macroadenomas, to our knowledge, this is the first reported case of pituitary apoplexy in a patient receiving a GnRH agonist as an adjuvant for breast cancer. Physicians should be aware of this rare complication of GnRH agonist therapy in patients with a pituitary macroadenoma.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Recently, strategies aimed at optimizing provider factors have been proposed, including regionalization of surgeries to higher volume centers and adoption of volume standards. With limited literature promoting the regionalization of spine surgeries, we undertook a systematic review to investigate the impact of surgeon volume on outcomes in patients undergoing spine surgery. METHODS: We performed a systematic review examining the association between surgeon volume and spine surgery outcomes. To be included in the review, the study population had to include patients undergoing a primary or revision spinal procedure. These included anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), anterior/posterior cervical fusion, laminectomy/decompression, anterior/posterior lumbar decompression with fusion, discectomy, and spinal deformity surgery (spine arthrodesis). RESULTS: Studies were variable in defining surgeon volume thresholds. Higher surgeon volume was associated with a significantly lower risk of postoperative complications, a lower length of stay (LOS), lower cost of hospital stay and a lower risk of readmissions and reoperations/revisions. CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest a trend towards better outcomes for higher volume surgeons; however, further study needs to be carried out to define objective volume thresholds for individual spine surgeries for surgeons to use as a marker of proficiency.
Subject(s)
Hospitals, High-Volume/statistics & numerical data , Orthopedic Procedures/statistics & numerical data , Spine/surgery , Surgeons/statistics & numerical data , Hospitalization/economics , Humans , Length of Stay , Patient Readmission , Postoperative Complications , ReoperationABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To gauge the general population's knowledge and attitude towards a possible public health insurance scheme. METHODS: This descriptive, cross-sectional study was conducted at the Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, from April to May 2015, and comprised permanent residents of the city. Convenience sampling was used. Data was collected via questionnaires. SPSS 22 was used for data analysis. RESULTS: There were 340 participants in the study with an overall mean age of 32.9±12.4 years. Besides, 159(46.8%) participants were aware of the concept of medical insurance while the correct definition was identified by 160(50.5%) respondents. Overall, 256(75.3%) participants were willing to join a theoretical public health insurance scheme. Of all the respondents, 107(31.5%) had faced a catastrophic event in the past and consequently were more willing to join. Of those unsure or not willing to join, 33(37.9%) respondents identified lack of trust in government programmes as the main reason for their choice. CONCLUSIONS: A large majority of adults had a favourable attitude towards the implementation of a possible public health insurance scheme.