Human skin CD141+ dendritic cells regulate cutaneous immunity via the neuropeptide urocortin 2.

Skin immune homeostasis is a multi-faceted process where dermal dendritic cells (DDCs) are key in orchestrating responses to environmental stressors. We have previously identified CD141+CD14+ DDCs as a skin-resident immunoregulatory population that is vitamin-D3 (VitD3) inducible from monocyte-derived DCs (moDCs), termed CD141hi VitD3 moDCs. We demonstrate that CD141+ DDCs and CD141hi VitD3 moDCs share key immunological features including cell surface markers, reduced T cell stimulation, IL-10 production, and a common transcriptomic signature. Bioinformatic analysis identified the neuroactive ligand receptor pathway and the neuropeptide, urocortin 2 (UCN2), as a potential immunoregulatory candidate molecule. Incubation with VitD3 upregulated UCN2 in CD141+ DCs and UVB irradiation induced UCN2 in CD141+ DCs in healthy skin in vivo. Notably, CD141+ DDC generation of suppressive Tregs was dependent upon the UCN2 pathway as in vivo administration of UCN2 reversed skin inflammation in humanized mice. We propose the neuropeptide UCN2 as a novel skin DC-derived immunoregulatory mediator with a potential role in UVB and VitD3-dependent skin immune homeostasis.

Upregulation of MMP12 and its activity by UVA1 in human skin: potential implications for photoaging.

UVA1 constitutes around 75% of the terrestrial UV radiation, and most of the output of artificial tanning sources. However, the molecular effects of UVA1 in human skin in vivo are surprisingly poorly understood. We have examined time-dependent whole-genome expression, along with mRNA and protein changes in the skin after one minimal erythema dose of spectrally pure UVA1 (50 J cm(-2)) and 300 nm UVB (30 mJ cm(-2)). After 24 hours, the genes induced to the greatest extent were those involved in extracellular matrix remodeling with both UVA1 (P=5.5e-7) and UVB (P=2.9e-22). UVA1 and UVB caused different effects on matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) expression: UVB induced MMP1, MMP3, and MMP10 mRNA at 24 hours to a much greater extent than UVA1. MMP12 induction by UVA1 at 6 hours is marked and much greater than that by UVB. We have found that MMP12 mRNA induction by UVA1 resulted in expression of MMP12 protein, which is functional as an elastase. This induction of elastase activity did not occur with UVB. We hypothesize that the UVA1 induction of MMP12 mediates some of its photoaging effects, particularly by contributing to elastin degeneration in late solar elastosis. MMP12 is a good marker of UVA1 exposure.

UVA1 is skin deep: molecular and clinical implications.

Long wavelength UVA1 (340-400 nm) is the main component of terrestrial UVR and is increasingly used in skin phototherapy. Its damage to critical biomolecules such as DNA has been widely attributed to its ability to generate reactive oxygen species (ROS) via other chromophores. However recent studies in vitro and in vivo have shown that UVA1 has a specific ability to generate cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers (CPD), especially thymine dimers (T<>T), and that this is probably due to direct absorption of UVR. The CPD has been implicated in many aspects of skin cancer. Measuring UVB-induced CPD in the epidermis and dermis in vivo shows that, as expected, the skin attenuates UVB. In contrast, our data show that this is not the case with UVA1: in fact there is more damage with increased skin depth. This suggests that the basal layer, which contains keratinocyte stem cells and melanocytes, is more vulnerable to the carcinogenic effects of UVA1 than would be predicted by mouse models. These data support the continuing trend for better UVA1 protection by sunscreens.

UVA1 induces cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers but not 6-4 photoproducts in human skin in vivo.

UVB readily induces cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers, mainly thymine dimers (TTs), and pyrimidine (6-4) pyrimidone photoproducts (6-4PPs) in DNA. These lesions result in "UVB signature mutations" found in skin cancers. We have investigated the induction of TTs and 6-4PPs in human skin in vivo by broadband UVA1, and have compared this with comparable erythemal doses of monochromatic UVB (300 nm). In vitro and ex vivo studies have shown the production of TTs, without 6-4PPs, by UVA1. We show that UVA1 induces TTs, without 6-4PPs, in the epidermis of healthy volunteers in vivo, whereas UVB induced both photoproducts. UVB induced more TTs than UVA1 for the same level of erythema. The level of UVA1-induced TTs increased with epidermal depth in contrast to a decrease that was seen with UVB. UVA1- and UVB-induced TTs were repaired in epidermal cells at a similar rate. The mechanism by which UVA1 induces TTs is unknown, but a lack of intra-individual correlation between our subjects' UVB and UVA1 minimal erythema doses implies that UVA1 and UVB erythema occur by different mechanisms. Our data suggest that UVA1 may be more carcinogenic than has previously been thought.

Human erythema and matrix metalloproteinase-1 mRNA induction, in vivo, share an action spectrum which suggests common chromophores.

Matrix metalloproteinase 1 (MMP-1) is widely regarded as a biomarker of photoageing. We tested the hypothesis that MMP-1 mRNA expression and erythema share a common action spectrum by comparing the effects of erythemally equivalent doses of UVB, UVA1 and solar simulated radiation (SSR) on acute MMP-1 mRNA expression in whole human skin in vivo. Our results show comparable MMP-1 expression with all three spectra, which supports our hypothesis. The sharing of an action spectrum implies common chromophores, one of which is likely to be DNA. We have previously shown that all spectra that we used readily induce cyclobutane thymine dimers (T<>T) in human epidermis in vivo but we lack quantitative data on damage to dermal DNA. This is important because we do not know if dermal MMP-1 induction occurs via direct damage to the dermis, or indirectly via damage to the epidermis. Our results show that UVB induces about 3 times more T<>T compared with erythemally equivalent doses of UVA1, which is similar to our published epidermal data. This supports previously published work that also implicates an unknown UVA1 chromophore for erythema and MMP-1 induction. However, the distribution of the dermal DNA damage varies considerably with spectrum. In the case of UVB it is primarily in the upper dermis, but with UVA1 it is evenly distributed. Thus, irrespective of chromophores, MMP-1 induction by direct dermal damage by both spectra is possible. The practical conclusions of our data are that the small (<5%) UVB content of solar UVR is likely to be the main cause of photoageing, at least in terms of MMP-1 expression. Furthermore, prevention of erythema by sunscreen use is likely to result in reduced MMP-1 expression.