Pen needle use patterns in an insured population with diabetes: US retrospective claims analysis.

BACKGROUND: People with diabetes who inject insulin with pen devices may reuse the pen needles (PNs), a practice that can cause PN tip deformity, breakage, and contamination, and that is associated with lipohypertrophy and injection-related pain. OBJECTIVE: This retrospective study aimed to estimate the extent of PN reuse among people with diabetes in two insured populations in the United States. METHODS: Using claims data for Commercial Fully Insured (CFI) and Medicare Advantage (MA) populations from 1-Oct-2018 to 31-Dec-2022, we identified adults with type 1 or type 2 diabetes (T1D/T2D) who had ≥1 claim for PNs and ≥2 claims for insulin from 1-Jan-2019 to 31-Dec-2021, with continuous medical/pharmacy eligibility for 3 months before first claim and 1 year after (follow-up). Those receiving hospice or palliative care or using mail-order prescriptions were excluded. We compared actual annual fill rate of PNs with expected fill rate (assuming single use) according to prescribed insulin regimen. Whether the annual actual-to-expected ratio for PN numbers equaled 1 was evaluated using sign tests with 2-sided p-values. RESULTS: Median annual actual-to-expected ratios ranged from 0.41 (T1D basal+prandial cohort) to 0.82 (T2D basal cohort; all p<0.001) in the CFI population (N=10,854), and from 0.55 (TID basal+prandial) to 1.10 (T2D basal and basal+prandial; p=0.382 to <0.001) in the MA population (N=32,495); medians were 0.34 and 0.55 for four expected T2D basal+prandial injections/day in CFI and MA populations, respectively (p<0.001). Annual actual-to-expected ratios were <1 for 62% and 47% of CFI and MA populations, respectively. An estimated 2-27% and 0-17%, respectively, depending on insulin regimen, had inadequate supplies of PNs suggesting that PNs could have been used ≥5 times. CONCLUSIONS: These findings highlight the need for educating people with diabetes about reasons for avoiding PN reuse and the key role that pharmacists can play in providing this information and adequate supplies of PNs.

Indirect comparison of apomorphine sublingual film and levodopa inhalation powder for Parkinson's disease 'OFF' episodes.

Aim: To compare efficacy of apomorphine sublingual film (APL) and levodopa inhalation powder (CVT-301) for 'on-demand' treatment of Parkinson's disease 'OFF' episodes. Patients & methods: Patient-level data from an APL pivotal study were re-weighted to match average baseline characteristics from a CVT-301 study (SPAN-PD). Placebo-adjusted treatments were compared at week 12. Results: Improvements in predose Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Part III scores were significantly larger for APL versus CVT-301 at 60 min postdose (least squares mean difference-in-difference: -8.82; p = 0.002); difference at 30 min favored APL but was not statistically significant (-4.46; p = 0.103). Total daily 'OFF' time reductions were significantly larger for APL versus CVT-301 (-1.31 h; p = 0.013). Conclusion: Results suggest APL treatment may lead to improved efficacy versus CVT-301.

Comparative economic outcomes in patients with focal seizures initiating eslicarbazepine acetate versus brivaracetam as their first adjunctive ASD.

AIMS: To study the association between initiation of first adjunctive therapy with eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) vs. brivaracetam (BRV) on healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and charges among patients with treated focal seizures (FS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Symphony Health's Integrated Dataverse (IDV) claims data (1 April 2015 to 30 June 2018) were used to identify two cohorts as first adjunctive therapy with ESL or BRV following a generic anti-seizure drug (ASD). The index date was the earliest claim for a new ESL or BRV prescription. Key inclusion criteria were only 1 generic ASD in the 12 months before the index date; ≥1 medical claim with an FS diagnosis. Unit of analysis was the 90-day person-time-block. Changes in HCRU and charges were assessed using a difference-in-differences framework. Both unadjusted and adjusted analyses were performed. The adjusted model utilized person-specific fixed effects and propensity score-based weighting to control for differences in baseline covariates. Bias-corrected bootstrap confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for charge outcomes. RESULTS: 208 and 137 patients initiated first adjunctive therapy with ESL (43.7 years, 51.9% female) or BRV (39.3 years, 51.8% female). Patients in the ESL cohort had numerically larger reductions in all-cause and FS-related inpatient hospitalizations and outpatient visits and FS-related emergency department visits. Compared to patients initiating BRV, patients treated with ESL had significantly larger reductions in total charges (-$3,446, CI: -$13,716, -$425), all-cause (-$3,166, CI: -$13,991, -$323) and FS-related (-$2,969, CI: -$21,547, -$842) medical charges, all-cause (-$3,397, CI: -$15,676, -$818) and FS-related (-$2,863, CI: -$19,707, -$787) outpatient charges, and non-ASD-related prescription charges (-$420, CI: -$1,058, -$78). LIMITATIONS: Claims may be missing, or miscoded; outcomes may be influenced by variables not accounted for in the analysis; only information on submitted charges was included. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with FS, initiation of first adjunctive therapy with ESL was associated with significantly larger reductions in medical and non-ASD-related prescriptions charges compared to BRV.

