Laparoscopic suture sacrohysteropexy: A meshless uterine- sparing technique for surgical management of uterine prolapse.

Background: Laparoscopic mesh sacrohysteropexy has been established as an effective, safe, and popular technique to treat uterine prolapse. Nevertheless, recent controversies regarding the role of synthetic mesh in pelvic reconstructive surgery have triggered a trend towards meshless procedures. Other laparoscopic native tissue prolapses techniques such as uterosacral ligament plication and sacral suture hysteropexy have been previously described in literature. Objectives: To describe a meshless minimally invasive technique with uterine preservation, which incorporates steps from the above-mentioned procedures. Materials and Methods: We present a case of a 41-year-old patient with stage II apical prolapse and stage III cystocele and rectocele, who was keen to proceed to surgical management preserving her uterus and avoiding the use of a mesh implant. The narrated video demonstrates the surgical steps of our technique of laparoscopic suture sacrohysteropexy. Main outcome measures: Objective (i.e., anatomic) and subjective (i.e., functional) surgical success on follow-up assessment at least 3 months post-surgery, similarly to every prolapse procedure. Results: Excellent anatomical result and resolution of prolapse symptoms at follow-up appointments. Conclusions: Our technique of laparoscopic suture sacrohysteropexy seems a logical progression in prolapse surgery, responding to patients' wishes for minimally invasive meshless procedures with uterine preservation while at the same time achieving excellent apical support. Its long-term efficacy and safety need to be carefully assessed before it becomes established in clinical practice. Learning objective: To demonstrate a laparoscopic uterine-sparing technique to treat uterine prolapse without the use of a permanent mesh.

Prevalence of deep and ovarian endometriosis in women attending a general gynecology clinic: prospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: To assess using transvaginal ultrasound the prevalence of deep and ovarian endometriosis in premenopausal women attending a general gynecology clinic. We also investigated whether the presence of endometriosis was associated with various demographic factors and other pelvic abnormalities. METHODS: This was a prospective observational cohort study carried out between February 2019 and October 2020. Consecutive premenopausal women who attended our general gynecology clinic underwent pelvic ultrasound examination, performed by a single experienced operator. Pregnant women and those with a history of hysterectomy or oophorectomy were excluded. The primary outcome was the prevalence of deep and/or ovarian endometriosis. Secondary outcomes were the anatomical distribution of endometriotic lesions and the association of endometriosis with demographic characteristics and various pelvic abnormalities, which were analyzed using logistic regression and multivariable analysis. RESULTS: A total of 1026 women were included in the final study sample, of whom 194 (18.9% (95% CI, 16.6-21.4%)) had sonographic evidence of deep and/or ovarian endometriosis. Of the 194 women diagnosed with endometriosis, 106 (54.6% (95% CI, 47.4-61.8%)) were diagnosed with endometriotic nodules only, 26 (13.4% (95% CI, 9.0-19.0%)) with ovarian endometriomas only, and 62 (32.0% (95% CI, 25.5-39.0%)) women had evidence of both. There was a total of 348 endometriotic nodules in 168 women, located most frequently in the retrocervical area (166/348; 47.7% (95% CI, 42.4-53.1%)), uterosacral ligaments (96/348; 27.6% (95% CI, 23.0-32.6%)) and bowel (40/348; 11.5% (95% CI, 8.3-15.3%)). Multivariable analysis found significant positive associations between endometriosis and both adenomyosis (odds ratio (OR), 1.72 (95% CI, 1.10-2.69); P = 0.02) and pelvic adhesions (OR, 25.7 (95% CI, 16.7-39.3); P < 0.001), whilst higher parity (OR, 0.44 (95% CI, 0.24-0.81); P = 0.03) and history of Cesarean section (OR, 0.18 (95% CI, 0.06-0.52); P = 0.002) were associated with a lower occurrence of endometriosis. A total of 75/1026 women (7.3% (95% CI, 5.8-9.1%)) underwent laparoscopy within 6 months of pelvic ultrasound examination. There was very good agreement between ultrasound and surgical findings, with a kappa value of 0.84 (95% CI, 0.69-0.99). CONCLUSIONS: Deep and/or ovarian endometriosis was present in nearly one in five women attending a general gynecology clinic. There were significant positive associations with adenomyosis and pelvic adhesions and negative associations with higher parity and previous Cesarean section. © 2023 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Efficacy of transrectal ultrasound in assessing endometrium of postmenopausal women with axial uterus.