Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Int J Surg Case Rep ; 120: 109885, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38851061

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Radial head dislocations in children can result from congenital anomalies, traumatic events, or as part of more complex injuries like Monteggia fractures. These dislocations are rare and may be overlooked unless considered in differential diagnoses. CASE PRESENTATION: We describe a unique instance of a post-traumatic isolated lateral radial head dislocation in a 5-year-old boy with no previous medical concerns. The child presented with persistent pain and limited mobility in the left elbow following an unwitnessed fall at home. Diagnosis was confirmed via radiographs showing the dislocation without associated fractures. Closed reduction under anesthesia was successfully performed. CLINICAL DISCUSSION: This case underscores the importance of a high index of suspicion and thorough imaging in diagnosing pediatric radial head dislocations. Our discussion includes a review of the literature and the clinical approach for managing such injuries, highlighting the specifics of the closed reduction technique used. CONCLUSION: Isolated lateral radial head dislocations, although rare, can occur and are amenable to closed reduction. This case contributes to the limited reports of such dislocations in pediatric patients, emphasizing the need for awareness and precise management strategies to prevent long-term complications.

2.
J Orthop Case Rep ; 13(11): 58-63, 2023 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38025376

ABSTRACT

Introduction: In adults, fibrosarcoma (FS) of the bone is a rare occurrence. Infantile FS, particularly in the distal radius, is an exceedingly uncommon tumor and, to the best of our knowledge, has not yet been documented in the literature. In the subsequent report, we present a case involving a 2-year-old male diagnosed with primary FS of the distal radius. Case Report: We hereby report the case of a 2-year-old Caucasian boy presenting with primary bone FS in the distal radius. X-rays revealed an osseous mass with an extraosseous component. MRI showed heterogeneous enhancement, suggestive of non-liquefied necrosis or possible fibrosis within the extraosseous soft-tissue component. The patient underwent a resection of the tumor, followed by central translocation of the ulna. Conclusion: Managing infantile FS of the bone requires a multidisciplinary approach. A high index of suspicion is crucial for diagnosing the tumor. Further studies are needed to enhance our approach and management of infantile FS of the bone.

3.
J Orthop Case Rep ; 13(10): 141-144, 2023 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37885655

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Meniscal pathology constitutes a major reason for a vast number of patients suffering from knee pain. It is, in general, attributed either to meniscal tearing or degeneration. Debridement and partial meniscectomy, or repair, when possible, is the mainstay surgical approach for refractory knee pain from meniscal degeneration or tears. Sometimes, the patient has clinical symptoms of meniscal pathology, but despite those highly suggestive clinical symptoms, the patient turns out, during knee arthroscopy, to have meniscal degeneration and hardening of the meniscus without frank tearing of the meniscus. Surgical Technique: To initiate meniscal trephination, we first conduct a diagnostic knee arthroscopy to examine the suprapatellar space, the gutters, and the anterior knee space for any pathologies. Following this, both menisci are inspected for any signs of tearing or hardening. For the purposes of our study, the medial meniscus is considered pathological if it shows signs of degeneration or hardening, which then justifies our intervention. An 18-gauge spinal needle, manually bent for the procedure, is inserted through the portal to perform trephination on the hardened menisci. Care is taken to adequately space the needle insertion points to prevent accidental tearing. Our trephination technique aims to soften the meniscus, facilitating its ability to compact and compress when patients ambulate. Additionally, the needle insertion points help attract blood flow to the meniscus, thereby enriching it with growth factors and stem cells that may aid in improving the degenerative condition. Conclusion: Meniscal trephination is benign and effective for meniscal degenerative pathologies. The procedure allows for a healthier meniscus, free from degeneration, that would otherwise disable patients. The intervention does not have long-term adverse effects. To this end, more comparative trials are required to confirm the effectiveness of the technique and to ensure minimal to no associated side effects.

4.
Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr ; 17(2): 105-116, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35990176

ABSTRACT

Aim: This article aims to compare the outcomes between open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) and external fixation (ExFix) in tibial plateau fractures. Background: Open reduction and internal fixation and external fixation are common methods for managing tibial plateau fractures without a consensus of choice. Materials and methods: PubMed, Cochrane Library, Ovid, CINAHL®, Scopus, and Embase were searched. Clinical studies in humans comparing ExFix and ORIF for tibial plateau fractures were included. Case reports, pathological, and biomechanical studies were excluded. Two investigators reviewed the studies independently, and any discrepancies were resolved. The quality and heterogeneity of each study were assessed in addition to calculating the odds ratio (OR) of the surgical outcomes and complications at a 95% confidence interval, with p <0.05 as statistical significance. Results: Of the 14 included studies, one was a randomised trial, one was a prospective study, and 12 were retrospective studies. The 865 fractures identified across the studies constituted 458 (52.9%) in the ExFix group and 407 (47.1%) in the ORIF group. Most studies indicated a better outcome for ORIF as compared to ExFix. Open reduction and internal fixation had a lower incidence of superficial infection and postoperative osteoarthritis, while ExFix revealed a lower proportion with heterotopic ossification (HTO). Conclusion: ExFix has a higher rate of superficial infections and osteoarthritis, whereas ORIF has a higher incidence of HTO. Larger studies are needed to compare outcomes and investigate the findings of this study further. Clinical significance: This up-to-date meta-analysis on tibial plateau management will help surgeons make evidence-based decisions regarding the use of ORIF versus ExFix. How to cite this article: Naja AS, Bouji N, Eddine MN, et al. A Meta-analysis Comparing External Fixation against Open Reduction and Internal Fixation for the Management of Tibial Plateau Fractures. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr 2022;17(2):105-116.