Patient Preferences for Treating "OFF" Episodes in Parkinson's Disease: A Discrete Choice Experiment.

INTRODUCTION: Several on-demand treatments are available for management of "OFF" episodes in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). We evaluated patients' preferences for features of theoretical on-demand treatment options. METHODS: In a discrete choice experiment, US adults with self-reported PD of ≥5 years, or <5 years with "OFF" episodes, taking oral carbidopa/levodopa, selected between pairs of theoretical on-demand treatments that varied by mode of administration (with and without mode-specific adverse events [AEs]), time to FULL "ON," duration of "ON," and out-of-pocket cost for a 30-day supply. Data were analyzed with a random parameters logit model; results were used to calculate relative importance of treatment attributes, preference shares, and willingness to pay. RESULTS: Among 300 respondents, 98% had "OFF" episodes. Across the range of attribute levels included in the survey, avoiding $90 cost was most important to respondents, followed by a preferable mode of administration with associated AEs and decreasing time to FULL "ON." Duration of "ON" was relatively less important. On average, respondents preferred a theoretical dissolvable sublingual film versus other theoretical treatments with alternative modes of administration. Respondents were willing to pay $28-$52 US dollars to switch from least- to more-preferred mode of administration with associated AEs, $58 to reach FULL "ON" in 15 versus 60 min, and $9 to increase duration of FULL "ON" from 1 to 2 h. CONCLUSION: Respondents with PD valued lower out-of-pocket cost and a sublingual mode of administration with its associated AEs when choosing an on-demand treatment for "OFF" episodes.

Real-world assessment of "OFF" episode-related healthcare resource utilization among patients with Parkinson's disease in the United States.

AIMS: Within 5 years of initiating carbidopa/levodopa, ∼50% of patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) experience "OFF" episodes; little is known about the cost burden. We investigated the association of "OFF" episodes with patient characteristics, healthcare resource utilization (HCRU), and healthcare costs. METHODS: Analyses used neurologist-provided data from the US-specific 2017 and 2019 Adelphi Real World Disease Specific Programme for PD, including duration of "OFF" episodes and HCRU for 10-12 consecutive patients. Patients were grouped by presence/absence of "OFF" episodes and by average hours of daily "OFF" time. Between-group differences were assessed for demographics, personal circumstances, and clinical characteristics. Regression analyses modeled the relationship of "OFF" episodes with HCRU and costs. RESULTS: Of 1,309 patients, 41% experienced "OFF" episodes, 25% of whom were "OFF" ≥4 h/day. Patients having "OFF" episodes had more severe PD, were diagnosed for longer, and were younger than those without "OFF" (p < .0001). "OFF" episodes were associated with a greater number of prescribed PD drugs (p < .0001). Patients without "OFF" episodes were more likely to have full-time employment and less likely to be retired or unemployed because of PD (p < .001). Patients with and without "OFF" episodes had different living situations (p < .001): patients experiencing "OFF" were less likely to live alone and more likely to live in a nursing home and have a professional caregiver (p < .001). In the past 12 months, the number of hospitalizations, intensive care admissions, and emergency room visits; nights hospitalized; costs of consultations and hospitalizations; and total direct costs were all higher for patients experiencing "OFF" episodes (p < .05). CONCLUSION: Patients with PD and "OFF" episodes had higher HCRU and costs than those without "OFF," suggesting that "OFF" episodes contribute to the economic burden of PD. Further research is warranted to examine the extent that current PD treatments and treatment patterns impact HCRU and costs.

