The Care Coordinator's Tasks During the Implementation of an Integrated Care Pathway for Older Patients: A Qualitative Study Based on the French National "Health Pathway of Seniors for Preserved Autonomy" Pilot Program.

Background: Although integrated care and care coordination are known to be beneficial for older adults' population, the specific tasks of a Care Coordinator (CC) for integrated care pathways for this population have not been studied in detail. Setting & Subjects: The French national pilot program PAERPA provided an integrated care pathway for older adults. In North France, a CC was recruited to support patients and professionals. Objectives: (i) To analyse the CC's tasks in an integrated care pathway for older patients, and (ii) to record perceptions on the CC's tasks among the participating general practitioners (GP) and community pharmacists. Design & Methods: Qualitative, two-phase study: (i) Task analysis of the CC's tasks, to compare the planned and actual tasks; (ii) semi-structured interviews among GPs and community pharmacists involved in the pathway. Results: (i) The task analysis showed that the CC's actual tasks differed from planned tasks. The CC was only meant to be involved in the early stages of the process; actually, the CC undertook more or even unforeseen tasks in coordination, communication, and administrative support throughout the care pathways. (ii) The 28 interviewed healthcare professionals considered the CC's tasks to be essential to the success of pathways. They appreciated the CC's administrative support. However, CC's tasks related to interprofessional communication, and patient and family information, were controversially perceived among GPs and pharmacists. Conclusions: The CC's tasks in an integrated care pathway for older adults showed that the CC's overall workload was greater than expected and appreciated by healthcare professionals.

[Assessment of general practitioners' knowledge of inhalers]. / Évaluation des connaissances des médecins généralistes sur les inhalateurs. Les médecins généralistes savent-ils utiliser les inhalateurs qu'ils prescrivent dans le traitement de l'asthme ?

INTRODUCTION: Inhaled drug delivery is the cornerstone treatment for asthma. General practitioners (GPs) have a key role for educating patient about how to use their inhalers. The purpose of this study was to find out whether GPs know how to use the inhalers they usually prescribe. METHOD: This was a descriptive and analytical cross-sectional study among GPs from the Paris metropolitan area. GPs had to choose the inhalers they usually prescribe and then demonstrate their use. The technique of use was assessed using a scale specific to each type of inhaler. Overall success was defined by the use of prescribed inhalers without critical errors. RESULTS: Thirty-seven GPs were recruited between July 2018 and July 2019. Nineteen GPs (51.4%) were able to use the inhalers they prescribed without critical errors. The success rate without critical error was better with the pressurized metered dose inhalers with spacer than with other inhalers. The overall success rate was better among GPs who had previously used an inhaler on a personal basis (OR 7.58 95%CI [1.86, 37.02]) or who had prescribed only one type of inhaler (OR 4,8 95%CI [1.21, 22.41]). CONCLUSION: Half of the GPs in our study did not know how to use the inhalers they prescribe and therefore may have difficulty educating their patients.

Bivalve δ15N isoscapes provide a baseline for urban nitrogen footprint at the edge of a World Heritage coral reef.

Eutrophication is a major threat to world's coral reefs. Here, we mapped the distribution of the anthropogenic nitrogen footprint around Nouméa, a coastal city surrounded by 15,743 km2 of UNESCO listed reefs. We measured the δ15N signature of 348 long-lived benthic bivalves from 12 species at 27 sites and interpolated these to generate a δ15N isoscape. We evaluated the influence of water residence times on nitrogen enrichment and predicted an eutrophication risk at the UNESCO core area. Nitrogen isoscapes revealed a strong spatial gradient (4.3 to 11.7‰) from the outer lagoon to three highly exposed bays of Nouméa. Several protected reefs would benefit from an improved management of wastewater outputs, while one bay in the UNESCO core area may suffer a high eutrophication risk in the future. Our study reinforces the usefulness of using benthic animals to characterize the anthropogenic N-footprint and provide a necessary baseline for both ecologists and policy makers.

Mercury contamination level and speciation inventory in Lakes Titicaca & Uru-Uru (Bolivia): Current status and future trends.