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the acceptance and efficacy of transrectal ultrasound (TRS) in assessing the endometrium in postmenopausal women with an axial uterus. METHODS: This was a prospective cross-sectional study conducted between October 2015 and October 2018 of consecutive postmenopausal women with an axial uterus on transvaginal ultrasound (TVS). Women with a known diagnosis of gynecological malignancy were excluded. TRS was offered immediately after TVS without prior bowel preparation. A single operator determined subjectively whether the endometrium was visualized satisfactorily on TVS and TRS. In women with postmenopausal bleeding (PMB), endometrial thickness (ET) was measured and endometrial morphology was categorized as atrophic, uniformly thickened, benign endometrial polyp or endometrial cancer, based on subjective pattern recognition. All women with PMB and a non-atrophic endometrium underwent outpatient endometrial biopsy, hysteroscopy or hysterectomy. The success rate of TRS in assessing satisfactorily the endometrium was compared with that of TVS. In patients with PMB, ET measurements and subjective diagnosis of endometrial cancer on TVS vs TRS were compared. RESULTS: Of the 1553 women who underwent TVS examination, 103 (6.6%) had an axial uterus, of whom 76 (73.8%) presented with PMB. TRS was accepted by 66/103 (64.1%) women with an axial uterus. TRS assessed satisfactorily a significantly higher proportion of endometria compared with TVS (90.9% vs 62.1%; χ2 = 14.1, P < 0.001). In 50 women with PMB and an axial uterus who underwent both TVS and TRS, TVS failed to visualize the endometrium satisfactorily in 15 (30.0%) women, whilst TRS provided satisfactory images in all cases. Among the 35 women with PMB and a satisfactory endometrial assessment on TVS and TRS, measurements of ET on TRS were significantly lower compared to those on TVS (median difference, -1.2 (interquartile range, -3.0 to -0.4) mm). The overall agreement of TVS and TRS on the presence or absence of endometrial cancer using subjective pattern recognition was 30/35 (85.7%; 95% CI, 74.1-97.3%). While all seven cases of histologically confirmed endometrial cancer were diagnosed correctly on TRS, four were misdiagnosed on TVS as benign polyps or uniformly thickened endometrium. CONCLUSIONS: TRS is an acceptable and effective way to assess the endometrium in postmenopausal women with an axial uterus. Among women presenting additionally with PMB, TRS is associated with a higher proportion of satisfactory endometrial assessments and fewer misdiagnoses of endometrial cancer by subjective pattern recognition compared with TVS. © 2021 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Predictive value of presence of amniotic sac without visible embryonic heartbeat in diagnosis of early embryonic demise.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the diagnostic value and impact on management of visualizing on ultrasound an amniotic sac without a live embryo (amniotic sac sign). We also examined the potential effect on the number of follow-up visits in early pregnancy units of incorporating this sign into current diagnostic algorithms. METHODS: This was a prospective cohort study of all pregnant women who attended a single specialist early pregnancy unit from July 2017 to November 2018 with symptoms of pain and/or bleeding, or with a history of ectopic pregnancy or miscarriage, at < 14 weeks' gestation. Detailed initial ultrasound findings were documented, including whether an amniotic sac was present in a normally sited intrauterine pregnancy with absence of a live embryo. Women were followed up until a conclusive diagnosis was made. RESULTS: The study included 6012 women who attended our unit with early pregnancy complications during the study period. A conclusive diagnosis was reached on the initial scan in 4221 (70.2%), whilst 1135 (18.9%) women had a pregnancy of uncertain viability and 656 (10.9%) had a pregnancy of unknown location (PUL). All women with a pregnancy of uncertain viability required follow-up ultrasound scans to differentiate between a live pregnancy and early embryonic demise. An amniotic sac in the absence of a live embryo was found in 174/1135 (15.3%) women with a pregnancy of uncertain viability at the initial ultrasound scan. The diagnosis of early embryonic demise was confirmed in all 134 of these women who attended their follow-up scans. The presence of an amniotic sac without a live embryo at the initial visit had a specificity of 100% (95% CI, 98.53-100.00%) and positive predictive value of 100% (95% CI, 97.2-100.0%) for the diagnosis of early pregnancy failure. A total of 1403/6012 (23.3%) women were asked to attend for a follow-up ultrasound scan to resolve diagnostic uncertainties, including 268/656 (40.9%) women with a PUL. The majority of follow-up scans needed to reach a conclusive diagnosis were in women with a pregnancy of uncertain viability (1135/1403 (80.9%)). By using the presence of the amniotic sac sign to diagnose early pregnancy failure at the first visit, the number of follow-up scans for pregnancies of uncertain viability would be reduced by 14.4%, which accounted for 11% of all follow-up scans during the study period. CONCLUSIONS: The finding on ultrasound of an amniotic sac without a live embryo (amniotic sac sign) is a reliable marker of early pregnancy failure and could reduce the number of follow-up scans by 11% in cases of diagnostic uncertainty. © 2020 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Ultrasound diagnosis of endometrial cancer by subjective pattern recognition in women with postmenopausal bleeding: prospective inter-rater agreement and reliability study.