Real-world assessment of the impact of "OFF" episodes on health-related quality of life among patients with Parkinson's disease in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Many patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) who receive carbidopa/levodopa experience symptom reemergence or worsening, or "OFF" episodes. This study assessed the association of "OFF" episodes with health-related quality of life (HRQoL). METHODS: US-specific data from the 2017 and 2019 Adelphi Real World Disease Specific Programme for PD, a real-world cross-sectional survey, were used. Neurologists provided data for 10-12 consecutive patients with PD who completed the 39-item Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) and the EuroQol 5-Dimension (EQ-5D). Data were grouped by patients who experienced "OFF" episodes versus those who did not and by average hours of daily "OFF" time. Differences between patient groups were assessed for demographics and clinical characteristics; regression analyses were used to model the relationship between HRQoL and "OFF" episodes with age, sex, body mass index, current PD stage on the Hoehn and Yahr scale, and number of concomitant conditions related and unrelated to mobility as covariates. RESULTS: Data from 722 patients were analyzed. Overall, 321 patients (44%) had "OFF" episodes (mean of 2.9 h of daily "OFF" time). Patients who experienced "OFF" episodes were less likely to work full-time and more likely to live with family members other than their spouse/partner or reside in a long-term care facility than those without "OFF" episodes. The presence of "OFF" episodes, regardless of the average hours of daily "OFF" time, was significantly associated with high scores (reflecting poor HRQoL) on most PDQ-39 dimensions and the summary index and low scores (reflecting poor health status) on the EQ-5D health utility index, visual analog scale (VAS), and all dimensions. Furthermore, increased average hours of daily "OFF" time was significantly correlated with higher scores for all PDQ-39 dimensions and the summary index, as well as with the EQ-5D health utility index and VAS scores. Patients with "OFF" episodes experienced reduced HRQoL even after correcting for potentially confounding variables. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that the occurrence of "OFF" episodes in patients with PD is associated with reduced HRQoL and that the impact on HRQoL increased incrementally with increasing average hours of daily "OFF" time.

Cost-Effectiveness of Apomorphine Sublingual Film as an "On-Demand" Treatment for "OFF" Episodes in Patients with Parkinson's Disease.

Background: "On-demand" treatments approved in the United States (US) for "OFF" episodes in Parkinson's disease (PD) include apomorphine hydrochloride injection (SC-APO), apomorphine sublingual film (APL), and levodopa inhalation powder (CVT-301). APL received US approval in 2020, and its cost-effectiveness has not been compared with SC-APO and CVT-301. Objective: To develop a cost-effectiveness analysis model comparing APL versus SC-APO and CVT-301 for treatment of patients with PD experiencing "OFF" episodes from a US payer perspective. Methods: The model estimated total costs and effectiveness for each comparator arm, informed from the treatments' pivotal studies or literature, over a 10-year horizon. Total and incremental patient costs (in 2020 US dollars), total time spent without "OFF" episode symptoms, and quality-adjusted life years (QALY) gained were summarized and compared. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios for APL versus SC-APO and CVT-301 were estimated and expressed as incremental patient costs per patient QALY gained and incremental cost per "OFF" hour avoided. Scenario analyses varying inputs and including caregiver costs were also conducted. Results: In the base case, APL had the lowest total "on-demand" treatment costs ($42,095) compared with SC-APO ($276,320; difference: -$234,225) and CVT-301 ($69,577; difference: -$27,482) over the 10-year horizon. APL was also associated with the highest utility, with incremental QALYs of 0.019 versus SC-APO and 0.235 versus CVT-301. APL was dominant over CVT-301 in terms of incremental cost per "OFF" hour, and dominant over both CVT-301 and SC-APO in terms of incremental cost per QALY gained. In all scenario analyses, APL was dominant against both SC-APO and CVT-301, confirming the robustness of the base-case results. Discussion: APL was dominant compared with both comparator arms, being less costly and more effective on average than SC-APO and CVT-301 in terms of QALYs. For SC-APO, cost-effectiveness of APL was driven by lower "on-demand" treatment costs and adverse event-related disutilities. For CVT-301, cost-effectiveness of APL was driven by lower "on-demand" treatment costs and substantially higher efficacy. Conclusions: From a US payer perspective, APL represents a cost-effective option compared with SC-APO and CVT-301 for treatment of "OFF" episodes in patients with PD.

