The Feasibility and Impact of Routine Combined Limited Transthoracic Echocardiography and Lung Ultrasound on Diagnosis and Management of Patients Admitted to ICU: A Prospective Observational Study.

OBJECTIVES: Limited transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and lung ultrasound increasingly is performed in the intensive care unit (ICU), though used in a goal-directed rather than routine manner. DESIGN: Prospective observational study. SETTINGS: Tertiary ICU. PARTICIPANTS: Ninety-three critically ill participants within 24 hours of admission to ICU. METHODS: A treating intensivist documented a clinical diagnosis and management plan before and after combined limited TTE and lung ultrasound. Ultrasound was performed by an independent intensivist and checked for accuracy offline by a second reviewer. RESULTS: Ultrasound images were interpretable in 99%, with good interobserver agreement. The hemodynamic diagnosis was altered in 66% of participants, including new (14%) or altered (25%) abnormal states or exclusion of clinically diagnosed abnormal state (27%). Valve pathology of at least moderate severity was diagnosed for mitral regurgitation (7%), aortic stenosis (1%), aortic stenosis and mitral regurgitation (1%), tricuspid regurgitation (3%), and 1 case of mitral regurgitation was excluded. Lung pathology diagnosis was changed in 58% of participants including consolidation (13%), interstitial syndrome (4%), and pleural effusion (23%), and exclusion of clinically diagnosed consolidation (6%), interstitial syndrome (3%), and pleural effusion (9%). Management changed in 65% of participants including increased (12%) or decreased (23%) fluid therapy, initiation (10%), changing (6%) or cessation (9%) of inotropic, vasoactive or diuretic drugs, non-invasive ventilation (3%), and pleural drainage (2%). CONCLUSION: Routine screening of patients with combined limited TTE and lung ultrasound on admission to ICU is feasible and frequently alters diagnosis and management.

Diaphragmatic regional displacement assessed by ultrasound and correlated to subphrenic organ movement in the critically ill patients--an observational study.

INTRODUCTION: The objectives of the study are to identify the most reliably imaged regions of the diaphragm, to evaluate the correlation of movement between different parts of each hemidiaphragm, and to assess the agreement between liver or spleen displacement and movement of the ipsilateral hemidiaphragm. METHODS: Images of the diaphragm, liver, and spleen were obtained using 2-dimensional ultrasound. Acceptable agreement between regions of the diaphragm, liver, and spleen was defined as an absence of fixed or proportional bias using Deming regression analysis and limits of agreement of 2 SDs of the difference less than 30% of the mean value. RESULTS: We included 90 critically ill patients. The medial (87%) and middle (73%) regions of the right hemidiaphragm, liver (87.7%), and spleen (81%) and medial (71%) and middle regions (51%) of the left hemidiaphragm were most frequently imaged. In nonintubated patients, acceptable agreement was present for comparisons of the left middle and medial, right middle and medial, and left middle regions and spleen displacement. In intubated patients and in all patients when combined, acceptable agreement was only present for comparisons of the left middle and medial and right middle and medial regions of the diaphragm. Acceptable agreement was not present for intubated and all patients for diaphragmatic and solid organ movement. CONCLUSION: The diaphragm medial part is visualized in the majority of studied patients. The medial and middle thirds may be used interchangeably to assess hemidiaphragm movement. Acceptable agreement does not exist for diaphragm and solid organ movement, other than for the left middle region and the spleen.