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the inter-rater agreement and reliability of using subjective pattern recognition for diagnosing endometrial cancer (EC) on ultrasound in women with postmenopausal bleeding (PMB). METHODS: This was a prospective cross-sectional study conducted at a gynecological rapid-access clinic, between October 2016 and December 2017, in which consecutive women with PMB and endometrial thickness of ≥ 4.5 mm on transvaginal ultrasound examination were included. Women on hormone replacement therapy or tamoxifen and those with a history of primary gynecological malignancy were excluded. Two raters independently performed ultrasound examinations, blinded to each other's findings, and classified women as having uniformly thickened endometrium, benign endometrial polyp or EC, using subjective pattern recognition. Inter-rater reliability of ultrasound diagnosis was assessed using Cohen's kappa (κ) statistic. All women subsequently underwent either outpatient endometrial biopsy, hysteroscopy or hysterectomy. RESULTS: Forty women were included in the study, with a median age of 61 (interquartile range (IQR), 57-69) years and a median endometrial thickness of 11.0 (IQR, 6.2-20.3) mm. Final histological analysis confirmed 16 (40%) women with EC, 16 (40%) with benign endometrial polyp, four (10%) with atrophic endometrium, three (8%) with proliferative endometrium and one (3%) with endometrial hyperplasia. Inter-rater agreement for the ultrasound diagnoses of uniformly thickened endometrium, benign endometrial polyp and EC was 14/16 (87.5%), 22/30 (73.3%) and 28/34 (82.4%), respectively; inter-rater reliability was good (κ = 0.69; 95% CI, 0.49-0.88). When the ultrasound diagnoses were grouped as either cancer or no cancer, inter-rater agreement was 85% and inter-rater reliability was good (κ = 0.78; 95% CI, 0.61-0.95). Rater A correctly identified 14/16 cases of EC and Rater B identified 15/16. EC was misdiagnosed as benign polyps on ultrasound in two women by Rater A and in one woman by Rater B. The overall accuracies of Rater A and Rater B in differentiating between benign endometrial pathologies and malignancy were 90% and 90%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show good inter-rater reliability of subjective pattern recognition in diagnosing uniformly thickened endometrium, benign endometrial polyp and EC on ultrasound in women with PMB. Our findings should facilitate wider use of subjective pattern recognition in routine clinical practice. © 2020 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Intra- and interobserver reproducibility of pelvic ultrasound for the detection and measurement of endometriotic lesions.

STUDY QUESTION: What is the interobserver and intraobserver reproducibility of pelvic ultrasound for the detection of endometriotic lesions? SUMMARY ANSWER: Pelvic ultrasound is highly reproducible for the detection of pelvic endometriotic lesions. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Transvaginal ultrasound (TVS) has been widely adopted as the first-line assessment for the diagnosis and assessment of pelvic endometriosis. Severity of endometriosis as assessed by ultrasound has been shown to have good concordance with laparoscopy (kappa 0.79). The reproducibility of TVS for assessment of ovarian mobility and pouch of Douglas obliteration using the 'sliding sign' has already been described in the literature. However, there is no available data in the literature to demonstrate the intraobserver repeatability of measurements for endometriotic cysts and nodules. STUDY DESIGN SIZE DURATION: This was a prospective observational cross-sectional study conducted over a period of 12 months. We included 50 consecutive women who were all examined by two operators (A and B) during their clinic attendance. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS SETTING METHODS: The study was carried out in a specialist endometriosis centre. We included all consecutive women who had ultrasound scans performed independently by two experienced operators during the same visit to the clinic. The outcomes of interest were the inter- and intraobserver reproducibility for the detection of endometriotic lesions. We also assessed repeatability of the measurements of lesion size. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: There was a good level of agreement between operator A and operator B in detecting the presence of pelvic endometriotic lesions (k = 0.72). There was a very good level of agreement between operators in identifying endometriotic cysts (k = 0.88) and a good level of agreement in identifying endometriotic nodules (k = 0.61). The inter- and intraobserver repeatability of measuring endometriotic cysts was excellent (intra-class correlation (ICC) ≥ 0.98). There was good interobserver measurement repeatability for bowel nodules (ICC 0.88), but the results for nodules in the posterior compartment were poor (ICC 0.41). The intraobserver repeatability for nodule size measurements was good for both operators (ICC ≥0.86). LIMITATIONS REASONS FOR CAUTION: Within this cohort, there was insufficient data to perform a separate analysis for nodule size in the anterior compartment. All examinations were performed within a specialised unit with a high prevalence of deep endometriosis. Our findings may not apply to operators without intensive ultrasound training in the diagnosis of pelvic endometriosis. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: These findings are important because ultrasound has been widely accepted as the first-line investigation for the diagnosis of pelvic endometriosis, which often determines the need for future investigations and treatment. The detection and measurement of bowel nodules is essential for anticipation of surgical risk and planning surgical excision. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: The authors have no conflict of interest. No funding was obtained for this work.