Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Res Dev Disabil ; 34(12): 4293-303, 2013 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24171827

ABSTRACT

Both medication and non-medication based strategies are used in the management of problem behaviours in individuals with intellectual disabilities. Beta-adrenoceptor blocking medications are one group of drugs used for this purpose. However, despite its regular use, the evidence for the efficacy of these drugs for in this context is lacking. A systematic review was conducted to establish the research evidence for the efficacy of beta blockers in problem behaviours in adults and children with intellectual disabilities. Although the research identified supported the efficacy of beta blockers for this indication the overall quality of studies identified was poor and no randomised controlled trials were identified. There is a need for more robust research into the use of beta blockers for people with intellectual disabilities who show problem behaviours.


Subject(s)
Adrenergic beta-Antagonists/therapeutic use , Intellectual Disability/psychology , Self-Injurious Behavior/drug therapy , Aggression/psychology , Evidence-Based Medicine , Humans , Intellectual Disability/complications , Mental Disorders/complications , Mental Disorders/drug therapy , Mental Disorders/psychology , Self-Injurious Behavior/complications , Self-Injurious Behavior/psychology , Stereotyped Behavior , Treatment Outcome
2.
J Intellect Disabil ; 17(3): 223-35, 2013 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23801356

ABSTRACT

This audit was undertaken prospectively to examine the compliance of a group of psychiatrists against guidelines they developed for monitoring the onset of metabolic syndrome, a potential side effect of antipsychotic medication, especially second generation or atypical ones. Phase 1 of the audit was to set standards by a questionnaire survey of participating psychiatrists against Consensus Guidelines on monitoring (American Diabetic Association, 2004), which they favoured. The results led to modifying these guidelines to develop minimum acceptable standards against which their practice was audited in Phase 2. Although in Phase 1, 77% of the psychiatrists felt that they did some baseline recording, Phase 2 finding did not corroborate this--only 53.8% of the notes recorded the assessment of risk factors in personal history; 37.5% risk factors in family history; 31.7% baseline weight and 26.4% baseline blood sugar/lipid levels. In Phase 1, 85% of the psychiatrists thought that they carried out some of the recommended monitoring; our audit found the records of weight monitoring in 69.7% of the notes and blood sugar and lipids monitoring in 44.2%. People with intellectual disability have a shorter life expectancy and increased risk of early death when compared with the general population. Obesity is already a health issue for people with intellectual disability. We discuss the challenges faced by psychiatrists in implementing their own minimum acceptable standards and suggest measures to reduce the metabolic risk associated with antipsychotic medication through increasing awareness--use of information leaflets in accessible format, health promotion and use of side effect checklists and improving access--by working collaboratively with general practitioners utilising the forum of annual health checks.


Subject(s)
Antipsychotic Agents/adverse effects , Drug Monitoring/standards , Guidelines as Topic/standards , Intellectual Disability/drug therapy , Medical Audit/methods , Metabolic Syndrome/chemically induced , Psychiatry/standards , Adult , Humans , Metabolic Syndrome/blood
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...