Estimating the economic burden of migraine on US employers.

Migraine is a leading cause of disability globally. Individuals with migraine experience reduced work productivity and greater health care costs compared with the general population. The Migraine Impact Model (MIM) is an interactive calculator developed to estimate the economic burden of migraine on United States-based employers. We demonstrate use of the model with 4 case studies from different industries (education, manufacturing, retail/trade, and entertainment). The MIM estimates migraine prevalence among employees and the employer's annual migraine-associated costs by applying published, licensed, and publicly available data and several underlying assumptions to employee population information that is inputted by users. User inputs include the employer's industry, geographic location, and workforce characteristics (number of employees, gender distribution, and average age and compensation). Model outputs include estimated migraine prevalence, annual workdays affected by migraine, and annual migraine-associated indirect and direct costs to the employer. In the case studies presented, workforce size ranged from 18,800 to 250,000, representing midsized to larger employers. Employee gender distribution ranged from 29% to 74% women, and mean employee age was either 41 or 44 years. The model-estimated percentage of employees with migraine ranged from 14% to 19%. The model projected approximately 60,000 to 686,000 annual workdays to be affected by lost productive time due to migraine (often referred to as "absenteeism" and "presenteeism") and estimated annual indirect costs to total between 6.2 and 8.5 times the annual direct costs. The MIM estimates the economic burden of migraine on a company's workforce, which may aid employers in making data-driven decisions to reduce that burden for employees and business.

Evaluating the Psychometric Properties of the Migraine Functional Impact Questionnaire (MFIQ).

BACKGROUND: Migraine is a chronic neurologic disease that can be associated with significant migraine-related impact, disability, and burden. Patient-reported outcome measures (PRO) are included in clinical trials of migraine interventions to capture treatment effects from a patient perspective. Clinical and regulatory guidelines also encourage use of PROs in trials. The Migraine Functional Impact Questionnaire (MFIQ) is a novel PRO measure, assessing the impact of migraine on Physical Function (PF), Usual Activities (UA), Social Function (SF), and Emotional Function (EF), in the past 7 days. Scientific methods recommended to meet the requirements of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration were followed, to ensure that the MFIQ content included outcomes that were relevant to adults with migraine and were clinically relevant, specifically to evaluate preventive treatments for migraine. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to conduct item analyses informing item reduction and scoring, and to evaluate the psychometric properties of the MFIQ. METHODS: In a prospective, observational study, adults with migraine completed the MFIQ as well as additional clinical and PRO instruments, including the Headache Impact Test (HIT-6TM ), Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function Short Form 10a (PROMIS-PF), Migraine-Specific Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (MSQ), and Patient Global Rating of Change (PGIC). Item-level evaluation, item response theory (IRT), and factor analysis were used to select final MFIQ items, identify domains, and inform scoring. Psychometric properties of the MFIQ were evaluated to assess reliability (internal consistency and test-retest), validity (construct and known-groups), and responsiveness. RESULTS: The study enrolled 569 adults with migraine. Subjects had an average age of 39.9 years (SD 12.0), 87.2% were female, and 80.8% were white. Five items were dropped from the draft version based on results of item-level analyses reviewed in the context of previous qualitative research to produce the final 26-item MFIQ (v.2). Four domain scores (PF, UA, SF, and EF) and a global item score for impact on UA were identified. Higher scores on a 0-100 scale represent greater impact. All scores exhibited high internal consistency (α ≥ 0.89) and moderate test-retest reliability among stable subjects (ICCs ≥ 0.47). Construct validity was demonstrated by significant correlations (all P < .0001) between MFIQ domain scores, related PRO scores, and the frequency of migraine days and headache days. All domain scores differentiated between subgroups ("known groups") defined based on established levels of clinical severity: number of monthly migraine and headache days, migraine interference levels and scores on other PRO instruments (P < .05). Improvements in MFIQ scores corresponded with clinical improvement (percent reduction in monthly migraine days), improvement in migraine interference with daily activities, and related improvements in PRO scores (P < .05), demonstrating that the MFIQ was responsive to changes in migraine impact. CONCLUSIONS: The MFIQ is a reliable and valid measure that can be used to collect data about migraine impact. The MFIQ is being used to evaluate outcomes of migraine interventions in clinical trials and observational studies. It could potentially also be used in clinical practice both for initial and ongoing assessments for monitoring outcomes and to enhance communication between patients and healthcare professionals for the management of migraine.

