Results of a Community-based, Randomized Study Comparing a Clear Liquid Diet With a Low-residue Diet Using a Magnesium Citrate Preparation for Screening and Surveillance Colonoscopies.

BACKGROUND: Current bowel preparations for colonoscopy include a clear liquid diet (CLD) along with consumption of a laxative. This dietary restriction along with large volume bowel preparations are barriers to compliance and willingness among patients in scheduling screening examinations. The aim of our study was to compare the efficacy and tolerability of a low-volume split dose magnesium citrate bowel preparation in patients on a low-residue diet (LRD) with those on a CLD. METHODS: In this single center, single blinded, randomized controlled trial, patients scheduled for outpatient colonoscopies were assigned to either a CLD or a LRD 1 day before the examination. Both groups received a split dose magnesium citrate preparation. The quality of the preparation was rated using the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS). Patient satisfaction and side effects were evaluated using a questionnaire. RESULTS: We were unable to detect a significant difference in the BBPS scores between the LRD and CLD groups (P=0.581). A significantly higher percentage of patients in the LRD group rated the diet as easy compared with the CLD group (P<0.001). Satisfaction scores were significantly higher in the LRD group, compared with the CLD group (P<0.001). The side effect profiles of both arms were similar. CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant difference between LRD and CLD in patients using a magnesium citrate bowel preparation for screening and surveillance colonoscopies. Patient satisfaction scores were higher with a LRD compared with a CLD. We believe the LRD should be the recommended diet in patients using a standard bowel preparation for screening and surveillance colonoscopy.

Localizing Acute Lower Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage: CT Angiography Versus Tagged RBC Scintigraphy.

OBJECTIVE: Lower gastrointestinal hemorrhage is a common cause of hospitalization and has substantial associated morbidity and financial cost. CT angiography (CTA) is emerging as an alternative to (99m)Tc-labeled RBC scintigraphy (RBC scintigraphy) for the localization of acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding (LGIB); however, data on comparative efficacy are scant. The aim of this study was to assess the utility of CTA compared with RBC scintigraphy in the overall evaluation and management of acute LGIB. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed images from all CTA examinations performed for suspected acute LGIB at our tertiary care hospital from January 2010 through November 2011. The comparison group was determined by retrospective review of twice the number of RBC scintigraphic scans consecutively obtained from June 2008 to November 2011 for the same indication. All CTA and RBC scintigraphic scans were reviewed for accurate localization of the site and source of suspected active LGIB. RESULTS: In total, 45 CTA and 90 RBC scintigraphic examinations were performed during the study period. Seventeen (38%) CTA scans showed active gastrointestinal bleeding compared with 34 (38%) RBC scintigraphic scans (p = 1.000). However, the site of bleeding was accurately localized on 24 (53%) CTA scans. This proportion was significantly greater than the proportion localized on RBC scintigraphic scans (27 [30%]) (p = 0.008). There were no significant differences between the two groups in average hospital length of stay, blood transfusion requirement, incidence of acute kidney injury, or in-hospital mortality. CONCLUSION: Both CTA and RBC scintigraphy can be used to identify active bleeding in 38% of cases. However, the site of bleeding is localized with CTA in a significantly higher proportion of studies.

A meta-analysis on efficacy and safety: single-balloon vs. double-balloon enteroscopy.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Double-balloon enteroscopy (DBE) and single-balloon enteroscopy (SBE) are new techniques capable of providing deep enteroscopy. Results of individual studies comparing these techniques have not been able to identify a superior strategy. Our aim was to systematically pool all available studies to compare the efficacy and safety of DBE with SBE for evaluation of the small bowel. METHODS: Databases were searched, including PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. The main outcome measures were complete small-bowel visualization, diagnostic yield, therapeutic yield, and complication rate. Statistical analysis was performed using Review Manager (RevMan version 5.2). Meta-analysis was performed using fixed-effect or random-effect methods, depending on the absence or presence of significant heterogeneity. We used the χ(2) and I(2) test to assess heterogeneity between trials. Results were expressed as risk ratios (RR) or mean differences with 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: Four prospective, randomized, controlled trials with a total of 375 patients were identified. DBE was superior to SBE for visualization of the entire small bowel [pooled RR = 0.37 (95% CI: 0.19-0.73; P = 0.004)]. DBE and SBE were similar in ability to provide diagnosis [pooled RR = 0.95 (95% CI: 0.77-1.17; P = 0.62)]. There was no significant difference between DBE and SBE in therapeutic yield [pooled RR = 0.78 (95% CI: 0.59-1.04; P = 0.09)] and complication rate [pooled RR = 1.08 (95% CI: 0.28-4.22); P = 0.91]. CONCLUSIONS: DBE was superior to SBE with regard to complete small bowel visualization. DBE was similar to SBE with regard to diagnostic yield, ability to provide treatment and complication rate, but these results should be interpreted with caution as they is based on very few studies and the overall quality of the evidence was rated as low to moderate, due to the small sample size.

Defining the accuracy of secretin pancreatic function testing in patients with suspected early chronic pancreatitis.