Aquatic ecosystems of the Bolivian Altiplano (∼3800 m a.s.l.) are characterized by extreme hydro-climatic constrains (e.g., high UV-radiations and low oxygen) and are under the pressure of increasing anthropogenic activities, unregulated mining, agricultural and urban development. We report here a complete inventory of mercury (Hg) levels and speciation in the water column, atmosphere, sediment and key sentinel organisms (i.e., plankton, fish and birds) of two endorheic Lakes of the same watershed differing with respect to their size, eutrophication and contamination levels. Total Hg (THg) and monomethylmercury (MMHg) concentrations in filtered water and sediment of Lake Titicaca are in the lowest range of reported levels in other large lakes worldwide. Downstream, Hg levels are 3-10 times higher in the shallow eutrophic Lake Uru-Uru than in Lake Titicaca due to high Hg inputs from the surrounding mining region. High percentages of MMHg were found in the filtered and unfiltered water rising up from <1 to ∼50% THg from the oligo/hetero-trophic Lake Titicaca to the eutrophic Lake Uru-Uru. Such high %MMHg is explained by a high in situ MMHg production in relation to the sulfate rich substrate, the low oxygen levels of the water column, and the stabilization of MMHg due to abundant ligands present in these alkaline waters. Differences in MMHg concentrations in water and sediments compartments between Lake Titicaca and Uru-Uru were found to mirror the offset in MMHg levels that also exist in their respective food webs. This suggests that in situ MMHg baseline production is likely the main factor controlling MMHg levels in fish species consumed by the local population. Finally, the increase of anthropogenic pressure in Lake Titicaca may probably enhance eutrophication processes which favor MMHg production and thus accumulation in water and biota.

Clinical tolerance and profile of cytokine induction in healthy volunteers following the simultaneous administration of ifn-alpha and the synthetic immunomodulator murabutide.

As the therapeutic use of interferon-alpha (IFN-alpha) is limited by a dose-dependent toxicity and variable efficacy, ways of improving the therapeutic index of the cytokine are being sought. Murabutide (N-acetyl muramyl-L-alanyl-D-glutamine-O-n-butyl-ester) (ISTAC Biotechnology, Lille, France) is a safe synthetic and clinically acceptable immunomodulator that enhances the biologic activities of IFN-alpha in different experimental models. We evaluated in healthy human volunteers tolerance of the coadministration of Murabutide with increasing doses of IFN-alpha. The simultaneous administration of the two drugs was well tolerated without any increased or prohibiting toxicity, and all recipients experienced side effects that were similar to those observed after the administration of IFN-alpha alone. We also profiled the serum levels of cytokines induced following coinjection of the two drugs. We mostly detected an induction of anti-inflammatory cytokines and of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1)-suppressive beta-chemokines, in the absence of release of key proinflammatory cytokines. Therefore, the simultaneous administration of Murabutide and IFN-alpha is well tolerated and does not lead to increased toxicity. In addition, the selectivity in the profile of cytokines and chemokines induced following the coadministration of Murabutide and IFN-alpha points to the potential use of this combination in the treatment of inflammatory diseases and chronic viral infections.

Improved delivery of ipratropium bromide using Respimat (a new soft mist inhaler) compared with a conventional metered dose inhaler: cumulative dose response study in patients with COPD.

Respimat (RMT) is a reusable, propellant-free, soft mist inhaler (SMI), a novel device for inhalation therapy. We conducted a three-period cross-over study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of cumulative doses of ipratropium bromide inhaled from RMT (Two dose levels) or from a pressurized metered dose inhaler (MDI), in 36 patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The bronchodilator effect of ipratropium bromide was greater when administered via RMT (10 or 20 microg per puff, given double-blind within device, to total doses of 160 or 320 microg) than via MDI (20 microg per puff, total dose 320 microg). The bronchodilator effects of the 160 and 320 microg doses delivered via RMT were similar. Cumulative ipratropium bromide doses of 320 microg given via MDI or RMT and 160 microg given via RMT produced similar safety profiles. Between 45 min after the first drug inhalation and 45 min after the final dose, greater bronchodilatory effect was obtained from half the cumulative dose of ipratropium (RMT 10 microg per puff) when compared with the MDI (20 microg per puff). Therefore, ipratropium bromide delivered by RMT is as safe as, and can be more effective than, the MDI on acute administration in patients with COPD.