Associations Between Treatment Satisfaction, Medication Beliefs, and Adherence to Disease-Modifying Therapies in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis.

BACKGROUND: Adherence to disease-modifying therapy (DMT) remains problematic for many patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). An improved understanding of factors affecting DMT adherence may inform effective interventions. This study examined associations between treatment satisfaction, medication beliefs, and DMT adherence. METHODS: A survey was mailed in 2016 to 600 adult patients with relapsing-remitting MS taking an injectable or oral DMT. Patients were sampled from the North American Research Committee on Multiple Sclerosis (NARCOMS) Registry. The survey measured self-reported DMT adherence (doses taken divided by doses prescribed during previous 2-week period-adherence ≥0.80), DMT satisfaction using the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication version II, medication beliefs using the Beliefs About Medicines Questionnaire, and demographic and clinical covariates. Relationships between variables were examined using multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: Final analyses included 489 usable surveys. Mean ± SD participant age was 60.5 ± 8.3 years. Most respondents were white (93.8%), female (86.6%), taking an injectable DMT (66.9%), and adherent to DMT (92.8%). Significant predictors of DMT adherence were age (odds ratio [OR], 1.086; 95% CI, 1.020-1.158; P = .011), type of DMT (oral vs. injectable; OR, 23.350; 95% CI, 2.254-241.892; P = .008), and DMT experience (naive vs. experienced; OR, 2.831; 95% CI, 1.018-7.878; P = .046). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with MS sampled from a patient registry, treatment satisfaction and medication beliefs were not significantly associated with DMT adherence. Based on significant predictors, younger patients, patients taking injectable DMTs, and patients with previous experience with another DMT(s) are at higher risk for nonadherence. Future research is warranted to assess relationships between variables in more diverse MS populations.

Development of a New Tool for Evaluating the Benefit of Preventive Treatments for Migraine on Functional Outcomes - The Migraine Functional Impact Questionnaire (MFIQ).

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to develop a method for evaluating patient-relevant outcomes of interventions for preventing migraine attacks, followed by an assessment of the content validity of a new patient-reported outcome (PRO) instrument: the Migraine Functional Impact Questionnaire (MFIQ). BACKGROUND: The aim of preventive treatments for migraine is not only to reduce migraine frequency, but also to restore patients' ability to function and improve quality of life. METHODS: A multi-stage process based on best practice methods and regulatory guidelines for ensuring content validity of PRO instruments for evaluating treatment benefit was followed. Qualitative concept elicitation interviews conducted to understand the experiences of adults with migraine underpinned the development of the instrument. The initial stage included the development of a conceptual disease model (CDM) based on information from these interviews. This CDM was used to identify the concepts of interests (COI) to evaluate outcomes of preventive treatments. The results of the interviews were also used in stage 2, to develop a measurement framework for collecting data about these COI. In the third stage, existing instruments were reviewed for coverage of the concepts in the framework and evidence of concept elicitation to the point of saturation, to support content validity. In the fourth stage, an instrument was drafted to evaluate concepts in the framework, based on the qualitative data collected from the interviews. Following a review by clinical and translation experts, the new instrument was tested in adults with migraine in the fifth stage using 2 rounds of cognitive interviews, and was modified based on interview feedback. In the last stage, the instrument was linguistically adapted, using methods recommended for PRO instruments, to ensure conceptual equivalence of language versions for use in international studies. Each language version was tested in at least 5 native speakers using cognitive interviews. RESULTS: Results from the concept elicitation interviews suggested that migraine had an impact on various aspects of functioning. A conceptual framework for evaluating functional outcomes was developed for the concept selected based on a review of the CDM - physical and emotional functioning, every day activities, and social/leisure activities. Existing PROs lacked coverage of some concepts in the conceptual framework, had recall periods that were inappropriate for capturing the experience of COI or did not have evidence of content validity. A novel PRO instrument, the MFIQ, was developed to address these gaps. Cognitive interviews with 9 adults with migraine resulted in minor changes to the items of the MFIQ, and a final round of 8 interviews confirmed the changes were acceptable and supported its validity. The interviews conducted to test linguistic adaptations confirmed conceptual equivalence in the 25 countries evaluated. CONCLUSIONS: Development of the MFIQ followed best measurement practices to ensure content validity and followed regulatory guidelines for PRO instruments to evaluate benefits of treatments. The MFIQ was developed for use in clinical trials or clinical practice settings to track outcomes of preventive treatments that are most relevant to adults with migraine.