OBJECTIVES: The diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis in patients with characteristic symptoms but normal pancreatic imaging is challenging. Assessment of pancreatic function through secretin pancreatic function testing (SPFT) has been advocated in this setting, but its diagnostic accuracy is not fully known. METHODS: This was a retrospective review of patients who received SPFT at our tertiary care institution between January 1995 and December 2008 for suspected chronic pancreatitis. For all patients, medical records were reviewed for evidence of subsequent development of chronic pancreatitis by imaging and/or pathology. Patients were then categorized as "true positive" or "true negative" for chronic pancreatitis based on follow-up imaging or histologic evidence. RESULTS: In all, 116 patients underwent SPFT. Of the 27 patients who tested positive, 7 were lost to follow-up. Of the remaining 20 SPFT-positive patients, 9 (45%) developed radiologic or histologic evidence of chronic pancreatitis after a median of 4 years (1-11 years). Of the 89 patients who had negative SPFT testing, 19 were lost to follow-up. Of the remaining 70 patients, 2 were eventually diagnosed with chronic pancreatitis based on subsequent imaging/histology after a median follow-up period of 7 years (3-11 years). The sensitivity of the SPFT in diagnosing chronic pancreatitis was 82% with a specificity of 86%. The positive predictive value (PPV) of chronic pancreatitis was 45% with a negative predictive value (NPV) of 97%. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with suspected early chronic pancreatitis and normal pancreatic imaging, SPFT is highly accurate at ruling out early chronic pancreatitis with a NPV of 97%.

Location of bile leak predicts the success of ERCP performed for postoperative bile leaks.

BACKGROUND: ERCP is effective for treating a bile leak (BL) after cholecystectomy (CCY), but few data exist on its effectiveness after hepatobiliary surgery (HBS). OBJECTIVE: To determine the effectiveness of ERCP for treating BLs after HBS compared with BLs after cholecystectomy and to identify factors associated with treatment success. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. SETTING: Academic tertiary-care referral center. PATIENTS: Patients referred from 2001 to 2009 for ERCP treatment of BL after cholecystectomy or HBS. INTERVENTIONS: ERCP. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Resolution of BL after a single ERCP. RESULTS: A total of 223 patients were identified and 46 were excluded. Fifty underwent ERCP for treatment of BL after HBS and 127 after CCY. A single ERCP was successful at resolving BL in 89% of patients. Failure occurred in 7 HBS patients (14%) and 12 CCY patients (9%) (P = .379). After multiple ERCPs, success improved to 95% of the CCY group and 86% of the HBS group (P = .033). HBS patients underwent 30% more ERCPs (P = .049). ERCP was 3.3 times more likely to be successful in patients with cystic duct or duct of Luschka BLs (P = .028). Patients undergoing biliary stent placement were significantly more likely to have successful outcomes (odds ratio 71.0, P < .001). Surgical history or biliary sphincterotomy did not affect outcome. Odds of treatment failure were 3.5 times higher for each additional ERCP performed (P < .001). LIMITATIONS: Single-center, retrospective study. CONCLUSIONS: ERCP is effective for treating postoperative BLs. Location of a BL and placement of a biliary stent are the best predictors of endoscopic treatment success.

Quality improvement in gastroenterology clinical practice.

An emphasis on quality improvement (QI) is vital to the cost-effective provision of evidence-based health care. QI projects in gastroenterology have typically focused on endoscopy to minimize or eliminate procedure-related complications or errors. However, a significant component of gastroenterology care is based on the management of chronic disease. Patients with chronic diseases are seen in many different outpatient practices in the community and academia. In an attempt to ensure that every patient receives high-quality care, major gastrointestinal societies have published guidelines on the management of common gastrointestinal complaints. However, adherence to these guidelines varies. We discuss common outpatient gastrointestinal illnesses with established guidelines for management that could benefit from active QI projects; these would ensure a consistently high standard of care for every patient.

Risk for immune-mediated graft dysfunction in liver transplant recipients with recurrent HCV infection treated with pegylated interferon.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Patients with recurrent hepatitis C virus infection treated with pegylated interferon (PEG) after liver transplantation can develop severe immune-mediated graft dysfunction (IGD) characterized by plasma cell hepatitis or rejection. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter case-control study of 52 liver transplant recipients with hepatitis C to assess the incidence of, risk factors for, and outcomes of PEG-IGD. Data from each patient were compared with those from 2 matched patients who did not develop PEG-IGD (n = 104). We performed a multivariate analysis of risk factors and analyzed treatment and outcomes of graft dysfunction subtypes. RESULTS: Overall incidence of PEG-IGD during a 10-year study period was 7.2%. Risk factors included no prior PEG therapy (odds ratio = 5.3; P < .0001), therapy with PEGα-2a (odds ratio = 4.7; P = .03), and immune features (mainly plasma cell hepatitis) on pre-PEG therapy liver biopsies (odds ratio = 3.9; P = .005). The PEG-IGD group had lower long-term patient (61.5% vs 91.3% of controls) and graft (38.5% vs 85.6% of controls) survival and higher rates of retransplantation (34.6% vs 6.7% of controls) (all, P < .0001), without increases in sustained virologic response. Variables associated with increased mortality included acute rejection as the PEG-IGD sub-type (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.4; P = .002), a high level of alkaline phosphatase at PEG initiation (HR = 1.003; P = .005), and lack of a sustained virologic response (HR = 3.3; P = .04). Variables associated with graft failure included a high level of alkaline phosphatase at PEG initiation (HR = 1.002; P = .04) and lack of a sustained virologic response (HR = 2.1; P = .04). CONCLUSIONS: PEG-IGD has high morbidity and mortality and is not associated with increased rates of virologic response. It is important to avoid PEG therapy in liver transplant recipients with specific clinical, biochemical, and histologic risk factors for PEG-IGD.