Rapid deployment of an emergency department-intensive care unit for the COVID-19 pandemic.

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic mandated rapid, flexible solutions to meet the anticipated surge in both patient acuity and volume. This paper describes one institution's emergency department (ED) innovation at the center of the COVID-19 crisis, including the creation of a temporary ED-intensive care unit (ICU) and development of interdisciplinary COVID-19-specific care delivery models to care for critically ill patients. Mount Sinai Hospital, an urban quaternary academic medical center, had an existing five-bed resuscitation area insufficiently rescue due to its size and lack of negative pressure rooms. Within 1 week, the ED-based observation unit, which has four negative pressure rooms, was quickly converted into a COVID-19-specific unit, split between a 14-bed stepdown unit and a 13-bed ED-ICU unit. An increase in staffing for physicians, physician assistants, nurses, respiratory therapists, and medical technicians, as well as training in critical care protocols and procedures, was needed to ensure appropriate patient care. The transition of the ED to a COVID-19-specific unit with the inclusion of a temporary expanded ED-ICU at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic was a proactive solution to the growing challenges of surging patients, complexity, and extended boarding of critically ill patients in the ED. This pandemic underscores the importance of ED design innovation with flexible spacing, interdisciplinary collaborations on structure and services, and NP ventilation systems which will remain important moving forward.

A survey of pediatric surgeons' practices with enhanced recovery after children's surgery.

PURPOSE: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols have been shown to improve outcomes in adult abdominal surgical populations. Our purpose was to survey pediatric surgeons' opinions regarding applicability of individual ERAS elements to children's surgery. METHODS: A survey of the American Pediatric Surgical Association was conducted electronically. Using a 5-point Likert scale, respondents rated their willingness to implement 21 adult ERAS elements in an adolescent undergoing elective colorectal surgery. RESULTS: Of an estimated 1052 members, 257 completed the survey (24%). The majority of the respondents (n=175, 68.4%) rated their familiarity with ERAS as "moderately", "very", or "extremely familiar". However only 19.2% (n=49) replied that they were "already implementing" an ERAS protocol in their practice. Most respondents replied that they were "already doing" or "definitely willing" to implement 14 of the 21 (67%) ERAS elements. For the remaining 7 elements, >10% of surgeons answered that they were only "somewhat willing" to, "uncertain" about or "unwilling" to implement these interventions. CONCLUSIONS: Most respondents were willing to implement the majority of adult ERAS concepts in children undergoing abdominal surgery. However, we identified 7 elements that remain contentious. Further investigation regarding the safety and feasibility of these elements is warranted before applying them to children's surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V.

Pediatric Patient and Caregiver Preferences in the Development of a Mobile Health Application for Management of Surgical Colorectal Conditions.

Patient-centered frameworks are an effective way to engage patients in treatment plans, strengthen adherence behaviors, and improve disease outcomes. These frameworks can also be applied in the design of mobile technology disease management applications. However, the utilization of these frameworks is rare and frequently overlooked in existing colorectal mobile health (mHealth) applications. The purpose of this study was to utilize a patient-centered framework to facilitate the development of a valid, appropriate, and feasible mHealth tool for pediatric patients and their caregivers. To inform application design and production, in-depth interviews were conducted with pediatric patients and their caregivers to capture management experiences, application preferences, and barriers and facilitators to application use. Patient ages ranged from 3 to 16. Six caregivers and 2 adolescent patients participated in the interviews. Patients and caregivers reported various management styles and desired an application that is not only user-friendly and customizable, but also able to facilitate communication and information sharing with other patients, caregivers, and providers. Older patients also wanted the application to give them more independence in managing their disease. Employing patient-centered frameworks is context-specific, but holds much promise at the intersection of mobile technology and healthcare. By incorporating pediatric patient experiences and viewpoints, we identified important components for inclusion in a mHealth surgical colorectal disease management application. Patients and caregivers wanted a mHealth application that was unique to their needs and easy to use. They suggested that the application include treatment tracking, note taking, and provider communication features.

Cost comparison of initial lobectomy versus fine-needle aspiration for diagnostic workup of thyroid nodules in children.

BACKGROUND: Though uncommon in children, pediatric thyroid nodules carry a higher risk of malignancy than adult nodules. While fine-needle aspiration (FNA) has been well established as the initial diagnostic test in adults, it has been more slowly adopted in children. The purpose of this study was to examine the comparative cost of FNA versus initial diagnostic lobectomy (DL) in the pediatric patient with an ultrasound-confirmed thyroid nodule. METHODS: A decision tree model was created using an adolescent with an asymptomatic thyroid nodule as the reference case. Probabilities were defined based on review of the pediatric and adult literature. Costs were determined from previous literature and the publicly available Medicare physician fee schedule. Tornado plot and sensitivity analyses were performed to assess sources of cost variation. RESULTS: Using decision analysis, FNA was less costly than DL with an estimated cost of $2529 vs. $5680. Tornado analysis demonstrated that the probability of an initial indeterminate FNA result contributed most to cost variation. On sensitivity analysis, when probability of an indeterminate FNA result was increased to 35%, the maximum value found in the literature, FNA remained less costly. In Monte Carlo simulation set to 10,000 iterations, FNA was superior to DL in 74% of cases. CONCLUSIONS: In this theoretical model based on available literature and costs, FNA is less costly than DL for initial diagnostic workup of thyroid nodules in children. Securing resources to offer FNA in the work-up of thyroid nodules may be financially beneficial to hospitals and patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 1 cost effectiveness study - using reasonable costs and alternatives used in study with values obtained from many studies, study used multi-way sensitivity analysis.