Impact of gaming disorder on first episode psychosis patients' evolution: Protocol for a multicentered prospective study.

AIMS: The objective of this study is to underline the impact of Gaming Disorder on the clinical evolution of patients with First Episode Psychosis. The specific aims of the study are to determine the prevalence of gaming disorder among those patients and assess the consequences of gaming on their clinical trajectory. METHODS: This is a prospective multicenter cohort study that will enrol 800 patients diagnosed with a first episode psychosis, with a follow-up period of up to 3 years. Using a systematic screening procedure for gaming disorder, the clinical staff will assess patients gaming habits at admission and every 6 months thereafter. Information from patients' medical records will also be extracted using the same timeframe. RESULTS: The patients' characteristics at admission and during follow-up will be presented in the form of descriptive statistics and compared between different subgroups of patients using uni- and multivariate logistic regression models. Repeated measures ANCOVA will also be performed to analyse the impact of gaming disorders on patients' clinical path as assessed by the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale and the Clinical Global Impression scale, considering covariates such as psychiatric diagnosis, pharmacological treatment, age, sex/gender, and duration of untreated psychosis. CONCLUSION: These findings will guide the development of prevention, detection, and treatment strategies for the comorbidity between gaming disorder and first episode psychosis, ultimately improving the patients' recovery.

Problem gambling among people with first-episode psychosis: protocol for a prospective multicenter cohort study.

BACKGROUND: The limited available data suggest that the prevalence of problem gambling is increased among young adults with first-episode psychosis, possibly due in part to several risk factors for problem gambling that are common in this population. Aripiprazole, a widely used antipsychotic drug, has also been linked to cases of problem gambling, but causality remains uncertain. Although the consequences of problem gambling further hinder the recovery of people with first-episode psychosis, there is a paucity of research about this comorbidity and its risk factors. Additionally, to our knowledge, no screening instrument for problem gambling tailored to these individuals exists, contributing to its under-recognition. Further, treatment approaches for problem gambling adapted to this population are at an embryonic stage, while existing treatments effectiveness remains to be documented. Using an innovative screening and assessment procedure for problem gambling, this study aims to identify risk factors for problem gambling among people with first-episode psychosis and to document the effectiveness of standard treatment approaches. METHODS: This is a multicenter prospective cohort study conducted in two first-episode psychosis clinics, including all patients admitted between November 1st, 2019, and November 1st, 2023, followed for up to 3 years until May 1st, 2024. These 2 clinics admit approximately 200 patients annually, for an expected sample size of 800 individuals. The primary outcome is the occurrence of a DSM-5 diagnosis of gambling disorder. All patients are screened and evaluated for problem gambling using a systematic procedure at admission, and every 6 months thereafter. Socio-demographic and clinical variables are prospectively extracted from the patients' medical records. The nature and effectiveness of treatments for problem gambling offered to affected individuals are also documented from medical records. Survival analyses with Cox regression models will be used to identify potential risk factors for problem gambling. Descriptive statistics will document the effectiveness of treatments for problem gambling in this population. DISCUSSION: A better understanding of potential risk factors for problem gambling among people with first-episode psychosis will allow for better prevention and detection of this neglected comorbidity. Results of this study will also hopefully raise clinicians' and researchers' awareness and serve as the basis to adapted treatments that will better support recovery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05686772. Retrospectively registered, 9 January 2023.

Real-life effectiveness of transitioning from paliperidone palmitate 1-monthly to paliperidone palmitate 3-monthly long-acting injectable formulation.

Background: Non-adherence to antipsychotics in schizophrenia is associated with an increased risk of psychotic relapse and hospitalization, a risk that is reduced with the use of long-acting injectable (LAI) antipsychotics. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) have demonstrated the efficacy of paliperidone palmitate 3-monthly (PP3M) for psychotic relapse prevention in schizophrenia, but it remains poorly documented among individuals treated in real-life settings who can benefit the most out of LAIs. Objectives: The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of PP3M in relapse prevention among patients with schizophrenia. Methods: This is a multicentre retrospective study conducted in four outpatients' clinics across Canada. All consecutive patients with a main diagnosis of schizophrenia who initiated PP3M between June 2016 and March 2020 were included. The primary outcome was psychotic relapse, defined using broad and clinically relevant criteria. Results: Among 178 consecutive patients who were switched to PP3M, the 12-month relapse rate was 18.5% and the relapse-free survival probability was 0.788 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.725-0.856). Comorbid diagnoses of personality disorders and substance use disorders were associated with hazard rates (HRs) of 3.6 (95% CI = 1.8-7.3, p < 0.001) and 3.1 (95% CI = 1.6-6.2), respectively. Increased psychopathology severity was associated with an increased likelihood of relapse, while having a job or being in school was protective. Conclusion: These findings reinforce the necessity of conducting research in patients with comorbid psychiatric disorders who are typically underrepresented in RCTs, yet overrepresented in real-life settings, in order to better inform and guide clinical practice.