5.
Oncol Lett ; 22(2): 596, 2021 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34188698

ABSTRACT

Myxoid liposarcoma (MLPS) is the second most common type of LPS after the well differentiated LPS. MLPS is primarily localized to the extremities. The incidence of LPS is ~2 per million worldwide. MLPS accounts for ~30% of all LPS cases. MLPS is usually encountered in adults, but can also occur in younger individuals more than other types of LPS. MLPS can be divided into low- and high-grade subtypes, which present with differences in patient prognosis and outcome. Methods of tumor management include surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy; however, there is no unified treatment based on tumor characteristics alone. The present manuscript reviews the surgical management, radiotherapeutic and chemotherapeutic approaches reported in the literature for different types of MLPS in the extremities, as well as the post-treatment outcomes. In addition, the present review provides an evidence-based management plan for MLPS in the form of an organogram based on specific tumor and patient parameters.

6.
Clin J Pain ; 37(2): 133-139, 2021 02 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33273276

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Myofascial pain is one of the most common causes of regional pain with no definitive treatment. This randomized clinical trial was conducted to assess the efficacy of deep cervical plexus block versus placebo injection (sham block) for the treatment of myofascial neck and shoulder pain in terms of analgesic consumption and pain during a follow-up period of 2 weeks after the block. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients were randomly divided into 2 groups. Group I (block) received deep cervical plexus block and group II (placebo) received normal saline. A total of 66 patients were included in the study, 34 patients in the block group and 32 patients in the placebo group. RESULTS: Two weeks after the intervention, the average pain duration was significantly lower in the block group: 1.38±1.39 versus 5.25±1.72 for the block and placebo groups, respectively (P<0.0001). Pain intensity was significantly less in the block group such that 2.9% of patients in the block group had severe pain compared with 53.1% of patients in the placebo group (P<0.0001). Two weeks after receiving the block, the mean opioid consumption calculated as tramadol equivalent was 21.1±44.2 mg compared with 166.1±118.8 mg for the block and placebo groups, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that patients with a longer history of pain had a higher pain score after 2 weeks. The possibility of recovery is affected by pain duration as patients with a history of chronic pain were least affected by the block. DISCUSSION: This technique could be an alternative to pharmacological and other nonpharmacological treatments for myofascial pain.


Subject(s)
Cervical Plexus Block , Myofascial Pain Syndromes , Tramadol , Double-Blind Method , Humans , Injections , Myofascial Pain Syndromes/drug therapy , Pain, Postoperative , Shoulder Pain/drug therapy , Tramadol/therapeutic use
7.
Endocr Metab Immune Disord Drug Targets ; 18(2): 148-154, 2018 Feb 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28982344

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Familial Mediterranean Fever (FMF) is one of the most common hereditary auto-inflammatory diseases especially among Arabs, Armenians, Jews, and Turks characterized by recurrent attacks of fever, abdominal pain and arthritis.Whether the prevalence of ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is increased in FMF patients is a matter of debate. This review will summarize all the literature data relevant to this topic. METHODS: We searched all the articles through PubMed and Embase databases from 1963 until 2017 addressing the relationship between AS and FMF patients. RESULTS: The prevalence of AS among FMF patients is highly variable. However, a significant relationship was found to exist between MEFV gene mutations and AS. Most patients with coexistent MEFV gene mutations and AS were human leucocyte antigen B27 (HLA-B27) negative. The effect of these mutations on AS severity and prognosis was not significant. CONCLUSION: Large based population studies are needed to further assess the existence of MEFV gene mutations among AS patients and their effect on the clinical course of the disease in addition to assessment of AS prevalence in patients with FMF.


Subject(s)
Familial Mediterranean Fever/genetics , Genetic Predisposition to Disease , HLA-B27 Antigen/genetics , Mutation , Spondylitis, Ankylosing/genetics , Diagnosis, Differential , Disease Progression , Familial Mediterranean Fever/diagnosis , Familial Mediterranean Fever/physiopathology , Humans , Prevalence , Spondylitis, Ankylosing/diagnosis , Spondylitis, Ankylosing/epidemiology , Spondylitis, Ankylosing/physiopathology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...