Pharmacokinetics of estradiol valerate 2mg + dienogest 2mg (climodien® 2/2) after single and repeated oral administration in healthy postmenopausal women.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the pharmacokinetics and tolerability of estradiol valerate 2.0mg plus dienogest 2.0mg (Climodien® 2/2). DESIGN AND SETTING: This was an open single-and multiple-dose study. STUDY PARTICIPANTS: 16 healthy postmenopausal women. INTERVENTIONS: Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined in plasma after single and multiple daily intake of Climodien® 2/2 for 12 weeks. Accumulation during multiple administration was calculated from the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC). Changes in plasma levels of other hormones and sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) were also measured. RESULTS: The observed accumulation of estradiol (accumulation ratio R(1) = 3.3) and free estrone (R(1) = 2.4) was higher than that predicted from single-dose data (R(theor) = 1.7 and 2.0 for estradiol and free estrone, respectively). This was thought to be due to high interindividual variability in estrogen parameters, or the degree of extrapolation required when calculating the half-life (t1/2). The observed accumulation of total estrone after multiple-drug administration was as predicted from single-dose results (R(1) and R(theor) = 1.5). The pharmacokinetics of dienogest were not time dependent, the observed accumulation (AUC(0-24h) 627 vs 483 µg/L · h) was as predicted from single-dose results (R(1) and R(theor) = 1.3). Reduced total plasma testosterone levels confirmed the antiandrogenic effect of dienogest.The main adverse events with Climodien® 2/2 (breast tension in five participants and irregular vaginal bleeding in four) reflected its hormonal content, and laboratory screening tests revealed no tolerability concerns. CONCLUSIONS: Estradiol may accumulate in plasma during multiple-drug administration with Climodien® 2/2 more than predicted from single-dose results. However, dienogest kinetics after multiple-drug administration were as predicted from single-dose results. Climodien® 2/2 demonstrated antiandrogenic effects and was well tolerated.

Repeated-dose pharmacodynamics of clopidogrel in healthy subjects.

The effect of repeated doses of clopidogrel, a novel platelet ADP-receptor antagonist, on platelet aggregation and its tolerance were assessed in two randomized, double-blind studies in healthy male adults. In each of the four successive dose groups in Study I, 6 subjects received either clopidogrel 25, 50, 100, or 150 mg once daily and 2 received placebo for 16 days, according to a rising dose design. In each of the three successive treatment groups of Study II, 9 subjects received clopidogrel (50, 75, or 100 mg once daily) in the morning, 3 received triclopidine 250 mg twice daily and 3 received placebo for 14 days. In both studies, the inhibition of platelet aggregation induced by 5 microM of ADP was measured before dosing (baseline), then at regular intervals during and after treatment. Bleeding time was generally assessed at the same time points as platelet aggregation. In both studies, the inhibition of platelet aggregation reached steady state after day 6 dosing. Mean steady-state percent inhibition of platelet aggregation was 30%, 46%, 53%, and 73% for clopidogrel 25, 50, 100, and 150 mg, respectively, in Study I; and 54%, 52%, 47%, and 43% for clopidogrel 50, 75, 100 mg, and for ticlopidine, respectively, in Study II. After treatment discontinuation, statistically significant inhibition of platelet aggregation persisted for up to 8 days. In Study I, up to 75 mg repeated doses, mean bleeding time prolongation factor did not exceed 2, but increased further to 3.5 and 5.5 at a clopidogrel dose of 100 mg and 150 mg, respectively. In study II, prolongation factors during treatment did not exceed 2.2 for clopidogrel (in the 75 mg dose group) and 1.6 for ticlopidine 500 mg. Recovery of bleeding time was observed within 7-8 days. Treatments were well tolerated, and no serious clinical events or important changes in laboratory parameters were recorded. These data were consistent with those obtained in atherosclerotic patients and showed that the plateau response for the inhibition of platelet aggregation was reached at the 75 mg dose, for which bleeding time prolongation was approximately 2.

Single-dose pharmacodynamics of clopidogrel.