Determinants of health-related quality of life in international graduate students.

INTRODUCTION: International graduate students often experience additional levels of stress due to acculturation. Given the impact of stress on health outcomes (both physical and mental), this study examined the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in international graduate students to determine its association with acculturative stress, perceived stress, and use of coping mechanisms. METHODS: A cross-sectional, self-administered survey was designed and sent to 38 student chapters within the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR) student network. HRQoL [physical component summary (PCS) and mental component summary (MCS)] was measured using the 12-item Short Form (SF-12) while coping mechanisms were assessed using the Brief COPE Scale. Acculturative and perceived stress were assessed using the Acculturative Stress Scale for International students [ASSIS] and Graduate Stress Inventory-Revised (GSI-R), respectively. Demographic and personal information (e.g. age, religion) were also collected. Descriptive statistics (mean ± SD and frequency) and hierarchical multiple regression analysis were conducted. RESULTS: The average PCS and MCS were 60 ± 9 and 44 ± 13, respectively, indicating that while the physical health was above the United States (US) general population norm (50), mental health scores were lower. Findings from the hierarchical multiple regression showed that perceived and acculturative stress significantly predicted mental health. Acculturative stress was also a significant predictor of physical health. CONCLUSION: The results from this study support the hypothesis that international students in the US experience both perceived and acculturative stress that significantly impacts their HRQoL. Universities should consider providing education on stress reduction techniques to improve the health of international graduate students.

Predictors of prostate cancer screening using Andersen's Behavioral Model of Health Services Use.

PURPOSE: The purposes of the study were to examine the prevalence of prostate cancer screening (PCS) in the United States and to identify predictors of PCS guided by Andersen's Behavioral Model of Health Services Use (ABM). METHODS: PCS rates were analyzed in men (aged ≥40y) using 2014 data from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Descriptive analysis was conducted using sampling weights to determine the prevalence of PCS (i.e., had a prostate-specific antigen test). Multiple logistic regression within the framework of ABM was used to identify predictors of PCS. The ABM variables of predisposing (e.g., age), enabling (e.g., health insurance), and need (e.g., comorbidities) comprised the independent variables. RESULTS: Among the 131,415 men, 62.4% (N = 82,014) reported that they had a prostate-specific antigen test in the last 2 years. Among predisposing factors, age, education, income, and employment status were significantly associated with undergoing PCS. Informed decision-making process, health care coverage, regular health care provider, and length of time since last routine checkup were significant enabling factors. Health care provider recommendation and previous cancer diagnosis were significant need factors. CONCLUSIONS: Most older men in the United States had previously engaged in PCS. Several ABM variables were predictive of PCS and should be considered when developing future strategies to encourage PCS in at-risk men with the recommended life expectancies. Such strategies should also ensure that the decision to undergo PCS is an informed process between patients and their health care providers.

Consumer perceptions about a community pharmacy-based medication take back program.

The stockpiling and improper disposal of unused or expired medications has the potential to harm the environment and humans. Community-based medication take-back programs have been established to ensure proper disposal of unused drugs; however, few of these programs present consumers' perceptions about the program. Therefore, the main aims of this pilot study are 1) to assess the users' and non-users' perceptions about a medication take-back program and 2) to determine if perceptions differ between users and non-users. The results are based on a survey administered to 35 users and 20 non-users of a medication take-back program located at a community pharmacy in Texas. The majority of users were participating in a take-back service for the first time. Though most non-users had never participated in a take-back program, they would consider participating in the future. All users viewed the medication take-back program as a valuable service, while nearly all (90%) non-users viewed the program as a potentially valuable service. The primary reason for participating in the service was to protect the environment. Most respondents (users and non-users) were likely to choose a pharmacy that provides the take-back service more than a pharmacy that does not. More than half of respondents positively viewed paying for the service on a per weight basis. In comparison to non-users, users were significantly older, had more favorable perceptions about paying for the service, and were more likely to choose a pharmacy that provides the service. This pilot study presents overall favorable user perceptions toward medication-take back services and supports the need to establish more community-based take back programs to meet the needs of consumers.