ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Selecting embryos with the highest implantation potential is crucial for in vitro fertilization (IVF) success. Both the timing of blastulation, day 5 (D5) or D6, and the embryo quality have been suggested as influential factors in determining the clinical outcome of single euploid blastocyst transfers. However, evidence supporting the superiority of D5 over D6 blastocysts remains inconclusive. The aim of this study was to compare clinical outcomes following the transfer of euploid blastocysts with different quality and timing of blastulation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted at our Assisted Reproductive Center, analyzing the outcome of 774 transfers with D5 euploids and 155 transfers with D6 euploids performed between January 2019 and February 2022. RESULTS: The live birth rate was significantly lower in the euploid D6 group compared to the euploid D5 group (38.71vs. 55.04%, P=0.001). The outcome was significantly influenced by the quality of the embryos. Live birth rates were 62.14 and 53.61% following transfers of D5 and D6 excellent embryos respectively, 45.18 and 32.21% following transfer of D5 and D6 good embryos but only 28.64 and 19.32% following transfer of D5 and D6 fair embryos. The outcome difference was statistically significant across embryo quality categories (P=0.001). The adjusted risk ratios (RR) of clinical outcomes indicated that excellent euploid D5 embryos consistently outperformed other types of embryo quality. CONCLUSION: The timing of blastulation and embryo quality are crucial factors in determining the success of single euploid blastocyst transfers. Excellent euploid D5 transfers yielded superior clinical outcomes, providing valuable insights for IVF teams and patients when selecting embryos to be transferred.
ABSTRACT
Surgical sperm retrieval (SSR) is currently one of the most common procedures in in vitro fertilization (IVF). However, a gap between the guidelines and routine clinical practice regarding antibiotic use in SSR, which might lead to antibiotic resistance, is a challenging problem worldwide. A cross-sectional survey was conducted from May 1, 2021, to July 15, 2021, to investigate antibiotic usage by medical professionals when performing SSR in IVF centers in Vietnam. The confidential questionnaire comprised 12 items, including characteristics of the study population, awareness of antimicrobial resistance, attitude toward prescribing antibiotics, and current practice of prescribing antibiotics when performing SSR. Surveys were completed by 30 of 45 registered IVF centers (66.7%). Among 67 physicians working at those centers, the age and work-experience years (mean ± standard deviation [s.d.]) were 38.6 ± 6.6 years and 11.2 ± 7.0 years, respectively. Over 60% of them held a degree in Obstetrics and Gynecology, and over four-fifths were men. Most respondents "often/very often/always" raised awareness of antimicrobial resistance to their patients (83.3%), but only half of them "often/occasionally" prescribed antibiotics to patients with SSR in cases where the prescription would be optional. About one-tenth of respondents followed the recommendation from the American Urological Association using "prophylaxis only" for SSR patients. For more invasive SSR, physicians tended to prescribe more complicated and sometimes inappropriate regimens. In conclusion, antibiotic usage in SSR was not always appropriate among IVF centers. Further studies may define specific recommendations for regimens, intervention strategies, and programs to promote appropriate antibiotic use for SSR patients among IVF specialists.