The inhibition of platelet aggregation by clopidogrel, a novel platelet ADP-receptor antagonist, was evaluated in healthy male volunteers in two single-dose studies. In one study, 10 subjects received, in increasing order, single doses of 100, 200, 400 and 600 mg of clopidogrel or placebo in five study periods, according to a randomized, doubleblind, protocol design. In the second study, 12 subjects received a single 400 mg dose of clopidogrel as capsules and as tablets, according to an open-label, randomized, crossover design. The interval between the two administrations was seven days. Platelet aggregation induced by ADP (2, 5 and 10 microM) and by collagen (0.5 and 1 microg/mL; rising-dose study only) was assessed from blood samples collected over a period of 24 hours to 72 hours postdose. The inhibition of platelet aggregation was expressed as the mean percent change from baseline in maximum platelet aggregation. The effect of clopidogrel on bleeding time was also assessed. Clopidogrel induced a statistically significant inhibition of ADP-induced platelet aggregation at all doses. With 5 microM of ADP, the inhibition was dose-related up to a dose of 400 mg, with no further increase at a dose of 600 mg. At 2 hours, mean inhibition ranged from 12+/-6% (100 mg) to 42 +/-6% (400 mg), and at 24 hours, it ranged from 17+/-7% (100 mg) to 43+/-9% (400 mg). After 400 mg, the inhibition of platelet aggregation remained stable from 2 hours up to 72 hours, with mean percentages of inhibition ranging from 49 to 39%. Clopidogrel only showed a slight-to-moderate inhibitory effect on collagen-induced platelet aggregation. A mean bleeding time prolongation of 1.7 was observed 5 hours after the 400 mg and 600 mg doses; it was statistically significant only following the higher dose. Individual bleeding time prolongations ranged from 1 to 2.85. Clopidogrel was well tolerated at all doses. The results of these studies were part of the rational for the choice of the loading dose.

Clopidogrel does not affect the pharmacokinetics of theophylline.

The potential influence of clopidogrel on the pharmacokinetics of theophylline was evaluated in 15 healthy male subjects during the pharmacokinetic steady state of theophylline, after single and multiple doses. Theophylline was administered orally as one 300-mg capsule in the morning before breakfast and one in the evening before dinner for 13 days (day 1 through day 13), and one capsule on the morning of day 14. Clopidogrel was administered orally as one 75-mg tablet in the morning before breakfast from day 5 through day 14. Plasma concentration of theophylline was determined at the following times: before the morning dose on days, 1, 6-9, and 12; before administration, then at 0.5, 1,2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, and 12 hours after administration on days 4, 5, and 14. Tests of hemostasis (ADP-induced platelet aggregation and bleeding time) were carried out 2 hours after clopidogrel dosing on days 5, 7, 9, 11, and 14. The curves of the mean plasma concentration of theophylline over 12 hours post-morning dose on day 4 (drug alone), day 5 (after a single dose of clopidogrel), and day 14 (after 10 days of clopidogrel coadministration) were superimposable, indicating the absence of an effect of clopidogrel on the steady-state pharmacokinetics of theophylline. There were no statistically significant differences between the days of administration for the log-transformed values of theophylline C(bt) (concentration before treatment) Cmax, AUC(0-12h), and Cmin; and the 90% confidence intervals of the day 5/day 4, day 14/day 4, and day 14/day 5 ratios of the geometric means of C(bt) all fell within the (0.80; 1.25) interval. These results show that the administration of clopidogrel during steady state theophylline administration had no effect on the plasma concentration of the latter drug. The average steady-state (days 11-14) percentage of inhibition of ADP-induced platelet aggregation by clopidogrel with respect to day 1 was 46%. The geometric mean of the bleeding time prolongation factor was about 2 at steady state. The latter results indicate that the pharmacodynamics of clopidogrel were not affected by concomitant theophylline.

Pharmacokinetics of estradiol and of estrone during application of three strengths of an estradiol transdermal patch with active matrix.

The pharmacokinetic pattern of estradiol (CAS 50-28-2) and of estrone (CAS 53-16-7) during and after application of three strengths of a new transdermal estradiol patch (Dermestril) with active matrix was investigated in a cross-over study in 24 women in natural or surgical menopause. Free estradiol and estrone were assayed by GC-MS on plasma samples obtained during a 4-day application on the upper buttocks of the patches with 3 strengths and release rates of 25, 50 and 100 micrograms/day estradiol. The estradiol concentrations in plasma increased from 0-10 pg/ml typical of menopause to average concentrations of 23, 40 and 79 pg/ml during the application of the new estradiol transdermal patches with the three strengths. The concentrations of estradiol are in the range of those during the early follicular phase in women in fertile age. The increases were linearly related with the strength of the patches. Upon removal of the patches the estradiol concentrations returned to the basal low values in 8-24 h. Retarded with regard to estradiol, there was also an increase of estrone, from basal average concentrations of 22-32 pg/ml up to 31, 39 and 60 pg/ml. The increase of estrone was less pronounced than that of estradiol. Also estrone returned to its basal concentrations 24 h after removal of the patches. The estradiol/ estrone ratio from very low values typical of postmenopause increased to values of about 1, i.e. in the range of those found during the fertile age of woman. The adhesion of the patches was satisfying, provided that direct rough frictions were avoided. The patches were locally well tolerated, with rare mild and transient irritating effects on the skin. Also the systemic tolerability was good, with occasional mild or moderate side effects typical of estradiol (headache, mastodynia and pelvic heaviness) which in the practical use can be easily avoided by the application of patches of lower strength.

[Comparative study of the acceptability of a new estradiol Tx 11323 (A) gel and a transdermal matrix system]. / Etude comparative de l'acceptabilité d'un nouveau gel d'estradiol TX 11323 (A) et d'un dispositif transdermique matriciel.

OBJECTIVE: to compare the acceptability of a new estradiol gel TX 11323 (A) and a transdermal matrix system. METHOD: this randomised open crossed study was conducted on 80 healthy menopausal female volunteers treated successively with 1.5 mg of estradiol per day in gel form (Estreva Gel, Theramex, Monaco) and by a transdermal matrix twice-weekly system delivering 50 micrograms/24 h of estradiol (Oesclim 50, Fournier, Dijon-France). The treatment was applied for 25 days with an interval of 6 days between the 2 administration cycles. Acceptability was evaluated and compared by a self-questionnaire given on D1 and D25 of each therapeutic cycle. RESULTS: the 2 treatments, after 25 days of use, were judged convenient, easy and fast to use by more than 90% of subjects. There was, nevertheless, a significant difference in favour of the gel in respect of the estimation of the "visual aspect" of the treatment, reported skin problems, problems with application technique, as well as discomfort during intimacy found in 11% of cases using the transdermal system. It is noted that 80% of the women consider the gel treatment more feminine (p < 0.001) and that 61.3% prefer this treatment compared to 32.5% preferring the transdermal system studied (p = 0.005). CONCLUSION: this study shows a better acceptability of the estradiol gel TX 11323 (A) compared to that of the transdermal matrix system studied.

Comparison of two estradiol transdermal systems (Oesclim 50 and Estraderm TTS 50). II. Local skin tolerability.

OBJECTIVES: The objectives were to compare the local skin tolerability of a matrix-type estradiol transdermal system, Oesclim 50, with that of the reservoir-type system, Estraderm TTS 50. METHODS: Two randomised studies were performed. In the first study, the modified Draize-Shelanski-Jordan method of sensitization was used in an open, parallel-group trial to compare the cutaneous tolerability of repeated applications of Oesclim 50 with that of Estraderm TTS 50 in 24 healthy postmenopausal women. The second study was an open, randomised, parallel-group, multi-centre clinical trial involving 283 healthy menopausal women. A total of 143 women were allocated to treatment with Oesclim 50 and 140 to Estraderm TTS 50. The treatment duration was four months. RESULTS: The first study showed that the treatments, Oesclim 50 and Estraderm TTS 50, had no sensitizing potential and did not induce allergic reactions. In the second study, 4.2% of applications in the Oesclim group provoked reactions compared with 9.5% in the Estraderm group (P < 0.001). Thirty-seven patients (25.9%) treated with Oesclim and 55 patients (39.9%) receiving Estraderm experienced one or more reactions (P < 0.05). Redness and itching were the most frequent types of application site reaction in both treatment groups. The durations of the reactions were significantly shorter in the Oesclim group (P < 0.01), with a higher percentage of durations of less than 1 h and a lower percentage of durations of over 48 h than in the Estraderm TTS 50 group. None of the reactions in the Oesclim group led to premature removal of the patch, compared with 11 (3.4%) in the Estraderm group (P < 0.05). The number of patients who discontinued treatment due to application site reactions was one (0.7%) in the Oesclim group and seven (5.1%) in the Estraderm group (P < 0.05). Efficacy and general safety were comparable in the two treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: In the first study, neither Oesclim nor Estraderm induced allergic reactions. In the second study, the local skin tolerability of Oesclim was significantly better than that of Estraderm, in terms of the number, duration and severity of the application site reactions.

[Comparative evaluation of the acceptability of a new estradiol gel TX11323(A) and a reference gel]. / Evaluation comparative de l'acceptabilité du nouveau gel d'estradiol TX11323(A) et d'un gel de référence.

This randomized, crossed, single-blind study compared the acceptability and drying time of the new estradiol gel TX11323(A) (Estréva Gel, Laboratoire Théramex) to that of a reference gel (CEstrodose, Laboratories Besins-Iscovesco), in two phases. In phase 1, 48 healthy menopausal female volunteers applied 1.5 mg estradiol of each form of estradiol gel on the outer side of the arm for 8 days, with a free period of 7 days between the two treatments. Acceptability, evaluated by self-questionnaire and drying time for the two treatments were noted at day 1 and day 8. The second phase applied only to 16 subjects who followed the same therapeutic protocol, except that this time application was made on the antero-external side of the thighs. Only the subjectively and objectively quantified drying-time was taken into account. A significant difference was found in favor of TX11323(A) gel in terms of the following items: consistency, ease of application and penetration, quantity of gel to apply, sensation of lasting stickness. We note that 68.8% subjects prefer TX11323(A) gel and 27.1% prefer the reference gel (p = 0.001). The timed drying-time for TX11323(A) gel is significantly reduced, 40 to 50% on average depending on the phase, compared to that of the reference gel. The subjective evaluation of the subjects confirms this shorter drying time.

Comparative wheal and flare study of mizolastine vs terfenadine, cetirizine, loratadine and placebo in healthy volunteers.

1. Mizolastine, a new benzimidazole derivative with potent selective, non-sedative H1-histamine antagonist activity was compared with terfenadine, cetirizine and loratadine using the histamine-induced wheal and flare model in healthy volunteers. 2. Study design was a five way double-blind crossover design using a single dose of mizolastine 10 mg, terfenadine 120 mg, cetirizine 10 mg, loratadine 10 mg and placebo. 3. Histamine tests were performed on 10 occasions up to +24 h after dosing using an intradermal injection of histamine 2 micrograms with concommittant contralateral injection of a saline control. 4. Mizolastine, terfenadine, cetirizine and loratadine significantly (P < 0.001 vs placebo) inhibited the wheal and flare formation starting 1 to 2 h after dosing up to 24 h after dosing. 5. Mizolastine was significantly more active than loratadine on the wheal (P < 0.01) and flare (P < 0.05) inhibition from 3 up to 6 and 8 h respectively, as active as terfenadine on both parameters and as active as cetirizine on wheal inhibition while less active (P < 0.01) than cetirizine on flare inhibition at 2 and 12 h post-dosing.

Comparison of the pharmacokinetic profiles of three low molecular mass heparins--dalteparin, enoxaparin and nadroparin--administered subcutaneously in healthy volunteers (doses for prevention of thromboembolism).

The present trial was designed to comparatively investigate the pharmacokinetic profile and evaluate the apparent bioavailability pattern of three already marketed low molecular mass heparins (LMMHs): dalteparin (Fragmin), nadroparin (Fraxiparin), and enoxaparin (Lovenox) given by subcutaneous route. The study was carried out in 20 healthy young volunteers given, according to a cross over design, a single subcutaneous injection of the doses recommended for the prophylaxis of deep vein thrombosis (commercial preparations, prefilled syringes): dalteparin 2,500 IU (= 2,500 IU anti-Xa), nadroparin 7,500 ICU (= 3,075 IU anti-Xa), enoxaparin 20 mg (= 2,000 IU anti-Xa) and enoxaparin 40 mg (= 4,000 IU anti-Xa). Of the markers used, activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), thrombin clotting time (TCT), Heptest, anti-thrombin (aIIa) activity and anti-Xa (aXa) activity, the most pertinent parameter (from a biodynamic viewpoint) is plasma aXa activity. We demonstrated that dalteparin, nadroparin and enoxaparin exhibit statistically significantly different pharmacokinetic and overall disposition patterns. Normalized to the same injected dose (1,000 IU aXa), the relative actual amount of plasma anti-Xa activity generated by enoxaparin is 1.48 times greater (p < 0.001) than that of nadroparin and 2.28 times greater (p < 0.001) than that of dalteparin while the plasma amount induced by nadroparin is 1.54 times greater (p < 0.001) than that of dalteparin. The apparent total body clearance of enoxaparin doses (CL/F = 16.7 +/- 5.5 and 13.8 +/- 3.2 ml/min) is significantly smaller than those of nadroparin (CL/F = 21.4 +/- 7.0 ml/min; p < 0.01) and dalteparin (CL/F = 33.3 +/- 11.8 ml/min; p < 0.001) while dalteparin apparent clearance is about 1.5-fold greater (p < 0.001) than that of nadroparin. These LMMHs also differ by their renal excretion pattern: more fragments exhibiting an anti-Xa activity are recovered in urine following enoxaparin doses (6.4 and 8.7% of the dose, respectively) than following nadroparin (3.9%) and dalteparin (3.4%) injection. These differences in the disposition profiles explain why the apparent elimination half life t1/2 values of the LMMHs compared here are different: dalteparin: 2.8 h; nadroparin: 3.7 h; and enoxaparin: 4.1 h. Whether or not these differences may contribute to explain the different safety/efficacy balance of each of these antithrombotic medications remains to be discussed and needs further studies.

Bioavailability Study of Menorest®, a New Estrogen Transdermal Delivery System, Compared with a Transdermal Reservoir System.

The aim of this study was to compare the bioavailability and plasma profiles of estradiol and estrone after repeated applications of 2 types of estradiol transdermal systems: a new adhesive matrix system (Menorest®) compared with a reference membrane/reservoir system (Estraderm®) and to evaluate their short term safety. This was an open, randomised, crossover study, with 2 treatment periods of 10.5 days separated by a 10-day washout period and with a 1-week follow-up. Participants were studied at Institut Aster, Paris, and Association de Recherche Thérapeutique (ART), Lyon, France, and included 31 healthy postmenopausal women, all volunteers aged between 49 and 67 years (mean 58 years). Each transdermal system was applied for three successive 3.5 day-wear periods (10.5 days) on the lower abdominal skin. Plasma estradiol and estrone concentrations were measured at steady-state, before and after the third application of each transdermal system at regular intervals over 106 hours. Cutaneous tolerance was assessed after each transdermal system removal. Although the extent of availability [area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) and average plasma concentration (Cav)] was similar with both transdermal systems, their pharmacokinetic profiles were different, with Menorest® producing less fluctuating and more sustained plasma estradiol levels than the reference system. The mean estradiol to estrone Cav ratio was similar with the 2 transdermal systems and in the physiological range of premenopausal status. The incidence of adverse events was similar for both treatments, but a lower incidence of local erythema was observed with Menorest® (8.9%) than with the reference system (18.3%). In conclusion, during the entire wear period, Menorest® produced more sustained plasma estradiol levels with less fluctuations (40 to 72 ng/L) than the reservoir/ membrane system (18 to 102 ng/L). Menorest® gave estradiol plasma levels approximating the concentrations observed during the early to mid-follicular premenopausal stage, with a 2-fold lower incidence of erythema than with the reservoir/membrane system.

Pharmacokinetics of sparfloxacin in humans after single oral administration at doses of 200, 400, 600, and 800 mg.

The pharmacokinetics of sparfloxacin at oral doses of 200, 400, 600, and 800 mg were studied in 12 healthy volunteers in a randomized double-blind crossover study. Each dose administration was separated by a 1-week washout period. Plasma and urine samples were collected up to 120 hours postdosing, for determination of free and total (free plus glucurono-conjugated) sparfloxacin levels by high-performance liquid chromatography assay and ultraviolet detection. Mean Cmax values ranged from 705 +/- 158 to 1966 +/- 620 ng/mL for the 200 to 800 mg doses, at median tmax ranging from 4 to 5 hours. A slight decrease of sparfloxacin bioavailability with increasing dose was observed because AUC was 87% to 88% of the expected area when the dose was doubled. The elimination half-life values were constant over the dose range (with values ranging from 18 to 21 hours) as well as the renal clearance. The metabolic ratio conjugated/free drug was not modified by increasing dose.

[Gastroduodenal tolerance of methylprednisolone. Study of oral versus intravenous administration in healthy volunteers]. / Tolérance gastro-duodénale de la méthylprednisolone. Etude de la voie orale versus voie veineuse chez le volontaire sain.

OBJECTIVES: To endoscopically evaluate the tolerance of gastroduodenal mucosa to methylprednisolone given orally and intravenously. METHODS: Thirty two healthy volunteers (age range 18-39 years) were divided randomly into two groups of 16 each (8 males and 8 females). All were Caucasians, gave their informed consent and were considered normal after a complete clinical and laboratory work-up including gastroduodenal fibroscopy. Methylprednisolone (500 mg) was administered for three consecutive days at 9 a.m., orally in one group and intravenously in the second group. No other drugs were being taken and alcohol and smoking were prohibited from day 0 to day 11. Tolerance was evaluated on days 4 and 11 based on clinical examination, blood pressure, heart rate, oral temperature, body weight, blood and urine chemistry and by video-recorded gastroduodenal endoscopy. Two independent endoscopists, uninformed of the patient's regimen, scored lesions from 0 (normal) to 5 (more than 25 lesions including at least 2 erosions). In case of abnormal findings, follow-up was continued to normalization. RESULTS: Endoscopically detectable lesions (stage I) attributed to corticosteroid therapy were observed in 4 subjects in the oral group and in 5 in the intravenous group. All regressed spontaneously. Duodenal lesions were observed only after oral administration while lesions of gastric mucosa were mostly found after intravenous administration. Systemic effects included abdominal pain after oral intake, 1 case of insomnia and bitter taste in the mouth after intravenous administration. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that the effect of corticosteroid therapy, on the gastric mucosa, is basically systemic, and on the duodenal mucosa, basically local. No severe manifestations were observed after high-dose methylprednisolone given orally or by intravenous injection.

EEG profile of intravenous zolpidem in healthy volunteers.

Zolpidem is an imidazopyridine which binds specifically to the omega 1 receptor. Zolpidem demonstrated potent hypnotic activity at a dose of 10 mg. Pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of zolpidem were studied after daytime administration in a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over trial. Single doses of zolpidem (10 mg IV as a 3-min infusion and 20 mg orally) and placebo were firstly tested in 12 healthy young male volunteers. Two other doses (5 mg IV and orally) were then evaluated in 6 out of these 12 subjects. EEG (4 leads = Fp2-T4, Fp1-T3, T4-02 and T3-01), and Stanford Sleepiness Scale (SSS) were measured up to 5 h postdosing. Blood samples were also collected up to 24 h. The time course of the hypnotic activity of zolpidem, assessed by the score obtained on SSS, showed a similar profile whatever the route or the dose administered: slightly earlier onset after IV but sedative scores were reached at 30 min and the effect peaked between 1 and 1.5 h and lasted 4 h in both conditions. The EEG profile of zolpidem was characterised by a decrease of alpha activity and an increase in delta and in beta activity. The effect on beta activity was marked within the first hour and then disappeared. The time course of delta and alpha activities indicated a rapid onset (10 min after IV, 30 min after oral route) and a duration of 3-4 h. The amplitude of these relative EEG changes and their duration were independent of the route of administration and the dose administered. AUC and Cmax increased proportionally to the administered dose and elimination half life (2h), clearance and volume of distribution did not change according to the dose or the route of administration.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)